ML20210R164

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Copy of Two Volume ORNL Rept,Dtd 941214,documenting Staff Review of Colorado Final 10CFR20 Equivalent Rule.Nrc Review Concluded That Colorado 10CFR20 Equivalent Rule Meets Compatibility,Health & Safety Categories of New Policy
ML20210R164
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/18/1997
From: Lohaus P
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To: Quillin R
COLORADO, STATE OF
Shared Package
ML20210R170 List:
References
NUDOCS 9709020333
Download: ML20210R164 (26)
v • d • e


Text

- __-_____ - -_ - - _ - - -

Mr. R:bert Quillin, Dir:ct:r Mi8 g Laborat:ry cnd Radiati:n S:rvic:s Division Department of Public Health and Environment  !

8100 Lowry Boulevard Denver, Colorado 80220-6928

Dear Mr. Ouillin:

Given the significance of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 rule to both NRC and Agreement State programs, NRC undertook a review of all Agreement State final Part 20 equivalent rules for compatibility with 10 CFR Part 20. The review was conducted as a two step process. The first step involved a review by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), under contract with NRC, to identify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each Agreement State equivalent rule. A copy of the two volume ORNL report, dated December 14,1994, documenting its staff review of the Colorado final 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule,is enclosed for your information and use (Enclosure 1). The second part of the review was conducted by NRC staff and consisted of a review of the differences and inconsistencies identified by ORNL for compatibility and adequacy significance.

The NRC review focused on those provisions of the Colorado rule that are required for compatibility or for health and safety under the new adequacy and compatibility policy statement approved by the Commission by Staff Requirements Memorandum dated June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes the new compatibility categories). The NRC review concluded that the Colorado 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the new policy.

If you have any questions regarding the compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me at (301) 415 2326 or Ms. Cardella H. Maupin of my staff at (301) 415 2312, or INTERNET: CHM @NPC. GOV.

Sincerely, Original Signed Byt PAUL H. LOHAUS Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs

Enclosures:

As stated Distribution:

DlR RF DCD (SP08) (Enclosure 1 to PDR & Central Files only) s SDroggitis PDR (YESv')

KSchneider RBlanton 9709020333 970818 PDR j DSuitenberger STPRG ESGCO Colorado File PDR Part 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1)

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ CHM \Part 20\COREVIEW. CHM

  • See Previous Concurrence.

Ta receive a copy of this docurnent Msete in tne boa: 'C' = Copy without attachment /encloture *E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure *N* = No copt liFFICE OSP OSP:DD OGC OSP:Df jf.,

NAME CMaupin:gd:nb PHLohaus FXCameron RLBangart 'F' DATE 07/31/97* 080/01/97* 08/ /97 08//fl97 88 *""'*""*"#

9109 02oM3 lilll11

' ' 'Ilill' 'ill' 'll M MB CEMER CDPL

Mr. Robert Quillin, Dirsctor AUG 181397 Laborat:ry and Radiation Sirvices Division-Department of Public Health and Environment 8100 Lowry Boulevard Denver, Colorado 80220-6928

Dear Mr. Quillin:

Given the significance of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 rule to both NRC and Agreement State programs, NRC undertook a review of all Agreement State final Part 20 equivalent rules for compatibility with 10 CFR Part 20. The review was conducted as a two step process. The first step involved a review by Oak Ridge National Laboratory-(ORNL), under i contract with NRC, to identify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 l

and each Agreement State equivalent rule. A copy of the two volume ORNL report, dated December 14,1994, documenting its staff review of the Colorado final 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule, is enclosed for your info mation and use (Enclosure 1). The second part of the reviuv was conducted by NRC staff and consisted of a review of the differences and inconsistencies identified by ORNL for compatibility and adequacy significance.

The NRC review focused on those provisions of the Colorado rule that are required for compatibility or for health and safety under the new adequacy and compatibility policy statement approved by the Commission by Staff Requirements Memorandum dated June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes the new compatibility categories). The NRC review concluded that the Colorado 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the new policy.

If you have any questions regarding the_ compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please centact me at (301) 415 2326 or Ms. Cardelia H. Maupin of my staff at (301) 415 2312, or INTERNET: CHM @NRC. GOV.

- Sincerely, l

Original Signed By:

PAUL H. LOHAUS Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs ,

Enclosures:

c As stated Qistribution:

DIR RF DCD (SP08) (Enclosure 11 to PDR & Central Files ^only)'

SDroggitis iPDR (YESv'))

KSchneider RBlanton DSollenberger Colorado File Part 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1) _

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ CHM \Part 20\COREVIEW. CHM

  • See Previous Concurrence.

