ML20211C079
| ML20211C079 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 01/27/1987 |
| From: | Trevors G NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | Gagliardo J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| CNSS877063, NUDOCS 8702200007 | |
| Download: ML20211C079 (2) | |
Text
.j,
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION Nebraska Public Power District
" ' "
- i'A*E,,"o J M U S.^ti N Qi! @ X W E P i
FEB - 91987 j
CNSS877063 January 27, 1987 Mr. J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011
Subject:
Status of the Cooper Nuclear Station Preventive Maintenance Program Upgrade.
Reference:
1.
J. M. Pilant to J. E. Gagliardo, "NPPD Response to Inspection Report 50-298/86-01", dated October 7, 1986.
2.
G.
A.
Trevors to J.
E. Gagliardo, " Status of Vendor Techneial Information Update Program at Cooper Nuclear Station", dated January 15, 1987.
Dear Mr. Gagliardo:
This letter is written to provide you with the current status of NPPD's efforts to upgrade the Cooper Nuclear Station Preventive Maintenance (PM)
Program.
As committed by the District in Reference 1, procedural controls have now been established for maintaining the PM Program.
Additionally, the District has completed the review of specific vendor PM recommendations against existing station PM requirements.
As a result, additional PM's and Surveillance Procedures have been identified as being required and, in those instances where vendor recommendations were found not to be required, a documented Engineering evaluation has been developed.
Presently, the District is proceeding with development of the new PM's, related Maintenance and Surveillance Procedures, and procurement of spare parts to support the additions. Additionally, the District has also initiated a second, more in-depth review of the safety related vendor manuals to determine whether any subtle, non-specific PM recommendations exist. To date, 80 of the approximately 250 safety related manuals have had this review. The District intends to continue this process for the remaining safety related manuals.
Qf
r s Mr. J. E. Gagliardo January 27, 1987 Page 2 Further information regarding Reference 2 is that five vendors still have not provided updated information. Action is being taken by District management to obtain this information.
When this input is received, the District will complete the necessary reviews to upgrade the PM Program, as required, for the components supplied by these vendors.
Should you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact me.
L 1
revors Division Manager of Nuclear Support GAT:ss