ML20210S891
| ML20210S891 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop |
| Issue date: | 02/06/1976 |
| From: | Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Deyoung R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-1652 NUDOCS 8605290493 | |
| Download: ML20210S891 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:I i 3 se c FEB 1 9 576 Docket File ABournia N Reading UEreff) EIGoulbourne IRR #3 File DBVassallo BCRusche WButler IECase ODParr RHeineman MWilliams A RCDeYoung KKniel Docket Nos. STN,509 08 DSkovholt JStolz and STN 50-509 SVarga R. S. Boyd, Director, Division of Pmject Management, DIM This menomenchsa is to advise you of the status of the Safety Evaluation Report fe the Washington Public Rnser fhapply System Pmject )bs. 3 and 5 and to samarize the issues for which our review is irmmplete. A as: mary of these issues is enclosed. There are tuo outstanding issues and only six maolved f a==a as defined in RL Opemting Pmcedurc 706. Te the two outstarding issues, we need no further infomation fmn the app 14=rit. For the resolved issues, on three itens, we have stated a clear position, the applicant has agreed to meet it, and we have fourd the===ftment acceptable, subject to confimatory doctanentation of the agra===rit in the PSAR. On two items, we have clear positions which we will require and we need no further infomation fmn the applicant. The last remaining iten, we have a clear position which we will require and we need further infomation fmn the applicant. We will resolve all of the issues }rie to 4a==nce of the constructicri pemits. The itens on the envias dal qmlification progrum has been accepted as reported in the PSAR fe the construction pemit stage of review. However, we will require doctrnentation on the applicant's
- rogram and will continue to review this as a post-construction perstit ites.
6 R. C. De oung, Assistant Dimeter for Light Water Reactes Division of Pmject Managment i ~ l \\ f k ( I 8605290490 760219 PDR ADOCK 05000508 i E PDR l O $/ D % 1HR-43 gW#3 ... N A/D. N 0"* summaus h {, gg h Vm 9/ 0/7 R -9/ D/76 -2/h76-Form ABC,318 (Rev. 9 95) AECM 0240 W u. s. sovanmusm? Paintene orreces sere.sas.see
(,
- ?
a E!EIDSURE FEB 1 9 1976 SlWARY OF SAFLTi RE1ATED ISSUES I.i Outstanding Issues A.. We Have ibt Ccmpleted Our Review 1. Evaluation of the confomance of the radwaste design with Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. 2. Evaluation of the applicant's financial qualifications. .II. Resolved Issues 'A. We Need Ccnfimatory InforTration Fmm The Applicant 'l. Docinentation is required to confim that an acceptable environ-mental qualification program will be developed for all safety related electrical equipment. 2.' Documentation is required for the design modifications on the - fire protection system. We Have Ibt Completed Our Review -B. 1. Evaluation of supplemental infonration regarding design criteria for protection against the dynamics associated with the postulated rupture of high energy piping outside containment. 2. Evaluation of informtion reganling the validity of tm computer codes used in the analysis of the effects of dynamic loadings associated with the sudden operation of pressure-relieving. device. 3. Evaluation of the documentation is required for the containment air purification and cleanup systems test. to verify the adequacy of the design. C. We fleed Additional Informtion From the Applicant 1. The applicant must-substantiate that he has proper authority reganiing activities within the exclusion area. =}}