T4 receive a copy of this document. Indicate in the bon: 'C' = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N* = No copt OFFICE -OSP- OSP:DD OGC NAME CMaupin:gd:nb l OSP:Qf /h PHLohaus FXCameron RLBangart i F" DATE 07/31/97* 080/01/97* 08/ /97 08//j/97 OSP FILE CODE: .SP_-AG 5 SP-P-1  ;

MEh p= 4 UNITED STATES g }2 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 30866 0001

  • s.,...../ August 18, 1997 Mr. Robert Quillin, Director '

Laboratory and Radiation Services Division Department of Public Health and Environment 8100 Lowry Boulevard Denver, Colorado 80220-6928 Dest Mr. Quillin:

Given the significance of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 rule to both NRC and Agreement State programs,-NRC undertook a review of all Agreement State final Part 20 equivalent rules for compatibility with 10 CFR Part 20. The review was conducted as a two step process. The first step involved a review by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), under contract with NRC, to identify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each Agreement State equivalent rule. A copy of the two volume ORNL report, dated

, December 14,1994, documenting its staff review of the Colorado final 10 CFR Part 20 l

equivalent rule, is enclosed for your information and use (Enclosure 1). The second part of the review was conducted by NRC staff and consisted of a review of the differences and inconsistencies identified by ORNL for compatibility and adequacy significance.

The NRC review focused on those provisions of the Colorado rule that are required for compatibility or for health and safety under the new adequacy and compatibility policy statement approved by tha Commission by Staff Requirements Memorandum dated June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes the new compatibility categories). The NRC review concluded that the Colorado 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the new policy.

If you have any questions regarding the compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me at (301) 415 2326 or .

Ms. Cardelia H. Maupin of my staff at (301) 415 2312, or INTERNET: CHM @NRC. GOV.

Si c 'ely,

\

h is J V Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs

Enclosures:

As stated

Comoatibility Cateaory and H&S Identification for NRC Reaulations Key to categories: A= Basic radiation protection standard or selated definitions, signs, labels or terms necessary for a common understanding of radiation protection that the State should adopt with (essentially) identical language.

B= Program element with significant direct transboundary implications that the Stste should adopt with essentially identical language.

C= Program element, the essential objectives of which should be adopted by the State to avoid

' conflicts, duplications or gaps. The manner in which the essential objectives are addressed need not be the same as NRC provided the essential objectives are net.

D= Not required for purposes of compatibility.

NRC = Not required for purposes of compatibility. The regulatory area is reserved to the NRC anc the State should not adopt these program elements.

H&S= Program elements identified as H&S are not required for purposes of compatibility; however, they do have particular health and safety significance. The State should adopt the essential objectives of such' program elements in order to maintain an adequate program.

Enclosure 2 i

-_A

Mr. R:bert Quillin, Dir:ctor Laboratory and Radiation Services Division Department of Public Health and Environment -

8100 Lowry Boulevard Denver, Colorado 80220-6928' j

Dear Mr. Ouillin:

/

Given the significance of the revised.10 CFR Part 20 rule to both NRC and,Ahreement State programs, NRC undertook a review of all Agreement State final Part'20 equivalent rules for compatibility with 10.CFR Part 20. The review was conducted as a two step process. The first step involved a review by Oak Ridge National Labo'ratory (ORNL), under contract with NRC, to identify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each Agreement State equivalent rule. A copy of the two, volume ORNL report, dated December 14,1994, documenting its staff review of the Colorado final 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule, is enclosed for your information and use (En' closure 1). The second part of the review was conducted by NRC staff and consisted of'a review of the differences and inconsistencies identified by ORNL for compatibility and adequacy significance.

/

The NRC review focused on those provisions of the' Colorado rule that are required for compatibility or for health and cafety under the n'ew adequacy and compatibility policy statement approved by the Commission by Staff Requirements Memorandum dated 1 June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes the new compatibility categories). As a result of the l NRC review, the Colorado 10 CFR Part 20' equivalent rule meets the compatibility and

. health and safety categories of the n w' policy.

! If you have any questions regardin.g'the compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in i the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me at (301) 415-2326 or Ms. Cardelia H. Maupin of my staff at (301) 415-2312, or INTERNET: CHM @NRC. GOV p

Sincerely,

./

,/

/

/

/ Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director

/ Office of State Programs 7

Enclosures:

j As stated ,/

Distribution:

DIR RF . >

DCD (SP08) (Enclosure 1 to PDR & Central Files only)

- SDroggitis / PDR (YESV)

- KSchneidei RBlanton' DSolltnberger-Colora'do File

' Pcrt 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1)

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ CHM \Part 20\COREVIEW. CHM

  • See Previous Concurrence.

