ML20211L901
| ML20211L901 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 10/03/1997 |
| From: | Mcdonald D NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9710100286 | |
| Download: ML20211L901 (107) | |
Text
-
LlCENSEE:
Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO) h 3, j997 FACILITY; Millstone NucI:ar Pswer Station, l81's 1,2, and 3 9
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF SEPTEMBER 29,1997, MEETING WITH NNECO TO DISCUSS THE STATUS OF MILLSTONE UNITS 1,2, AND 3 On September 23,1997, the Director of the Special Projects Office and his staff met with s
NNECO representatives in a publicly observed meeting. The meeting was held to allow NNECO to inform the NRC staff of the status of the recovery of NNECO's three Millstone units. A list of meeting attendees la enclosed (Enclosure 1).
NNt!CO's Ser. lor Vice Presloent and Chief Nuclear Officer Millstone, began NNECO's pt6sentation with a discussion on leadership progress and challenges. This discussion was followod by updates of each Millstone unit relating to organizational readiness, physical plant readiness, regulatoru readiness including corrective actions and self assessment, operational readiness, c e oversight assessment. NNECO's presentation slides are anclosed (Enclosure 2!.-
NNECO also presented the NRC staff with background material on Key Performance Indicators, Significant items L*.t Status, and a License Amendment Schedule. The background materialis inclu4d as Enclosure 3 to the docket file and the NRC and Public Document Rooms copies of this meeting summary only.
Origina) 316aa %.
Daniel G. Mcdonald Jr., Senior Project Manager Special Projects Office Licensing Office of r4uclear Reactor Regulation Dockst Nos. 50 245, 50 336, and 50 423
Enclosures:
As stated (3) cc w/ enclosures 1 and 2 only: See next page HARD COPY E MAIL (w/ encl 1 only)
Docket File
- SCollins/Miraglia PMcKee J/
PUBLIC WTravers JAndersen
/
SPO-L Reading SDembex BMcCabe, EDO SPO Reading (w/o Encl. 3)
DMcDonald CMohrwinkle OGC (w/o Encl. 3)
LBerry JLieberman ACRS (w/o Encl. 3)
TMartin (SLM3) hm )
HPastis DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ MCDONALD \\MTGSUM 923
- t. me..opy.: w. e..um.ai. ine... i. o wo *c. copy w>ihout.is. chm.ni/.[ A.
. c,, with.it. chm.nti.acio.u,. 'N
. No copy 0FFICE SPD-L:PM l _ SP0-L:LA h t SP0- _:DD l l
l NAME DMcDonald M, LBerry 1(h PMck ee DUE 10/3 /97 7FfX/ 10/9)/97 ' '\\
10/ M 97 10/ /97 10/ /97 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 9710100286 971003 PDR ADOCK 05000245 tty a
ja s t oa ta i as P
, lK l l llll jll ll T
r,
!" (g{
{g
Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Nuclear Power Station Units 1,2, and 3 cc:
Lillian M. Cuoco, Esquire Mr. Wayne D. Lanning Senior Nuclear Counsel Deputy Director of Inspections Northeast Utilities Service Company Special Projects Office P. O. Box 270 475 Allendale Road Hartford, CT 061410270 King of Prussia, PA 19406 1415 Mr. Kevin T. A. McCarthy, Director Mr. F. C. Rothen Monitoring and Radiation Division Vice President Work Services Department of Environmental Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Protection P.O. Box 128 79 Elm Street Waterford, CT 06385 Hartford, CT 06106 5127 Charles Brinkman, Manager Mr. Atlan Johanson, Assistant Washington Nuclear Operations Director ABB Combustion Engineering Office of Policy and Management 12300 Twinbrook Pkwy, Suite 330 Policy Development and Planning Rockville, MD 20852 Division 450 Capitol Avenue MS 52ERN Mr. D. M. Goebel P. O. Box 341441 Vice President Nuclear Oversight Hartf ord, CT 061341441 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company P. O. Box 128 Regional Administrator, Region I Waterford, CT 06385 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Al!endale Road Mr. M. L. Bowling, Jr.
King of Prussia, PA 19406 Recovery Officer - Millstone Unit 2 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company First Selectmen P. O. Box 128 Town of Waterford Waterford, CT 06385 Hall of Records 200 Boston Post Road Senior Resident Inspector Waterf ord, CT 06385 Millstone Nuclear Power Station c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. J. P. McElwain P. O. Box 513 Recovery Officer - Millstone Unit 1 Niantic, CT 06357 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company P. O. Box 128 Mr. David Amerine Waterford, CT 06385 Recovery Officer Nuclear Engineering and Support Deborah Katz, President Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Citizens Awareness Network P. O. Box 128 P. O. Box 83 Waterford, CT 06385 Shelburne Falls, MA 03170 I
l
t i
Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Nuclear Power Station Units 1,2, and 3 cc.
Mr. M. H. Brothers Little Harbor Consultants, Inc.
Vice President Millstone Unit 3 Millstone frPOP Project Office Northcm Nuclear Energy Company I
- y. Box 0630 P. O. Bo4 ')
Niantic, Connecticut 06375 0630 Waterford, CT 06385 Mr. Evan W. Woollacott Mr. M. R. Scully, Executive Director Co Chair Connecticut Municipal Electric Nuclear Energy Advisory Council Energy Cooperative 128 Terry's Plain Road 30 Stott Avenue Simsbury, Connecticut 06070 Norwich, CT 06360 Mt. Daniel L. Curry Mr. William D. Meinert Project Director Nuclear Eng!neer Parsons Power Group Inc.
Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale 2675 Morgantown Road Electric Company Reading, Pennsylvania 19607 P. O. Box 426 Ludlow, MA 01056 Mr. Don Schopfer Verification Team Manager Ernest C. Hadley, Esq.
Sargent & Lundy 1040 B Main Street 55 E. Monroe Street P. O. Box 549 Chicago, Ilinois 60603 West Wareham, MA 02576 Mr. Neil S. Carns Joseph R. Egan, Esq.
Senior Vice President Egan & Associates, P.C.
and Chief Nuclear Officer 2300 N Street, NW Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Washington, D.C. 0037 clo Ms. Patricia A. Loftus Director Regulatory Affairs Citizens Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 128 ATTN:- Ms. Susan Porry Luxton
. Waterf ord, CT 06385 180 Great Neck Road Waterford, Connecticut 06385 The Honorable Terry Concannon Co-Chair Nuclear Energy Advisory Council Room 4035 Legislative Office Building Capitol Avenue Hartford, Connecticut 06106 Y
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS September 23, 1997 EG W. Travers P. McKee E. Imbro W. Lanning J..Durr S. Reynolds A. Corne D. Beaulieu
.T. Easlick et al.
MLCQ N.-Carns M. Brothers M.-Bowling-J. McElwain-D. Goebel P. Loftus et al.
1 w
1 Northeast Utllities Briefing for the NRC Opening Ramarks Restart Assessment Panel Buzz Carns MIIIstone Station Senior Vice President a septernber 23.1ee7 Agenda Agenda
' Leiadership Bus Carns
' Unit 2 Update
' Unit 3
-Unit status Marty Bowling
-Organlaational Readiness Mine Brothers
-Reload Readiness 8teve 8rin& man
,-Physical Plant Readineet Jack McElwaln p 'u ru is
-Regulatory Readiness. Marty Bowlinf 6 Unit 1 Update Jaca McElwein Corrective Action and Self Assessment Readiness
' Closing Remarks Bura Carns
-Op ReadinesstStartup Denny Hic As
~0versteht Assessment Dave Goebel l..,.......
,n Progress on Key Site Wide issues Progress on Key Site Wide issues hmn huam*$
inn umu manamerm lue Listriami inastialants!
ttwin u t
.1:aenaunnat
- Leadership partial es
' s.i' A...
ai Parti i v=
. Re.ui,io,,
pa,tiai
,es Comphance
- Corrective Actio.i partial
- Configue.uon partial yee
- overs 6ght partial
.e
"*"*9'*'"I
- NSA8
. partial yes
' h*Mgi'i,nment partial no
- Emergency Plan intru yes
' f, lo hal partial yes e Work Control partial
- Training pa a yes e $ecurity partial yes
- Procedure Quauty partial yes
- Operator Readiness partial no
" " ^ '"
i s e. p >.m asa nas m,
i me.
p>
assnaps n,
- ..,........., e..,n m.
Page1
,,.. ~
h INPO Assist Visit 9/8 9/12 INPO Assist Visit 9/8 9/12
' improvement seen since 1996 Evaluation
- StreQth
-engineering program
-MP2 operations work observations
-work p ann g
-MP3 control toom distraction reduction p,
~workforce morale
-corrective setion (problem
-communications identification and evaluation)
- willingnesa fo raise problems to
-it items taken back io industry peer supervisor site e good unders tanding and in volvement
- Challenges in self assessmentactivilles
-operationalownership
-engineering workload Station. Level Station. Level
- 30. Day Look Ahead
- 30. Day Look Ahead (continued)
'40500 Readiness Assessment
,60.64(f) CAL Response 45 day
' CMP Effectiveness Assessment Update
' oversight lAT Followup Review
' Leadership Survey Bottom
'SCWE Workshop for First Line Performer Action Plans in Place Supervisors and Above
'SCWE
- Hot Spot" Action Plans in
' Training Stand Down Lifted Place
' Unit 2 Core Reload Preparations Organizational Readiness is Being Measured Unit 3 Oraani;:ational
' o*pa"m'a' anaunco' *tado**
define performance attributes e
Readiness s Seif assessments measure performance against standard Mine Brothers
- Management reviewing standards and assessment process r-4 Page 2
Ciganizational Readiness Unit 3 Ready for Restart Window Performance Against Success Criteria Generally On Target for M,,,,
g - :-~_--
..,_,,,,,m.,,,,,,
Restart u w-gr_
' Corrective Action plana developed 5 W-*' ~
p for areas needing improvement M ~""**
' SCWE hot spot" resolution action (IOC unO.-
plans under development QT_
7.'i
~
jQ Z E7**~
an U*- Ja-* *- *~
y...............,,
Physical Readiness Performance Against Success Criteria On Track Unit 3 Physical 3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, s i,,,,,,,, s,,,,,
Plant Readiness
- curr.ni compietion dai. of 10r2s
- Geheduto is challenged by MoVs and bulk work off rate Jack McElwain Physical Work MP3 Work Planning and Control Accomplishments
= = o-. w..- a
- All 4 RCPs replaced
'I
- a"'*~'*
- $0 /116 Mode physical work complete
' A1ditional 30 /116 Mods physical work l**
~
in progress
- 1260 AWos required for restart
~
~
'f[
~~
' organization in place for 24.hr day a
support g
g g
g g
g 4_
__Q
- ..,.........,e..,,,
Page3 i
l i
l l
MP3 Maintenance / l&C Nwdoet Overop Assessment Unit 3 Operational
- ~ ' ~ '.....
Readiness / Startup /
l*
Power Ascension Plan I
j Denny Hicks
l l
l 1
l l
l l
3
..,e..,,,
- ..,e....e....., e,
Operational Readiness Performance Against 8uccess Criterla Requires MP3 Conduct of Operations improvemont u,Jo., o.,e,.w A.e, ent
- Nucleat Oversight SR0siPeet Mentore
~ ~
- Now Conduct of Onerations Mang
' r'"a*'s i
' Al powetobtetystions alother plants
- e+'*aa.
q
- Training on Conservative Dectolon M aking i
~
so.ciivny Man.go eni
' Leadership (FLE) ttelning fot Shift Managota l 3.T i
, e o......
Supervisors
' Scheduled Completion of Modification Training I
l l
I l
l l
l
' Op.tationsi ownet. hip
_L
_J l
m MP3 Chemistry kwieer Ove, sight Assess,nent i '. - ' " ' '
Unit 3 Regulatory 1.;
Readiness l
in.......
Marty Bowling t
i I
I I
I I
t,._..--
i t
Page 4 l
l
Regulatory Readiness Performance Against Success Criteria Requires Regulatory Readiness improvement
- FS AR updates scheduled for 10/31/97
- Commitments are being closed on and 11/22/97 time (187 temala)
- LARs scheduled for submittel by
' increased resources and priority 9/30/97 being appiled to ICAVP response
- Pressuriser Level
- quality and timeliness
- Training CAL ltems for Unit 3 have
-Instrumentinaccuracy been submitted
- Containmentisolation
- SIL closure quality is good (79 remain
- Spent Fuel Pool to be adm/Ned)
- RSS Surveillance 50.54(f) Response Performance Corrective Action Program Against Success Celteria Requires Performance Against Success improvement.
Criteria Requires improvement
- New PORC approved methodology for Results achieved:
development of Deferred items List
- Low threshold for reporting
- Next 46 day update to be provided by
- Operability and reportabillity 10/16/97 (all units) determinations are timely
+ Key issues support final submittal by
- Corrective action evaluations and action P ans are of high qvality l
12/647 Corrective Action Program Corrective Actions Programmatic (continued)
Issues Being Addressed Challenges:
- Revision 5 to RP 4 to be effective on
' Evaluation timelinesa commonsuret, 9/30/97 with safety significance but needs
- Common, site-wide trending program improvement (average age is f 7 days) to be implemented by 9/30/97
- Backlog remains high
- Human performance being monitored
- Corrective action implementation is
- Corrective action affectiveness of key sometimes not effective assessments (i.e FCAT, ACR7007)In
' 40500 readiness assessment in progress
,P CM ms meme progress g.,.......,,-,,
Page 5
t Unit 3 CR Peiformance MP3 Corrective Action Nucled owsosht Asseesneent e......, a
,/
I"
'==
~
~
' * -i ~; I 1
1 I
L l
I l
+
- M.aN MAM ~
~
Nuclear Oversight Restart Verification Plan (NORVP)
+21 Areas selected for evaluation Nuclear Oversight Restart
- each area sub divided into measurabie Verification Plan for Unit 3
- "riuut.
Ourintegrated Approach to e MC 0350,iNPO 96 006, Key station Assessing Readiness for Restart I* * **
- attributes assessed by activity Dave Goebel success and human performance Nuclear Oversight Recovery NORVP (continued)
Verification Plan
- Focuses on the quality of ecfin%t# wtme performance G"
D'**'."*""".~"'..
- numericalassessment tools PM G L
developed FA % P ""
9 U
-each attribute area is rolled up bianua._
Q " *""'
into a weekly issue average
{ah -
-all assesement areas rolled up to
- ,g?==~
}
g s,,.
provide weekly unit everage
- g*e==
1 7
- Weekly managemer) arogress lr-reviews incorporett Oversight results
- g g g e-._ 4 q
g IEE12 2
m Page 6
\\--
I Regulatory Readiness Performance Against Success Criteria Requires improvement Millstone Unit 2 Update
- Commitm.nts are curr.ntiy b.ing closed on time (117 remaln)
' incrossed resources and priority Marty Bowling are being applied to ICAVP Unit Olficer.Miil stone 2 response quality and timeliness Regulatory Readiness Regulatory Readiness Against (coatlau'd>
Success Criterla Requires
- Training Confirmatory Action Letter improvement items are closed for continuing
- Next FSAR update la scheduled for operator license training 10/31197
'SIL closure packages are of good o Finall.icense Amendment Requests quality will be submitted by mid October (2
-ARs are being closed as work remaln) completes for 43 closure
' Next 45 day 50.54(f) response to be packages provided by 10/15197 Physical and Operational Unit 2 Milestones
- Readiness in Challenged
'lCAVP Readiness 6/30/97 (met)
' Operator Training
- Completion CMP Discovery 9/15/97 (met) e y oy,
- Ready for Core Onload 10/31197
- Work Off Curves
- Physical Pisnt Roadmess 12/16197
- AWO (-f 250 ln Malnfenance Rule
' OSTl Readiness 12/31197 bacAlog)
' Ready fo' Mode 4 12/31197"
-modification implementation (f 30
- Final 50.54(f) Submittal 2/98 remaln)
, Ready for Commission Brief 3/98
-AITTs (5852 remaln)
- uns n anager,,.ns ms,
~ canuncont en tans erun ene.uon
- ..,,....,=,..,.....,
.a..~.-, ~,,-
Page 7
I Work Has Been Completed to be Ready for Fuel Load
' Design Basis and Licensing Basis Millstone Unit 2 revie*e Refueling Readiness
- Tech Spec Surveillance reviews
,,c,tions.
- RBCCW CTMT Header Rollef Valves Steve Stinkman
- LPSIValve repairs Engineering Director
- RCS Thermowell replacement J. Alan Price
- SDC 4est Exchanger repalt Unit Director
-Velan 4 Bolt Valve checke A
m
- a.-
' a * ** ' *'p Ready for Fuel Load Refueling Readiness Preparation Assessment
' System Readiness Reviews
' Systomrtle review process established
' Reactor Engineering Fuel Handling
- Co.itrollei by Operations Procedures Preparations
- Representation from line and support deportments at manager level
- PORC and Volt director approval for modo changes
=-
Refueling Readiness Assessment
' Requires Nuclear Oversight review and approval Core Reload Assessment
' Requires management involvement M4'llsfone 2 and monitoring of activities
'Operationalownerships Paul Parulls Wanager Performance Evaluation. Unit 2 Page 8
Oversight Has Completed CMP Oversight is Conducting Detailed Assessments to Support Reload Assessments to Confirm MP2
- oversight has confirmed Confleurstion Management activities to support
- Training & Qualification reloed:
- Procedures
' < licensing basis
' Equipment Readiness
- design basis
- Operating Enperience
- system reviews
' Mode Restraints
- support programs
- Safety Culture Checks and Balances in Place to Demonstrate Readiness
- Unit preparation readiness
- Correctiv. AcHons for:
Millstone Unit 1 Update
-unit specificIsauss
- Oversight Audit & Surveillance Jack McElwaln responses n#
m.
stone f
- Oversight concurrence is required as part of the reload and modo change assessment process 1997 Unit 1 Initiatives 1997 Unit i Initiatives
' Return Plant to Creon Status
- Shutdown Caoling system. competed
' Prepare and finallas startup schedule
- Service Water System. completed
'Continus CMP discovery
- Diesel Generator modifications and
' Reduce Corrective Action backlog testing. completed _
e Continue process enhancements
- Oas Turbine hammer testing outage.
e Organizational readiness completed Page 9 i
i
_J
9 i :.
}
l i
i T
s 4
Closing Remarks Susa Carns t
d.
r i
i
- ,~....-..
4 f
4.
l 1 -
4 -
4 4
4 i
k S
t t
].-
J U.
4 y
o 4
4 4
4 4
i A
s
+
t Page 10 4
ev e~
w.
m-
-em,-
,.-w#w-c v-e m,
...,-..4 c-...,wemy_m.,
r.,,
,,,,.-,,,.,m.~mww..w,y.g.,_
y
_,,._3 g
,,,,,,.,m.,
.J
(
Index Key Performance Indicatom MILLSTONE UNIT 3 KPls Pane Number KPlTitle A.1..................................
Configuration Management Plan Progress A2...................................
Task Completions Required for Restart A3...................................
Open Condition Re;, orts A4...................................
Condition Report Initiation and Evaluation Timeliness A5................................
Condition Report Method of Discovery A6.....................
Open NRC Commitments for Restart A7..................................
Significant items List A8...................................
10CFR50.54(f) Significant Items for Restart A.g...................................
Licensee Event Reports A10.................................
Licer.ae Amendment Requests A11.................................
Restart Modifications Awaiting implementation A12.................................
Work Order Status A13.................................
Temporary Modifications A14.................................
Control Room and Annunciator Deficiencies A15.................................
Operator Work Arounds A16.................................
Procedure Revision Backlog MILLSTONE UNIT 2 KPls Paos Number KPl Title A17.................................
Configuration Management Plan Progross A18.................................
Task Completions Required for Startup A19................................,
Open Condition Reports A20...............................
Condition Report initiation and Evaluation Timeliness A21.................................
Condition Report Method of Discovery A22.................................
Open NRC Commitments for Restart A23.................................
Significant Items List A24................................
10CFR50.54(f) Significant items for Restart A25................................
Licensee Event Reports A26................................
License Amendment Requests A27.................................
Restart Modifications Awalting implementation A28.................................
Work Order Status A29.................................
Temporary Modifications A30.................................
Controf Room and Annunciator Deficiencies A31.................................
Operator Work Arounds A32................................
Procedure Revision Backlog i
(~
Index t
Key Performance Indicators MILLSTONE UNIT 1 KPls Pane Number KPlTitle A33.................................
Independent Cortective Action Verihcation Program Readiness A34.................................
Configuration Management Plan Progress A35.................................
Task Completions Required for Restart A36.................................
Open Condition Reports A.37.................................
Condition Report Initiation and Evaluation ' timeliness A.38.................................
Condition Report Method of Discovery A39.................................
Open NRC Commitments for Restart A.40................................
Significant items List A41.................................
10CFR50.54(f) Significant items for Restart (to be developed)
A42.................................
Licensee Event Reports A43.................................
License Amendment Requests A44.................................
Restart Modifications Awalting implementation A45.................................
Work Order Status A46.................................
Temporary Modifications A-47.................................
Controf Room and Annuncialor Deficiencies A48.................................
Operator Work Arounds A49.................................
Procedure Pevision Backlog
(
Overslaht KPJ.g Pane Number KPl Title A50.................................
Millstone Oversight Recovery Gap Chart A51.................................
Millstone Oversight Procedure Status A52.................................
Millstone Oversight Recovery Plan Action item Work Off Curve A53.................................
Millstone Oversight Audit Schedule Adherence A.54.................................
Millstone Oversight Surveillance Schedule Adherence A55.................................
Millstone Oversight Self Assessment Gap Chart A56.................................
Millstone Oversight AITTS Assignments A57.................................
Status of Oversight Condition Reports, Millstone 1 A58.................................
Status of Oversight Condition Reports, Millstone 2 A59.................................
Status of Oversight Condition Reports, Millstone 3 Nuclear Employee Concerns KPls Pane Number KPl Title A60.................................
Nuclear Employee Concerns Program Progress. Millstone A61.................................
Number of NU and NRC Received Concerns, Millstone A-62.................................
Millstone Employee Concems Confidentiality Trend A-63.................................
Millstone Employee Concerns Type Trend
(
2
Ccnfiguratisn Manag m:nt Plan Prcgrcas Millstone 3. September 1997
(
Progreae:
configuration Management PInn (CMP) discovery was cornplete Att,wi, all remaining CMP work (FSAR Change Requests Inlilated) will be completed by MGMT, i
10W.
sos. -
{I 60%.
Discovery complete i remaWng as of by B/1197 0/17/97 40%.
80%.
f 0%
I I
t l
l Jan Feb Mat Apr May Jm JJ Aug Sep cm Nov Dec B 7MP WOA Romaaning l
Row Dets Jan-97 Feb O7 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 07 Jun-07 JJ07 Augef ' cep 07 CM97 Nov 07 Dec-97 CMP Wo* Ramaintg 09 7s%
6?%
JL%
- 7%
PO%
s%
0 47%
Ot?%
Work DftGoal Definttlon AnalyelWAction This indicator measures progress in completing the As of g/17/g7 CMP Punchlist is gg 2% complete, Configuration Management Plan (CMP). This is the plan by System SSAs/ STAS are complete. This results in which the management of each nuclear plant verifies that the having 0.6% remaining to complete CMP, design and operation of their plants is consistent with what the NRC has approved and all changes and commitments Re evaluation of FSAR changes needed to address all since original licensing are properly reflected in current of the CMP ltems has resutted in a new estimate of the licensing documents, such as the Final Safety Analysis total number FSAR Change Requests (FSARCRs)
Report (FSAR).
needed. A projected totalof 458 FSARCRs are For MP3 this is made up of the:
needed, of which 424 have been initiated.
1, Configuration Management Plan (CMP) task completion (weighted at 75%)
- 2. System Assessments completion (weighted at 25%).
These are composed of System Specific Assessments (SSAs) for Wave 1 Systems and System Technical Assessms.1ts (STAS) for Wave 2 and 3 Systems.
Gael Ihs CMP tank comnietion includent CMP Punch List items plus Licensing Commitment Validation, FSAR Change The Unit 3 goalis for the CMP cove 7 to be Request submittals into the revitrw cycle, Piping & Instrument complete by B/13,97, Degram Walk Downs, and Design Basis Summary completions.
The ETAs orovida: assurance that the CMP 6dentified Commente significant Licensing Basit' Design Bases (LB/DB) issues.
This is accomplished by management technical review of Data through g/17/g7,
(
Wave 2 and 3 systems.
Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
Dere source-o cessau4?ssup l Ane& sis by:
o censun4232MPl0wnw M H Brothers ud311MP A1 l
l
Task Cemplotions Roquired far Rostart Mllistone 3 September 1997
(
Progress: This gos!la very chattenging; management ettention is being oppited to reduce the Open category and Improve the workoff rate of open tasks
. required for restart.
4 4000 sooo
' Open tasks as 3g L of 9/15/97 I..I p
Good
,; 3000 2500 j
. ' tooo Ready for y
.l $$oo OSTI 1000 5
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec M Open (Restart) -e-Work Oft / Goal --al-Work Off/ Goal (new)l l
Raw Osts Jan-97 F ot> 97 Mar 97 Apr97 May-97 Jun 97 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oc197 Nov-97 Dec 97 open (nestaro 3059 3076 3489 3753 3650 3362 3389 2911 2513 Work Ott Gont 3362 1876 390 30 o
Work Oft / Goal (neM o
0 1340 301 Definition Analysis / Action The total number of tasks is defined as those requiring This indicator includes open items in the Action closure prior to restart. Automated Work Orders (AWOs)
Item Tracking and Trending System (AITTS), such as required for restart are not Iduded, as they are tracked NRC Open items, Significant items List issues, and in a separate indicator.
