ML20211P800

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Integrated Assessment of Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater Sys.Program Instituted to Define Changes Needed for Improvement of Sys Function.Five Principal Areas of Evaluation Listed
ML20211P800
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/13/1986
From: Selman M
CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC.
To: Kane W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NUDOCS 8612190139
Download: ML20211P800 (3)


Text

.-

,f Murray Selman

~.

Vce Presu$ent e

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Indian Point Station Broadway & Bleakley Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511 Telephone (914) 737 8116 November 13, 1986 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:

Mr. William F. Kane Director, Division of Reactor Projects Region 1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406

SUBJECT:

Integrated Assessment of Indian Point Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater System Dear Mr. Kane As a result of the events associated with the Indian Point Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater System during the two reactor trips during the week of October 20, 1986, we have instituted a program with the objective of defining any changes that may be desirable in order to improve the system's function.

The basic elements of the program will be as outlined by Consolidated Edison to the Region during a telephone discussion on Sunday, October 26, 1986 prior to resuming plant operation.

It will consist of an evaluation of five principal areas:

1.

System functional requirenents 2.

System design and modifications 3.

Demonstrate adequacy of present equipment performance 4.

Maintenance and operational history 5.

Adequacy of surveillance 8612190139 061113

[9 PDR ADOCK 05000247 P

pyg

o s

r I

o It is currently envisioned that this assessment will be partly accomplished within Con Edison and also with an outside consultant experienced in such matters who can provide an independent view point.

Initially, a short-term evaluation will be performed in-house, the status of which will be made known to the Region in a presentation the week of December 1, 1986.

This preliminary review will focus on the functional criteria and the system design basis of the AFW system.

In the long term, with the assistance of the outside consultant, a program will be developed to evaluate the status of the installed equipment and our methods for maintaining its continued qualified availability.

The program will also evaluate tha potential for system enhancement. A schedule for accomplishing this program together with a plan will form part of the presentation to the Region the week of December 1, 1986.

If you would like to discuss our course of action as outlined above or if you have any questions, please contact us.

Very truly yours, M s+

Mw cc: Senior Resident Inspector P.O. Box 38 Buchanan, NY 10511 Marylee Slosson Projects Manager Division of PWR Licensing - A U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phillips Duilding 7920 Norfolk Ave Bethesda, MD 20014