Ts ,ocahre e copy of thle document, hithca e aca: 'C' = Copy without attachment / enclosure 'E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure *fe' = No copy OFFICE OSP l OSP:DD l OGC OSPi[i l [

NAME CMaupin:gd - PHLohaus FXCameron RLBangart DATE 07/31/97* - 080/01/97* 08/1Y97

- - - . .. . - . , . .-. ., -.--.~.--.- -

' MriR:bert Quillin, Direct:r C Laboratory and Radiation Services Division Department of Public Health and Environment 8100 Lowry Boulevard; _.

Denver, Colorado _80220-6928 - ,

.o

Dear Mr. Ouillin:

Given the significance of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 rule to b h NRC and Agreement

  • State programs, NRC undertook.a review of all Agreement St e final Part 20 equivalent rules for compatibility wlth 10 CFR Part 20. The review we conducted as a two step <

process. The first step involved a review by Oak Ridge Nati nel Laboratory (ORNL), under contract with NRC, to identify any differences or inconsisteAcies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each Agreement State equivalent rule.' A copy of the/wo volume ORNL report, dated  !

= December,14,1994, documenting its staff review of the olorado final 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule, is enclosed for your information and use (Enclosure 1). The second part of ,

the review was conductcd by NRC staff and consisted f a review of the differences and l Inconsistencies identified by ORNL for compatibility a adequacy significance.

The NRC review focused on those provisions of the olorado rule that aie required for ,

compatibility or for health and safety under the ne adequacy and compatibility policy' statement approved by the Commission by Staff quirements Memorandum dated -

June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes the new compatibility categories). As a result of the NRC review, the Colorado 10 CFR Part 20 equivaient rule meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the new policy, if you have any questions regarding the comp tibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please cjintact me at (301) 415 2326 or .

Ms. Cardelia H. Maupin of my staff at (301) 415 2312, or INTERNET: CHM @NRC. GOV.

Sincerely, Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs Encl:sures: '

LAs stated Distribution: -

DIR RFE DCD ISP06) (Enclosure '1 to PDR & Central Files only)

SDroggitis t PDR (YES/)

i KSchneider -

RBlanton DScllInberger-

" Col rado File: j

[

- P rt 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1) ~ /

/

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ CHM \Part 20\COREVIEW. CHM

  • See Pre
  • Concurrence.

73 seeeive a sepy of this clocument, insiteete in the ison: "C" = Copy without ettechment/ enclosure f py with,ettachtnant/ enclosure 'N* = No copy OFFICE OSP l: OSP:DD . \{ lOELC/ OSP:D l l l NAME- CMaupin:gd PHLohaus PMCameron- wm RLBangart -l DATE - 07/31/97* 080/01/97* 08/@97_ 08/ /97 j' '

,. OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG 5 SP-P-1 f,

y sw = t- t w- *g-E e N ~-var - --'+e-e'-t tv i- m e a.-r-- --r- v- - ti- e Y e ,- r e n+tr----m- e- - - - --

. Robert Quillin, Director La ratory and Radiation Se ices Division Depa ent of Public Health and E ironment i 4300 Ch ry Creek Drive South (RCD DO B1)

Denver, Co rado 80222-1530 Dear Mr. Quilli Given the significa e of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 rule to both NRC and Agreement State programs, NR undertook a review of all Agreement State final Part 20 equivalent rules for compatibility ith 10 CFR Part 20. The review was conducted as a two step process. The first step volved a review by Oak Ridge National Laboratery (ORNL), under contract with NRC, to ide ify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each Agreement State uivalent rule. A copy of the two volume ORNL report, dated October 28,1994, documer t g its staff review of the Colorado final 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule, is enclosed for our information and use (Enclosure 1). The second part of the review was conducted by N ' staff and consisted of a review of the differences and incransistencies identified by ORNL or compatibility and adequacy significance.

The NRC review focused on those pro 'sions of the Colorado rule that are required for

- compatibility or for health and safety un er the new adequacy and compatibility policy statement approved by the Commission b Staff Requirements Memorandum dated June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes the w compatibility categories). As a result of the NRC review, the Colorado 10 CFR Part 20 eq ivalent rule meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the new policy, if you have any questions regarding the compatibi y criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact e at (301) 415 2326 rsr

- Ms. Cardelia H. Maupin of my staff at (301) 415-231 or INTERNET: CHM @NRC. GOV.