Condition Report (CR) corrective actions.
Management has developed weekly closure rates for new and existing tasks for each organization.
Increased management attention is being applied
+
to this area.
Goal Comments Goal is all complete prior to 9/30.97.
Open tasks as of 9/15/97 Work off beyond 9/30/97 reflects tasks that must awatt These taskt are tracked in Action item Tracking and completion of modifications with 9/3097 completion Trending System (AITTS) and the P2 Schedule.
(
dates.
Autnmated Work Orders (AWOs) are not included.
Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
Dara Source:
3 J Closius n4232l Ana4sle by:
G J Clossus x42rl owner-M H Brothers a4303 A2
Opon Canditi n Rep rte Millstone 3 September 1997 l (
Progreae: condition Reports re< rating cornctive action are Increasing. Increased Managernent attention le being appIled to this ares to meet the restart goal.
6 l
2500 l pen CRs throuIg
~
'O 9/17/97 l
00od i
Open CRs I
d*
3120 days T
73o 600 250 0
I I
t I
I I
t I
t t '
1 Jan Feb Mar
,,_.Apr Maj fn Ji Ava Sep Od P4ov Dec MCRs Open e120 C4ys -e T0tal Op0n CRj i
Raw Date Jan.97 F eb.97 Mar 97 Apr-97 May 97 Jun97 Jui 97 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct.97 Nov-07 Dec-6(
Totel Open CRs 1827 1921
,P003 P006 P437 2403 2524 2511 2548 Level t 141 153 166 176 195
??6 216 221 213 level f 1686 176e 1837 1910 P242 2177 2338 2200 P336 t'As Open s 120 Days 1223 1173 1100 1104 1194 1233 1255 1960 1139 t evel 1 R3 81 74 72 105 130 143 tot 131 t evel t 1140 1092 1035 1032 1089 1103 1112 1029 1000 Definition Analysia/ Action This indicator depicts the number of condition reports Significant attention has been focused on completing the (CRs) which have not had corrective actions implemented evaluation phase of recent and backlogged condition reports, cs TotalOpen CRs. The number of these total CRs This has resulted in a large number of corrective actions whlch are over 120 days old and have not been deferred being identifed and tracked. Efforts are underway to is depicted in the bar graph.
review the Identified corrective actions to ensure that they are property scheduled and that redundancies are Conditien Reports (CRs) are written to document sliminated.
degraded or non conforming conditions associated with plant systems, structures or componeritt necessary to support the generation of electricity, Gos!
Comments The coal is to have all Level i Condition Reports closed Open CRs through 9/t7/97
(
by startup unless they have been reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Con.rnittee (PORC) and approved by a Un't Officer.
Data Source?
AiT78l Analyels by:
S M Smith 12277MPl Owner:
0 McCracken x0481MP A3 I
CondBlen R;pgrt initiatian and Evaluati2n Timellncss Millstone 3 September 1997
(
Progresat condition Report evaluations andIdentification of appropriate corrective actions are now being completed on a timely basla.
500 450 400 Data through gfg7jg7 950
~
00 Jan
- Fet, Mrs Apr May Jm JJ Aug Sep Oct Pov Dec 5 Total CRs initiated a # Evr'uations Complattrd OCompleted wittjn 30 day [
Raw Data Jen 97 F eb-97 Mar 97 Apr-G7 May-97 Jur> 97 JJ Aug 97 Lop 97 Oc197 Nov 97 Deva 7 Total CRs inttleted 360 304 283 302 434 P99 427 331 177 L evel 1 CRa initisied 46 24 16 11 23 25 i t.
Po 4
(
Level f and 3 Cns init41ed 314 274 247 P91 411 274 415 311 173
(
- Evoluellone Completed 360 304 F83 302 434 295 411 P31 19 C_empleted wRhin 30 days 79 02 91 155 P84 271 321 223 19 surress Rate o 22 0 31 0 32 0 $3 0 65 0 91 on o 84 NA Defonition Analysia/Aciion This indicator depicts the initiation of Conditon Reports (CR) for NOTE: The success rate for Aug reflects the Unit and the number o' evaluations which were not completing 155 of 179 evaluations which are completed within the goal of 30 days, over 30 days old as of 9/17/97.
The graph shows CR data beginning 1/t/97, and represents the inttiation of CRs remains above the 1996 monthly current status! effectiveness of Corrective Action Initiatives.
average. The reason for the decline in early 1997 can be attributed to the completon of major potions of the discovery phases for several recovery projects. Improvement has been realized in completing evaluations within 30 days. The Managsment Goal of having no evaluations over i
30 days old by July 5,1997 was met, howver recent performance in this area has dropped. A CR was written to address this concern.
Goal Comments Goal is to corrplete all evaluatons and identify appropriate Data tnrough 9/17/97 correctrve actior's withia 30 days.
Evaluations are considered open 11 they are either in
(.
an open status or a pending review status p-ior to the approvalof the corrective action plan. The latest month's data reflects the status to date.
Dets Source:
ArTTSl Analyele by:
s M Smith 277MPl Owner:
D yCrocken mo481MP A4
_2
Csnditlen R pSrt M;thod cf Disc 2 vary Millst:ne 3 September 1997
(
Progress:
The IIne organtation is continuing to utt Ihntity Issues and the porcentage at ownt drinn reports is decreasing.
1D0 Data through}
e0 0/17/97 1,
10 y
b-O m
m
__ _i g
Nov Dec Jan F eti Mar Apt May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct 3sELF IDENTIFitD EINTERNAL OVf RsOHT DEXTtRNAL OVER$10HT DEVENT !
Row Defe Nov 96 Dec-96 Jan-9 7 Feb 97 Mar 97 Apr97 Mar 07 Jtn97 Jui97 Auge7 Sep 07 Oc197 Number of CR s UrWIk$erened IF2 169 P97 P68 266 P64 390 PS3 351 245 126 Internal CNorsgrd 13 48 36 2s Pr, P9 39 44 7e 81 33
( ulemal Overw11t 11 3
4
?
O 1
1 0
7 to 23 E ver11 23 P0 P0 e
1 e
2 P
1 0
0 T otal ldertshed 169 240 357 303 282 302 432 799 437 336 182 O
Dept self ID Re160s
(,
Maintenance 0 35 0 33 0 63 0 47 0 45 0 30 uis 0 70 0 07 0 26 0 21 Opershont 0 (8 0 40 0 F7 0 60 0 64 0 49 0 26 0 40 0 55 0 53 0 66 Work P6minno 0 36 0 19 0 27 0 36 0 16 0 77 0 25 0 43 0 33 0 30 0 P9 Des 71 E no 0 39 0 30 0 43 0 40 0is 0 31 0 32 _
0 32 0 37 0 19 0 17 System E rg 0 38 0 21 0 P6 0 42 0 34 0 30 0 44 0 78 0 21 0 22 0 22 Licensing 0 40 0 40 NA 0 00 N 'A NA NA 0 08 0 to 0 29 0 29 Definition AnalyelWActiso This indicator represents the percentage of CR s identified by Self 6dentificeuon of issues by Unit 3 es a whole has each of the barriers. CR s are categortted into the following improved duftng the first part of the year. One factor four areat; influencing thle was the large number of CRs initiated by the discovery phasa of the different recovery plans.
Event Driven. Self-revealing, an avont occurs.
- Extemal Oversight Identified by NRC, JUMA, INPO, etc.
Increased emphas's on self essessment will help to e intomat Oversight Identified by OAS, PORC, ISEG, increase self 4dentification ratios within specific NS AB, etc.
departments.
- Self Supervisor Observation, document review, Se f-checking, !ndependent / dual venfication, etc.
The department self identification ratios are a measure Of the individual department % 9te of identifying their own issues, Dept Self 10 ratio =
number of CR's ID d /atticried to that decaiment number of CR's assigned to that department Goal Comments Data through 9/17/97 1
Dare Source _
AITTSl Analysis by:
8 M Sme x2277MP!Osmer:
0 Mccranen :Saat MP A-s m
Open NRC Cemmitmonts for Rostart Millst:no 3 - September 1997
(
Progress:
While the total number of open commitments to the NRC remains high, we have reduced the number that are overdue with a goal of closing commitments on their due dates.
350 300
' Data through 1
9/17/97 Good ll l
200 l
150 100 60 0
5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec M Open items M Overdue items -e-W0rk Off/ Goal -*-New Work Oft / Goal (7/97) !
1 Raw Dets i
Jan-97 Feb 97 Mar 97 l Apr 97 May 97 Jun-97 Jul97 Aug 9' Sep-97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Dac 97 Open items 243 237 224 2 64 316 168 1 59 146 157
(
Overdue items 0
3 23 10 1
2 11 0
0 Work Off/ Goal 270 316 147 107 36 7
3 0
0 New Work Oft!Ooal(7/97) 161 60 0
Definition Analysis / Action An NRC commitment is:
As of 9/17/97,73 items have been closed in Septembut.
3 There are no overdue items to the NRC,
- written statement that is dxketed.
- verbal statement to take a specific action, agreed To continue to focus management attention in this area, to by an officer.
the overdue NRC commitments and a 30 day look
- requirement to take an action imposed by the NRC.
ahead are included in the Unit 3 daily report.
The commitments counted here are those that need f
final closure with the NRC prior to restart of the unit.
l Goal Comments NRC commitments closed on due dates prescribed Data through 9/t7/97 and all closed prior to restart Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
Dorm Source:
H Kross x6656MPl Analysis by-D. Smah x5840MPl Owner:
D Heks r0326MP A6
Significant it ms List Millstone 3 - August 1997
(
Progress: closum ofitems on the Significant items List Is a chnIIenge for the IWW97 goal.
too N
3ata through Onginal Goal. all 9/17/97 items complete by 14o 9/30.97 120 Good ioo New Goal: all l
so items complete I
so by 10'897
/
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
$5p t
Nov Dec y Total Remaining -G-Work Off/ Goal -4n-New Work Off l Row Dets Jan-97 F ot997 Mar-97 Apr97 May97 Jun 97 Jut 97 Auge7 Sep 97 Oc197 Nov 97 Dec 97 Total Remaining 69 65 43 189 173 136 102 tot 79 Work Oft / Goal 65 45 191 177 121 74 4
o New Work Off o
90 7
o
(
l Definition Analyels/ Action items on the Significant items List include A total of 215 closure packages have tx: n requested by the those Condition Reports (CRs), Notices of NRC to date through revisions of the Readiness Assessment Violation, Unresolved items. Escalated Plan (RAP) issued on 7/24/97. This is an increase of 10 Enforcement items, Licensee Event Reports, packages since the last revision of the SIL, A new work off and programmatic concerns chosen by the curve was developed based upon input provided by Sll item NRC which require closure prior to start up.
owners at various workshops.
Severely Challenged: Modifications, procedure changeJ f.3d programmatic issues scheduled delivery dates have extended the final SIL package delivery date to 1G'B. There are eight Sll zones that are severely challenged to meet the extended date:
(RSS/OSS, FSAR Update, Ctmt Basemat, CCP, MOVs, ACR 7007/f * ;9, Elec. Separation, and RSS)
Action:
Owners for the severely challenged zones are reviewing deliverables and schedules to determine actions which can be brought forward. Coordinators meet twice each week to discuss progress and required support required to meet the Sll deliverable dates.
Goal Comments Original Goal: Allitems closed by 9/30/97.
Data through 9/17/97 New Goal: Allitems closed by 10/a97.
Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
A totalof 215 closure packages have been requested by the
(
NRC to date through revisions of the Restart Assessment Plan (RAP) issued on 7/24/97. This is an increase of 10 packages since the last revision.
Dets Source:
J Genet mS5oSMPl Analysis by:
C H Clement mS590MPl Owner:
D Smith mS840Mr A7
10CFR50.54(f) Significant ltoms for Restart Millst:ne 3 September 1997
(
Progress: The v2nr este for the next so.sttr) vedste he, been tescheduled for mwor. sit significant Items required for restert closed by October 16,1997 The finst 50.54(f) responseIs scheduled for 11/22/97.
1600 4
i4ao Data through j/
7/t 6,96 1200 1
1000 og i
0 t
t M.y Jd Aug Od I E Open Significant items 3 Closed S'Dnif' cant items i Row Dets M.y 97 Jui97 AtrJ 07 Oct97 Open Svyvnc.nl Roms 686 777 Clos.ed Sgnittant liems 3(4 610 Tet.1 Sonifwa tems 1169 1382 Deferred noms 1052 1387 Definition AnalysisfAction Significar.1 Items for Restart are those items being reported The 8/2997 date for the ne.*t 50 54(f) update has been to the N'4C in accordance with the 10CFR50.54(f) request rescheduled for 9/30/97. The final 50.54(f) response is of April 16,1997, scheduled for 11/22/97. Additional analysis will be provided l
with the 9/30/97 update, i
All of these items are %cked in the Action item Tracking and i
Trending System (AITIS).
i l
l l
Gosl Comments All significant items required for restart closed by October Data through 7/16/96 This indicator will be updated every 45 days.
- r. a-m.-.. -a.. e,.
-. -.. - \\
.c A4
~ - _ -
Lic ncee EvCnt R:p3rts l
Mllistone 3 September 1997
! (
Progress:
Licensee Event Reports made to the NRC are trending down, reflecting that the discovery effort Is concluding, to 18
[
16 14 Good 12 I
g 10 I
f.
LER data through 9/17/97 6
4 8
_.2 c
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
_MLERs Recent ML ERs Historical Industry Standard]
Raw Data Jan-97 Fet> 97 Mar 97 Apr97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oci97 Nov.97 Dec 97 L ERs-Recent 0
2 1
1 0
0 1
o 0
(
LERs Historical 3
11 9
3 3
4 e
4 2
LERs YTD 3
16 28 30 33 37 44 48 So industry Standard 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 Definition Analysis / Action Ucensee Event Reports (LERs):
There have been 2 LER's submitted to date in September.
. are reports made to the NRC pursuant to 10CFR50.73 LER 97 048 00" Oversized PGS Impeller Could
- are defined as historical if the event did not occur Potentially Result in Non-Consetvative Boron Dilution within the last 12 months Event.'
e are reported in the month of the submittal to the NRC LER 97 047-00 ' Additional Technical Specification Testing Of Motor Operated Valves Required for Valves With Multiple Actuation Signals.'
Goal Comments LER data through 9/17/97
(
\\
Dets Source:
R Flanagan x5617l Analysta by:
A Flanagan x5817l0wner:
D SrnahiS840 A-9
LiconCD Am:ndm:nt Rcqu sts Mllistone 3 September 1997
( ' Ogress: The Internal goal for submittal of sli License Amendment Requests has been revised to W3G57, 2e te LAR submittal data Goal: All(original scope) submitted through 9/f 7/97, to by Br3a97 g5
Goal: All yj1i submitted by I'
8 4
j as 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May
[un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec M LARs Submmed (total)
M LARs to t>e Submmed (original scope)
C"""3LARe to be Submmed (new scope)
+ Work Ott/ Goal (now scope)
+ Work Off/ Goal (origing! scope)
Raw Dets Jan 97 Feb-97 Mar-97 Apr 97 May-97
_.lun-9 7 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov-97 DecG7 g
L Ans to be Sutantted (total) 19 24 23 17 10 6
4 6
6
\\
L ARs Sthmated (total) 0 0
0 7
6 2
0 1
0 L ARe to te SLtwnnted (new scepai 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
3 3
L ARs to be SubmRted (ongjntit scope) 19 24 23 17 10 6
1 2
2 Work. Ort / Goal (onginal) 19 24 23 17 8
0 0
0 0
Work. Ort' Goal (new) 4 d
l 0 Definition Analysis!Ar: ion License Amendment Requests (LARs) are changes to Technical Three new LARs have been identified during the Specifications or other license changes that are required for restart, discovery / disposition phase of Wave 1 and 2 systems, and that must be submitted to the NRC for approval.
Two LARs that were submittod to the NRC, need to be resubmitted. Submittal date W3a97, The resolution of engineering issues is effecting the submittal of the five LARs. Daily review meetings are being conducted to monitor status of activities and expedite completion of LARs.
Communications have been ongoing with the NRC staff to insure that the delays in filing the amendment requests do not significantly threaten the NRCs ability to support our restart schedule.
Goal Comments All LARs requiring NRC revi&w submmed by 9/3097, LAR submittal data through 9/17/97.
Work off curve reflects end of month goal, LARs: Pressurtzer Level, instrument inaccuracy, P 6 Interlock, Spent Fuel Pool, Containment Valves.
Del Source:
G. Papanic x2069MP l Analysis by:
D Smith uS840MP! Owner:
D SmRh n$&40MP A 10 j
R start Madificatiens Awaiting Impicmontatisn Mllistone 3 September 1997
(
Progress: Percent complete for Engineering is currently 79% and Construction is 38% complete. This goalremains challengIcg and the focus ofIncreased mannoement attention.
100 160 Modification
[
r data through 140 -
9/1G'97 120 100-Il g
Goal (new): All 60 -
4 modifications complete 10/1697
,g 40 20 0
Jan Feb_ ___ Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec h
-e W k G
W k O
Raw Dets Jan-97 F ot> 97 Mar-97 Apr97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul 97 ug97 Sep-97 Oct 97 Nov.97 Mods Aeleased to F6eu 20 29 20 25 40 62 45 Mods Awaiting Engineenng 83 81 78 72 62 35 32 Total Mods Remaining 173 149 103 110 98 97 92 87 77 Work Off! Goal 88 62 0
Work Off! Goat (now) 31 0
Definition AosslyslWAction The total number of outstanding modifications identified As of 9/1697, the total number design modifications as required prior to restart that have not been tumed required for start up is 149. Of these,72 are complete over to Operations.
and 77 are required to be implemented pr6or to restart.
This month:( 9/1 thru 9/16 )
Required Modifications exclude MOV Projects (6).
Status is being tracked separately.
- 13 Modifications were completed.
- 13 New Modifications were added, 4 Modifications are not req'd for startup and.
- 10 Modifications wem released to the field.
Gos!
Comments i
All start up related design mor.ifications completed by Modification data through 9/16'97 9/30/97. A new completion r/oal of 10/1697 has been Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
established.
oaM,_
. Me_. 89,%.,. e,,
,-,.ao_
m._
A 11
_ - _ _ - - - 1
r Werk Order Status Mllistone 3 September 1997
(
Progresa: The geaeration and completion at corrective mnIntenance work orders required for restart is lower than expected and currently challenges the restart timeline.
4 2500-3250
' Work order l data through 1750 9/18,97 Good
" i t,00 <
t 1250<
g 1000 -
- 750 l
l 500
~
250 C
0-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec lMMR AWO Mother AWO +MR AWO Goal 4-Total AWO Goal!
Raw Osts Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oct-97 l Nov.97 Dec 97 Total AWO Backlog 1637 2123 2170 2069 2006 1928 2211 2260 178A
(
MR AWO Goal 350 350 350 3rA) 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Totat AWO Ooal 500 500 600
'00 500 500 500 600 500 530 500 500 MRAWO 1203 1400 1409 1354 1336 1565 1596 1662 1046 other AWO 4 34 723 761 715 670 5t3 615 598 742 Definition Ansinla/ Action
- Automated Work Order (AWO) Backlog is the tota:
All malor unit work groups have Work week number of corrective maintenance / condition driven management has gone to two sh:ft coverage to (non recurring) AWOs.
fac?, ate problem resolution and work completion.
Normal outage work is proceeding six days per week, The total does not include: AWOs awaiting retest, 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> per day. Crdical path and near critical path in closure, work planned for future outages. AWOs that work is proceeding 7 days per week,20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> per day.
support feld work already included in backlog (i.e.
insulation, staging, etc.) and non-power block AWOs.
Safety significant systems are defined as Maintenance Rule risk and/or safety significant systems.
Goal Goal < 500 total AWOs at start up, less than 350 Maintenance Rule risk and/or safety significant system AWOs at start up, and no AWOs that are required for Comments Work Order data through 9/1&97
(
Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
Dets Source A Roth9eb x5241MP l Analysis by:
L Vomacchio x0491MPl Owner:
L Vomacchio r049tMP A 12
Tomperary Medifications Millstone 3 - August 1997
(--
Progress:
Temporary Modifications are being reduced at a pace supp:<tive or the goal.
60 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
{
Temp Mods MOutage Support -G-Work-Off/ Goal -in-Work oft / Goal (new)
Goal <15 l Raw Dets Jan 97 Feb 97 Mar-97 Apr97 May 97 Jun 97 Jut 97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct 97 Nov-97 j Dec.07 Temp Mods 48 45 48 38 34 30 25 20 23 Outage Support 5
6 6
0 8
8 9
11 5
Totalinstaned 53 51 52 47 42 38 34 31 28 Work Oft / Goal 52 52 51 44 35 37 30 25 13 13 13 13 Woit oft / Goal tne*)
35 29 20 14 11 to Definition AnalyslWAction A temporary modification is a modification to the plant that The new work-off curve has been revised to reflect the is short-term in nature and not part of the permanent plant temp moos tied to mode 4 and th6 latest design change process, implementation dates for design mods. In addition, at this time,11 temp. mods, are scheduled to remain post-Temporary Modifications to permanent plant design are
- startup, categorized here in two ways: " Outage Support' are those in addition to the terrip. mods, requirire new design directly tied to physical work to plant equipment in an packages, other temp. mods, require implementation of outage condition, and ' Temp Mods' are all others, design modifications already designed.
Re evaluation indicated there are five Temp Mods are required to support outage actMties and 23 norvoutage support Temp Mods.
Goal Comments
<15 TMs installed at startup Temp Mod data through 9/17/97 g
Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
(
None greater than one cycle without Unit Officer approval.
Data Source:
S. Stricker x54o9l Ansfy sls by-S. Stricker x54o9MPl Owner:
G. Swider x5381MP A 13
i Contral Rcom and Annunciater Doficiancies Mllist::no 3 - Sept:mber 1997
(
Progress: The net addition of seven newitems during the month of August resulted in the total exceeding the goal ofless than ten deficiencies.
f 35 Goal: <10 by So June 30,1997 Good Deficiency 25 data through l
20 9/22/97 y
is g
A 10 O
O l
o Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jtsi
.M Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec M Total Deficiencies -e-Worit Oft /G0al !
Qw Data Jan 97 Feb-97 Mar.97 Apr 97 May-07 Jurv07 JJ-97 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nov 97 Dec97 Total Deficanoes 21 18 19 1,.,
24 9
12 19 17 Work OftCoal 17 15 to 12 10 to 10 10 1c to 10 j
\\
4 Definition Analysis! Action Control roc Ti instruments, recorders, indicators, and The current goal of less than 10 items by June 30,1997 annunciators that function improperly that could affect was achieved. However, a ne; of 8 items were added the ability of the operators to monitor and control plant to date, leaving 17 items remaining to complete. Three conditions.
items are scheduled for completion in September,6 items are scheduled for completion in October. There are 5 items that are TR'd as well as 3 new items, all of which are under review for inclusion in the schedule.
Goals Comments Fewer than 10 at startup.
Deficiency data through 9/22/97
[.
Work that is complete awaiting retest based on plant None greater than 6 months old without Unit Officer conditions will not be included in the total.
spproval.
Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
Data Source.-
L. Palone x4737MPl Analysis by:
D. Beamy x4Ga0MPl Owner:
J A Beckman x$361MP A 14
Oparatcr Werk Aroundo Millstone 3 - September 1997 l
Q Progress:
A workottplan has been developed to support the goal of s 10.
i 45 40 33 Work Around data g3,4 through 9/15,97 s0 4 25 illIIl h Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jur.
Jul Aug sep Oct Dec
! M Operator Work Arounds - G-Work Oft / Goal -al-Work Off/ Goal (new) l
~
Raw Dats Jan 97 Feb 97 Mar-97 Apr97 May-97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug-97 sep-97 Oct-97 Nov 97 Dec 97 operatorWork Arounds 21 24 23 21 21 21 21 21 20 work Ott/ Goal 20 17 15 13 10 10 to 10 Work Ott/ Goal (new) 18 16 10 10 10 10 Definition Analysis! Action Operator Work Arounds are conditions requiring an operator Of the 12 Work Arounds scheduleu to be completed to work with equipment in a manner other than original design prior to plant startup,3 are complete awaiting plant which could:
conditions to support post maintenance testing. These are still reflected in the total count, and are shown on the
- 1. Potentially impact safe operation during a plant transient, workoff curve to be fully operational by 9/30, but will
- 2. Potentially impose significant burden during normal require NOP/NOT (Normal Operating Pressure / Normal operation, Operating Temperature) to be fully tested.
- 3. Create nuisance condition due to recurring equipment deficiency,
- 4. Distract an operator from noticing a recurring condition.
Goal Comments Goal <10 Work Around data through 9/15/97 Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
None greater than 6 months old without Unit Officer approval.
\\
Data Source L. Palone x4737MP l Anarysis by:
J. A Beckman x5361MPl Owner:
J. R. Beckman x5361MP A 15
Pracaduro Rovisien Btckleg Millstone 3 - September 1997 l (
Progres8:
A new work-off curve for procedure upgrades has been developed to reflect completion based on operational needs.
300 Goat complete all Procedure data through 9/17/97 200 fof start up by Good 11/30/97 150 l
I I
im 5
Jan Feb Mar Apr May
.kn Jul Aug Sh Od Nov Dec m Restart Reg'd. Proc. Rev.
PUP Procedures
-G-PUP Work Oft / Goal
-*- Restart Req'd. Work Oft /Goa!
-M-Restart Reg'd. Work Oft / Goal (new) -e-- PUP Work Oft / Goal (new)
Raw Dets Jan-97 Fot>97 Mar.97 Apr 97 May-97
.hn97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Seo-07 Od-97 Nov 97 Dec 97 Total RemairinD 340 300 288 244 218 164 12o 90 75 Restart Req'd Proc.
