ML20210T348

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Statement for SER Re Assessment & Conclusions Concerning Implementation of QA Program.Implementation of QA Program PSAR Commitments Consistent W/Status of Project
ML20210T348
Person / Time
Site: Satsop
Issue date: 05/15/1975
From: Jennifer Davis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Giambusso A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CON-WNP-1776 NUDOCS 8605300077
Download: ML20210T348 (2)


Text

_, r _ . _ . . . .. - ._. - ._. _ -_-

- - ,w - . -.\

,l

. A r ,

. . . . ~

.-f i

.. . ,n u .a -

m. .: . .

4 .

5 ., e/ m.

w . 7.

. . . . . a .. .. - -

f..' y:.. A..c i. /, ~ /

.. _MAY.1 5 B75 s .

- g

, s. ..f .3 y .

-,.. ..a>.;.. .

~

, . , u , ,Ag. , - c cy y n _. 4. w : .: 'y,. . . .,: .

i an , . *

.., m ._ .a .. ...,s..-~,.

w. .,

t o

n. -

.v.:.s. .^ , a . . . .

<- s'

~,

. v . -,

ww w . ,,. . ' 4 it. ea w'* ,

m.%. g ,, A . , < , p. - -6_

e -

cf . . 2 c... - r.,. +g  ; v/. w, . -A 4, p

.t s **.hw. ,2. ,,w=

.a , r - 4a  ;.

3

. e t.

..n..

e,p, , .

,e. . s. .a. . . , . *a; v ~3  :

, . . . 5

% m;p 4 S ;p.d.w t s, g. .e

-}f..~'4'., E.. '  %( -  !

\ ' '. Q.,.$m&,,f.,;y S&. hg.w.% yJ.  % G Q,, o y'w.

w s, j 3 ,: n' -O.a .?.Y ; -e-

. n e. c .; ,1 cl.=l -Qy'~).! 1&. mlQ !l2.QTQ.QK. .s.-R. se<c. * ' a.s k tgyM.jky&.y a.f}l.)q}Qk y

j'  :.;

. m , . .r . m . . ~ . m. M .. ..'c:.3;j,Ty..ll^r

' f. hg.ypivissem of Emester Liseesing 7 M,4 d ng.$ e JxpQt y- 4.; k. f,

.~

3

' .wg c .

q.il', j. <

~

~<;-QOffice, of Weelaar Beseter Eagalation u w. jy. ~,% ,

a 3'g4 sjf,@,ij M .,

^

V /- - ,]~ , d

, w , _.up . , . , m 3 g - ,

- ; _ q..

. - 7 .'I.I'

~ '

  1. - J*' SUFFLY SYSTEM

. II'Smet&RT SEE STATBERT

- mAmu m f0N PLBLIC N 'N> M POWER 9

  • 7

^ '.

4 '-

V '

' N,

w, . y-

~.. nocEIT uns. D 50s & 5 509' .

. :+

? '

~

7 Mc o 1

. . , - ,-5' -

ysr .% .,Wa- ,

  • Eme1msed is a statement prepared by the Offica of Inspection and '.h i

' Enforcement for use in the Safety Evaluation Report regarding our r@ l

~

' ' assessment and an==ha=1mme relating to ' implementation of the QA M-.

' [G#.

, for this project. , - , 1.,.. l ,

- - - 1,

.w.x,. . n. ,~z; .,. ~ .

.v~. s. . . i.~w .,% .e. . . . 3. .

" ~ ."-

s.n. 6. . . n..V m. A..

- .- 2 >

.Driginal signed by " - '

..V f ^

I ,4

\ - .y m.g-

. u. .zey ~3 4.. Agi-},Q:h,%eape?

, . ..ny. . , . y ; p -@~.4 . . . .

L C.; Davis - .N ,- 7~

  • W ,

' -~ ^ '

7.,7f... '

John G. Davis i

4

~-

.il,<r {.Q@ ~ C. '~

geputy Director for ,

, .- m . , ..'1 Field'Operatiosa '

l .

- ", Office of Inspection

.7' .r, , .

v '

,.5,.

and Enforcement ~f a i . . ..

v.

, o es: R. N. Bagelken, IE V . qq,p ,

, , , .; .y D. J. Sewholt. EL V . . ,i w: w. -.

, R.,R. Yellmer, IL , . ,; , y q,,, g#2;{ .. y l , , R. L. DeToung. EL. y ,. , , .