Sincerel Paul H. Loh s, Deputy Director Office of Sta Prograrns

Enclosures:

As stated Distribution:

D I R R F_

DCD (SP06)

SDroggitis . PDR (YES ,y_' (NO._)

KSchneider RBl:nton DSoll:nberger Col:rtdo File DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ CHM \Part 20\COREVIEW. CHM

  • See Previous Concurrence.

Ta ,eceive e copy of tNs docuenent, ardcate in the boa: "C' = Copy vphovt4tachment/ enclosure 'E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure

  • N , No copy OFFICE OSP l OSM )p/ -OGC l OSl%p NAME- CMaupin:gd . FXCameron -

PHLohaus l'(/) RLBangart \

DATE. 07/31/97*- 08/J /97 08/ /97 08/ /9A OSP FILE CODE: S Gb

Mr. Robert Quillin, Director Laboratory and Radiation Services Division D artment of Public Health a Environment 430 Cherry Creek Drive South (RCD DO-B1)

Denve Colorado- 80222 1530

Dear Mr. uillin:

Given the sig ficance of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 rule to both NRC and Agreement State programs, NRC undertook a review of all Agreement State final Part 20 equivalent rules for compati 'lity.with 10 CFR Part 20. The review was conducted as a two step p process. . The first tep involved a review by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), under contract with NRC, t identify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each Agreement ate equivalent rule. A copy of the two volume ORNL report, dated October 28,1994, docu enting its staff review of the Colorado final 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule, is enclose for your information and use (Enclosure 1). The second part of the review was conducted NRC staff and consisted of a review of the differences and inconsistencies identified by NL for compatibility and adequacy significance.

I The NRC review focused on thos provisions of the Colorado rule that are required for compatibility or for health and safe under the new adequacy and compatibility policy statement approved by the Commiss n by Staff Requirements Memorandum dated June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 descrit'es e new compatibility categories). As a result of the NRC review, the Colorado 10 CFR Part equivalent rule was found to be adequate and compatible, if you have any questions regarding the comp tibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridga raport, please con et me at (301) 415 2326 or Ms. Cardelia H. Maupin of my stati at (301) 415- 312, or INTERNET: CHM @NRC. GOV.

Sinc ely, Paul H. haus, Deputy Director

- Office of ate Programs

Enclosures:

As stated DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ CHM \Part 20\COREVIEW. CHM

  • See Pre us Concurrence.

To receive a copy of thee document, indicate in the box: *C' = Copy without attachment /enctosu,s "E = Copy with attachment /enclosu,e

'N' = No copy -

l OFFICE- OSPf }ff OSP:DD .OGC l \ OSP:D l lNAME CMaupin pli /h PHLohaus FXCameron RLBqngart lDATE 0761/97 08/ /97 -08/ /97 QQ/ /97 OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-15' -

~. S f-l%r-[

l

, ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE: August 4,1997 ,

CONCURRENCE / SIGNATURE

\

1.- F. CAMERON, OOC - CONCURRENCE '

LETTER TO: ROBERT QUILLIN, DIRECTOR LABORATORY AND RADIATION SERVICES DIVISION COLORADO DEPT OF "UBLIC HEALTH AND 4 ENVIRONMENT FROM: PAUL L HAUS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR i OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS

SUBJECT:

REVIEW OF 10 CFR PART 20 RULE

.PLEASE RETURN ORIGINAL ENCLOSURES TO OSP YOUR CONC URRENCE IS REQUESTED BY MONDAY.7 AUGUST 18'1997!

OSP CONTACT: CARDELIA MAUPIN, OSP,415-2312 PLEASE CALL KATHLEEN KERR. OSP. 415 3340. FOR PICK UP.

1

iMCKGROUND IIFORMATICAI

. FOR OSP FILES REVIEW OF COLORADO PART 20 EQUIVALENT REGULATIONS JULY 1997 EXPLANATION OF ENTRIES UNDER 'tcirwtW'

[Y] means the definition or rule is C;;.n#.ed to be compatible with 10 CFR Part 20

[N] means the definition or rule is C;;.n-M to be NOT cc. .p.iTule with Part 20 Desionation Defimbon NRC Secbon State Secten Compabble A Absorbed dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Actmty 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Adult 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Arbome radea:bve matenal 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Arbome radioactmty area 20 1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A ALARA EG.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Annuallimit on intake (ALI) 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Background radiabon 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Beassay 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Byproduct matenal 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Class (lung class or inhalaten class) 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A Collective dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] .

