ML20211E200

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Test Repts & Data Re Testing of Kwik-Bolt at Facility,Per 860828 Meeting.Current Bolt Values Supported by Onsite Field Test Repts
ML20211E200
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/16/1986
From: Poparad C
HILTI FASTENING SYSTEMS
To: Fair J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20211E206 List:
References
NUDOCS 8702240259
Download: ML20211E200 (4)


Text

,

ctL Sf6-SE O 32s MIbTE U.S. Construction Company 4115 South 100th East Avenue
  • PO. Box 470400
  • Telex 796503 a

September 16, 1986 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission office of Inspection & Enforcement Washington, D.C.

20555 Attention:

Mr. John Fair

Dear Mr. Fair:

Subsequent to our meeting on August 28, 1986, I have reviewed in detail the Kwik-Bolt data and would like to provide you with the following information.

First, on-site Kwik-Bolt testing was conducted at Susquehanna Steam Electric Station / Emergency Diesel Generator Facility during May, 1985, and March / April, 1986 (Attachment 1).

These tests indicated some local site-specific deviations from the expected values for the 3/8, 1/2, 5/8, 3/4 and 1-1/4 inch Kwik-Bolts with deep embedments (Attachment 2).-

A preliminary review at the jobsite did not reveal a cause for the differences.

The Susquehanna Kwik-Bolt data along with other nuclear power plant on-site test data (39 test reports) 1425 data points, Attachment 4) was compared to the published values.

This analysis revealed that the on-site average ultimate tensile values met or exceeded the current published ultimate tensile values except for the 1/2 inch diameter Kwik-Bolt with embedments greater than 3-1/2 inches.

These values were 7 to 20% below published data.

Next, additional 1/2 inch Kwik-Bolt tests were conducted at the HILTI L

Test Center (Report WENT #115-86).

This test program confirmed the 1/2" ultimate tensile values reported in the nuclear power plant on-site test report data analysis.

In addition, tensile tests were conducted in a hard river gravel (Moh's hardness #9) to determine the influence of aggregate hardness on the 1/2 inch Kwik-Bolt.

For comparison, the limestone aggregate norms 11y used in our testing has a Moh's hardness equal to 4 or 5.

The test results in the river gravel concrete met or exceeded the published data by 0 to 16%.

As the aggregate hardness increases, the ultimate tensile values increase until the bolt or wedge material

(

strength is exceeded.

Thus, we have concluded that the 1/2 inch Kwik-Bolt tensile values are influenced by the coarse aggregate hardness.

l A Division of Hilti, Inc.

0702240259 860916 i

PDR ADOCK 05000307

(

P PDR

= - -

1 i

U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:

Mr. John Fair Page 2.

September 16, 1986 We believe that aggregates commonly used in concrete mix designs more closely match the limestone aggregate used in our laboratory vs. a hard river gravel.

Therefore, after review of all the test data, we have elected to revise the 1/2 inch diameter Kwik-Bolt tensile values, (Attachment 10).

All other Kwik-Bolt values will remain as currently published.

For your review, I have calculated the factor of safety using the revised ultimate values vs. the current working load.

As you can see, even for the worst case, there remains at least a 2.9:1 factor of safety.

Practically, there would probably be at least a 3.6 to 1 factor of safety since most designs are based on a 4000 psi concrete and an embedmont of less than six (6) inches, i

In summary, the Kwik-Bolt values currently published are substantiated by the on-site field test reports.

The only exception is the 1/2 inch diameter Kwik-Bolt, which is influenced by aggregate hardness at deep embedments.

Any NRC notice deemed appropriate could be developed with the text being i

specific and narrow in scope.

Working together, HILTI can be supportive to you and to the utility owners in effectively and efficiently resolving application questions that need attention.

I am available to meet with you as required.

Sincerely, i

HILTI U.S.

CONSTRUCTION kWbd Q&M Charles Popar&d, P.E.

Director Technical Marketing Services CJP:bc Attachments cc M.

Hilti - HILTI/ Tulsa E. Hoelker - HILTI/ Tulsa R. L. Zink - HILTI/ Tulsa

ATTACHMENTS 1.

Susquehanna Test Reports - March 1985 March / April 1986 2.

Susquehanna Test Data Analysis 3.

Nuclear Power Plant On-Site Test Data Analysis Index 4.

Nuclear Power Plant On-Site Test Data Analysis 5.

Hilti Test Report WENT #115-86 6.

1/2" Kwik Bolt Detailed Data Analysis 7.

1/2" Diameter Kwik Bolt Data Analysis Excluding Susquehanna Test Reports 8.

Susquehanna Kwik Bolt Material / Dimension Analysis 9.

Concrete Mix Design 10.

Revised 1/2" Kwik Bolt Tension Values 11.

Factor of Safety Analysis 12.

Nuclear Power Plant On-Site Test Index i

l l

4

1 SUSQUEHANNA TEST REPORTS March 1985 March / April 1986 J