~-

l -

W66 j 'ii , "

(' M. .E' l -

_ ,1%

-q:M ~,5

.:O. . .n;34 s
. Parr, A., .e- ')  % IL f . cw, ..M'M'.@.t

$. W; hs - ,,**%

w:'la -y" w} .,.L&

q"e

~'

E~

!: vu - ' [?

H

?

. n.--

.s$:rm r k. i 'a

  • e.6.y 's:
3. .f.rlwge,r(

. 4 . .f . ,. 4- .:p J'.q?4 .s ,r y_ /r% 3. , J ,*f w. V ^ - *

  • R i

I t.

. ' >-- -"t 3 - sg

..s a +

k. i n

.- 1 e. ," b.g'-'=es*.

.,k nrg

~

g

.'e,e-.".

,'. .s *

. - . . ,A

, r- *

s. -s -
e. -

ms ') n n.

.r , to e ,'-  ? s t

,s,.'e r a

=l.

.g} $ f. ,

..E F. , 5 ' *hW w j Y -rg a Y 4% *-".b '. g,

- Y l .~ . ,2 p _9

  • 4 * *

.W, fe,g, w T' !4, "h.Yg.. r.,a:r -p.<- *c:

,.,,u.'&.% j. . /grl,m,9q f - - y-

~

2

,.ap

. .4 .  : N W.T;. -m, ',*

, g.~. a.s .. . J.aq

. . ,).., ..' . r.~sc.s . .y A . g . a,<. . ,c + .: ,

. . . , , , . , .*..s .*,<,

e .% . -;n.+. .

< ,? g. -

a. .

3 .3 -

m t ...a

'. '..'.,'~ ,;

1:n. ;2. . qL , ...

m .

e,:, *.

n. W . &. . w .. .

u, ,, 2c.*s &. : - ..y%,3:

svd.a. s..  ;.: m. n ,~ ' .';. . - Q . a .

.", L.9w ..&. . c ._5. .; ~n. :c, ,

-.~.

. ...n..... 1~a

. - .,. , . v . ,

, ~. . ~

.>- ' , J. . * '

M *. f .* , , . . ,

3 .s.

8605300077 750515

(..

~

PDR ADOCK 05000508

. E *PD.R .

,s. -

- - ~ ~

. u. . . , " .

/ .

/ >

~ ~ ,

- FSEB . .

. ,, . ,' C . D.D,F.:0.- - v -

..'.. . _.t_ ._1._1.. .h . .

_ - urg_ .

-JGDa is A Fi '

~ .. g

5/_ 75 5/ g- '/75 --5/b/75 -

_q.. ...

c .*

4. ...s.-*

ucm mm m _ ou. _..'e r...... .; .* , , .. ..,,.. . , . .4 .%s. "

. , ,,u ,,,,,,, . . ,,. ..,.. . . , .

4, . oedean.ea,.apAereakt.AaSan. 'te .d'* 4 * *bI.s&%k [ e%ehe ' ' '.--3 om

  • 3m) .J dte " & ' .' * ~ ^ ws n  ? &amm, A. e da . um M 4 8

.j. . . - . - . . . - . .

i .-

'" (;

n

.) l IE

SUMMARY

SER POSITION STATEMENT l IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WNP UNITS 3 & 5 QA PROGRAM DOCKET NOS. 50-508 & 50-509 i

ASSESSMENT i The Office of Inspection and Enforcement has conducted inspections to

'! examine the implementation of the WNP Units 3 and 5 QA Program to as-

.l certain its conformance with related 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, PSAR commit-l ments. Our examinations encompassed the organization of the applicant i and the QA audit, review and approval functions of the applicant for l those major contractors selected to date. These examinations focused on quality assurance activities related to the design, procurement and construction of the nuclear power plants, and included a review of established procedures and instructions along with the execution of applicable provisions contained therein.

Our assessment includes consideration of the results of the above in-spection activities and of the applicant / contractor actions leading to the resolution of identified deficiencies, or delays in timely establishment of procedures and instructions, as necessary, to arrive at effective implementation of PSAR QA commitments. ' Based thereon, the Office of Inspection and Enforcement has determined that there are no substantive unresolved issues relating to the implementation of the QA program which require further identification and followup at this time.

CONCLUSIONS Based on the above assessment, the Office of Inspection and Enforcement concludes that the implementation of WNP Units 3 and 5 QA program PSAR commitments is consistent with the status of the project.

i 4

i e

1

  • . . - , - _ _ .. .. - _ ~ . ~ . . .

m_ - __