A Ccii . iicd dose equwalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Committed eNective dosa equivalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

D Coi.Lv";d area 20.1003 OMIITED [Yj A Declared pregnant womr.n 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

j r.

,. ..; - 't Rule Reviour: [ Agreement State ] Part 20 equivalent compattulity rules f

, , i ir

~

Desenaten DeEnton DNtQTiecton State Sermon Conestbie l A Deep h equivalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]  !

A Denved air concentration (DAC) 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A Denved air concentraten4 tour (DAC-hour) 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

D. Dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] ,

'A Dose g ' ;" 4 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] [

A. Dose limits { limits} 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]  :

D . Dos; metry prnr== ear 20.1003- RH4.3 [Y] l A. Effective dose equivalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A E. 4+'"_ ^f 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]  ;

C Entrance or arr=== point 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] l A Exposure 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]  !

A Extemal dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] .j A Extremity 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] }

A Eye dose M ' _14 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] t AKP GeneraNy applicable ermronmental 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]  !

r% standards l

  • (A for sesens meh semey to sepasse womum me scaver. O ser sesens meest answay)

A Gray 20.1004 RH1.4 [Y] j A- High radi=8iari area 20.1003 - RH1.4 [Y]

A Individual 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] [

A individual montonng 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]  !

C Individual monitonng devices 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A intemal dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

D- Licensed [or registered] material 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

B Lost or missing licensed [or mgmeered] 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

source of r=di=8=ri { materiel}

A Member of the putec 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Minor 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Monitorire 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Nonstochastic eflect 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A ^

Om= - Ji-.e: dose 20.1003 RH1.4 - [Yj 2

J

. .=_.. __ _- _ _ _ .. . .. . _ . - _ _ _

Rule Review: [ Agreement State ] Part 20 equivalent companhany rules Desionahon Definiton NRC Seckon State Sectorl Compatible D Planned specol exposure 20.1003 RH1A .[Y]

A Pubbe dose 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A- Quatty factor 20.1003 RH1A .[Y]

D Quarter .

20.1003 RH1A [Y]

-A -Red 20.1004 RH1.4 [Y]

A Radiation 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A R-m arac ~ 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Reference Man 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A- ~ Ren ' 20.1004 RH1.4 [Y]-

C- Respiratory protective eqampment { device} 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A kelncted ar.se 20.1003' RH1A [Y]

A Sanstory sewerage 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A She5our dose equwater:t 20.1003' RH1A [Y]

A' Seevert 20.1004 RH1.4 [Y]

D Site boundary 20.1003 RH1A [Y]

A Source metenal 20.1003 RH1A. [Y]

A Special nuclear matonal 20.1003 RH1A [Y]

A Stochaebc eWoct 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A Survey 20.1003 RH1A [Y]

A Total eWecewe dose MAC 4 (TEDE) 20.1003. RH1.4 [Y]

A Unrestricted asea 20.1003 RH1A [Y]

A Very high r% area 20.1003 RH1A [Y]

D Week 20.1003 RH1A- [Y]

A Weeghting factor wr 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A WWhole body 20.1003 RH1A [Y]

A- Wariang level (WWI_) 20.1003 RH1A [Y]

A Wortang level month (WWUW) 20.1003 RH1A [Y]

A Year- 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

3 J

Rule Reviour: [ Aya.. A State ] Part 20 equmulent compatiblity rules Qv Desonatum - NRC rule Rule suinect State Rule Conesthie 1 A 20.1004 Uruts of radiabon dose RH1.12.2.1.14.3.1.14.4 Tables I arid II [Y]

1 A 20.1005 Uruts of rah %ty RH1.14.5 [Y]

2 .D 20.1008(b - e) Implementabon, general RH4.4 [Y]

2- D 20.1101 Radiabon protechon programs RH4.5 [Y]

1 A 20.1201 Om_W dose linuts fe adults R H4.6 [Y]

1 A 20.1202 Requwements for summahon of external and intomal doses RH4.7 [Y] ,

1 A 20.1203 Detemunabon of extemal dose from arbome r=taar*we RH4.8 [Y]

matenal 1 A 20.1204(except c) Detemunahon ofintemal exposure ,

RH4.9 [Y]

2 A 20.1204(c) Informabon on intemal exposure RH4.9 [Y]

1 D 20.1206 Planned speaal exposures RH4.11 [Y]

1 A 20.1207 OmW dose limts for rmnors RH4.12 [Y]

1 A 20.1206 Dose to an embryonetus RH4.13 [Y]

1 A 20.1301(a, b) Dose limits for indnridual members of the public RH4.14 [Y]

1 D 20.1302 Compliance with dose limits for indudual members of RH4.15 [Y]

the public 2 D 20.1501(a, b) Surveys and moratonng -general RH4.17 [Y]