Rev 251 213 198 162 143 98 64 43 36 PUP Promdures 98 98 90 82 75 66 56 47 39 Restart Req'd. Work Off, Coal 20 2o8 169 131 tot 7o 36 o
Restart Req'd, Work oftcoal trew) 64 27 o
PUP Work Ofttoal o
94 78 50 43 27 8
o PvP Work OftGoal (new) l l
36 19 1
1 Definition Analysis! Action Procedure Revision Backlog is the total number of new As the result of FLE 3 project a new work off curve procedures or proce'ure revisions required or desired for reflecting the revised completion logic has been added.
restart.
This completion logic reflects completion of procedures Millstone Procedure Upgrarla, Project (PUP) (Phase Ill).
based on when they are needed (e.g., completion of Upgrade the Technical Procedures at Millstone Statica to procedures required for Mode 4 prior to going to Mode a Standardized Writer's Guide and Venfication and 4 completion of procedures required for Mode 2 prior Validation (V&V) Process. The goal of PUP is to improve to going to Mode 2, etc.).
the technical quality and usability (human factors) of procedures; this will reduce human errors and enhance plant reliability by supporting quality of work.
Comments Procedure data through 9/17/97 Work off curve reflects end of month goal.
Gont All open items have been reviewed and proper corrective actions are completed prior to 9/30/97.
[
New PUP Procedure completion goal is to complete all PUP procedure upgrades required for start up by 11/30/97.
Departrnened Anarysis by:
T. Kuterman x5421MPl Owner.B. Pinkowitz x4203MPU R Beckman x5361MP Data source:
A 16 o
Configuration Mcnagamant Plan Progross Millstone 2 - September 1997
?TOgr888: CMP discovery was completed on MV97.
6 100 %
80%
{
i Goal; CMP complete 60 %
by 9/1597 Good I
Data through y
40%
l 9/6/97 20%
}
0%
1 1
I I
l l
l
's Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep j M CMP Completion Status -e-Work Off/GoalJ Raw Date Jan-97 Feb.97 Mar 97 Apr97 May 97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Dec 97
(
CMP Compietion Status 100 %
98%
93 %
86%
79 %
62%
30%
7%
0%
Work Ofi/ Goal 62 %
34 %
6%
0%
Definition Analysis / Action This indicator measures progress in completing the Discovery complete for Unit 2 CMP on 9/6/97.
Configuration Management Plan (CMP). This is the plan by which each nuclear plant verifies that the design and operation of the plant is consistent with what the NRC has approved and all changes and commitments since original licensing are property reflected in current licensing documents, such as the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). CMP complete is defined as System Review Packages (SRPs) complete and approved for all Phase 1 and 2 Systems, along with graded reviews completed and documented for all Unit 2 programs.
Note: The title of this indicator was changed from 10 CFR 50.54(f) Readiness for Submittal due to the revised 10 CFR 50.54(f) request from the NRC dated April 16,1997.
Gon!
Comments The Unit 2 goalis for CMP discovery to be complete by Data through 9/6/97
[
9/15/97.
c Data Source:
B. Mutt 1estaa:tt x3321l Analysis by-M. Ahem x 6426l Owner:
R. Necci x5739 A 17
1 Task Complotions Rcquirod for Startup Millstone 2 - September 1997
(^
Progress:
As discovery continues, the tasks required for sist1up continue to
- increase, i
6000 5000 Data through g
9/11/97 Good 4000 l
3000 2000 0
l I
I I
I I
I I
I l
l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
!M Open (Restart) M Open (Undetermined) -Work off Goal j Raw Dets Jan 97 Fet>97 Mar 97 Apr.97 May-97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Auo 97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nov-97 Dec 97 Open (Restart) 1655 1778 1866 2502 2538 3278 4594 4839 5736
(
Open (undeteraned) 135 165 168 107 127 116 wort-off Goal 4761 5000 4500 3082 1665 0
Definition Analysis /Aution The total number of tasks is defined as those requiring The increase in tasks required for restart is due to the closure prior to restart. Items in PMMS (AWOs) are not generation of AITTS assignments to track engineering included. Undetermined are those assignments in activities and corrective action implementation.
AITTS that have not been screened as to whether or not they are required for restart.
Approximately 39% of the assignments are tracking resolution of UIRs. Approximately 43% of the assignments are corrective actions for CRs. The remaining 18% are tracking assignments iriiemal to various departments.
The workoff curve projects an increase in assignments initiated due to CMP /ICAVP activities. Engineering is diverting resources to completing tasks.
Goni Comments The goal of 320 restart assignments per week has been Data through 9/11/97 tstablished as a weekly focus item.
f Data Source:
G. L. Aux x2200l Analysis by:
S.V. Heard r5600l Owner:
9.V. Heard x5600 A.18
Open Conditlen Roperts Millstone 2 - September 1997
(
Progress:
The number or open condition reports rettects continuation at discovery.
4 2000
\\l Total Open CRs as of 1600 l
gjg 3jg7 i
1200 I CRs open >120 days as Good
^
[j of 9/11/97 I
E
~
Y Goal: < 700 800
/
CRs open n
> 120 days by 9/30/97 400 0
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l M CRs Open >120 Days - +--Total Open CRs l Raw Data
(
Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr97 May-97 Jun-97 Jul97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct 9s Nov 97 Dec.97
(
Total Open CRs 1335 1300 1255 1215 1282 1458 1515 1786 1909 CRs Open 3120 Days 738 787 735 810 722 7s0 780 912 935 Definition AnalysisfAction This indicator depicts th6 total number of open (i.e.
The condition report initiation rate increased dunng corrective action plan not fully implemented) condition June, July, and August. As discovery continues, CR reports (CRs) and the number of CRs that have been open initiation rates will continue to increase, greater than 120 days.
The increase in CRs > 120 days old is due to Condition Reports (CRs) are used to document an continued review of previously closed CRs (pre 1997).
cdverse, discrepant, or other condition that could impact Any with open assignments were re opened.
plant safety and operation, and equipment operability.
Following characterizatiot..f a condition, the Corrective CR generation is expected to continue for approximately Action Program provides the process to determine the 2 weeks after completion of discovery (9/6/97).
reason (s) for the condition and to establish appropriate corrective actions. From any given CR, a number of corrective action assignments can be generated. The Corrective Action Program also provides a mechanism for evaluating adverse conditions and their causes to identify tnd address precursors to problems to minimize occurrence of significant problems.
The 120 day criterion was selected based upon industry benchmarks for resolution of open items.
Goal Comments
[
Net reduction to less than 700 CRs open >120 days by Data through 9/11/97
\\
the end of the third quarter.
G L Ahx x2200 l Anstyeie by:
c v. Heard 15soo l owner:
s v. Heare x5soo Osts source:
A 19
Cenditien R port initiatien cnd Evaluati n Timalinoss Mllistone 2 - September 1997 l
(Gg(OSS:
The IIne departments continue to reduce the number of CRs open >30 days.
i 300 250 A
h.
g 3
f j
3 h
lk(
S g
fd 5
A Data through 9/11/97 I
t g
50 h-q N
?
3
- f u
3
)
!)
y
/
~
O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
- 5 Total CRs initiated B Total Now Complete O Cornotwted within 30 days l Raw Data Jan-97 Fet>97 Mar-97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun J7 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov-97 Dec 97
{
Total CRs Inmated 182 163 158 158 203 268 221 298 56 Level 1 CRs Instated 6
7 7
8 9
10 11 13 4
Level 2 CRs initated 176 156 151 150 194 258 210 285 52 Concleted wittun 30 days 31 53 37 37 71 63 107 105 1
Total Now Conplete 190 162 158 157 199 264 190 125 1
Success Rate 17.0 %
32.5%
23.4%
23 4 %
35.0%
23 5%
48.4*4 NA NA Definition AnalysisfAction This indicator depicts the initiation of level 1 and 2 Condition Investigation is incomplete for 59 Unit 2 condition R: ports (CRs) and the number of evaluations that were reports meeting the following criteria:
completed within the goal of 30 days. The center bar shows the number of CRs for which the investigations have been significance level 1 or 2 completed to date.
CR initiated in 1997 Cr1 more than 30 days old as of 9/11/97 The unit is basically working to a 45 day clock. Using focus items and constant reminder, we are attempting to integrate the completion of investigations within 30 days with all the other work on the unit.
Goal Commants Goal is to complete all evaluations and identify appropriate 7
TIctive actions within 30 days.
i G. L AAx x2200l Analysis by:
S. V. Heard x5600l Owner:
S. V. Heard x5600 De9 Source:
A 20
Condition Roport Mothod of Discovory Millstone 2 - September 1997 l
Progress:
InternalIdentification or condition reports remains high. The increase in CRs identified by external oversight is due to ICA VP.
4 100 go Data through 9/11/97 "a 60 3
e 40 20 l-fl.
n.
n.
l o
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
!E Self Identified Winternal Oversight D Extemal Oversight D Event i Raw Dats Jan 97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Dec 97 Self Identified 134 127 138 144 189 240 204 245 40 Intemal Oversight 23 23 17 22 30 37 23 30 8
External Oversight 7
5 5
1 3
2 1
21 5
Event 16 10 8
8 7
6 15 13 5
180 165 168 175 229 285 243 309 58 Definition AnalyslalAction This indicator rspresents the percentage of CRs A substantial number of condition reports continue to identified by each of the barriers. CRs are categorized be self identified with 21 extemal oversight CRs into the following four areas:
Identified in August. Event driven CRs remain low.
Event Driven Self revealing, an event occurs.
The increase in CRs identified by external oversight External Oversight Identified by NRC, NCAT, during August is due to ICAVP.
INPO, Parsons, etc.
Internal Oversight Identified by PORC or Nuclear Oversight: Audits, Surveillance, inspections, IRT, NSE, and NSAB.
Self identified Supervisor observation, document review, Self checking, independent / dual verification, etc.
Goal Comments Data through 9/11/97.
(
Data Source:
G. L Alix x2200l Analysis by:
S. V. Heard x 5600l Owner:
l S.V. Heard x5600 A-21
Opon NRC Commitmonts for Rostert Millstone 2 - September 1997
(
\\
Progress:
No items have been overdue to the NRC this year. Closure ofitems is on track to support restart.
150 l
Data through 125 j
/
g/11/97 100 75 50 25 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec lEOpen items EOverdue items l Raw Dets Jan 97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Au9-97 Sep97 Oct 97 Nov-97 Dec 97 Open items 117 103 91 109 109 94 100 110 117 Overdue items 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Definition Analyels! Action An NRC Commitment is:
These commitments consist of: URis, IFis, L ERs, Violations, and Docketed correspondence.
. Any written statement that is docketed.
- Any verbal statement to take a specific action, URis 11 Remained the same.
agreed to by an officer.
- Any requirement to take an action imposed by IFls 3 Remained the same, the NRC.
VIOs 4 Remained the same.
The commitments counted here are those that need final closure with the NRC prior to restart of the unit.
LERs 59 increased by 3 LERs 97 026 and 97-027 submitted this week.
Doc Corr 40 Remained the same, items required for restart are being reviewed as part of the 50.54(f) submittal.
Goal Comments NRC commitments closed on due dates prescribed Data through 9/11/97 and all closed prior to restart.
Data Source: E. Annino x 4604 l Analysis by:
E. Annino x4604l Owner:
R. Joshi x 2080 A-22 a
Significant Itoms List Millstone 2 - September 1997 l
Progress: closure ofitems on the SIgnificant items List is on track 80 69 closure packages 70 required for 43 SILs l
g 9/15/97 Good 60 Goal: all I
40 submitted by 30 12/16/97 20 10 0
1 I
I I
i e
Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec
( M Total Pkgs. Remaining -e-Pkgs. Work Off/ Goal l Raw Dets Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nov 97 Dec-97 Total PkDs Remaining 69 43 43
(
Pkgs. Work Oft' Goal 69 43 38 32 15 0
Total slla Remaining 43 29 29 Definition AnalysisfAction items on the Significant items List include those items Effective 8/13/97, the enteria for submittal of packages (51) chosen by the NkC that requir0 closure prior to start to the NRC was changed. Based on the new criteria, up. Of the 51 SILs,43 require closure packages to be only complete packages will reside with the NRC.
submitted to the NRC. In May, the NRC determined that Packages with open items will be retained by Licensing 8 SILs did not require closure packages. The work (On Hold).
off/ goal line in the graph above has been revised as of September to reflect tracking of the 69 individual closure SILs w/no pkg. required 8
packages required to address the 43 S:Ls.
SILS complete or with NRC 14 SILs with Licensing pending open items 29 Total number of SILs 51 Total number of Packages required 69 All rwign al SIL packages have been delivered to Licensing and are available to the NRC.
Goal Comments Goal: Completion of closure packages by 12/16/97.
Data through 9/15/97
- o..,_..
1 e...,.s.,, %,..,.
1 e.....s.uO_
emo._
A-23 m
10 CFR 50a54(f) Significant Itoms for Rostart Millstene 2 - September 1997
(
Progress:
New items have been added as a result of the discovery process and are being Incorporated Into the restart schedule.
1600 1400 1200 1000 Good l
c 800 4
Y g 600 400 200 0
I I
I 6/31/97 7/15/97 9/30/97 11/22/97
{ E Open Signifcant items E Closed SigniSant items l Raw Dets 5/31/97 7/15/97 9/30/97 11/22/97 Open Significant items 601 676 Closed Signifcant items 709 726 Total Significant items 1310 1402
~
Deferred items 346 384 Definition AnalysisfAction Significant items for Restart are those items being New items are due to the discovery process. It is reported to the NRC in accordance with the expected that the total number of significant iten.s will 10 CFR 50.54(f) roquest of April 16,1997.
grow for approximately 2 weeks after discovery is complete (9/6/97). The new items are being incorporated into the restart plan.
Additional analysis will be provided with the 9/30/97 update.
Goal Comments Significant items for restart closed by November 25, The 8/29/97 date for the next update has bee n 1997.
rescheduled for 9/30/97. The final 50.54(f) response is scheduled for 11/22/97.
This indicator will be updated every 45 days.
A work off/goalis under review.
ont, soune:
J Z. LaPtanta x 3269l Analysis by:
J. 2. Laplante x 3269l Owner:
J. 2. LaPlanto x 3269 A 24
Liccnsco Evcnt Ropsrts Millstone 2 - September 1997
(
Progress:
LER generation rates has remained low for the past two months.
15
,10 5a
}
Data through 9/11/97 e
5 0
l l
l l
1 I
l l
l l
t Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec lELERs Recent ELERs Historical l Raw Data Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr-97 May 97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nov-97 Dec 97 LERa Recent O
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
LERs Histoncal 0
3 2
3 12 0
4 0
0 LERs-YTD 0
4 6
9 21 21 25 26 27 Definition Analysis / Action Licensee Event Reports (LERs) are reports made Through September 11, one LER has been wntten, to the NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73.
bringing the year to-date total to 27. This LER was not hist 0:icalin nature.
LERs are defined as historicalif the event did not occur within the last 12 months.
September LER:
LERs are reported in the month of the submittal to 97 027-00 Unplanned Automatic Start of'A' the NRC, Emergency Diesel Generator While Troubleshooting Gael Comments To tread inwards industry norms as the recovery Data through 9/11/97 process concludes.
Data Source:
FL Joshi x2080l Analysis by' R. Joshi x2080l Owner-R. Joshi x2080 A 25
Liconso Amondmont Roquests Millstone 2 - September 1997 Progress:
Ucense Amendment Requests are approximately one month behind the originalschedule.
15 l
,10 Octa through Good E
9/16/97 5
/
Y i
4 Y
5 0
t i
I I
I I
I I
I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct lm LARs Remaining -e-Work Off/ Goal l Raw Data Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 07 Jun-97 Jul-07 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct-97 LARs Submitted 2
1 1
1 1
0 0
0 4
LARs Remainng 11 10 9
8 7
7 7
7 2
Wark Off/ Goal 13 12 11 11 9
7 5
0 Definition Analysis / Action Ucense Amendment Requests (LARs) are changes to There were 13 License Amendment Requests req 3 red Technical Specifications or other license chaages that for startup. To date,10 LARs have been submitted to are needed for restart that are to be submitted to the the i:RC. Of these,1 has been approved by the NRC.
NRC for approval.
Four LARs were submitted during Seotember.
Delays were a result of additional analysis required by outside support and the sharing of intemal resources.
Of the remaining 3 LARs: 1 request is contracted to ABB and is expected by 9/30. The second amendment request (compliance issue #2) is expected to be completed and submitted to the NRC by October 18,1997. The remaining amendment request is a calculation change contracted to Siemens. It is expected that a technical specification change will not be required; therefore this LAR is no longer considered as required for restart.
Goal Comments Receive NRC approval prior to restart.
Data through 9/16/97
(
D*ta Source:
R. Joshi x2000l Analysis by:
R. Joshi x2080l Owner:
R. Joshi x2080 A 26
Rootart Modificatiens Awaiting implomontation Millstone 2 - September 1997
(
Progress:
Modifications are being released for work. The completion of these modifications is a challenge.
l 140 l
Data through 120 +
~
9/11/97 I-All engineenng done 100' l
cornpleteafter by 10/15/97 i
80 +
60 t Mods to be I
40-restart l
20 +
Y 0l i
I I
I I
I I
i t
t i
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l m Mods Released to F6 eld m Mods Awalting Engineering Work Oft' Goal i
~
Raw Dets Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr97 May 97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Doc-97 Mods Released to Field 0
0 11 31 34 50 56 55 Mods Awamng Eng!neenng 81 103 91 76 86 66 64 75 Total Mods Remaining 81 103 102 107 120 116 120 130 Work Off/ Goat 107 102 106 95 108 81 46 3
Definition Anahnis/ Action The total number of outstanding modifications The trend for design approvals was positive for this identified ao required prior to restart that have not period. Schedule analysis of in progress design work been approved forimplementation, indicates that this trend will continue. Two mods were closed and three mods issued this reporting period.
Reported numbers reflect changes in scope of work /non work EWRs and a rebaseline of the work off goal to adjust for the increase in restart required mods.
>The total scope as of 9/11/97 is 147, an increase of 7.
>Of the 147 mods, a total of 17 have been completed with 130 remaining.
> Mods requiring field work total 105, of which 55 have been issued / released to the fielci or need final closure.
> Forty two mods require no field work, of which 12 have had the engineering actions implemented.
Goal Comments All start up related design modifications completed Data through 9/11/97 prior to restart.
(
Data Source:
M. Amadon x6249l Analysis by:
M. Amadon x6249l Owner:
S. Bnnkman x5321 A 27
.J.
.m<e-_-_m:
a
_.4
,i,me m
u.a_es...e-__ea a_o
.-_.se-a.i s
-_a_
4._-3, Sa.-_4
&A
-A-.-m.aa
.e
.A aa Ae.4As_%a aa..
Werk Ordor Status Millstone 2 - September 1997 N
Progress: The Awo backlog is not decreasing.
i
-1 1800-1600-Work Order
- 1400, data through 9/11/97 1200*
{
Good j
1000 -
m 800-k 600-4 400-200-0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec p MR AWO Mother AWO -+-MR AWO Goal -G-Total AWO Goal l Raw Date
(
Jan-97 Fet>97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun-9r Jul 97 Au0-97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Dec-97 Total AWO BackloO 1348 1376 1434 1354 1461 1455 1572 1539 1707 MR AWO Goal 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total AWO Goal 500 500 500 500 500 Sr0 500 500 500 500 500 500 MRAWO 964 976 1031 940 1045 1045 1127 11o4 1247 Other AWO 384 400 403 414 416 410 445 435 460 CONnition Analysis / Action Automated Work Order (AWO) Backlog is the total The maintenance force has increased its work hours to number of corrective maintenance / condition driven (non support increasing work output. Additionally, AWOs recurring) AWOs, awaiting approved designs have decreased and moved to a ' working
- status. This increase in Design work is
- The total does not include: AWOs awaiting retest, a!so linked to more manhours worked by Engineering, in closure, work planned for future outages, AWOs that Engineering is executing a plan to free up AWOs on support field work already included in backlog (i.e.
Engineering hold, insulation, staging, etc.) and non-power block AWOs, Safety significant systems are defined as Maintenance Rule risk and/or safety significant systems.
~
1*oel Comments Less than 500 AWOs and trending down prior to Data through 9/11/97 readiness for restart, with none required for restart.
a Data Source:
D. Knopf x5174l Analysis by:
R.W. Poole x5338l Owner:
S J. Jordan x4292 A-28
Tempsrary Msdifications Millstone 2 - September 1997
(
Progross:
Temporary Modifications are being reduced.
60 Data throVQh l j/
9%'97 l
so.
Good 20 -
0 I
I i
t i
I i
i t
t i
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec (MTemp Mods MOutage Support --e-Work Ott/ Goal {
Raw Date Jan-97 Fot>97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul-97 Au9-97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov-97 Dec 97 Ternp Mods 29 29 30 31 31 31 35 33 31 Outage Support 21 21 19 18 18 20 15 13 14 Total Instaned 50 50 49 49 49 51 50 46 45 Work Oft / Goal 50 50 50 50 50 50 45 44 34 22 17 8
Definition AnalyelsfAction A temporary modification is a modification to the plant There are current!y 45 Temp Mods installed. A that is short term in nature and not part of the review of the MP2 Manc.ger Restart Worklist compared permanent plant design change process.
with the Temp Mod list showed a dramatic reduction (33 to be removed) in the number to be installed by Temporary Modifications to permanent plant design are start up. While future developments may require
,ttegorized here in two ways: ' Outage Support' are changes, cunent expectations call for fewer than five those directly tied to physical work to plant equipment Temp Mods to remain installed post start up. A in an outage condition, and ' Temp Mods' are all others.
recent review by the Unit managers was performed, changing the category of some of the Temp Mods and therefore changing the outlook of the above graph.
Gael Commente Unrt 2 has a goal c'less than 5 installed temporary Data through 9/8/97 modifications at Restart. Temporary Modifications have
(
been made a weekly focus item in an effort to reduce With the plant shutdown there are currently 14 temp their numbers prior to restart, mods installed that are required to support shutdown work.
These data are updated on Mondays.
Data Source:
W. Woolery xo698l Analysis by:
W. Woolery x0698l Owner:
M. J. Wilson x2081 A-29
r-Control Room and Annunciator Doficioncios Millstone 2 September 1907
(
Progress: Most deficiencies tracked In PMMS are scheduled to be worked and released prior to start up. Some are Mode dependent and wlIIbe removed post Restart.
6 60 Deficiency data go 1
j/
through9/8/97 0
Good 30 I
o 0
l I
I I
i I
i l
I I
l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec j M Total Deficiencies -e-Work Oft / Goal !
Raw Date Jan 97 Fet>97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May-97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nov 97 Dec 97 Total Dehciencies 41 39 45 62 49 52 49 52 55 Work Oft / Goal 52 48 41 39 37 30 25 20 11 Definition AnalyslWAction Cor.nol room instruments, recorders, indicators, and Fifteen of the items being tracked by PMMS are annunciators that function improperty that could affect awaiting Retest or are ' Work Stopped Operations the ability of the operators to monitor and control plant Hold,' that will be removed upon successful co 1dations, completion of the retest or when plant conditions permit the retest. One item is being worked on in the Minor Maintenance (MM) program. Deficiencies are not being corrected in a timely manner.
Gonla Comments Operations has a goal of less than 5 CRP Deficiencies Deficiency data through 9/8/97.
during Mode 1.
These data are updated on Mondays.
Data Source:
W. Woolery x0698l Analysis by:
W. Woolery x0698l Owner:
M. J. Wilson x2081 A 30
Oparator Work Arcunds Mllistone 2 - September 1997
(
Progress:
Operator Burdens are not being reduced. Additional management attention willbe required to make the goal, 45 40 8
Good 30 j
25 Data through Y
f20 9'O'97 I. 15 E
10 0
l I
I l
I I
I I
I I
I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sap Oct Nov Dec
$ Operator Work Arounds Work Ot!/Goall R*w Data Jan-97 Feb 97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May-97 Jun 97 Jul07 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct97 Nov-97 Dec97 OperatorWork Arounds 43 39 41 42 41 41 42 42 44 Work Off/ Goal 41 41 41 41 41 39 98 36 32 28 Definition Analysic/ Action Operator Work Arounds are conditions requiring an operator The number of Operator Burdens has remained to work with equipment in a manner other than original design relatively constant over the past eight months due to that could:
the plant priority of Working on Restart items.
Presently,13 Operator Burdens are on the Restart list
- 1. Potentially impact safe operation during a plant transient and will be resolved prior to Restart. The other 31
- 2. Potentially impose signrficant burden during normal Operator Burdens have plans (DCNs/EWRs) operation associated with them to be completed post Restart.
- 3. Create nuisence condition due to recurring equipment Management focus will help reduce Operator Rurdens.
deficiency
- 4. Distract an operator from noticing a recurring condition Goel Comments Goal is <.= 10 burdens remaining. This goal will not be Data through 9/B!97 acNeved until after Restart. The Operations Review Board (ORB) has accepted the task of prioritizing the existing These data are updated on Mondays.
Operator Burdens and establishing criteria for future issues.
(
Ed Seacor, the ORB Chairman, is implementing a plan that
\\
incorpora*ss the best elements from several plants' programs as they apply to MP2.
Data Source:
W. Woolery 10698l Analysis by:
W. Woolery x0698l Owner:
M.J. Wilson x2081 A-31
Prscoduro Rovisien Backleg Millstone 2 - September 1997
(
Progress:
Procedure revisions are a challenge to bs completed prior to restart.
