ML20210S135

Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 85 to License DPR-61

ML20210S135
Person / Time
Site:	Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date:	09/29/1986
From:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20210S108	List: ML20210S106 ML20210S111 ML20210S135
References
NUDOCS 8610080021
Download: ML20210S135 (3)

Text

e

\ UNITED STATES j

e. 3 j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

= WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e

~e,,,**

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT N0. 85 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-61 CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY HADDAM NECX PLANT DOCKET N0. 50-213 1.0 INTRODUt.iiO' By letter dated August 6,1986, the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power  !

Company (CYAPC0) submitted a request for changes to the Haddam Neck Plant technical specifications. The proposed amendment revises the technical specifications to properly identify the addressee for the Monthly Operating Reports currently required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.

A Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to License and Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determinatior, and Opportunity for Hearing related to the requested action was published in the Federal Register on August 27, 1986 (51 FR 30563). No coments or requests for hearing were received.

2.0 EVALUATION Haddam Neck Plant Technical Specification 6.9.1(d) required the licensee to forward Monthly Operating Reports to the Director, Office of Management Information and Program Control within the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). As a result of NRC reorganizations, the addressee presently identified in the technical specifications is no longer applicable. By letter dated August 8, 1986, CYAPC0 proposed a revision to the technical specifications to revise the addressee for the monthly operating reports to the Director, Office of Resource Management.

8610090021 860929 PDR ADOCKOS00g3 P

l l

4 The staff has reviewed this proposed change and has concluded that the proposed change is administrative in nature and is consistent with the guidance for the subject area currently found in the Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications, Revision 5. The staff, therefore, concludes that the proposed change is acceptable.

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

This amendment involves a change to a requirement with respect to the installation or use of facility components located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and changes to the surveillance requirements. The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that this amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.

4.0 CONCLUSION

The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance.with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

5.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT i

1 This Safety Evaluation has been prepared by F. Akstulewicz.

Dated: Septenber 29, 1986 1

4 4

h t

4 4

h 3

i a

4 4

1 l

- . - , . - . _ , _ , . , . . - . . - - - - . - . . . _ - , . - _ _ . . . , _-.. ,.