4 l

Rule Review: [ Agreement State ] Part 20 equivalent compatblity rules Djv Desionation NRC rule Rule subiect State Rule Compatbie 1 D 20.1501(c) NVLAP requirement RH4.17 [Y]

2 D 20.1502 Conditions requi-ing individual monitoring of extemal RH4.18 [Y]

and intemal occupational dose 1 D 20.1601(a - d) Control of access to high radiation areas RH4.19 [Y]

2 D 20.1601(e) Control not required for DOT package RH4.19 [Y]

2-D 20.1601(f) Control not required for hospital rooms and areas RH4.19 [Y]

1 D 20.1602 Control of access to very high radiation areas RH420 [Y]

1 D 20.1701 Use of piecess or other engineering controls RH422 [Y]

1 D 20.1702 Use of other contmis RH423 [Y]

1 D 20.1703 Use of individual resperatory protection equipment RH4.24 [Y]

2 D 20.1801 Secunty of stored scurces of radiation RH425 [Y]

2 D 20.1802 Control of materia! not in storage RH426 Urvi h onrm e "in patent" i 1 A 20.190i Caution signs RH4.27 [Y]

1 A 20.1902 Posting requirements RH428 [Y]

1 A 20.1904 Labeling containers RH4.30 [Y]

1 A 20.1905 Exceptions to labeling requirements RH4.31 [Y]

5

(

J

Rule Review: [ Agreement State ] Part 20 equivalent compatiblity rules Div Desianation NRC rule Rule subiect State Rule C.,i vot2/,e 2 D 20.1906 Procedures for receiving and opening packages RH4.32 [Y] ,

2 C 20.2001 Waste disposal - general regtnrements RH4.33 [Y) l 2 D 20.2002 Method for obtaining approval of proposed disposal RH4.34 [Y]

procedures ,

2 A -(a)(2) & (3) 202003 Disposal by release into sanitary sewerage RH4.35 [Y] l C - (a) (4)

D -(a)(1) & (b)  !

2 B 202006 Transfer for disposal and manifests RH4.36 [Y]

1 D 202104(except f) Determination of prior occupational dose RH4.10 [Y]

(C e stane adepts ww>s sp o : expopsw -)

2 C 20.2201(except c) Reports of Stolen, Lost, or Missing Licersed or Registered RH4.51 [Y]

Sources of Radiatxm 1 C 202202(except e) Notification of incx$ents RH4.52 [Y]

2 C - (a), (b) 20.2203 Reports of Exposures, Radiation Levels, and Conceu'u 1,vns RH4.53 [Y]  !

D - (d) of Radioactive Material Exceed;ng the Lunits NRC - (c) 2 D 202204 Reports of Planned Special Exposures RH4.54 [Y]

1 C 20 Appendix A Protection Factors for Resperators Appendix A [Y]

1 A 20 Appendix B ALrs and DAC's; effluent concenu ucns; conceuo .Scas Appendix B [Y]

for release to sewerage 6

i.

4 1

. Ruse meriew: I%.Ta-a State ] Pat 20 equivalent w,y % frules

oir Desenaten NRC rule Rule subiect State Rule Competitde

-1 A. 23 Appendix C Quantees of licensed rnalenal requang labeling Appendix C [Y]

4 j Desiansten NRC rule- Rule sutmect State Rule Consethie

2 B 20 Appendix F LLW transfer for disposal and mondests Appendix D [Y]

NOTES:

d l

i 1.

~

i l

a H

i I

e a

i i

7 I
. l i

. , . ~ _ _ _ ~ . -- - . . . . . , - . ._- . . . . , ,_ _ - . . . . - _ , . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ , - _ . , , . . _ , _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - . . _ .

Rule Review: [ Aya.v.wis State ] Part 20 equivalent compatibility requirements Desanahon Definton NRC Secten State Secten Compatible

- Becquerel 20.1005 0 Cune 20.1005 0 U.S. Department of Energy { Department} 20.1003 0 Div Desanaten NRC rule Rule subiect State Rule Corruptible 2 -

20.1603(see note) Control of access to very high radishon areas - 0

'wradetors

" NOTE " 10 CFR 20.1603 replaced by Part 36 e5edive 7/1/93 "

Part 36 will be a Division 2 competitWIIty requirement eNoctive July 1,1996 7

8 a

Rule Review: [ Ay_..e4 State ] Part 20 ==y_W compatibility requirements W Designation NRC rule Rule sutnect State Rule Comments 1 (A) 20.1302 Dose to indnndual members of the public RH.4.6 The Colorado rules do not include the term controned area and has resened sechan 20.1301b, which requwes me lirruts for members of the pubisc in " controlled areas

  • to compey wei me imes for members of the putsc. This is compettde because secton cieerfy retains the limits for members of the public. Additione5y, in heelm physses, an area is 4-1_ .-2:$ "restncted aree* for the purpose oflimitmg r% exposure Because controsed ares serves no direct role in hesuh physses, there is no segnificance to Colorado's ommission of this language from a hesRh physics v'empoet.