Additional resources and management attention are being af piled.
4 l
300 l
22 Goat cr.snplete Data through corrective actions g
9/11/97 by restart 200 g
)
gong
\\
Onginal l
I Nd 150 cornpietion goal I'
j RI EIIf.t1hl 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec M Restart Reg'd Proc. Rev. M PUP -e-Restart Reg'd Work Off/ Goal - *- PtsP Wo,K Off/ Goal !
RawData Jan-97 Feb 97 Mar 97 Apr-97 May-97 Jun 97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep 47 Oct 97 Nov 97 oec-97 Total Remanneng 268 270 289 257 243 220 228 238
,230 Restart Req'd Proc,
(
Rev 88 102 116 108 102 92 108 124 122 pup 180 168 153 149 141 128 120 114 108 Restart Req'd Work Oft / Goal 94 106 115 105 93 92 105 118 113 90 62 0
pup Work Off/ Goal 210 190 150 120 l 100 70 120 100 75 50 0
Definition AnnivsisfAction Procedure Revision Backlog is the total number of new Two hundred and four deficient procedures have been procedures or procedure revisions required or desired for identified to date. The majo,ity are EOP revisions and restart.
AOP development and upgrades. The remaining are Millstone Procedure Upgrade Project (PUP)(Pnase til),
actual deficiencies which must be corrected prior to Upgrade the Technical Procedures at Millstone Station to restart. This indicator is expected to have constant a Standardized Writer's Guide and Verification and input of newly identified procedure deficiencies, still Validation (V&V) Process. The goal of PUP is to improve with the goal of completion before restart, the technical quality and usabilrty (human factors) of procedures; this will reduce human errors and enhance PUP is 90% complete. The Centralized Procedure plant reliability by supporting quality of work, Group (CPG)is continuing to work down the number of procedures not yet upgraded.
Comments Data through 9/11/97 The work off/goa!s were adjusted from October to a November 25th completion date.
Gos!
All restart required procedure revisions and PUP I
k requirements have been reviewed and proper corrective actions have been taken prior to restart.
Dera Source: W.J Charant x6416 l Arv..ysis by:
W R Watson x6245l owner:
W R Watson x6245 A 32
Indspondant Corrcctivo Action Vorificction Progrcm Recdinoco Millstone 1 - September 1997
(
Progress: The work remaining Is on schedule for this period.
100%
80%
ICAVP Work remalrdng as of W12/97 lI 60%
l40%
Good Goal: Ready for I
ICAVP 11/%7 o%
1 i
f i
I I
Jan Foo Mar Apr May Am JJ Aug Sep oct Now oec (MICAVP Remaining Worx Off/Goall Raw Dets Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jm Jd Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ICAvPRats.es 100%
95%
67%
45%
42%
32%
31 %
29%
27%
work Oftcoal 42%
07%
32%
26 %
1e%
0%
o%
Dennition AnalyeWAction This indicator measures progress in readiness for independent Significant progress has been made on the GE stop work Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP). For MP1, this order. GE was released on August 30,1997 to start all consists of the following systems:
work on the first 17 systems required for ICAVP. Work on the remainder 25 systems will be released shortly.
TBSCCW Cors Spray Based on the revised GE schedule, the first 17 systems Service Water Emerg Diesel Generator are 6 weeks behing schedule.
RBCCW Gas Turbine Generator A
Rm Ventrooling OV E sonW rece% ass @neMe N RWCU 125 Volt DC Electrical effort have conflicting priorities for plant work, whereby Condensate Vital AC the equivalent support for CMP effort is only 50% This Nuclear toetrumentation instrument AC will have an impact on the November 8,1997 date for Standby Uquid Control ICAVP readiness. The impact is being evaluated at this time. Preliminary indications show a 6-week slippage
' Original 17 Systems based on the GE schedule.
The dispiayed % value is a weighted average for progress within the 17 systems hsted in the Pi 6, Pl 7, and PI 8 arenas.
Goal Comments The Unit 1 goal is to be ready for ICAVP / Scheduled 1 t/8/97.
September data is through 9/12/97.
Forecast completion is being evaluated.
Data prior to 4/23 is estimated.
l Analysh! by:
C. Weecten x6803l Owner:
Data Source: CE Scorecard E. Patet x5729 A-33
Configuration Managemcnt Plan Progroco Millstsna 1 - S:ptember 1997 (orogress: Submittal of this document to the NRC is on schedule to meet the WJON8 gon!.
m.
10CFR$0 54(f) work remaining as of 9/12/97 e0% -
[
4 11IIBf W GM Feb Mar Apr May JLai Jd Au)
Sep Od Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
( M 50.54(f) Remaining
-G-Work OftCoal l Raw Dets Feb-97 Mar-97 Apr 97 May-07 JLn97 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct-07 Nov-97 Dec 97 Jan-98 Feb-98 Mar 98 50 54d) Remameng 85%
75%
73%
68%
63%
61 %
50%
58 %
Work OrtCoal 69%
63%
57%
50%
43%
36%
29%
22%
15%
7%
0%
- j)e rltion Analysis / Action This indicator measures progress in readiness for 10CFR50.54(f) submittal which is the NRC's Signifeant progress has been made on the GE stop work order. GE was requirement that management at each nuclear plant released on August 30,1997 to start work on the first 17 systems verify in writing that the design and operation of their required for ICAVP. Work on the remainder 25 systems will be released plants 6s consistent with what the NRC has approved, shortly. Based on revised schedule from GE, the first 17 systems are 6 and that all changes and commitments since original weeks behind schedule. Also, the NU personnel assigned to the CMP lictnsing are properly reflected in current licensing effort have conflicting priorities for plant work, whereby the equivalent documents, such as the Final Safety Analysis Report support for CMP effort is about 50%. Hence, very little total progress was made over the last 8 weeks.
l (FSAR).
For Unit 1,an analysis to set up this KPl was used as the data source and was performed as follows:
A weight was applied to each of the Project instructions as well as the ICAVP and OSTl. The computation of thtt data provided the % shown.
Goal The Unit 1 goal is for CMP to be complete by 3/30/98.
Comments Data is through 9/12/97.
To date, approximately 1030 UIRs have been written; 140 CRs initiated.
Data source. UPM Analysia l Analysis by:
E. Patel x5729l Owner:
E Patelx5729 A 34
Task Complotiono Rcquircd for Rostart Millstone 1 - September 1997
(~
Progress: Work off curves will be developed in conjunction with a revised startup schedule.
t 6
4000 3500 I4 Open tasks as of 3000 g/jyg7 gnoo 2500 1
1600 1000 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jd Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
! E Open (Restart) E Open (Undetermined) Work Oft / Goal }
Raw Dats Jan-07 F eb-07 Mar-97 Apr-97 May 07 Jurv07 Jul-07 Aug-97 Sep-07 Oct-97 Nov47 Dec-97 open (Restart) 1489 1687 2094 2113 2267 2745 3176 3146
[
open (undetermanecn 325 413 197 189 547 423
_385
$7
(
wom on/ coni Definition AnalysisfAction The total number of tasks is defined as those requiring The number of tasks required for restart is increasing closure prior to restart. Automated Work Orders (AWOs) primarily due to the approval and assignment of required for restart are not included, as they are tracked corrective actions. Work-off curves are not available at in a separate indicator. NOTE: the Open this time. The Unit I Leadship team needs to continue (Undetermined) category are those assignments that their efforts to drive down the number of UndetermLied are still being screened to determine whether they are assignments.
required for restart.
All data retrieved from AITTS.
Goal Commente Goal is to have all complete prior to restart. and have zero (0) Undetermined.
_si..
e _.....ao _
a_.,
e _e...,
A 35
Op3n Conditien Rcparts Milhtone 1 - September 1997
(_
Progress: The number of open condition Reports is trending upwstd.
2600 2400 w
Open CRs 2200 g/1 orgy
/
Good 2
Open CRs >120!
I I
days 1 1400 y1200 f
1000 800 600 400 200 0
l I
I I
I I
I I
l I
I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aus Sep Oct Nov Dec
(-5-CR's Not Closed (Total) M CR's Not Closed (>120 Days) l Rsw Dats Jan-97 Feb 97 Mar 97 Apr-97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul 97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct 97 Nov-97 Dec 97 CR's Not Closed (Total) 1680 1740 1778 2010 2235 2335 2162 2420 2420 Levol i 98 122 130 159 206 191 230 277 277 Level 2 1584 1618 1648 1851 2029 2144 1932 2143 2143 CR'e Not Closed (>120 Doys) 1275 1455 1487 1614 1646 1877 1916 Level 1 61 82 103 137 138 183 186 Level 2 1224 13'/3 1384 1477 1508 1694 1730 Definition Anstysis/ Action This indicator depicts the number of condition reports The number of CRs Open >120 days is not where it should (CRs) which have not had correctrve actions implemented be. Experience Assessment is performing an aggregate es CRs not Closed (Total). The number of these total assessment this month, September, to develop plans for CRs which are over 120 days old and have not been
- closure, deferred is depicted in the bar graph.
Note: at this point, the aggregate of Open CRs has not been assessed to determine which CRs are constrained by plant Condition Reports (CRs) are wrrtten to document conditioris. Therefore, this graph represents all CRs that are degraded or non-conforming conditions associated with not closed, plant systems, structures or components necessary to support the generation of electricity.
Gos!
Comments The goal is to have all Level i Condition Reports closed Data through 9/10/97.
(
by startup unless they have been reviewed by the Plant A
Operations Review Committee (PORC) and approved by a Unit Officer.
Data Sourg: AITis l Analysis by:
G Winters x5401l Owner:
G Winters x5491 A-36
Csnditicn Rcpgrt initiatisn end Evaluation Timoliness Millstone 1 - September 1997
(
Progreaa: success rate for August showed improvement.
i 400 350 300 Data Through 250 9/10/97 200
~
150 j
100 j
(
j f
50 i
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun N
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec j E Total CRs initiated E # Evaluations Completed 0 Completed within 30 days I Raw Dets Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 07 Jun 97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-9' Oct-07 Nov47 Dec-97 Total CRs inRisted 240 191 194 296 387 255 222 179 43 Level 1 CRs Inneted 50 30 8
29 33 22 53 30 1
Level 2 and 3 CAs innisted 190 161 186 267 354 233 160 149 42
(
8 Evaluations Coenpisted 230 164 179 287 348 219 168 58 6
Completed within 30 days 34 23 34 93 173 203 116 55 30 Success Rate 0 14 012 0 25 0.33 0 66 0 73 0 57 0.76 Definkion Anstysis/ Action This indicator depicts the initiation of Conditon Reports (CR) for The Unit I leadership placed high priority on the Unit and the number of evaluations which were not completing Arrective acten plans within 30 days, completed within the goal of 30 days.
As a result of this effort the success rate, as well as the total number of evaluations completed showed a The graph shows CR data beginning 1/1/97, and represents the step improvement in May, June and August.
current status / effectiveness of Corrective Action Initiatives.
Evaluations are considered open if they are eitner !r. an upon swtus or a pending review status prior to the approval of the corrective action plan. The latest month's data reflects the status to date.
The success rate is calculated based on the number of CRs that are 30 days old, without Corrective Action Plans approved. The success rate does not include the Level 3 CRs.
Goal Comments Goalis to complete all evaluations and identify appropriate Data. through 9/10/97.
corrective actions within 30 days.
Data Source: AITTS l Analyste by:
G. Winters x5491 l Owner; o. winters x5401 l
A 37
Canditi'::n R:pgrt Mathsd cf Discsvcry Millstone 1 September 1997
(
Progress:
The Unit continues to Identity a high percentage or cas.
100 00 70 Data Through 9/10/97 S0
$ 40 l
30 to 10 0
- I'I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec EUNn IDENTflED WINTERNAL OVERSIGHT DEXTERNAL OVERSIGHT DEvENT l Row Date Jan 07 Feb-97 Mar.97 Apr-97 May-97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep 97 Oct-97 Nov-97 Dec-07 Number of CR's Unit k1entiAed 218 177 169 277 361 218 200 141 38 Internal Overs @t 17 7
24 11 21 23 14 33 3
E xternal Overs @t 1
2 1
3 3
0 e
0 1
Event 13 5
0 5
2 3
o 5
1 Totai ndershed 249 101 194 296 387 244 222 179 43 Dept sell 10 Ratlos
[
Masntenance 0 13 0 29 0 66 0 50
(
Operatons 0 47 0 6e 0 51 0 72 Work Management 0 22 0 00 0 to 0 6e Ernneenng 0 60 0 59 0 39 0 33 Support Services 0 39 0 47 0 57 1 00 De6nition Analysis / Action This indicator represents tne percentage of CR s identified by For a Unit to be considered healthy, departments must self each of the barriers. CR s are categortzed into the following four assess as well as be entical of other Unit departments. An areas:
overall picture can be seen by looking at two new numbers. First, app!y the Department Self ID Rato at the
- Event Driven Self. revealing. an event occurs.
Unit level. For June, July, and August, the numb 6's are
- Extemal Oversight identified by NRC, JUMA, INPO, etc.
.72,.74, and.77, respectively. The goal would be to have
- Intemal Oversight identified by QAS, PORC, ISEG, these numbers approach 1.00.
NSAB, etc.
The second number is generated by taking the number of a Unit Supervisor observation, document review, Self-CRs identified AND investigated by the Unit, and divide it checking, independent / dual verification, etc.
by the total number of CRs categorized as Ur it identified.
For June, July, and August, thest numbers are.40,.45.
The department self identification ratios are a measure of the and.51, respectively, As the programs and procemes are individual department's rate of identlying their own issues.
fixed across the station, these numbers should also appror.J11.00.
Dept Seit 10 ratio =
Events:
number of CR s ID'd and investicated bv that deontment M1-97 2075 Individual entered RCA without e!cctrr'nic number of CR's investigated by that department dosimetry.
Extemal Overs!ght:
M3-97 2937 EPOP 4432 does not meet industry standards.
Goal Comments
[\\
The unit-identified percentage and the department self Data through 9/10/97.
identification ratios should be rising as the self-assessment culture matures.
Dard Source: ATTTS l AnalysJe by:
l0wner: G Winters x5401 l
A 38
Opon NRC Csmmitmants fer Rostart Millstone 1 - September 1997 l(
Progress:
While the total number of open cl:nmitments to the NRC remains high, we are reducing the number that are overdue with a goal of closing commitments on their due dates, and none open at restart.
450 400 Data Through
(
3g 9/12/97 Good 300
{
250 ll l
p 200 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jur' Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 15Open ttoms MOverdue items,:
Raw Data Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun 97 Jut 97 Aug-97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Dec 97 Open items 156 177 233
- 18 241 216 205 208 210 r
Overdue items 26 17 0
2 2
2 1
1 0
Work Off/ Goal TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Definition AnstysisfAction An NRC commitmentis:
The work off curve will be developed.
- w-tten statement ' hat is cocketed.
- verbal statement tt take a tpecific action, agreed to by an officer.
- requirement to take an iction imposed by the NRC.
The commitments counted Isere are those that need final closure with the NRC pnot to restart of the unit.
Goal Comments NRC commitments closed on due dates prescribed Data through 9/12/97.
and all closed prior to restart Work Off/Goalis for end of month.
(.
Commitments that need to be changed can be evaluated under NGP 4.06. This date reflects AITTS changes theough 9/12/97.
cara Source:
U2 Muetter x0508l Analysis by:
Ur Musiler x0508l Owner-FI Wa' pole x2191 A-39
Significant ltoms List Millstone 1 - September 1997
' (
Progress: stL due dates are currently under evaluation.
120 t00 Data through 09/11/97 o
l 6o 1
- > 40 Goat: AH ltems complete 20 by 03/01/98 0
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Ncv Dec Jan Feb
{ E Total Remaining BWork Off/Goalj Raw Data Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Au9-97 Sep-97 Oci-97 Nov 97 Dec-97 Jan 98 Feb 98 Total Romann9 108 108 108 100 100 99 99 Worm Ofi/ Goal N/A N/A N/A N/A N!4 M'A N/A
(
Definition AnalysidAction items on the Significant items List include those items Due to thes decision to scale back work and minimize (108) chosen by the NRC which require closure prior resource expenditures on Millstone Unit 1, the existing to start up. Of the 108 SIL items,100 require closure SIL due dates provided to the NRC on 04/1&'97 must packages to be submitted to the NRC. In June, the be revised. A work.off curve will be developed to NRC determined that e SIL ltems were inspection-reflect the revised completion schedule when revised related activities which did not require closure SIL due dates are established. An action plan has packages.
been drafted to address SIL item resolution with the reduced level of resources. A SIL ltem pilot resolution effort is on-going, The first SIL ltem closure package was completed and turned-over to the NRC on August 12,1997 (SIL# 2).
Goal Comments Goal: Allitems complete by 03/01/98-Data through 09/11/97.
Data Source M Janus x3181MPlAnafysis by:
P.Meer x2085MPl Owner:
P. M ner x2085MP A 40
l 10CFR50.54(f) Significant it:ms fcr R: start Millstone 1 July 1997
(
Progress: Indicator to be developed 1400 1M 1000 Good Indicator to be developed l
600 y
200 0
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec fm Open Significant items M Closed Significant items -e-Work off Goalj Row Dets May 97 Jun-97 Jub97 AuD 97 Sep.97 Od97 te,*v497 Dec.97 Og an S6grdtr. ant hems Closoft SignWennt hems
(
Work off Out Total SignWeant noms o.verrea n.m.
1
~'
Definklon AnalyeWAction
$6gnNecant items for Restart are those items being reported This is a new indicator, analysis will be provled as data to the NRC in accordance with the 10CFR$0 54(f) request accumulates, of April 16,1997.
~
Goal Commente All significant items for restart are completed on schedule.
Dete Source l AMWe% t>yt l Owner:
A41
Lic nsee Event Rapsrts Millstone 1 September 1997
(
Progresa:
Ucense Event Reports made to the NRC are trending down to the Industry standard.
16 14 12 10 Good a
4 g
Data through 9/11/97 I
E Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec iM LERs.Recent M LERs Historica! -+-Industry Standard l Raw Dets Jan 97 FebO7 Mar-97 Apr 97 May-9 7 Jun 97 Jul07 Aug-07 Sep-97 Oc197 Nov-97 Dec-97 LERa-Recent 2
1 3
2 1
o o
0 L E ns-Histoncal 2
4 to 2
6 1
o 2
3
(
LER6.YTD 4
9 22 26 33 34 34 36 39 industry Standard i
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 Definition AnalyslWAction Licensee Event Reports (LERs):
Two LERs were submitted in August and 3 LERs have been submitted in September, All five LERs irudved e are reports made to the NRC pursuant to historic.il events. One involved an error in the safety IXFR50.73 analysis for Unit No,2, and the other four resulted from
- are defined as historicalif the event did not occur the review of Technical Specification surveillance within the last 12 months procedures.
- are reported in the month of the submittal to the NRC I
0 001 Comments Data through 9/11/97.
(
gia Source:
T. L Hooper x0677l Analysis by:
T. L Hooper x0677l Owner:
R Walpole x2191 A 42
Ll nse Am:ndm nt R qu sts Millstone 1 September 1997
(
Progreas: Unit 1 is on schedule for submittet of IIconse amendment requests to support reloadandtestart 10 s
{6 3
LAR submittal data 1,
through 9/11/97 N1. i i
i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec (M LARs to be Submitted M LARs Submitted -Work Oft / Goal l Jan-97 Fotv97 Mar 97 Apr47 May 97 Jun 97 Jut 97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Dec.97 L Ana to be Submitted 4
3 2
2 1
1 0
1 1
r L ARs Submitted 2
1 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
k Worm Ott/ Goal 4
3 2
2 1
1 1
1 1
~ Definition AnaI)eis! Action License Amendment Requests (LARs) are changes to Thert are two License Arnendments required for Technical Specifications or other license changes that reload, both are submitted.
are required for restart, and that must be submitted to
- 1. Response Tirre Testing. submitted on the NRC for approval.
2/7/97, in a telecon 7/22/97 NRC requested a FSAR change to be implemented prior to issuance of amendment for Response Time Testing.
- 2. Allowed Outage Time (AOT), submitted on W97, approved on May 28,1997, implemented ti/26/97.
Yhere are four license amendments required for start.
up, three are submitted.
- 1. SBGT Vent and Purge
- 3. Neutron Monitoring
' For the SBGT Vent and Purge amendment, the NRC only actMty for the month,
' issued RAl which has questic' 41 the approach for the PTSCR. Engineering is corecucting a review of other utilities to determine an attemate approach for venting Goat and purging containment.
All LARs requiring NRC review submitted by Oct 21, The fourth issue is GL 87 09. Operations is reviewing
('
1997.
this issue with other LAR priorttles, and will propose a nM schedi.de.
Data Source:
R Walpole X2191l Analysis by:
M ermath X2494l Owner:
A Walpole X2191 A 43
RCstcrt Msdificatiens Awaiting Impicmontatien Millstone 1 September 1997
(
Progress: percent compiere tor unoinooring in currentrat u. ono construction is en compiere.
60 Fiestart Mod 46 -
/
data through j
4o.
/
9597 i
j 35' Good l
30 26
't0 -
16-10 6
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1
[M Mods Ro4ated to Fmid MMods Awalting Engmoenng -S-Work Off/ Goal i
Raw Data i
Jan 97 Feb97 Mar-97 Apr47 May97 Jun 97 Jul97 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nov-97 Mods Released to Field 4
10 10 P0 20 20 18 18 18
[
Mods Awamng Engineenng 45 39 31 22 10 19 19 19 19
\\
Total Moda Roma6neng 49 49 49 42 39 39 37 37 37 Work Oft / Goal 49 49 46 42 39 30 37 37 37 Definition AnalyelWAction The total number of outstanding modifications identified As of 9597, the total number of plant modifications as required prior to restart that have not been tumed required for start up is 72. Of these 23 are Engineering over to Operations.
Only and 49 are Plant Modifications. Of the 49 Plant Mods,12 are completed and 37 are required to be Implemented prior to restart.
Reduction in resources has impacted progress.
- Work off goal to t>o revised.
Goal Comments All start up related design modifications completed Data through 9S97 prior to restart.
l C
... _.. m,.n.a, un.,,,,. e,. e _,
iO_ ma_.,
A44
AWO Status Millstone 1 August 1997 l (
Progresa: an Turbine has been nostored 4000 s500 Work Order data through s000 -
. p/
9/0097 PbOO <
Good
,t 2000 4
l 1000 600-p g
g g
o
'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AQ sep Oct Nov Dec
[L.'AMR AWO Mother AWO -+-MR AWO Goal -G-Total AWO Goal j i
Raw Dets Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul97 AuD 97 Sep-97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Dec 97 Total AWO Backlog 2636 3041 3290 3112 3004 3201 3137 3089 MR AWO Goal 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Total AWO Goal 500 600 500 600 boo 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 MRAWO 2281 2581 2798 2629 2602 2788 2723 2678 Other AWO 355 460 492 483 462 413 414 411 Definition AnalyslalAction
- Automated Work Order ( AWO) Backlog is the total Gas Turbine has been restored to an available status, number of corrective maintenance / condition ddven (non-recuaing) AWOs.
The focus for the unit is implementation of Control Room i
Ventilation Mods to support MP 3 Restart and House The total does not include: AWOs awalting rotest, in Heating Boiler Outage in preparation for plant closure, work planned for future outages, AWOs thet winterization, support field work already included in backlog (i.e.
1 insulation, staging, etc.) and non power block AWOs.
The total number of AWO's required prior to startup has decreased, although the workoff rate is impacted by the
- Safety algnificant systems are defined as Maintenance following:
Rule risk ansor safety significant systems.
l
- 1. AWO's being generated to support future work.
- 2. Resources to perform physical work are at a minimum as a result of resource allocation and in house assistance to other units & CMP Project.
Goel Comments Goal < 500 total AWOs at start up, < 350 Maintenance Data through 9/08/97.
Rule risk andor safety significant system AWOs at start up, and no AWOs that are required for restart at start up, Data Source E. Annano no492l Analysis by:
D. Teece x4951l Owner:
J. Law v4373 A 45 J
~
Tcmparary Modifications Millstone 1 September 1997
(
Progreas:
Due to recent changes In manpower and work scheduling, the gos!Is set at the current level until a revised schedule is developed.
I 6
1 70-60-60 -
OOOd d0' Temp Mod I
30-data through M,
9/10/97 20-10-0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec
[M Temp Mods M Outage Support -e-Work Ott/ Goal j Raw Dats Jan-97 Fet> 97 Mar 07 Apr07 May 97 Jun 97 Jul07 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct 97 Nov 97 D00 97 Temp Mads 69 69 67 66 66 65 61 43 41 Outage Support 11 13
(
Totalinstallec 69 69 67 66 66 65 61 64 64 Work Oft' Goal 69 69 67 66 66 65 61 54
$4 54 54 64 Definition Analyels/ Action A temporary modification is a modification to plant design that is short term in nature and not part of the permanent plant design change process.
Temporary Modifications to permanent plant design are categorized here two ways: ' Outage Support' are those directly tied to physical work to piant equipment in an outage condition, and ' Temp Mods' are all others.
Goal Comments The goal is set at the current level of 54 until a revised 13 of the Temporary Mods, are for outage support schedule is developed, at which time a better estimate (e.g. temporary power, etc.). These are being tracked of tne work off rate will be established.
separately as of August 1997.
C.
