ML20211K397

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Memorandum & Order Directing Util to File & Serve Revised Std Version of Contentions Contained in 861003 Prehearing Conference Order & Directing Any Other Party to Respond within 5 Days of Svc.Served on 861114
ML20211K397
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 11/13/1986
From: Frye J, Paris O, Shon F
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO., NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), SHOREHAM OPPONENTS COALITION
References
CON-#486-1510 86-533-01-OL, 86-533-1-OL, OL-5, NUDOCS 8611170158
Download: ML20211K397 (3)


Text

--

t 15/o UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Sk ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD '86 NOV 14 All 35 Before Administrative Judges: g . ,

John H. Frye, III, Chairman u t.J -

Dr. Oscar H. Paris Mr. Frederick J. Shon gn**a NOV 1419% '

Docket Nos. 50-322-0L-5 In the Matter of (EP Exercise)t LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (ASLBPNo.86-533-ol-OL)

(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) November 13, 1986 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER All parties to this proceeding have expressed confusion with respect to the rulings on contentions contained in the October 3 Prehearing Conference Order, and counsel for LILC0 and Intervenors have expressed differing views of the Board's rulings. Additional, counsel for LILCO indicated in his October 30 motion for leave to respond that he was compiling a " Revised Standard Version" of the contentions which would be attached to his response to the motions for reconsideratien of the Board's Prehearing Conference Order.

Because the so-called " Revised Standard Version" of contentions was not received with LILCO's responses, we inquired as to its status and were informed that counsel had withheld it pending a ruling on the various objections to specific rulings on contentions.

h O

03 02-

.3__.,n-4 _ _ _ ,

s b

2-The confusion concerning the rulings on contentions must be eliminated. Further, it must be eliminated prior to a ruling on specific objections. Consequently, we are directing counsel for LILC0 to file and serve his " Revised Standard Version" immediately. Any other party may respond within five days of service. Service is to be accomplished by express mail or a more rapid means. On receipt of the

responses, we will rule on the specific objections and promulgate a final version of the admitted contentions.I This Memorandum and Order in no way stays the discovery schedule set forth in the Prehearing Conference Order or the deadlines for responding to pending motions.

l 4

I Intervenors have objected that this Board is not competent to pass i on objections to the Margulies Board's rulings or to discern its intent. This objection is overruled. No limitations have been placed on this Board's authority in this portion of this proceeding, nor would such limitation be appropriate.

o It is so ORDERED.

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

\

d'6MW b . \ aN \ S l

Dr. Oscar H. Paris ADMIN TIVE JU GE

.s:>

Mr'. Frbc eri k J;Soh ADMINISTRAT 11DGE

, an John (Frye, III, Chairman ADMI STRA TIVE JUDGE Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 13th day of November,1986.

1 1

i