9 i

i i

i

.. . - , - v. -. ., , , , , _ . ._ _ _ .__.: _ . _ _

REVIEW OF COLORADO PART 20 EQUlVALENT REGULATIONS JIJLY 1997 EXPLANATION OF ENTRIES UNDER T,ompatible-

[Y] means the d=1atini or rule is determoed to be ca..p.iane with 10 CFR Part 20

[N] means the definition or rule is C;c.ni..ed to be NOT cs..p.iaAc with Part 20 DesiQnsim Defimten NRC Seebon State Sechon Cw 4 A Absorbed dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]'

A Activity 20.1003 -

RH1.4 [Y]

A Adult 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Airbome radioachve material 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Arrbome radioactivity area 20.1063 -

RH1.4 [Y]

A ALARA 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Annuallimit on intake (AU) 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Background radiaten 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Bioassay 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Byproduct material 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Class (lung class or inhalabon class) 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A Collechve dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Commetted dose equwalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

Cui m iicd effective dose equrvaient 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y' h R-and area Decisied piegn&nt woman

'"*M3 20.1003 OMITTED RI44.3

_ D_

[Y]

% L

_ m

Rule Review: [ Av....v.cnt Staie ] Part 20 equwalent cc. .p.Lii1y rules Desenata Definsbon NRC Section State Sechon Compshbie A Deep dose equivalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Denved air concentration (DAC) 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A Denved air conceub. Gen-hour (DAC-hour) 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

D Dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Dose equwalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Dose limits { limits} 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

D Dosametry pivcesscs 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

A Effective dose equwalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

s A- Eiebryonetus 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

C Entrance or access point 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

l A Exposure 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

] A Extemal dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Extremity 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Eye dose equivalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A/D* Generally applicable environmental 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

'; radiabon standards

  • (A for sesses wan mewer to medmee waruum mm acever, o sor samme weeut auswer) 4 A Gray 20.1004 RH1.4 [Y]

A High radiabon area 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

l' A Individual 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Individual monstonng 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

C Individualinc .iiv irs devices 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A intemal dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

D Licensed [or registered] matenal 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

B Lost or missmg licensed [or registered] 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

source of radiabon { material}

A Member of the pubhc 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Menor 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Monitonng 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]
A Nonstochastic effect 20.1003 RH1.4 . [Y]

A Occupational dose 20.1003 RH1.4 [] -

I 2

N

i Rule Review: [ Avia.T,wat State ] Part 20 equivalent compatibildy rules .

Desonatxm Defirwbon NRC Sechon State Sechon Compabble

D Planned special exposure 20.1003 RH1.4 [Yj [

] A Public dose 20.1003 RH4 3 [Y] ,

I A Quaitj Ln.IGr 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

D Cw1rter 20.1003 RH1.4

[Y] b t

A Rad 20.1004 RH1.4 0  !

A Radiation 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A . Radiabon area 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A R?ference Man 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]  :

i A Rem 20.1004 RH1.4 [Y]

C Resp;..tviy piviective equipment { device} 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y] [

A. Restricted area 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

A Sanitary sewerage 20.1003 RH4.3 [YZ A Shallow dose equivalent 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] e A Sievert 20.1004 RH1.4 [Y] l D S3e boundary 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] i A Source matenal 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] l A Speaal nuclear matenal 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] i A Stochasbc effect 20.1003 RH4.3 [Y]

j; A Survey 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]  ;

A Total effecbve dose equivalent (TEDE) 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] ,

A' Unrestncted area 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]  !

A Very high radiabon area 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] r D Week 20.1003 RH1.4 _ [Y]

A '"t.jri;.sv

.. factor w r 20.1003 RH4.3 0  ;

A Whole body 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y]

}

A Woriang level (WL) 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] .