Data through 9/1097
~
osta source:
C. Ackwy x0771l Arialysis by:
R. schmidinocht l Owner:
P. Hennenkamp X0466 A 46
Centrcl Resm and Annunciater Deficioncles Millstone 1 - September 1997 l (-
gost is set at the current level untlI a revised schedule is developed, Progress:
Due to recent changes in insnpower and work scheduling, the i
35 30 26 lI1 Gmd
- 0
{
I Defceeney data I
10 0"9h IIOI O
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
( M Total Deficiencies -G-Work Oft' Goal !
Row Dets Jan.97 Feb 97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May-97 Jun 97 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov-97 Dec97 Total Defriencies 74 P4 21 16 16 18 18 15 19 Work OftOut 24 24 21 16 16 16 18 15 19 19 19 19 Definition AnalynisfAction Control room instruments, recorde*1, indicators, and The total deficiencies count displayed is the sum of the annunciators that function improperly that could affect ol$previously identified Control Room Panel (CRP) the ability 01 the operators to monitor and control plant items and the new items. The total count reflects CRP
- condtons, deficiencies on operable and shutdown risk significant equipment.
Goele Comments The goal is set at the current level of 19 until a revised schedule 18 developed, at which time a better estimate of the
(
v'tk off rate will be established.
Data Source:c. Ackley l Analyele by: R. Schmidtnocht l Owner: P. Hinnenkamp A-47
Oporater'Nork Arcunds Mllistone 1 September 1997
(
Progresa:
Due to recent changes In manpower and work scheduling, the goalis set at the current level until a revised schedule Is developed, i
l 16 Work Around data through 9/1W97 Good 6
i I
O I
I I
I I
i t
i t
I i
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug bp Oct Nov Dec l
[M Operator Work Arounds --G-Work Off/ Goal !
R*w Dats Jan 97 Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr-97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct97 Nov 97 Oee-97 l
Operator Work Arounds 12 12 11 11 11 11 14 ja Work Oft' Goal 12 12 11 11 11 11 14 14 14 14 14 Definition Analysla/ Action
)
Operator Work Arounds are conditions requiring an operator to work with equipment in a manner other than origina: design which could:
l
- 1. Potential!y impact safe operation during a plant transient, i
- 2. Potentially impose significant burden during normal operation,
- 3. Create nuisance condition due to recurring equipment 4
l deficiency,
- 4. Distract an operator from noticing a recurring condition.
i i
Gos!
Comments 3 Operator work arounds were fixed, however,6 new The goal is set at the current level of 14 until a revised operator workarounds were identified in August.
schedule is developed, at which time a better estimate of
{
the work off rate will be established.
Data through 0/1097
(
1
)
Data Source:
C Ackley x0771 Analysis by:
A schtmdinochtl Owner:
P. Hinnenkamp XO466 A 48
Prac:'duro Rovision Backlsg Mllistone 1 July 1997
( ?(Og7988; An achievable schedule has been estabIlshed to support unit restart.
450 400 350 Data through 9/12/97 300 Good 250 l
200 Y
Goal; complete q$g procedure revisions p
{by 3/1/98 1m
^
y p
60
+
0
~
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May M Other Procedures M PUP Procedures -e-PUP Work Ofi/ Goal Other Work Off/ Goal l Raw Data Jun 97 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Dec 97 Jan 98 Feb 98 Mar 98 Apr98 May-98 e otal Roma6rwng 536 529 517 451 Other Procedures 441 432 422 362 PUP Procedures 95 97 95 89 PUP Work Ott/ Goal 95 85 75 65 51 45 35 25 15 0
Other Work Ofi/ Goal 441 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Definition Analysis! Action Procedure Revision Backlog is the total number of new The biggest barrier to completion of Operations procedures or procedure revisions required or desired for procedure revisions is a shortage of SOR qualified
- restart, Procedure Screeners. Qualification of additional Millstone Procedure Upgrade Project (PUP) (Phase Ill).
screeners is not currently possible, due to the Upgrades Procedures at Millstone Station to a Standard suspension of formal training at NTD. This condition Writer's Guide, Verification and Validation (V&V) process, has existed for several months, Formal requests for The goal of PUP is to improve the technical quality and restoring this training program have been made, usability (human factors) of procedures; this Will reduce human errors and enhance plant reliability by suppotting Comments quality of work Work off curve is based on 100% complete by 3/1/98, This provides 3 months from the scheduled completion Goal of 50.54f discovery phase to complete 50.54f All procedure revisions required for restart completed prior resolution and procedure to 3/1/98 revistorvapproval/ training / implementation.
The number of procedure deficiencies is expected to
{
increase significantly, once the 50.54F project begins to finalize their results for each system.
Data Source:
Ops. Maint., l&C Analysis by:
Pete S::hilke x0421 Owner:
Paul Hmnenkartp r0466 A49
Millsteno Ovcraight Rocsvcry Gap Chart August 1997
(
Progreea:
Management attention is being tocused on prob 1em areas.
i 100 %
90%
60%
70%
i s
i t,0%
40%
30%
20%
i 10%
0%
Staffing Procedures Recovery Atrats Surve Belf AITTS Plan Anaess-mords l
5 Actual 5 Goal l
l Mew Date 4
Apr 97 May-97 Jm07 JJ 0' AtrJ 97 Sep-97 Or197 Nov-97 Dec 97 Ja498 Fot> D8 Mar 94 Staffing. Actual 121 118 118 118 118
(
StaffinD. Goal
__134 134 134 1 34 1 34
?
Procedurcs. Actual" P3 26 P7 28 30 Procedures. Goal 31 30 30 30 30 Recovery Plan. Actual 88 88 100 11P 132 Recovery Plan. Goal 119 99 170 170 179 Audits. Actual P
6 4
4 3""
Audits. Goal P
5 4
6 3
6 7
6 1
Surveillances. Aetual'"
10 33 26 31 P5 Surveinances. Goal "'
34 45 43 44 0
j Self Assessments. Actual
- NA NA 6
NA NA NA NA Sell Assessments. Goal' NA NA 6
NA NA 4
NA NA 13 AITTS Cunent. Actual 169 140 166 196 P40 AITTS Cunent Goal 206 202 P36 P61 279 Definition Analyela/ Action This indicator measures progress in Millstone Oversight
'"' Audit previously scheduled for July was exited in j
Recovery.
August.
The two bars measure actual petsentage vs. the goal.
- Sett Assessment Goals set by the quarter.
" All procedures were completed in August. The last procedure (NOOP 1.01) will be effective 9/22.
"' Actual surveillances indicates scheduled and unscheduled Goalis scheduled only Goal Commente
(.
On 5/27 the total number of flocovery Plan action items was increased by 34 and the schedule due dates were revloed to provide more realistic goals.
Date Sourcer M BelM 4456l Ans&sAs by:
V Papaipoll $246lOsvnert O Goebel:4300 A 50
Milloteno Ovcrsight Prcecduro Status Sept:mber 1997
!(
Progress:
work complete.
i 40 I
4 4
v i.i pr 4u,
. so 30 1
A A -
e' A
A A
A A
Illl 0
t i
i i
t i
1
- t t
t i
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Eissued (Cumutstive) i Row Dets 8
Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oct-97 Nov.97 Dec 97 Jan-ce Feh9e issued (Cumulettve) 6 23 26 27 P8 P9 30 Total Not issued 17 8
6 3
2 1
0 DeNnition Analyela/ Action All procedures completed and issu6d.
I 4
}
Goal Comments Dele Source J Beauchamp l AnaYsis by: J Beauchamp l0wner: V. Papadopoli 4
A 51
. ~.. - -
Millst nD Ovcraight R:33vcry Plan Asti n it:m Wcrk Off Curva
(
Progress: NO anticipates being prepared for NRC review by the end of September, 100 100 '
140-110 -
\\
- 100, Data at of 9/13."J7 1
to l
I 40 -
20 O,
k A,
,I h,3khb
~~~~~~~r.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
b
,tP
~
s u a s g, bb b
s ssses
- h. b t9 V
n s
f
- +
- Work Off SchedJe
+ Action flams Remaining l
Mew Date Romaining iteme 7/17/97 7/31/97 877/97 9 697 9/1397 977/97 107597 I tr?917 1247/97 1/31/98 P/?&S8 37&S8 Actual 70 67 47 47 47 Current schedule 70 64 40 34 28 F2 0
8 6
3 3
0 Schedule Vanance 0
3 7
13, 19
(-
DeNnition Anatyrist/ ction This Chart displaV8 the work Off Curve for the action items in W'"8 0"
- D #* ** ""
the Nuclear Oversight Recovery Plan. Depicted is the areas (t) Formal Trairdng Programs Training Departmort tes toen m b support Nudear MgPt Wye action 4 underwat b histonc progress in Completing action items and the to teenm, weekty trairung autgects recessary for restart wit t>e anticipated work off schedule for iemaining items, conduded ty NO blafi (2) Nuc6 ear Gale'y Ergneering A new intiatve to enhance tre portormance of Ogerstng E xpertence Review and ISEO evalustsons has tegun and is supected to te in pace try early Auget (3) Licensing commitmeris and past JUMA assesament open items. Work is contrung on vnplomanung commaments and past assesament frdings. The independent Assessment Team (IAT) provided adstional gudence m tus area.
Some add 4onal actorn items have teen comp 6sted. however, the qualty of tre dosure packages must te improved belure acceptance by be VP Nudear Oversight Management attention is teing erected to ensure Fat all ac6on llems re34 red to support MP3 readiness for restart are comp 6eled ty
- 93097, Completion of to 179 action hems in the pan does not ensure that NO is ettoctave A speckJ NRC inspection of Oversigrt (station and Nudoar Oversight) is schedJed for 10/1 1W13 M a$3iton, NO anticipates having the (AT Fertorm a folkmup assesstnert prior to MP3 restart.
Goal Comments The goal is to implement an effective overs 6ght organtzations The wat off curve has teen redrawn b show actual progress since and to asse$s unit readine$$ for testart, inception of De pian and the antsoipated work off rate (Ea$er vers #ws ed accurate 9 reRed assessments whose due dates wre not known)
Aceon tems due 90097 support MP2 and MP1 restart and NO C
conersious improvement Data Source T. Houytm x0270! Analyste Ly:
T Houghton x0270l Owner:
O Goebel u4XO A 62
MillstEno OvCraight Audit Sch5dule Adhercnco August 1997
(
Progreaa:
Planned audits will be completed on an annual basis.
e to e
Data Through 8/2797 7
t I
I Jan Feb Mar Apr May M
JJ Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec (M Audits Performed M Audits from past months -e-Audits Scheduled j f
Row Dets Jan 97 Fet>-97 Mar.97 Apr-97 May-9 7 Jun97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct97 Nov-97 Dec 97 Audne Scheduled 2
4 4
2 6
4 6
3 5
7 6
1 Audas Performed 2
4 4
2 6
4 4
2
(
Audns from past enonths 1
Definition AnalyeWAction This charts depicts the schedule adherence of Cversight ne auW exded in Agst:
Audrts at Millstone Station. The audit schedule for the year was approved in January,1997. The audit is considored CorrectNe Maintenance & Maintenance Rute.
performed when the exit occurred.
The Corrective Action audit pre exit debrief will occur on Bf29/97 (counted as complete).
The EOP audit will exit on 9/5/97.
The Corrective Maintenance audit not performed in July was combined with the Maintenance Rule audit and performed together, Goal Comments Goat. Perform a!! audits as scheduled.
o a-e -- -\\ a-o. e,,
e -- -\\....,
A 53
Millstcno Ovcraight Survcillanco Schcdulo Adhcrcnco August 1997
(
Progress:
schedule adherence was 100% in August.
f4 Data Through 40 OI27/97 30 4
0 l
I i
l I
I I
I I
I I
I I
Jan Feb Mar Ap.
May Jun Jul Aug
ap Oct Nov Dec Mar Apr WScheduled Survealances Performed M Unscheduled Performed
-G-Surveillances Scheduled Row Dets Je97 Feb97 Mar 97 Apr97
- May9, Jun-97 Jut 97 Aug-97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov-97 Dec 97 Surv Scheduled 22 16 19 34 46 43 44 9
Sary Podormed (sched) 9 9
12 18 33 25 18 9
j ~(
Performed (unscheduled) 14 12 11 17 7
8 13 16 Performed'Seneduled by Und-Une*
6/6 2/7 7/8 6/11 67 7/8 7/8 1'3 Una 2 2/12 3/4 2/4 7/17 17/26 1177 6'28 S/3 UnN3 2/4 4/5 37 L'8 10/12 6/8 L'8 S'3 Definition AnalyslWAction This chart depicts the Oversght surveillance scheduled and the Data Thrnuch B27/97.
number of them performed. The table shows the breakdown of the scheduled surveillances performed vs. those scheduled by unit. It The number of suvell!ances scheduled is limited to committed also shows th6 total number of unscheduled surveltlances surveillances. There was 100% success in performing performed.
surveillances that we have commitments to perform.
Gos!
Comments The goalis 100% schedule adherence As of May 1.1997 August data:
st veillance perfortnance duration will b ? no more 'han 2 days-(Performed)
Scheduled Unscheduled Unit 1 3
3
(
Unit 2 3
9 Unit 3 3
4 oere source L Borek x3086l Anaysis by:
L Borek x3086l Owner:
P Rohardson ud30 i
A44
Millst3nD Oversight Self Assessment Gap Chart August 1997
(
Progres8:
sett. assessments are being performed by att units. Both programs and report quality vary from unit to unit.
20 Goal =20 Data as of 8/27/97 10 I
o May 97 Je97 JJ97 Aug 97 Sep-97 Oct97 Nov-97 Dec 97 Jan 98 Fot>99 l
N Mllatone 1 5 utstone 2 OMkstone 3 Raw Dets Self Asseamments Points May 97 Jm07 JJ 97 Aug-97 Sep.97 Oct G7 Nov 97 Dec 97 Jan.98 FotrDe Mar 98 Ape-98 Millstone 1 66 12 00 Millstone 2 8 00 12 00 12 00 16 00 Millstone 3 15 75 15 30 16 00 14 00 a
Definition AnalyslWAction This indcator displays the results of the Oversight evaluation of
' No self assessments provided for June or July the quality of the U;Jt self assessments. Repons are evaluated assessments.
for points using a checklist of attributes. The possible number of points is 20.
i Goni Comments 20 Points.
Dets Source-M Baldni a4456l Analysis by:
V Papatton v5245l Owner:
O Goet* n4X10 A 65
Millstsno Ovcraight AITTS Assignmcnts
(
Progress:
The number at overdue Itema decIInod this week.
am j
frs
{
MHill 1:
250 rnor u.,,, w ar u.,,,
s,,,
u,7 ans,
,,,,r
,9,1
.w on,r on.,,
l W Overdue ECurrent l Raw Date Feb 97 Mar.97 Apr-97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul07 a'1 f.97 a7297 87997 9597 91297 99997 Over& e 41 68 47 62 70 65 45 39 30 46 39 30 Currer.
13o 16' 169 140 166 196 19s too tss 246 F35 146 Total 171 213 Po6 P02 236 P61 feo 779 Pes P92
- 14
??6 NRC Commitments 4
17 4
3 4
9 17 17 14 11 8
6 und Restart items 106 114 119 126 125 87 112 86 92 92 47 es Definition Analyels! Action l
Displayed are the number of A'R assignmeets for the Nuct ar Breakdown of 9/19 deta by Department:
Oversight Orgeniration at Millstone in the Action item Tracking Overdue /rplat and Trending System ( AITTS). Both ovntdue and total yp g
assignments are shown.
N IN Assignments made to Overs.Jht groups that are designateu as commitmet t to the NRC (assignment type-CATC in AITTS) are ECP 0/5 listed in the table, as well as assignments made to Oversight A&P 16/52 groups that the Millstone units have designated as necessary to A&E 1/126 be completed for their unit restart.
00
"""'"O'
"'" " " 9'"
" " '"Q "
Data is based on all Millstone Oversight alert groups.
be completed for startup on Unit 3.
i Gc 11 Commente Goat; No overdue items. Any items determined to require item due dates are being screened to deterrrune any which resolution prior to key events (ICAVP, OSTI or moda changes) require resolution prior to key esents, such as ICAVP, OSTI, or are compiers in a time 9 manner.
mode Char ges Dora source:
M Baktra m4456l AnerysAs by V. Papatroll ts24!,l Caner:
D Gxbel n4300 A $e
Status cf Ovcraight Csnditirn RcpSrts Millst:ne 1
(
Progress: continued progress Is evident in reducing the number ofIssues open for eval <tation, n
it0 100 11 Good f>0 4
I
,I J, l 8,I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
l 1
s s
5 i 1
e 1
4 s
g Elevel 10 pen Elevel 2 0 pen ulevel30 pen l New Dets Fetv97 Mar 97 Apr97 May 97 Jurip' J4 97 k'1997 a72!97 879'97 9'997 9/12'97 k'i t 'i,*
Total CRa 164 181 Po6 P32 P14 PP4 166 ifo 176 176 177 174 Operi 1P5 135 133 ito,
98 78 36 39 43 do 39 36 L1/m3o days 11'io 11/1o to/9 a7 6'6 t/3 2/1 S'3 4 '?
6/3 fd3 fv3 12/m3o days 194/102 1Po/113 11a'96 13&'116 90'f19 71/45 3271
'4276 1476 31/24 3a72 27/16 l.S'33o days o9 49 fi e d '4 37 19 19 49 49 49 49 4/3 l
Re6obred 39 46 77 62 116 146 131 131 133 136 138 1 38 Definition AnotyeWAction This graph displays the status of Condition Reports (CRs) initiated by Nuclear Oversight for adverse, discrepant, or otter conditM teeding improvement,
Open. Condition has been identified. The evaluation for j
reportability and operability, failure mode and'or root cause has not been performed, or, has been performed, but not yet sporoved f' Wived Condition has an a*ceptert soluthn, a clear owner, a commitment for completion and a corrective action date and plan. The corrective action has not been completed by the unit.
Overall evaluation of the unit based on this KPl is as follows:
SAT (Green) No Level 1 or Level 2 CRs open e 30 days without an approved corrective ac$on plan, UNSAT (Red) Any Level 1 CR open > 30 days without an approved corrective action plan.
MARGINAL (Yel60w) No Level 1 CR open > 30 days but a Level 2 CR open >30 days without an approved corrective a: tion plan.
Goal Commente
(
No Level 1 or 2 CRs open > 30 days, o.,. a__
M -. 4 % a. 4,.
_.s,oio_.,,
_e,..,m A-67
Status ef Ov rsight C nditirn Pcports Mllist:no 2
(
Progreae: continued poveress is evident in reducing the number ofissues open for evaluation 160 100 1
I I
I I
i 1
l l
1 1
I i
i k
k k
g 1
g g
E h!
g 8
I I
I 4
5
)
E E
5 e
h Level i Open E Level 2 Open OLevel 3 Open l New Date F ette?
Mar-97 Apr.97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul-97 a/16'97 a72'97 a-79'97 9 S 97 9/1217 9/16'97 Total CRs a7 95 107 108 124 109 113 114 til 1PP 1P9 iP8 Open 60 66 78 70 to do 77 22 10 75 33 32
(
L1/>30 days 2/1 P/P 2'?
S'2 4 '3 4 '?
29 2'?
1/1 to im 10 L2/>30 days 6811 63%8 6&%9 63%P 60/41 32/14 169 161 1ES 21/6 Pa'4 27/8 L S'33o days 09 of 6/1 4 '3 61 4'1 49 4/4 3'3 S'3 4 '3 43 5
Resolved 27 io 31 38 64 69 91 02 92 of 96 96 Dehution AnalyelefAction This graph displays the status of Condition Reports (CRs) initiated by Nuclear Oversight for adverse, discrepant, or other conditions needing improvement.
Open. Condition has been 6dentified. The evaluat:on for reportability and operability, failure mode and or root cause has not been performed, or, has been pertonried, but not yet approved.
Resolveil Condition has an acc6pted solution, a clear owner, a commitment for completion and a corrective action date and plan The corrective action has not been compleled by the unit.
Overall evaluation of the unit based on this KPI la as follow 3.
SAT (Green) No Level 1 of Level 2 CRs open > 30 daya without an approved corrective action plan.
UNSAT (Red) Any Level 1 CR open > 30 days without an approved corrective action plan.
MARGINAL (Yellow) No Level 1 CR open > 30 days but a Level 2 CR open >30 days without an approved corrective acton plan.
Goal Comments
(
No Level 1 or 2 CRs oi en > 30 days.
Does sowee u Baksni 44r4I Analysis by:
V. Paretpc4 a5245lOwnec D Goet,el 4300 A 68
Status Cf Oversight Canditisn R:psrts Millst:ne 3
(
Progreea: continuedprneress Is endent In reducing the number ofIssues open for evatustion.
e 150 Ico
- I l h m..
Good i
lifililllillill 5 Level 1 Open Wlevel 2 Open DLevel 3 Open l Raw Dets Feb-97 Mar 97 Apr 97 May 97 Jun97 Jul 97 S'15'97 8'22'97
&79'97 9'5/97 9/12 3 S'10'97 Total CRs 162 179 200 213 247 29o 291 209 201 207 2o8 207 Opers 36 100 to 7a 73 68 64 35 31 36 36*
31'
('
Li/33o days 11/6 15/11 11/10 101 9 '4 2/1 1/1 2/1 4 '2 E'2 4 '1 2/1
(
LPl>30 da, a 85/63 9165 86/60 615o 63'32 65/o 4 &'3 33/4 27/4 31/6 20/3 27/3 LT33o days o@
1/o 2/1 6/3 1/1 19 09 6'o o/o 09 19 to Resolved f.6 to 101 135 174 222 237 164 170 171 172 176 Definition Analyels!Acticn This graph displays the status of Condition Reports (CRs)
- Totalincludes CRs without significan:e code in initiated by Nuclear Oversight for adverse, discrepant, or other AITTS.
conditions reeding improvement.
Open Condition has been identified. The evaluation for reprtablIsty and operability, faPure rnode and/or root causs has not been performed, or, has been performed, but not yet approved.
Resolved. Condition has an accepted solution, a clear owner, a commitment for completion and a corrective action date and plan. The cor ective action has not been completed by the unit.
Overall evaluation cf the unit based on this KPi ls as foews:
SAT (Green) No Level 1 or Level 2 CRs open > 30 days without an approved corrective action plan.
UNSAT (Red) Any Level 1 CR open > 30 days with0Jt an approved corrective action plan.
MARGINAL (Yellow) No Level 1 CR open > 30 days but a Levei 2 CR open >30 days without an approved corrective action plan.
Goal Comments
(
No Level 1 or 2 CRs open > 30 days,
- o. _
M -. 4 6u-,.,a,,
n ~.,4 a
~.,,4 -
A 59
l Nuclear Empl:yee C:ncerns Prcgrarn Prcgrcss
)
Millst:ne - Sept:mber 1997 l
l
(
Progress:
The number at unresolved concerns has been growing since May 1997.
i 65 60 65
/
Data Through 60 r-P31/97 46 40 j
i r ul~_.
s l.i Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec M Rec'd Resolved (This Month) 6 JTotal Resolve &Pending Closure M Resolve &Gverdue
-*-Total unresolved Neev Dete b-
~
u:
~,
1996-1997 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nav Received 6
8 12 12 27 7
17 18 16 Rate / Year 7P 96 144 144 324 84 Pod P16 192 Resolved 11 P3 13 to 21 12 9
o 8
Unresolved a 45 Dayt 11 4
12 14 16 11 17 27 P1 UnresoNed 45-90 Days 5
3 2
5 17 8
8 10 21 Unresolved >90 Days 20 14 6
3 1
4 6
12 14 Total Unresolved 36 P1 20 22 28 23 31 49 66 Resoko&Perung Closure 22 31 37 49 67 60 67 46 Resolve $ Overdue l
0 0
0 1
P P
2 2
NOTE: Matistone data listed through C31/97.
Opflnftlery -
+A 2O Analyp}gfActfon ' t'
,1; The ECP receives, and atterrpts to resolve, concems which are both The riunter W riew concems stayed roughly constant dunng the reponing d6rectly safety related and non-safety related This data reflects both types pened compared with the past few rnonths 7he f CP e contmump to work of concems eth kne rnanagement to focue etsention on potentet hotspots
,",,,,,,,,",,,,",',',"pators retamed by the ECP, the woruoed assocated wnh Beginnmo Ja3uary 1,1997 the Empbyee Concoms Pi, gram btroduced 8*
' Resolved
- as a category of concem status To meet this condatori a concem rnust have an accepted solutbn, a clear owner, a me' anal
,,,,,, powmg nunt+r of concems has outstrpped resources The everage age ce the unresolved concems le 69 6 ys, compared to 75 days commitment for cortpletH"i and a correcttvo action completion date and in May The TCP is contmumg to focus as efforts ori concem resolutici
' p si. The data b this table reflects this now defintion r+e enore contract byestgators have been reau,s e,oned and et been Beginnng with January data. ECP ta ploting the number of wort aunng eat Septenter.
ResolvetPendog Closure concems as wet as any cone: ems which have been identified as resolved, but whoot correcthre acton cortpletion is The nunter W covems that s'e roeolved but pending closure has been overdue lor cortpletion, redaced to es lowest level sece Aprli 7he ECP e8, orts to close reso4ed concems shomstsgntcantprogress ei Aapost
' rk ~
r v m.*1 *m
': QOgl
- f ~
~
8
- rL'
~
~.
-Comments
~~
The ECP Goalls to have no unresolved concem older than one year by Statistics displayog 'ResolvedPerviang Closure
- teflect trendng 2/11'97, no untosolved concem onder than 3 months by 5/1117, and no issues vs case files to mnko t*iss nformatoi cor Nstent wth other
(
unresolved concem oloer than 45 days by 7/1157 categories The long term goal estabhshed b the ECP Comprehensive Pian calls for concem resoluton m Rhb 45 days of mlhal fahng Date Souroe: 't. Van Voorhis a4266 l AnaYele by: G Van Voorbes n4266 l Owner:
E Morgan a4335 A 60 l
1 1
Number cf NU ond ilRC Rec:lved C:ncerns Millst n3-Sept:mber 1997
(
progreae:
During August the ECP continued the general trend of receiving more concerns than the NRC.
80 70 40 60 Data through 40 6"J1/97 30 kkh i
=LL 1994 1995 1998 Jar.47 Feb 97 Mar 97 Ap 97 May 97 Jun 97 Jul97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Oct 97 Nov 97 Dec 97 5 NU RecV ftNRC Rec'd 2h*
~
IN
?-'"
h' W > V O Rets'Oete
' ' ' ~ '
1997 Jan Feb Mar pr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
_ Oct Nov Dec.
NU Received 8
12 12
.7 7
17 18 to NRC Received 6
4 5
4 4
7 12 5
g NU Rec'd YTD a
20 32 59 E6 83 101 117
\\
NRC Rec *d "TD 6
10 15 19 23 30 42 47 NyE Data listed through e/31/97.
MnJtion * '
a+
- 'i?'
t:
AnalyeWAction' w
'3"-
ECP concems include; srce the ndcator was established m January, NU has generalty s.on recekmg slightly more concems than thou receNed by thu
- 1) Nuclear safety concems, which are nuMeer r r radiological NRC. %e r@ruents a %a from the relaWe nM recWed events or observations believed to violate ;gulatory requirements by i10 and the NRC h 1994,1995. e d 1996. This change suggests more e sliengness of employees to estrust the resolution of their or NU policy of procedure concems to ther own line rannagement and the ECP. The rate at which concoms are being receNed by both N') and the NRC Mditates
- 2) Other safety concems that more concems will be received h 1997 by both organtrations than were receNed m the peak pr of 1990. This suggests
- 3) Other employee concerns which are not directly safety related employus are r'ere wiling tu bnnu 15er concems forward to an orgenizMonof theirchooseg NRC allegations include concems received from licensee employees, contractors, the general public and Concems Self-July and August 4to reg rum.ts a correcton of NRC allegaton generated by NRC stift based upon obse tations andor med.a repods. Pnot hlormaton from WRC Regen i Dave allegalens on a
- by unt* buis, even when an issue was site woe This procou reports.
Inaccuralely drove up reported allegatons. Beginning with the report the NRC is aggregating allegatons M the same manner which NU uses to report concems. Meaningful compartson is now possible.
- b.. i 'la
. a L 0001 L:
"l'*
+,:As.
~
'.'N k2L: Cc.-~ ente -+6 a - ~
Dets Source: O. van Wochis x4268 l AnsYsle by: 0 Van voorhls x4266 lCwner:
E Morgan a43*5 A 61
Millst ne Empisyc3 CsncCrns Csnfid ntiality Trcnd September 1997
(
Progreas:
High levels of cont;Jentinitty walvers Indicate continued employee confidence in the ECP process.
n 100%
90 %
Data Through 8/31/P7 70%
60%
60 %
40%
M%
0%
l
_ _,I
_ _A _
_ _,a i
o,.
i i
i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec 5 Anonymous E Confidentiality 0 No Confidentiality D3rd Party g o,r,
_a u, uf-
,=
,4 y_,7 1997 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Anonymous 4
1 6
7 1
6 3
1 l
nonfdentiality 1
2 1
4 2
1 2
4 No Confidentiality 3
9 6
16 4
10 13 11 l
3rd Party 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 T7taf Recewed tiy Month 8
12 12 27 7
17 18 16 DeRnition f
Analyelo!4ction
.n' x.
d For each concem filed by an identified concemed individual, The percentage of indtviduals walving confidentiality he/she determines whether to request or walve confidentiality, continues to grow. The ECP is continuing to improm Anonymous concems have no confidentiality constraints.
the ECPprocess to regain employee conhaence in Third party concems are those received through an ECP Peer using /t.
Representative or similar person where the concern has an identifiable origin, but the identity of the concemee is not Data Through 8/31/97.
known.
This trind report tracks the selectioria made by identified concemees and em 'monymous or third party concerns received.
j
- g
<, ; gg
' ' ~
J AmnM a \\ < '
l Ana ysis by: C. Van Voorhis n4266 l Owner:
E Morgan n413s Data Source: Q. Van Voorn, g uets6 s
A-C2
Y MillstEno Empisyco issucs Typo Trcnd September 1997
(
Progress: The proportion of Nuclent Safety lowes is tanding downward.
I 1
100%
2 of the 9 tatues hitstedb August g3 in the
- Nuclear Salsty'catopy 70%
was alleged HIRD sn 7
~
~
6 of the 10 issuea 40%
hitiated h August y
sn u Our-cai.wy were tog allaged HIRD 10%
N, 0%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5 Nuclear Safety 5 Personnel Safety D Other pttr Dela '
N' V'
ts**i'd'
' *l 5,
16 '
Yh' D* #
-f r -
1997 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Nuclest Safety 4
4 4
11 0
7 4
6 Dersonnel Safety 0
2 1
2 1
1 2
0 Other 4
6 7
9 12 11 13 10 g
\\
Totalissues 8
12 12 28 13 19 19 16
.L d
c'
&v--
Analvels! Action
'F V
n-Dennitkwt-
^
- s- ^
ECP cunently trends three types of msues espressed h concerne Nuclear issues continue the multi-month trend where the relative Safety, Personnel Salety and Other. Each concem consists of one or rno'*
lasu'*-
numtwr of non nuclear safety Issets outnumber nuclear salety reisted issues. Within the Category 'Other*, Concem Nuewr safety issues are kaues whch h a broad irterpretatico could have issues in class 2 outnumber all Other represented Classes.
an impact on plant or pubhc safety or the quainy of plant operstens. These wund hetude issues about systems correonents. nuclear procedures.
Data Through M11/97.
engneenng. etc. Under the current ECP manual defnRon. these are Class t taeuw.
Personnet Safety covers lasues related to hdustnal saf ety and senuar issues.
Under the current ECP manual defirWton. thus are Class 3 asues.
Other covers management 6ssues, compensation, work place condtions, traud waste and abuse, etc. Under the current ECP manual definamn, these are Class 2.4 and 6 lasues.
Harassmert ritirndaten, retalaturi and decrvninaton (HIRD) may show up h any type of issue. These are total issues receNed by month.
s Qog! x
.,., +,
- n., ~ - o e - ~, > 4 Comments
~
(
_.,c......,
u s,.
,. c. M m o.s,
s_,.
. M
,.s,,s A43
m m
m NRC Restart Assessment Plan - MP3 Status Report Szted by s:L1hanbar NRC Ptars Dated 74to97-MP3 Status Dated W1697 SchedWiedDMt.
Esameted_
E argynein 8CR Reedy _fot 14 g_f9L MBC-ZeoD9cLmenLNo.
Densdptforte NRCtegm p g; ELP_Bu!rw EO Review
$38t42 E9N'"'
r 1.1 ACR 10773 RSS and OSS Piping Termerature May Be Higher Then NRR OSTSS7 09/30/97 Reschred meet Analyzed (NRR Rem L, u.., Analysis. DRS Insp*ct DRS NRC-905GT InstaEahon)
ACR 10773. EEI 96-06-13. LER 96-007-01. LER 96-007-02 12 eel 96-06-13 RSS and OSS Piping Termerature May Be Higher Than NRR OS'25G7 09/30/97 Anatyred (NRR Renew Engneenng Analyss. DRS Inspect DRS InstaBation)
ACR 10773. eel 96-06-13. LER 96W-01. LER 96-007-02 1.3 LER 96-007-01 RSS and OSS Piping Termerature May Be Ngher Than NRR 09/25G7 09/30G7 Analyzed (NRR Recew Engneenng Anavsis. DRS Inspect DRS InstaRation)
ACR 10773. eel 9646-13. LER 90cJ7-01, LER 96407-02 1A t.ER 96-00742 RSS and OSS Piping Termerature May Be Higher Than NRR 09/25G7 09/3(F97 Analyzed (NRR Rewew Engneenng Ansfyss. DRS Inspect DRS InstaEaton)
ACR 10773. eel 96-06-13. LER 96-007-01. LER 96-007-02 1.5 LER 96 007-00 RSS and OSS Piping Termerature May Be Higher Than NRR 09/25/97 09130G7 l
Analyzed (NRR Recew Engineenng Analysis. DRS Inspect instaEaton)
ACR 10773. eel 96-06-13. LER 96-007-01. LER 96-007-02 2.1 eel 96-201-01 UFSAR not updated to renect actual plant condtsons (50.71 sport) 09/30f97 09/30G7 violation)
Degree the FSAR Needs to tm Updated Before Restart ACRs-13780.12868.12215.10525.13778. M3-964930 3.1 ACR 05715 Reactor Power increase When Unborated Cation Demn DRP 06/19/97 07/11/97 To The NRC NRC Closed Placed into Sennce 3CHS-DEMIP'2 For Amiew On 7/S77.
4.1 ACR 01895 EDG Sequancer CDA Signal Output *A* Tran Components DRS 04.76/97 05/16/97 To N NRC NRC Closad Started For R new On 5/1667 TBD - No Act'on Required Frorr. ;JU. NRC To Determne When Renew To Be Cormieted 1
D
/*%
^
Ssterendel.Detr_
Estimated
,E atoponemen ACH ReedrJot Dett_fot IMC-2N Lon*/D9Cismt!!LIA pescripil9fl.DLL8! MUMM Jeftc EPh l63CJtevleur
$48485 EM 5.1 ACR 01844 Failure to Enter an Action Statement When MSIVs Were SPOC) 02/0397 02r21/97 To The NRC Qosed For Raview On VIO 94-24-01. ACR 01844. LER 97-00840 2f;8/97.
Up$ ate IR 97-02.
C cJ.2 NOV 94-2441 Faaura to Es*r an Achon Statemerd When MSIVs Were SPO (t) 06/02/97
'06/21/97 To The NRC Closed for Review (M VIO 94-2# st. ACR 01844.LER 97-00840 Gr17/97.
Up2 ate IR 97-02.
5.3 LER 97-00840 Faaure b Enter an Action S*atemnent When MSIVs Were SPO(f)
To The NRC Closed For Renew On VIO 94-24-01. ACR 01844.LER 97-00640 2128/97 i
G1 ACH 04199 RCP SealIriec5cn Fifter T Gasket Faned RestAng in SpR DRP 04/25f97 05/16/97 To The NRC NRC Closed of Coolant to Floor Drains For Rowew On
$f15/97.
7.1 ACR 06092 RCS Check Valve Body b Bonnet Lealy 3RC'"V146 DRP 02/1097 02/28/97 To The NRC NRC Closed
. For Remaw Ch 2/28/97.
8.1 ACR 01535 While Dewatering Spent Restn the Waste Temperature in DRP 02f26G7 03/15/97 To The NRC NRC Closed the Liner FWsed from 90 lo 310 degrees F For Rever On i
3/1397.
)
9.1 ACR 10543 Need for Addmonal Review of Resp m Trne Testing for 5%
07/01/97 07/22/97 Tc The NRC Procedures For Review On 712697.
10.1 ACR 11322 Closure J PIR Weout Addressing Deshys Feature of DRP 02/0357 02f21/97 To The NRC NRC Cbsad y
Affected Cv ivu.= as For %W On 2f;1197.
A 11.1 ACR 10774 Turtune Driven Auxibary Feedwater Desy Concems SPOU) 05/21/97 06f12/97 To The *4RC ACR 10780. ACR 10774. NU Letter 815397. URI 96-201-40.
For F= view On EEI 96-201-04. eel 96-201-05 6/12387.
TBO = No Act on Required From NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Comple'ed.
2
9 M:
ScheduledDeta.
Es#3nWmf_
E Responeessa 8CRLesodrlar_
DoetA NBC-E"""-
Zensfposynerde,
pescdytDn of NRCJtem
_fsag EPMovter
!EBC.Beyher It'8"E n
11 2 ACR 10780 Turtine Drtwen Aummary Feedwater Dssign Coscems SPOtt)
OS*2Sf97 09/3097 ACR 10780. ACR 10774. NU Lener B15397. URI 96-201-40 ED 96-20144. EB 96-201-05 11.3 EB 96-201-04 Turbme Driven AusdBary Feedwater Design Concems SPO(y 09/25/97 OgGy97 ACR 10780. ACR 10774. NU Lener B15397. URI 96-201-40 ED 96-20144. ED 96-201-05 l
11.4 eel 96-201-05 Turbme Drtwen Aurmary Feedwater Desagn h SPO(n 09/25/97 0900/97 ACR 10780. ACR 10774. NU Lemt 915397. URI 96-201-40 EB 96-20144. ED 96-201-05 C
11.5 UR!
96-201-40 Turbine Drivwi Aun11ery Feedwater Demgn Concems SPOC) 05/2197 06/1&S7 To The NRC ACR 10780. ACR 10774. NU Lener B15397. URI 96-201-40 For Recew On ED 96-201-04. ED 96-201-05 S/3/77 11.6 Letter B15397 Turbine Driven Auximary Feedwater Dessgn Concems SPO(n 07tD97 08/12f97 To The NRC ACR 10780. ACR 10774. NU t=ner B15397.URI 96-201-40 For Reveur On EEI 96-20104. ED 96-201-05 8/20G7 i
12.1 ACH 06323 Coesnt lb h.Efosion NRR 09/25/97 09/30f97 ACP 06323. URI 96-04-13. URI 96-04-14. URI 9604-15. IFE 94-14-09. M3-974317. INF Noece 97-11 12.2 ACR M3-97-0317 Contamment Foundehon Efesion F#tR 09/25/97 09G y97 ACR 06323, URI 9644-13. URI 96-04-14. URf 96-04-15. IF1 94-1149. M3-974317. INF Notee 97-11 c
12 3 URI 96-04-13 Conlamment Fotmdahon Erosion NRR OS/24S 0671697 To The NRC ACR 06323. URt 9644-13. URI 96-04-14. URI 96-04-15. IF1 For Rav=w On 94-11-09 M3-97-0317. INF Notce 97-11 6%97 114 URI 9644-14 Cordamr sent Foundaban Erosion NRR 0SG497 06/16/97 To The NRC ACR 06323. URI 96-04-13. URI 9644-14. URI 96-04-15. IFl For Rev6aur On 94-11-09. M3-974317. INF Notice 97-11 6577 12.5 URI 9604-15 Cordamrnent Fotmdaten Erossort NRR OSG497 06f!697 To The NRC ACR 06323. URt 9644-13. URI 96-04-14. URI 9644-15. IFI For Raveew Om L
94-11-09. M3-97-0317. INF Nc6ce 97-11 6577 l
TED = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Datermme When Renew To Be CorW 4
3
R f m.
m SchedukiLQuet_
Estast _ed E
Beep 9nsede JLCB_ReedyJgt Detgjet E
D-7tmedhttumtHLME Qt9Cthe#rML90BC Done s
EP_ Bey 4per IW!qBeview 3meiss M
12.6 IFl 94-1149 Certamment 6.14. Erosion NRR 09G5/97 09f3(Y97 ACR 06323. URI 9644-n 'JRI 96 04-14. URI 9644-15.1FI 94-11-09. M3-974317.1NF Nohce 97-11 13.1 ACR M3-964326 CCP System Opqwaton Above Dessgn Temperature-3 SFOp}
10ftn97 1005S7 Ar4S*HCV 606E07 Fs3ng Open and Other FaBure Modes ACR 13427. URI 96420. IR 96-291, M3-964326. LER 96-02840. LER 96-040-00. M3-9&CEf67 l
C 132 ACR 13427 COP System Operatpon Above Deocpi Tere 3 SPOp}
1003r97 1095/97 RHS*HCV 606507 Faeng Open and Cher Fahre Modes ACR 13427. URI 96M20. IR 96-201. E964326. LER 96-02roo.LER 96-040-00.M3-964887 i
13.3 URI 9646-20 CCP System Operaton Above Desgn Terveratise. 3 SPOg) 10/03/97 10f05/97 i
RHSHCV 606407 Famng Open and O!her Failure Modes ACR 13427. URI 96-06-20. IR 96-201. M3-96-0326. LER 96-02840. LER 96-04000. M3-96CBS7 13 4 LER 96 028-00 CCP System Oparaton Above Desgn Temperature-3 Spop) 09/16/97 09r30r97 RHS*HCV 606507 Failirg Open and Other Failure Modes ACR 13427. URI 96-06-20. IR 96-201. M3-96-0326. LER 96-02840.LER 96-040-00. M3-96-0887 13.5 LER 96C25-01 CCP System Operaton Atxyva Desgn Terversture-3 SPOF) 09/1697 09/30v97 RHSHCV 606S07 Famng Op=n and Other Fauure Modes ACR 13427. UR$ 96-08-20. IR 96-201. M3-964326. LER 96-028-00. LER 96-040-00. M3-96-OB87 13.6 LER 96-04040 CCP SystemOperaton Above DesgnTermerature 3 SPOp}
10031ri 1005/97 RHSHCV 60G507 Failmg Open and Otier Failure Modas ACR 13427. URI 96-06-20. IR 96-201. M3-964326. LER 96-02600. LER 96-04040. M3-96-0887 13 7 ACR M3-960887 CCP System Operaton Aboes Design Temperaturer 3 SPOp) 1303G7 1005/97 RHS*HCV 606/607 Fadog Open and Other Failure Modes ACR 13427.'JRI 96-08-20. IR 96-201 M3-96c326. LER 96-028-00.LER 96 040-00.M3-964887 14.1 ACR 07745 Safety Grade Cold ShiAdown Operalsonal Cordguraton Spop; 06/12,97 07/03/97 To The NRC Control ACR 07745. URI 9641-07 For Ravi=w OR~
6f24/97 TBD = No Ac6cn Required From NU. NRC To Determine When Recew To Be Cormseced.
i
=
Sctwduledpees.
Estimetal_
IC-Besponsibeqt AC8tBeedrlor_
IMeA 1890-W-
Zonet+
aMe.
m of MRC tiern g
m aw m
Comrehr 112 URI 960147 SaW Grade Cold Shukkwi Operatonal Cordgunson SPO(f) 04/1&s 7 050397 To The NRC Control ACR 07745. URI 96-01-07 For Rewew On 5/8T.
15.1 ACR M3-9GC159 1.eMown Heat Exchanger Leakags.wxt Design Drscrepancies SPO(Q 05/1097 0$r31/97 To The NRC ACR M3-96 0159. EEI 96-06-15 For h On 928/97.
Update in IR 96-06.
15.2
'EEI 9GO6-15 Lekbun Heat Excharupe Leakage and Design Discrepancies SPO(y 0929/97 OGr1W To h NRC ACR M3-96-0159. eel 9646-15 For Renew On 6/1&77.
Update in IR 9606.
16.1 AC.1 01935 (U2)
Dual Function Valve Control and Tes6ng SPO(y 02M7G7 02r26G7 To The NRC Updakd in IR 97-02 For Rev==w On z21/97.
Updase IR 97-02 17.1 ACR 07266 RCP Seal Housing Leakage and Dolt Conossor DRS 0977/97 OSM 18.1 ACR 10562 Control and Use of Vendor Informahon DRS OG07/97 OEV27/97 To The NRC eel 96-201-15. EEI 94201-18. ED 96-201-19. URI 96-201-SPO(f)
For Rene=r On
- 17. G2 st2ryg7.
122 eel 96-201-15 Control and Use et vendorInformaton DRS 09/26/97 09/3GT7 Update IR 97 ED 96-201-15. ED 96-201-18. ED 96-201-19. URI 96-201-SPO(0 02
- 17. G2 113 EE1 96-201-18 Contfoi and Use of Vendor Inbrmanon DRS 07M5/97 0742/97 To The NRC ED 96-201-15. ED 96-201-18. ED 96-201-19. URI 96-201-SPO(Q For Renew On
- 17. G2 7;stgy.
18.4 eel 96-201-19 Control and Use of Vendor Information DRS 04fW 37 05/1&97 To The NRC ~
eel 96-201-15. EEI 96-201-18. ED 96-201-19. URI 96-201-SPOfD For h On i
- 17. G2
- 99yy7, TBD = No Action Required Ffom NU. NRC To Determine wher: Renew To De Cormieted S
m
~,
- e. m.
M.,. ;p m
flescomage AGILBeedidor.
Dete_for_
NRC.
b&
Ze!Le/ Document fi?
pr9cdsdlors of NEG1995 g
EEReylem NRC ReWow Stelus 40DE*PM 18.5 URI 96-201-17 Control and the of Ve' dor information DRS 03/10/97 05/09/97 To The NRC eel 96-201-15. eel 96-201-18. eel 96-201 19. URI 96-201-SPO(f)
For Review On
- 17. G 2 4/14/97.
..~.....
~
19 1 URI 96-201-16 Resolution of AFW Valves HELB Crincem SPO(f) 09/25/97 09/30/97 20.1 VIO 96-59-13 Review Output from Hannorts Empiryae Concems Report SPO(L) 08/20/97 09" 0/97 VIO 96-59-13 21.1 None Assodated Fatigue Cycle Open items IP 37750 DRS P&A Corrplete Closed IR 96-Closed IR 96-01 (Urut 2 issuo) 01 22.1 None Associated Par 170 Storage and inventory IP 84750 DRS N/A Complete Closed IR 96-Closed IR 96-05 (Unit 1 Isste) 05
-u -
23.1 None Associated Formatty of Non-Routene Security Activities enr2 N Tuel DRS N/A Complete Closed IR 96-
';10 sed IR 96-05 Security IP 81064 05
..m 24.1 URI 96-01-08 OverlapTesting of RPS/ESF SPO(I) 05/31/97 OW1/97 To The NRC LER 97-017-00. URI 96-01-08 For Review On 6/12/37 24.2 LER 97-017-00 Overlap Testing of RPS/ESF SPO(1) 09/23/97 09/30/97 LER 97-017-00. URI 96-01-08 25.1 ACR M3-96-0912 Material Equipment and Parts List (MEPL) Program SPO(!)
02/20/97 03R)e/97 To The NRC Evaluaton DRS For Review On URI 95-07-10. EEI 96-201-43. ACR M3-96-0912 3/7/97.
25.2 URI 95-07-10 Material Equipment and Parts List (MEPL) Program DRS 06/16/97 07/07/97 To The NRC Evaluation SPO(t)
For Reviave On URI 95-07-10. eel 96-201-43. ACR M3 96-0912 7/7/97.
25.3 eel 96-201-43 Material Equipment and Parts List (MEPL) Program SPO(t) 09/22/97 09/27/97 Update IR 96-EvaluatKm DRS 201. IR 97-202 URI 95-07-10. eel 96-201-43. ACR M3-9412 26.1 ACR M3-96-0277 Motor Operated Valve Program GL 89-10 DRS 09/30/97 10/07/97 ACR M3-96-0277. ACR M3-96-0278. M3-96-0627,12862, LER 96-019-00. LER 96-020-00. LER 96-035-00. URI 95 1
- 09. IFl 95-01-01. IFl 95-17-01. IFl 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03. IFI 95 17-04. IFl 95-17-05. Info Notice 97-07 m.....................--
TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
6
O.
A N
MRC Scheduled Date Estieseng.
Besponellte, ACBReedy for Dale for fM-N ZenciD9Culrent No.
Descrigion of MRC flom NRC EPJulgtw teRCEgying Status Coniolem 26.10 IFl 95-17-01 Motor Operated Valve Program GL 89-10 ics 09/25/97 09/3(V97 Partial ACR M3-964277. ACR M3-96-0278, M3-96-0627.12862 Package LER 96-019-00 LER 96-020-00. LER 96-035-00. URI 9517-Ready.
09, IFl 95-01-01. IFl 95-17-01. IFi 95-17-02, IFI 95-17-03, IFl 9517-01. IFl 95-17-05, Info Notice 97-07 26.11 IFl 35-17-02 Motor Operated Va!ve Program GL 89-10 DRS 09/25/97 0900/97
- Partial ACR M3-96-0277. ACR M3-96-02M, M3-96-0627,12862 Package LER 96-019-00. LER 96-020-00. LER 96-035-00, URI 95 Ready.
- 09. IFI 95-01-01. IFl 95-17-01. IFI 95-17-02 IFI 95-17-03. IF1 95-17-04. IFl 95-17-05, Info Notice 97-07 26.12 IFl 95-17-03 Motor Operated Valve Program GL 891 DRS 09/30/97 10/07/97 ACR M3-96-0277. ACA M3-96-0278, M3 s6-0627.12862, LER 96-019-00. LER 96-02000. LER 96-035-00, URI 95 09. IFl 95-01-01. IFl 95-17-01, IFI 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03. IFl 95-17-04, IFI 95-17-05. Info Notice 97-07
....................u.....
26.13 IFl 95-17-04 Motor Operated Valve Frogram GL 89-10 DRS 09/3067 10/07/97 Partial ACR M3-96-0277, ACR M3-96-0278, M3-96-0627,12862 Package LER 96-019-00. LER 96-020-00. LER 96 035-00, URI 95 Ready.
09 IFl 95-01-01, IFI SS-17-01. IFI 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03. IFl 95-17-04, IFl 95-17-05. Info Notice 97-07 26.14 IFI 95-17-05 Motor Opereted Valve Program GL 89-10 DRS OW30/97 10/07/97 Partial ACR M3-96-0277. ACR M3-96-0278 M3-95-0627.12862 Package LER 96-019-00. LER 96-020-00, LER 96-035-00. URI 95 Ready.
- 09. IFl 95-01-01. IFI 95-17-01, IFl 95-17-02. IFI 95-17-03. IFl 95-17-04. IFl 95-17-05, Info Notice 97-07 26.15 LER 96-019-01 Motor Operated Valve Program GL 89-10 DRS 09/30/97 10/07/97 ACR M3-96-0277, ACR M3-96-0278. M3-96-0627.12832, LER 96-019-00 LER 96-020-00. LER 96-035-00. URI 95 09. IFI 95-01-01, IFl 95-17-01, IFl 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-0J, IFl 95-17-04, IFl 95-17-05 26.2 ACR M3-96-0278 Motor Operated Vaive Program GL 89-10 DRS 0900/97 1007/97 ACR M3-96-0277, ACR M3-964278. M3-96-0627.12862
~
LER 96-019-00. LER 96-020-00. LER 96-035-00, URI 95 09, IFl 95-01-01, IFl 95-17-01 IFI 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03, IFI 95-17-04. IFI 95-17-05. Info Notice 97-07 L
TBD = No Acticn Required From NU. NRC To Determene When Review To Be Completed.
7
D t'* %
ScheduleGDele_
Estimated _
E ReggMmpflylg ACFLf9eedy for Dett_f9L IEG-W-
Zone /Decument N9.
Dt9Cript19fud}fRCJtent NRC EP_Bgdeg lWICJIqvigg SlptWS M
i 26.3 ACR M3-96-0627 Motor Operated Vafve Program GL 89-10 DRS 09/3097 1007/g7 ACR M3-96-0277, ACR M3-96-0278. M3-96-0627,12862 LER 96-019-00. LER 96-020-00. LER 96-035 00. URI 95 09. IFI 95-01-01. IFl 95-17-01. IFl 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03. Irl 95-17-04. IFI 95-17-05, info Notice 97-07
...............,u~..~
26.4 ACR 12862 Motor Operated Valve Program GL 89-10 DPS 09/30/97 1007/97 ACR M3-96-0277. ACR M3-96-0278. M3-964627,12862 LER 96-019-00. LER 96-02040. LER 96-035-00. URI 95 09. IFl 95-01-01. IFl 95-17-01. IFl 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03. IFi i
95-17-04. IFl 95-17-05. Info Nonce 97-07 i
26.5 LER 96-019-00 Motor Operated Valve Program GL 89-10 DRS 09/30/97 10/07/97 ACH M3-96-0277. ACR M3-96-0278. M3-96-0627,12862 LER 96-019-00. LER 96-02400. LER 96-035-00. URI 95 j
- 09. IFl 95-01-01. IFl 95-17-01. IFl 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03. IFl 95-17-04. IFl 95-17-05. Info Notice 97-07 26.6 LER 96-020-00 Motor Operated Valve Program GL 89-10 DRS 09/30/97 10/U7/97 ACR M3-96-0277. ACR M3-96-0278. M3-9G-0627.12862 LER 96-019-00. LER 96-020-00. LER 96-035-00. URI 95 09. IFl 95-01-01. IFl 95-17-01. IFI 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03. IFl 95-17-04. IFl 95-17-05. Info Notice 97-07 26.7 LER 96-035-00 Motor Operated Valve Program GL 89-10 DRS 09'30/97 10/07/97 ACR M3-96-0277. ACH M3-96-0278. M3-96-0627,12862.
LER 96419-00. LER 96-020-00. LER 96-035-00. URI 95 09. IFI 95-0101. IFl 95-17-01. IR 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03. IFI 95-17-04. IFl 95-17-05. Info Notice 97-07 o_
26.8 URI 95-17-09 Motor Operated Va!ve Program GL 89-10 DRS 09f30/97 10/07/97 ACR M3-96-0277. ACR M3-96-0278. M3-96627,12862 LER 96-019-00. LER 96-020-00. LER 96-035-00. URI 95 09. IFl 95 01-01. IFl 95-17-01. IFl 95-17-02. IFl 95-17-03. IF; 95-17-04,IFl 95-17-05. Into Notice 97-07 26.9 IFl 95-01 01 Motor Operated Valve Program GL 89-10 DRS 09/30/97 10/07/97 ACH M3-96-0277. ACR M3-96-0278. M3-96-0627.12862 LER 96-019-00. LER 96-02000. LER 96435-00. URI 95 09. IFl 95-01-01. IFl 95-17-01. IFl 95-17-02, IFI 9517-03. IFI 95-17-04. lFl 95-17-05. Info Notice 97-07 27.1 PPR G.1.C. G2 Resident Emphasis: Missed Surveiltances/ Test Control Spo(f)
N/A Complate Closed IR 96-Closed IR 96-08 08 TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
8
e SchedulostDiet.
EstimeteIL m
ACfUhedy for peso for MiC_
h-ZM!aOocyntent No.
pendptm_91NftCJ!am jegq EP Review t@CBeyhg SW 28.1 PPR G.1.C Resk1ent Emphasis: Dilution Events SPO(I)
N/A Complete Closed IR 96 Closed IR 96-08 08
.......~.......::
29.1 PPR G.1.C Resident Emphasts: Feedwater Hammer DRS ffA Compiele Closed IR 96-Closed IR 96-01 01 30.1 ACR M3-96-0855 Resident Emphasis:AFW Check Valve Lankage SPO(I) 02/22/97 03/11/97 To The NRC NRC Closed ACR M3-96-0855.G.I.C. IR 95-31 For Review On 3/11/97 -
~. - -
30.2 IR 95-31 Resident Emphasis:AFW Check Valve Leakage SPO(!)
09/19/97 09/30/97 IR 95-31. G.1.C 31.1 PPR G.1.C. G2 Resident Empbasis-Work-Arourids and Abuse of Use-As-Is SPO(f) 07/25/97 08/09/97 To The NRC Deficiencies For Review On 7/30/97.
32.1 NOV 94-1645 Resident Emphasis: AWO Quality and Backlog Control G2 DRS 05f24/97 06/14/97 To The NRC NOV 94-16-05 For Review On 6/13/97
..... ~....
~
33.1 IFl 97-01-07 Seismic II/I DRS 07/01/97 07/22/97
' To The NRC IR 96 201. G2. IFl 97-01-07. LER 96-003-00. ACR M3 For Review On 0563. CR M3-97-0850 7/16/97.
..u.-
.~~
332 LER 96-0400 Seb.2 ft/l DRS 05/06/97 05/27/97 To The NRC IR 96-201. G 2, IFl 97-01-xx. LER 96-003-00. ACR M3 For Review On 0563. CR M3-97-0850 5/22/97
~
33.3 ACR M3-96-0563 Seismic M DRS 06KG/97 06/23/97 To The NRC IR 96-201 G.2. IFI 97-01-xx. LER 96-003-00. ACR M3 For Review On 0563. CR M3-97-0850 5/20/97.
33.4 ACR M3-97-0850 Seismic !!!!
DRS 06/24/97 07/15/97 To The NRC IR 96-201. G2. IFl 9741-xx. LER 96-003-00. ACR M3 For Review On 0563. CR M3-97-0850 7/26/97..
TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Determine M. Review To Be Completed.
9
q e
m SchshdadRete.
Estimated E-Besssmange ACR Reedy for.
DennJor_
IfBC-N Zonecocument.f4 Destdation of NRC Rom
_Ngg EP Review MRC Review I9EhN EN 34.1 NOV 96-09-18 Elfluent/Enwronmental Sampling and Analytcal Proficiency DRS 06/03/97 06/23/97 To The NRC NOV 96-09-18. NRC Inspecton Module 84750. IFl 9&1341 For Review On
'(U1) 6/21/97.
34.2 IFl 96-13-01 (U1)
Effluent"Jn-W~.. odal Sampling and AnalyScal Fmransi DRS To The NRC.
NOV 96-09-18. NRC Inspecton Module 84750. IFl 96-1341 For Review On (U1) 8/26/97.
35.1 None Associated Radwaste Systems / Controls DRS N/A 06/21/97 Update IR 96-NRC Inspection Module 86750 Ready For 08 Inspec5on 36.1 None Associated Heat Exchanger Performance (GL 89 *3)
DRS 06/10/97 07/01/97 To The NRC For Renew On 71387.
36.2 ACR M3-97-0216 Heat Exchanger Performance (GL 89-13)
DRS 09/23/97 09/30/97 37.1 eel 96-201-13 Review Licensee Corrective Action Programs for SPO(f) 05/30/97 06/19/97 To The NPC Effectiveness to incluje ACRs and NCRs For Review On eel 96-201-13. eel 9&201 21, EEI 96-201-22. EEI 96 201-6/19/97.
- 24. eel 9&201-26. eel 96-201-27. eel 96-201-28. eel 96-201-29. IR 96-04 37.2 eel 96-201-21 Review Licensee Correc6ve Action Programs for 3PO(!)
06/03/97 06/23/97 To The NRC Effectiveness to include ACRs and NCRs For Review On eel 96-201-13. eel 96-201-21. eel 96-201-22. eel 96-201-6/12/97.
- 24. eel 96-201-26. eel 9&201-27. eel 96-201-28. eel 96-201-29. IR 96-04 37.3 eel 96-201-22 Review Licensea Correenve Action Programs for SPO(f) 07/21/97 06/11/97 To The NRC Effectiveness to include ACRs and NCRs For Review On eel 96-201-13. EEI 96-201-21. EEI 96-201-22. eel 9&201-8/15/97.
- 24. eel 96-201-26. eel 96-201-27. eel 96 201-28. eel 96-201-29. IR 96-04 TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Determine When Rewew To Be Completed.
10
O D
E Scfieduletf_ Dele _
Estlmseed, Basconsitret ACILBe*W19L Deeg_for_
E ZenelDocumentNo.
DescriptiottofffRC_ Item
.ggq EP_Rgylger N_RC_Bqview
$1shes Complftt 37.4 eel 96-201-24 Review Ucensee Correclive Acton Programs for SPO(t) 04/26/97 05/16/97 To The NRC Effeceveness to include ACRs and NCRS For Review On EEI 9&201-13. eel 96-201-21. eel 96-201-22. eel 96-201-5/16/97.
- 24. EEI 96-201-26. eel 9&201-27. eel 96-201-28. eel 96-201-29. IR 96-04 n...................
37.5 eel 96-201-26 Review Ucensee Correc6ve Ac6on Frograms for SPO(I) 06/03/97 06/23/97 To The NRC Effectiveness to include ACRs and NCRs For Review On eel 96-201-13. eel 96-201 -21. EE196-201 22. eel 96-201-6/10,97.
- 24. eel 9&201-26. eel 96-201-27. eel 96-201-28. EE196-201-29. IR 96-04
...............n 37.6 eel 96-201-27 Review Ucensee CorrecGwe Acton Programs for SPO(l) 07/16/97 08/05/97 To The NRC Effectiveness to include ACRs & NCRs For Review On eel 96-201 13. eel 96-201-21. EEI 96 201-22. eel 96-201-
- 8/4/97.
- 24. eel 9&201-26, eel 9&201-27. EF.I 9&201-28. eel 96-201-29. IR 96-04 37.7 eel 96-201-28 Review Ucensee Corrective Acson Prog ams for SPO(I) 07/01/97 07/23/97 To The NRC Effectiveness to include ACRs and NCRs For Review On eel 9 t201-13. eel 96-201-21. eel 96-201-22. EEI 9&201-7/2397.
- 24. E ~ ! 96-201-26. eel 96-201-27. eel 9&201-28. eel 96-201 '. o, tR 96-P4 37.8 eel 96-201-29 Review Ucensee CorrecEve Ac5cn Programs for SPO(f).
09/23/97 09/30/97 Effec 6veness to include ACRs and NCRs eel 96-201-13. EEI 9&201-21. EEI 96-201-22. eel 96-201-
- 24. eel 96-201-26. eel 96-201-27. eel 96-201-28. eel 96-201-29. IR 96-04 38.1 None Associated Review 0737 AcBon items for Completion SPO(1) 09/15/97 09/20/97
...............mm.....-m x
39.1 None Associated Review Engineering Backlogs DRS 09/25,97 09/30/97 OSTI OSTI
......................... ~...
40.1 None Associated Review 507,*F issues for Restart / Review Deferred Restart SPO 05/30/97 06/20/97 To The NRC ltems Ust For Review On 6/16/97.
~
41.1 ACR 07007 Review Self Assessment Rool Causes and Verify Corrective SPO(l) 09/23/97 09/30/97 Update IR 97-Actions (:P40ArO) 02 ACR 7007. URI 95-81-0t. VIO 96-0944 (U1)
TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
if g
.I I'
^
eN!'
c_
E E
t 9E n
7 O
7-m n
n n
n n
~
C O.
C O.
C C
C O
O C
9 C-o 9
r GM R
R:
F R
Rw R
R Rw b.
N" R
n b.
Nt EF e
ie I
o d N
Nie N
t v
Nie e
e-v t r e-c7 a
h R9 a
Au h e7 e-ES R9 h c7 e e7 h;7 h R9 e
e t
t ci e7 T R9 h R 9 T
T R9 d
T r/
d 2 q
T T
4 r/
/
p2 oo/
p0 oeU oo/
/
oo/r9 r/
r oo/r8
/
4 oo/9 oo1 UC TF8 U2 NRN TF3 TF5 TF5 TF5 TF8
/
u o_W r
3 d
t 7
7 r n 7, F too 7
7 7
7 7
7 9
9 af 9
9 9
9 9
9 D
/
/
/
/
/
9
/
ne 0
yc
/
) J e B
5 9
3 6
3 4
/
S 3
1 ataC 0
0 2
0 1
2 A
p T
/
/
/
/
/
hDR
/9 8
/
0 %. i 8
s 3
5 5
/6 8
9 0
0 n
0 0
0 0
0 0
et n_ o_ w r
e J 7
7
. 7 7
7
. 7 7
7 Dye 9
9
.. 9 9
9 9
ddly 3
4 A
'A 4
9 3
6
/5 0
/
/
. /
/
/
/
9 9
ee o 2
2
/
/
l e uR R W
/
N N
1 1
0 1
2 1
/
/
/
/
/
/
7 2
4 5
5 7
9 deR P O
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 E
hC csA e
l i
t(
1)
)
p
)
t S
O 1
)
(
S S
S S
S sC O
O R
O R
R R
R
- R O
(
(
nR oO P
P D
P D
D D
D D
P pP S
S S
a S
h l
8 e
e e
e M
e e
2 v
v v
t v
v v
1 i
9 it it it t
it t
c c
a a
- c. r
- s. o a
2 e
e 8
vr vr r
vr d
0 r o r o o
r r
i 0
er er r
r
. r o r
s r
r r
r s
- er n
o v
6 nE sE sE sE nE s
a 6
r 9
d C
C 9
n e
e on on cn un on t
R y
y t
t CI Ci
erature Switches Defeated by Bypass Jumper for SPO(I) 06/3W97 07/22/97 To The NRC SWP*P3A1B (Booster Pumps)
For Review On EEI 96-201-23. LER 96-005-01. LER 96-005-00. ACR 10795 7/2/97.
53.1 ACH M3-96-0449 Pieces of ARCOR Found in '3RSS*E1 A and 3RCC*E1C SPO(f) 07/14/97 08/02/97 To The NRC UR19&O9-11.LER 96-025-00. ACR M3-96-0449 M3 SPO(O)
For Review On 1007. M3-97-0727. M3-97-1720 6/30/97.
53.2 URI 96-09-11 Pieces of ARCOR Found in 3RSS*E1 A and 3RCC*E1C SPO(f) 07/24/97 08/12/97
. To The NRC URI 96-09-11. LER 96-025-00. ACR E196-0449, fG97-SPO(O)
For Review On 1007. M3-97-0727. M3-97-1729 8/6/97.
53.3 LER 96-025-00 Pieces of ARCOR Found in 3RSS*E1 A and 3RCC*E1C SPO(l) 07/24/97 08/12/97 To The NRC URI 96-09-11. LER 96-025-00. ACR M3-96-0449. M3 SPO(O)
For Review On 1007. M3-97-0727. M3-97-1729 8/6/97.
~
53.4 ACR M3-97-0727 Pieces of ARCOR Found in 3RSS*E1A and 3RCC*E1C SPO(f) 09/2397 09f30/97 Update IR 97-URI 96-09-11. LER 96-0254)0. ACR M3-96-0449. M3 SPO(O) 202 1007. M3 97-0727. M3-97-1729 53.5 ACR M3-97-1007 Pieces of ARCOR Found in 3RSS'*EIA and 3F.CC*E1C SPO(1) 09/23/97 09/30/97 Update IR 97-URI 96-09-11. LER 96-025-00. ACR M3-96-0449. M3 SPO(O) 202 1007. M3-97-0727. M3-97-1729 53.6 ACH M3-97-1729 Pieces of ARCOR Found in 3RSS*E1A and 3RCC E1C SPO{f) 09/05/97 09/26/97 Update IR 97-URI 96-09-11. LER 9F 325-00. ACR M3-96 0449. M3 SPO(O) 202 1007. M3-97-0727. M3 97-1729 TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
14
O gygpggggge ACfulastfrfor Daggjor.,
E ZenetDocument Ne, Descriodon of NRC hem 3
EE.m ytow tggq.ggnden 348 tug Co m 54.1 ACR M3-96-0181 Numerous Bolts on Back Door on 4160V Sw4chgear M ssing DRP 05/28/97 06/18s 7 To The NRC NRC Closed For Review (b 6/12/97
~.
55.1 ACR M3-95-0467 Fast Transfer Test Failures DRS 08/01/97 08/13/97 To The NRC NRC Closed For Rev%w On 7/1697 56.1 ACR 12495 Shutdown Margin Monitor Alarm Selpoint DRS 05/28/97 06/17/97 To The NRC NRC Ckr.ed For Review On 6/5/97 57.1 ACR M3-96-0080 Potential Electrical Separation Violations DRS 0512/97 06/02/97 To The NRC ACR M3-96-0081. LER 96-015-00. LER 96-045-00. LER 96-SPO(1)
For Renew On 049-00. LER 96-015-01. LER 96-015-02, LER 96415-03, 6/2/97.
ACR M3-96,X)80 Update IR 97-202 57.10 LER 96-049-01 Potential Electncal Separation Violations DRS 09/27/97 09,M ACR M3-96-0081. LER 96-01540. LER 96-045-00. LER 96-SPO(t) 049-00. LER 96-015-01. LER 96415-02. LER 96415-03 ACR M3-96-0080 57.2 ACR M3-964081 Poter' e Electncal Sepai Nn Violations DRS 02/1497 0305/97 To The NRC ACR M3-96-0081. LER 96-01100 LER 96-045-00. LER 96-SPO(1)
For Review On 049-00. LER 96-015-01. LER 96-01W LER 96-015-03 3/5/97.
ACR M3-96-0080 Update IR 97-202 7.3 LER 96-015-00 Potential Electrical Separation Veolations DRS 07/08/97 07/28/97 To The NRC ACR M3-96-0081. LER 96415-00. LER 96-045-00. LER 96-SPO(I)
For Renew On 049-00. LER 96-01541. LER 96-015-02. LER 96415-03 7/30G7.
ACR M3-96-0080 Update IR 97-202 57.4 LER 96-045-00 Poterdial Electrical Separation Violations DRS CW27/97 09/3057 Update IR 97-ACR M3-96-0081. LER 96-015-00. LER 96-045-00. LER 96-SPO(1) 202 049-00. LER 96-015-01. LER 96-015-02. LER 96-015-03 ACR M3-96-0080 TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Detemune V/ hen Review To Be Completed.
15
O O
D
$gheduleglDett_
h a,,ponpitrie eG8LReediL4r_
DMt !st E C-N-
Zone /Desvenent Me.
Deserlotion oh
_ gag EP Revlegg NRCJgviour 38W89 57.5 LER 96-04940 Poter$al Electrical Separation Violations DRS 07/02/97 07/2397 To The NRC ACR M3-96.;~M51. LER 96-015 00. LER 96-045-00. LER 96-SPOP)
For Renew On 049-00. LER 96015-01. LER 96015-02. LER 96-01543, 7/22/97.
ACR M3-96-0080 Update IR 97-202 57.6 LER 96415-01 Potential Electrical Separation Violations DRS 07/08/97 07/28/97 To The NRC ACR M3-96@81. LER 96-015-00. LER 96-04540. LER 96-SPO(t)
For Remew On 04940. LER 96-015-01. LER 96-015-02. LER 9601543 7/3097.
ACR M19&0080 Update IR 97-202 57.7 ER 96-015-02 Potential Electrical Separation Violations DRS 07/08/97 07/28/97 To The NRC ACR M3-96-0081. LER 96-01540. LER 96045-00. LER 96-SPOC)
For Review On 049-00. LER 9&O15-01. LER 96415-02. LER 96015-03 7/30/97.
ACR M3-96-0080 Update IR 97-202 57.8 LER 96-015-03 Potential Electrical Separation Vdations DRS 09/03/97 09/24/97 To The NRC ACR M3-96-0001. LER 9641540. LER 9604540. LER 96-SPOp)
For Review On 049-00. LER 9601541. LER 96-015 02. LER 9&O15-03 7/30s7.
ACR M3-9&OO80
, Update IR 97-202 57.9 LER 96-015-04 Potential Electrical Separation Vsolations DRS 09/27/97 0900/97 Update IR 97-ACR M3-96-0081. LER 96-015 00. LER 94045-00. LER 96-SPO(f) 202 049-00. LER 96-015-01. LER 9&O15-02. LER 96-015-03.
ACR M3-96-0080 58.1 ACR M3-9&O557 Thermal Relief Vatre Setpoints SPO(T) 09/26/97 09/30f97 To The NRC ACR M3-96-0685. eel 96-201-33. ACR M3-96-0557 For Renew On 6/26/97.
Updated in IR 97-02 58 2 ACR M3-96-0685 Thermal Relief Valve Setpomts SPOO) 09/26/97 09/30f97 Updaf3 IR 97-ACR M3-9G-0685. eel 96-201-33. ACR M3-964557 02 TBD = No Action Required Frorn NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
16
D D
E-SchMMeuteem.
Estimated.
a,soonsspin ACB_ Beady for Does for MBC.
h-Zene!Q9sumentNo.
Descdotion of NRC Item gjg m
fg3CEgyjeg SMus S9EEME 58 3 eel 96-201-33 Thermal Relief Va8ve Setpoints SPO(f) 0600/97 07/22/97 To The NRC ACH M3-96-0685. EE196-201-33. ACR M3-96-0557 For Renew On Updated in IR 97-02 6/25/97 Updele IR 97-202
...............m 59.1 ACR M3-96-0775 Use of Doraflex in SFP Racks SPO(t) 05/24/97 06/12M7 To The NRC ACR 09124. ACR M3-96-0846. ACR M3-96-0775 NRR For Review On LER 96-033-00 6/597.
Update IR 97-202 59 2 ACR 09124 Use of Boraflex in SFP Racks SPO(f) 05/24/97 06/16/97 To The NRC ACR 09124. ACR M3-96-084G. ACR M3-96-0775 NRR For Review On LER 96-033-00 6/11/97.
Update IR 97-202 n.......**..............__
59.3 ACR M3-9641846 Use of Boraflex in SFP Racks SPO(f}
05/31/97 06/20/97 To The NRC ACR 09124. ACR M3-96-0846. ACR M3-96-0775 NRR For Review On LER 96-033-00 6/11/97.
Update IR 97-202 m........**u..
59A LER 964.33-00 Use of Botaflex in SFP Racks SPO(1) 07/15/97 08/04/97 To The NRC ACR 09124. ACR M3-96-0846. ACR M3-96-0775 NRR For Review On LER 96-033-00 7/16/97.
Update IR 97-202 60.
ACH M3-96-0718 Analysis of SOV Failure Modes Due To MOPD SPO(l) 09/23/97 09/29/97 ACR M3-96-0821. EEI 96 09-16. ACR M3-96-0718 C32 ACR M3-96-0321 Analysis of SOV Failure Modes Due To MOPD SPO(f) 09/22/97 09/27/97 ACH M3-96-0821. eel 96 09-16. ACR M3-96-0718
.m.........
60 3 eel 96-W-16 Analysis of SOV Failure Modes Due To MOPD SPO(1) 09/23/97 09/29/97 ACR M3-96-0821. eel 96 09-16. ACR M3-96-0718 61.1 ACR 7923 (U2)
EEO Process DRS 09/09/97 09/30/97
.. ~
TBD = No Action Regthed From NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
17
m
/*%
8 SchuluisLDete.
Es_!h!!stel pages.qq, ACR Roody for Depe_for.
MC W
Zone /Docuenent No.
Dennlegen of NBC_ Item m
Uh tdRC_ Review StelNa E'"9!A' 62.1 ACR 13788 TSP Basket Safety Evalua6on Possibly Not Valid.
SPO(t) 02/03/97 02/21/97 To The NRC NRC Closed For Review On 2f21/97 63.1 ACR M3-96-0396 3 MSS *MOV17D Missed IST Surveillance Requirement DRP 05/3157 08 % /9 7 To The NRO NRC Closed For Reviec On 5/22/97 64.1 ACR 08614 Reactor Pro ection Lead Lag Cwcuns May Be Set DRS 02/2157 03/11/97 To1he NRC NRCt h
}
s Nu.tu imecM"i For Rever Or.
3/11/97.
65.1 ACR M3-96-0745 SIUSlH Valves Powered From NonSafety Train SPO 09/21/97 09/27/97 LER 96-036-00. ACR M3-97-0742. ACR M3-9G-3745 NRR 65.2 ACR M3-97-0742 SillSIH Valves Powered Frorn NonSafety Train SPO 09/21/97 09f30/97 LER 96-036-00. ACR M3-97-0742. ACR M3-96-0745 NRR 65.3 LER 96-036-00 S!USlH Valves Powered From NonSafety Train SPO 09/21/97 09/30/97 LER 96-036-00. ACR M3-97-0742. ACR M3-96-0745 NRR 65.4 LER 96-036-01 SIUSlH Valves Powered From Nonsafety Train SPO 09/21/97 09f30/97 LER 96-036-00. ACR M3-97-0742. ACR M3-96-0745 NRR 66.1 ACR M3-96-0483 CCP and CCE Non-O Components Cause O-Components SPO(l) 09/25/97 09CO/97 Not To Fail Safe 67.1 ACR M3-964621 SBO Possible Overload in Event of an SIS Actuation and SPO(!)
02/03/97 02/21/97 To The NRC NRC Closed Design issues NRR For F.eview On TAC No. M96054. URI 96-201-14. ACR M3-96-0621. Infor 2/21/97.
Notice 97-21 67.2 URI 96-201-14 SBO Possible Overkrd in Event of an S!S ActuaMon and SPO(1) 09/26/97 09/30/97 Update IR 97-Design issues NRR 01 TAC & M96054. URI 96-201-14. ACH M3-96-0621 InfoNotice 97-21 67.3 TAC M96054 SBO Possible Overload in Event of an SIS Actuation and SPO(1) 09/26/97 09/30f97 Update IR 97I i
Desagn issues NRR Of TAC No. M96054. URI 96-201-14. ACR M3-96-0621. Infor Notice 97-21 TBD = No Action Required Frorn NU. NRC To Determene When Review To Be Completed.
18
EIM M-e M
E E
n n
ne n
n ea
. Co C
Ot 7
O O
9 7-a s
r d
9 C
C-n nF R=
N = U.2 I
Ni Ni; R
R p
R e
Rw R
Ea o
i t
pd Nt Ba se
._ e/
0 e
eev7 I
r e-Nt ei c
c7 7
e S
e;9 ta 7 -
t Ru hn9 hn9 7 a
h R/
9 h
q T
T R/
/
r/9 d
T 6
T 9
d oeU oo/
oo/R p2 oo/
r 4
5 r
oo/r2 1
NRN TF8 p2 TF6I U0 TF7 TF7 U0 t;.w i te 7
7 7
7 7
7 W e. ir 9
9 9
9 9
9 o t_ Be D
/
/
/
/
/
mt B
2 6
7 3
5
/0 T
/
/0 1
2 0
3 1
t d e C_
/
/
/
/
8
. 6 9
7 8
9 DB 0
0 0
0 0
0 E
N
.e r.
t o
ef Q w 7
7 7
7 7
7 lye
- 4 5
5 2
5 3
9 9
9 9
9
- 3 fdiv A
/
/
/
/
/
ee e
/
1L e B N
- 2 f
8 2
)
1 R
7 5
8 7
7
/2
/
A
/
/
/
li P_
0 0
0 0
0 0
9 aR E
fC C
SA D
sc O
O S
S S
S S
I nB P
. P R
R R
R R
os S
S D
D D
D D
pJ s
na s
r
- 7 7
s 0
6 6 7 9
6 7 9 0 6 7 6
r 0
1 e
9, 0 00
. 0 0
0
- 9. 0
- 9. 0
- 9. 0 p
0 -
)
0
. sn 0 7 s
m 0 7 s
n 0 7 s
X7 s
o 8 9 n
0 7 i
- 9, io 8
it 9,
- 9 n
t
. u
't 8
9, J
io 8
o 8
30 it 00 a
00 a
00 ta 04 te 30 t
30 30 it 30 d
t s
a 00 a
t s
t t
t e
64 lp a
e 64 e
64 e
64 e
64 e
r r
r r
0 0
p 90 p
p p
- 9. 0 p
- 9. 0 r
9, 0 0
p 90 r
r
. n 0 7 te 0 -
e 00 r
r 0
m y
e 0
e 0 -
e 0 -
o B
t n 0 7 d
0 7 tn 0 7 t
0 7 d
i 7-9, I
7 9 I
7 9, I
7 9
in r
9, C
7 n
s 300.
s 300 s
300 s
300 s
300 e
ns
. a ns441 he 014 it oe401 ns0 ns001 ns0 oe 01 B
oe u610 it u61 0 oe -
s s
it u61 u610.
it u610.
o e
n a s 9. 0 9 i
i f f i 1 a s 9,0 9 57 57 a
s957
- a. s 9 5 7 57.
T a s 9.0 9 -
ie o
cs ics i
e 0,619. L ic t
cs c
s 09 c s 49 s
it f
i i 1 f
w i 1 f
i
. a f i 1 - -
i is
. ic e0 61 c e0 61
. n
. es. 9. L i
61.
61 e 0.9,L de0 r
pn09,L e s -
- 9. L v
es -
e s -
e s t
. im pn00A.
0A o n00A r
pn00A.
pn00A e
a
. Sce00 C..
Sce00 Sce00 Sce00 C..
Sce00 t
r C.
l C.
R C.
t s
. e l
i28 i28 l
aLi28 s
t l
i 28 r
o
. e a L. 0 4 0 i 28 a L. 0 4 0 040 l
n a L. 0 0 0.
u L. 0 0 0 e
R 040 040 e
c c
- i. p. 4 0 0 D
ir400 s r000 c
t i i - -
W i
r h
ne r
i ne 69 6 - -
r ne 69 e
C o
it
. h p669 6
.p66+
e y
669 h p 9 9, 0
- d. O 9 9,0 cO 9 9,0 h p c
991 f
4O 99,1 c
1 1
1 eO 0
I l
eO R 0 -
Td T
s i
e
. Td R0 -.
0 7
Td R0 e R 0 b
R0 f
n a
n 7
Td r
r n E0 7.
Td nE0 7
o a. Ln E 4 9, o a. L. 4 0n E 4 9, o a. L.3 9, 7
o r
. r nE0 o a. L.4 09..
im o a. L.3 9, f
it r
r o
e 3
3 t
3 r
a pr f
40 f
f f
MS.640 e
f M S.6 04 6
6 40.
n g
Ota 6
M S.1 00 M S.1 00.
00 M S.1 00 te e
e 1
1 s
RT 8 68 RT 8 68 RT 8 68 RT 8 68 RT 8 68 D
l n
N e g
lg A
. A R Te0 9, 0 T. te0 9. 0 Te0 9. 0 Te0 9. 0 Te0 9. 0 1
1 1
1 1
o wta60 -
wta60 -.
t w
w e wta60
.a60
.t T
s e
- a60 -
C o
. ileu90 7.
cu90 7
- 9,
-.la! 2 9, ileu90 7 a
iv
. ier eu90 7 7
u 9 4 9,
- 9, de laI 2
- 9,.
i vaI 2 g
vf vaI 2 t
laI 2 R
evR 40
- vR 40 evR 40 O
e
. ee vR 40 7vR 40 N
R RB
. REU00 PEU00 REU00 REU00 REU00 U
N m
o r
F d
d 0
0 0
e
. e d
0 t
. 6 0
0 0
0 e
e a
t a
1 r
4 7
8 iu M
d M
9
. 8 0
0 1
1 L
q
. 0 0
0 0
0 e
t s
. s r
s s
6 7
7 7
e R
7 A
A 9
9 9
9 9
m tf f
n a
o s
s e
. e it o
n c
R R
R R
. n I
A D
o
. o R
E E
E E
e N
N U
L L
L L
o N
n 9
=
0 1
2 3
1 D
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 B
8 9
. 0 0
0 0
0 T
6 6
7 7
7 7
7
.O f**\\
P scheDied Onet.
F.snmated.
NBC_-
Besponsible ACR Rossiv for Does for.
NRC h
Z9ee/D9sumenLNe.
Dessdathutof NRC flem
.MBC EP Reve.Y NBCEeyjeg Speus M
r 70.14 LER 96402-00 Review TRM for Techrveal Specifications interpretations.
DRS 06/02/97 06/23/97 To The NRC Evaluate T.S. and Oper. License issues For Rev6ew On URI 96-08-16. LER 96-002-00 -01.96-037 00,96-038-00,96-6/6/97 042-00.96 443-00,96-048-00.96-051-00.97-004-00.97-007-00,97-01840,97-019-00. CAL 1-97-010 70 2 LER 96-002-01 Renew TRM for Tecincal Specticatens fr4erpretations.
DRS 09/15/97 09/30/97 Update IR 97-Evaluate T.S. and Oper. License issues 02 URI 96-08-16. LER 96-002-00.-01,96-037-00,96-038-00.96-042-00,96-043-00,96-048-00.96-051-00.97-004-00,97-007 00,97-018-00,97-01940, CAL 1-97-010 70.3 LER 96-037-00 Review TRM for Technical Specificateors Interpretatens.
DRS 09/25/97 09/30/97 Update IR 97-Evaluate T.S. and Oper. License :ssues 02 URI 96-08-16. LER 96-002-00.-01,96-037-El. 96-038-00,96-042-00,96-043-CO. 96-04840.96-051-00,97-004-00. 97-007-
- 00. 97-018-00. 97-019-00. CAL 1-97-010 70.4 LER 96-038-00 Review TRM for Technical Speculcations treerpretations.
DRS 08/31/97 09/21/97 To The NRC Evaluate T.S. and Oper. Ucense issues For Review On UR196-08-16. LER 96-002-00.-01,96-037-00,96-03840.96-9/5/97.
042-00,96-043-00. 96448-00.96 C51-00,97-004-00,97 007-00,97-01840. 97-01900. CAL 1-97-010 70.5 LER 96-042-00 Review TRM for Technical heili.%=1s Interpretations.
DRS 09/22/97 09/30/97 Update IR 97-Evaluate T.S. and Oper. License fssues 02 URl 96-08-16. LER 96-002-00.-01. 96-03740. 96-038-00,96-042-00,96-043-00,96-04840.96-051 00,97-004-00.97-007-00,97-018-00. 97-019-00. CAL 1-97-010 70.6 LER 96-043-00 Review TRM for Tec!wucal Specificahons Interpretations.
TWIS 0712S/97 08/13/97 To The NRC Evaluate T.S. and Oper. License issues For Review On URI 96-08-16. LER 96-002-00.-01. 96-037-00,96-038-00,96-8/14/97.
042-00.56-043-00,96-048-00,96-051-00.97-004-00,97-007-00,97-018-00. 97-019-00 CAL 1-97-010 70.7 LER 96-048-00 Review TRM for Techncal Specscatiuns Interpretations.
DRS 07/02/97 07/23/97 To The NRC Evaluate T.S. and Oper. License issues For Review On URI 96-08-16. LER 96-002-00.-01,96-037-00,96-03840.96-7/26/97.
04'!-00,96443C. 96-048-00.96-051-00,97-004-00,97-007-00, 97-01840. 97-019-00. CAL 1-97-010 TDD = No Action Required Frorn NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
20 e
L"!C-s:ned i.e o.=
znemeing.
m ACRBeedrJor_
Data for E
N --
ZommocurmriLfge.
Descr!R%L9LNftC_Dem
_t!!!c EP_.Herfew NRCJlgrigg h
EM 70.9 LER 96-051-00 Rewen TRM for Techrucal Specificanons interpre*ations.
DRS OG/20r'97 07/07/97 To The NRC Evaluate T.S. and Oper. License issues For Renew On URI 96-06-16. LER 96-002-00.-01. 96437-00,96438-00,96-7/7/97.
042-00,96-043-00.96-048-00.96-051-00.97-004-00,97-007-00,97-018-00,97-01940. CAL 1-97-010 71.1 None Associated Review Licensee Event Reports for Restart issues SPO(f)
N/A TBD No Response Req,4ed from NU
~
72.1 None Associated Review Enforcement and Unresolved items for Restar11ssues SPO(l)
N/A TBD No Response Requred from NU 73.1 NOV 96-05-12 Review OA Program for Adequacy and improvement NRR Co/02/97 06/21/97 To The NRC NOV 96-05-12. IFl 96-06-17 OSTI For Review On 6/18/97 73.2 IFl 96-06-17 Review OA Program for Adequacy and improvement NRR 09/08/97 09/15/97 NOV 96-05-12. IFl 9646-17 OSTI 74.1 URI 96-08 18 ISI/IST Program Control DRS 05/31/97 06/20/97 To The NRC URI 96-08-18. LER 96421-00. LER 96-021-01. ACR 97-901 For Review On 6/9/97.
74.2 LER 96-021-00 IS!/IST Program Contrul DRS 07/18/97 08/08/97 To The NRC URI 96-08-18. LER 96-021-00. LER 96-021-01. ACR 97-901 For Review On 7/26/97.
74 3 LER 96-021-01 ISI/IST Program Control DRS 07/18/97 08/08/97 To The NRC URI 96-08-18. LER 96421-00. LER 96-021-01. ACR 97-901 For Review On 8/19/97.
74 4 ACR M3 97-0901 ISI/IST Program Control DRS 09/2397 09/3097 URI 96-08-18. LER 96-021-00. LER 06-021-01. ACR 97-901 75.1 IFl 96-08-15 TIA issues (EDG Exhaust and Reped # of Service Water NRR 08/19/97 08/2T97 Pumps)
IFI 96-08-15. IFl 96-09-17 TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Determene When Revbw To Be Comrdeted 21
8
^
N Schm8 vied.Dete.
EstimesmL BeepposDen AC8tBeed dot Doet. Jet.
IEG i
Zone /DocumeM No.
Description of NRCleem psRC EP_ Bey!aw MRC Review Seah!,-
Ger m 75.2 IFI 96-09-17 TIA issues (EDG Exhaust and Requred 5 of Serse Water NRR 06/20/97 07/11/97 To The NRC Pumps)
For Renew On IFl 96-08-15.1Fl 96-09-17 7/W97.
76.1 IFl 96-08-17 Cracking of Fuse Fwrules DRS 0500S7 06/19/97 To The NRC For Renew On 6/16/97.
77.1 IFI 95-4446 Potential of Freezing Service Water Backwash Lines SPO(f).
05/16/97 06/06/97 To The NRC For Rev6ew On 5/20/97.
78.1 URI 9347-07 Safety Analyses (50.59) Process SPO(L) 04/26/97 05/16/97 To Tte NRC URI 93-07-07. eel 96-201-02. EEI 96-201-Cpl EB 96-201-For R view On
- 07. ED 96-201-08 5/tS9J
~
78.2 eel 96-201-02 Safety Analysis %59) Process SPO(l) 07/21/97 08/09/97 To The NI C UR193-07-07. eel 96-201-02. eel 96-201-06. eel 96-201-For Renew On
- 07. eel 96-201-08 9/5/97.
~....
78.3 eel 96-201-06 Safety Analysis (50.59) Process SPO(L) 09/25/97 0900/97 UR; 93-07-07. eel 96-201-02. eel 96-201-06 ED 96-201-
- 07. eel 96-201-08 78.4 eel 96-201-07 Safety Analysis (53.59) Process SPO(L) 07/16/97 OEMOS/97 To The NRC URI 93-07-07. eel 96-201-02. eel 96-201-06. ED 96-201-For Renew On
- 07. eel 96-20148 9/5/97.
78.5 eel 96-201-06 Safety Analysis (5059) Process SPO(L) 09/25/97 0900/97 URI 93-07-07. EB 96-201-02. eel 96-201-06. EB 96-201-
- 07. eel 96-201-08 79.1 eel 96-201-09 Design Control Process Renew (Pest of Fhase I of the SPO(O) 09/20'97 09/25/97 Updem IR 97-ICAVP)
SPO (i) 02 eel 96-201-09. ED 96-201-25. EB 96-201-37. EU-96-201-39 TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC To Deterrrune When Review To Be Completed.
22
-__,._..__.-.--__.......-l/-..--..
O O
8 sctmwstuen.
Esenseed.
E as,penstd, ACRDoodr for_
Dets for NBC-W-
Zone / Document No.
D6 g
EEEgylew NRQEeview
$%M#G EE N E!'
I 79.2 eel 96-201-35 Design Control Process Review (Part of Phase I of the SPO(O) 09/25/97 0930/97 Partial ICAVP)
SPO (f)
Package eel 96-201-09. eel 96-201-35. EE196-201-37. eel-96-201-39 Ready.
Update IR 97-02.
79.3 eel 96-201-37 Desup Control Process Review (Part of Phase I of the SPO(O) 06/21/97 07/12/97 To The NRC ICAVP)
SPO (I)
For Review On eel 96-201-09. eel 96 201-35. eel 96-201-37. eel-96-201-39 7/3/97.
79.4 eel 96-201-39 Design Control Process Review (Part of Phase I of the SPO(O) 06/21/97 07h2/97 To The NRC ICAVP)
SPO (t)
For Review On EE196 201-09. eel 96-201-35. eel 96-201-37. eel-96-201-39 7/8/97.
80.1 ACR M3-97-0348 Procedure Adequacy and Adherence / PUP Process SPO(l) 05/03/97 05/23/97 To The NRC OSTI For Review On 5/72/97 81.1 eel 96-201-32 Testing of Safety Systems DRS 06/30/97 0'/22/97 To The NRC eel 96-201-32. eel 96-201-34 For Review On 6/25/97.
81.2 eel 96-201-34 Testing of Safety Systems DRS 09/27/97 09/30/97 Update IR 97-eel 96-201-32. EEI 96-201-34 02 81.3 LER 96-0324X)
Testing of Safety Systems DRS 0603/97 06/23/97 To The NRC eel 96-201-32. eel 96-201-34. LER 96432-00 For denew On 6/23/97
~
82.1 eel 06-201-10 Qual #y Assurance Records SPO(f) 09'15/97 09.00/97 Par $al.
Package Ready-83.1 Letter B16195 Effectiveness of Emergency Response Organization DRS OMX3/97 06/23/97 To The NRC Coordination with Offsite EP Ofreciais: Dose Assessment For Renew On Capatitity G'20/97 IFl 95-36-01 TBD = No Action Requered From NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
23
schemend Dew Esammet N
BaseenaRda AChasedy for Date).or_
NRC.
N Zenet%MMitent.No.
Dessrigtlon of MRC.Desi
_ggg EP Review NRC Review I!nME 83.2 IFl' 95-36-01 Effec 8veness of Emergency Response Organization DRS 05/15/97 4Ni/Oli/97 To The NRC Coordination with Offsite EP Officials; Dose Assessment For Review On Capatdty 6/5/97.
IFl 95-36-01 84.1 eel 96-05-15 Secunty issues - Correceve Action and Review
'DRS 06/0397 06/23/97 To The NRC eel 96-05-15. eel 97-0341. eel 97-03-02. eel 97-0343. U1 For Review On VfD 96-09-20 6/23r97
~
84.2 eel 97-03-01 Security issues - Correctivs Action and Renew DRS 07/23/97 08/12/97 To The NRC eel 96-05-19. eel 97-03-01. eel 974342. EER 97-0343. U1 For Review On VIO 96-09-20 7/29/97.
84.J EEI 97-03-02 Security issues - Corrective Action and Review DRS 07/23/97 08/12/97 To The NRC eel 96-05-15. eel 97-03-01. eel 97-03-02. EEI 37-0343. U1 For Review On VIO 96-09-20 7/30/97.
.. ~
84.4 eel 97-03-03 Security issues - Corrective Action and Review DRS 07/23/97 08/12/97 To The NRC EEI 96-05-15. eel 97-03-01. eel 97-03-02. EEI 97-0343. U1 For Review On VIO 96-09-20 7/3097.
84.5 NOV 96-09-20 (U1)
Secunty issues - Corrective Action and Renew DRS 07/16/97 08M5/97 To The NRC eel 96-05-15. eel 97-03-01. eel 97-03-02. EE 57-03-03. U1 For Renew On VIO 96-09-20 7/29/97.
85.1 ACR M3-96-0496 Other RSS and Refated Design Basis Concems SPO(O) 08/02/97 08/1397 Resolved with ACR M3-96-0496. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M3-96-0620. ACR NRR the NRC -
M'rJ6-1078. ACR M3-97-0039. ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-9/5/97.
97-0409. LER 97-003-00. LER 97-015-00. LER 97-021-00 M3-971029 85.10 LOR
'7-021-00 Other RSS and Related Design Basis Concems SPO (O) 09/25/97 09/3G97 ACR M3-96-0496. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M3-96-0620. ACR NRR M3-96-1078. ACR M3-97-0039, ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-97-0409. LER 97403-00. LER 97-015-00. LER 97-021-00 M3-97-1029 TBD = No Action Required From NU. NRC lo Determine When Review To Be Completed.
24
O O
O m
m seasonsude ACBl%edidE.
Oshtfor_
IEIC-N Zope/Qggument No.
Desgdygen of NRC_Rqm NRC EP hw teRC h 3RRh8A E# FEE'ERE 85.11 'ACR M3-971029 Other RSS and Related Desegn Basis Concems SPO (0)
Resowed eMh ACH M3-96-0496. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M3-96-0620. ACR NRR the NRC -
M3-96-1078. ACR M3 97-0039. ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-W5/97.
97-0409. LER 97-003-00. LER 97-015-00. LER 97-021-00 M3-971029 85 2 ACR M3-96-0497 Other RSS and Related Design Basis Concems SPO (O) 08/02/97 08/13/97 Resolved with ACR M3-96-0495, ACR M3-964497. ACR M3-96-0620. ACH NRR the NRC-M3-96-1078. ACR M3-97-0039. ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-95/97, 97-0409, LER 97-003-00. LER 97-015-00. LER 97-021-00 M3-97-1029 85.3 ACR M3-96-0620 Other RSS and Related Design Basis Concems SPO(0) 07/10/97 07/30/97 Resolved wih ACR M3-96-0496. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M3-96 0620. ACR NRR the NRC -
M3-961078. ACR M3-97-0039. ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-9/5/97.
97-0409. LER 97-003 00. LER 97-015-00. LER 97-021-00 M3-97-1029 85.4 ACR M3 96-1078 Other RSS and Related Design Basis Concems SPD (O) 08/02/97 08/13/97 Resolved with ACR M3-96-04%. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M3-96-0620. ACR NRR the NRC -
- M3-96-1078. ACR M3-97 0039. ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-95/97.
97-0409. LER 97-003-00. LER 97-015-00. LER 97-021-00 M3-97-1029 85.5 ACR M3-97-0039 Other RSS and Related Design Basis Concems SPO (O) 07/25/97 08/13/97 Resolved with ACR M3-96-0496. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M'4-96-0620. ACR NRR the NRC -
M3-96-1078. ACR M3-97-0039. ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-9 5/97.
97-0409. LER 97-003-00, LER 97-015-00. LER 97-021-00 M3-97-1029 85.6 ACR M3-97-0128 Other RSS and Related Design Dasis Concems SPO (O) 07.7 --J7 08/13/97 Resolved with ACR M3-964496. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M3-96-0620. ACR NRR the NRC -
M3-96-1078. ACR M3-97-0039. ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-9/5/97.
97-0409. LER 97-003-00. LER 97-015-00. LER 97-021-00 M3-97-1029 85.7 ACR M3-97-0409 Other RSS and Related Design Basis Concems SPO (O) 07/26/97 08/13/97 Resolved with_
ACH M3-96-0496. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M3-96-0620. ACR NRR IbeNRC-M3-96-1078. ACR M3-97-0039. ACR M3-9'-0128. ACH M3-9/5/97.
97-0409. LER 97-003 00. LER 97-015-00. LER 97-021-00 M3-97-1029
~.
TBD = No Action Requis sd From NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
25
.m m
,~.
E OcteduleLQsk.
D#mewd Bespons3Me ACftssethr for De w for reeg_-
h ZonemocumentNo.
Description _stNBC_ Item
_N3C LPjgpew NBC Reykw IRE!WE 85.8 LER 97-003-00 Ottwe RSS and Related Design Basis Concerns SPO (O) 09/02/97 09/23/97 ACR M3-96-0496. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M3-96-0620. ACR NRR M3-96-1078. ACR M3-97-0039. ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-97-0409. LER 97-003-00. LER 97-015-00. LER 97-02140 M3-97-1029 u
85.9.LER 97-015-00 Other RSS and Related Design Basis Concems SPO (O) 09/25/97 09/30/97 ACR M3-96-0496. ACR M3-96-0497. ACR M3-96-0620. ACR NRR M3-96-1078. ACR M3-974039. ACR M3-97-0128. ACR M3-97-0409. LER 97-00340. LER 97415-00, LER 97-021-00 M3-97-1029 86.1 CAL 1-97-010 Operator Licensing and Training SPO(!)
07/15,97 08/05,97 To The NRC CAL 1-97-010. CR M3-97-0927 DRS For Review Or*
7TJO/97.
Update IR 97-202. IR 97-04 86.2 ACR M3-97-0927 Operator Licensing and Training SPO(f) 09/20/97 09/30/97 Update IR 97-CAL 1-97-010. CR M3-974927 DRS 202.IR 9744 P
~
TBD = No Action Required Frorn NU. NRC To Determine When Review To Be Completed.
26
Millstone 3 I.
Technical Specification Changes to be Submitted to the NRC Submittals by 9/30/97 (except as noted) i PTSCR 3-31-97 Pressurizer Level.
PTSCR 3-30-97 Instrument inaccuracy PTSCR 3-34-97 Comainment Valves PTSCR 3-33-97 Spent Fuel Pool Boraflex 10/15 (Mode 2) l PTSCR 3-35-97 RSS Pump Surveillances (Replacing PTSCRs 3 24-97 and 3-13 96) i e
_a
... -. - - -. _. - ~..
Millstone 2 -
- 1 Technical Specification Changes to be Submitted to NRC c
Pressure / Temperature Curves and LTOP issues
-10/15/97 Compliance issues # 2
-10/18/97 i
ESFAS/RPS Setpoint Changes i
due to environmental cllowance-1
- lt is expected that a technical specification change will not be required.
c b
i l
1 l
}
d 5
J
. -. ~
._.