A Wo king level month (WLM) 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] i A Year 20.1003 RH1.4 [Y] [

i 3 l i

k

._. - - _ . . - .. _ _ _ _. - . . -. .- .- . - . . _ _ _ - - - - _ - - ~-_ . _.._ _.- . . _ . . . . . _ _ _ _ . . . _ -- . .

i Reale Review- [ Av._. a State ] Part 20 equivalent compshbity rules l '

Div Dessanahon NRC rule Rule subsect State Rule Compatible 1 A 20.1004 Unds of radiabon dose RH1.12.2,1.14.3.1.14.4  ;

Tables I and II [Y]

! 1 A 20.1005 Umts ofiM RH1.14.5 [Y) 2 D 20.1006(b - e) Implementahon, general RH4.4 [Y] t 2 D 20.1101 Radiabon protechon p-@v.6 RHd.5 [Y] l 1 A 20.1201 Occupshonal dose limsts for adults RH4.6 .

^

1 A 20.1202 Requaernents for summahon of external and internal doses RH4.7

!. 1 A 20.1203 C ", .r .suv.i of extemal dose from ambome r=d-chve RH4.8 [Y]

! matenal  !

, 1 A . 20.1204(except c) Determinshon of internal exposure PH4.9 [Y]  !

2 A 20.1204(c) Informahon on intemai exposure RH4.9 [Y]
I j 1 D 20.1206 Planned special exposures .M.11 [Y] {

1 A 20.1207 OmW dose limits for minors RH4.12 [Y]

1 A 20.1208 Dose to an embryo #etus RH4.13 [Y]

1 A 20.1301(a, b) Dose limsts for indmdual members of the public RH4.14 fj ,J!

i 92 0 20.1302 Compliance with dose times for indmdual members of n_ l 1

RH4.15 -GfD - '

l the public *

,_gg g i gKg i

2 D 20.1501(a, b) Surveys and momtonng - general RH4.17

- i r-g (

j 4

.m ..v. . , . . . .. ..v...- ,,...n - . - - . y .- e w -- - . . . . , -s , ,. . -. , - ,w. , - . . , . . . . . .~,m , -

P.ule Review:[ Agreement State ] Part 20 eqtavaient vinv.htAty rules k Dessonation NRC rule Rule subiect State Rule Compabble 1 D 20.1501(c) NVLAP requwement RH4.17 l 3

2 D 20.1502 Cui4Gu.s requenng indmdual monitonng of extemal and intemat occup. bun.i dose RH4.18 $b f '

r 1 D 20.1601(a - d) Control of access to high radiabon areas RH4.19 O 2 D 20.1601(e) Control not requwed for DOT pad.ge RH4.19 2 D 20.1601(f) Control not requwed for hospital rooms and areas RH4.19 1 D 20.1602. Control of access to very high radiabon areas RH420 1

1 1

D D

20.1701 20.1702 Use of process or other ersk.cc.ig conLvis Use of other wubvis RH422 RH4.23

[

$3 i

f 9 D 20.1703 Use of indmdual respa.iviy viuni eqtapment RH424 [Y}

4 0.

2 D 20.1801 Secunty of stored sources of radiabon #8 RH425_ _

h8

~

! 2 D 20.1802 Control of matenal not in storage RH426 J '

1 A 20.1901 Caubon signs RH427 i A 20.1902 Posbng requirements RK - [Y]

1 A 20.1904 Labeling containers RH4.30 lY]

1 A 20.1905 Excepbuns to labeling requwements Ry [Y]

2 D 20.1906 Procedures for receiving and opening f% RH4.32 5

Y . _ .

. . . _ , . . _ _.- . . . . . _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ - _ .. - _ - ._ _ .~ - . . . _ _ _ _ . . -

Rule Review:[ Agreement State ] Part 20 equivalent w- ^'ry rules

}

Div Desemton . NRC rule Rule sutmect State Rule Compattde 2 C 20.2001 Weste <6=pand - general requwements RH4.33 2 D 20.2002 Method for obtasung approval of proposed <E=paad RH4.34 [Y]'

procedures

, 2 A-(aX2) & (3) 20.2003 Deposai by resosee into sandary sewerage RH4.35 [Y]

C - (a) (4)

D - (aX1) & (b)

[

2 B 20.2006 Transfer for chapand and mandests RH4.36 [Y]

1 D. 202104(except f) Detemunation of prior amW done RH4.1C [Yj

- (C e mm. a,= w e s== -)

j 2 C 20.2201(except c) Reports of Stolen, Lost, or Missmg Licensed or Regatored RH4.51 kY]

[ Sources of R=rhamars 1

i' ~

1 C 20.2202(except e) Notdication of incidents RH4.52 [Y]

4 . 1 /

2 2 C - (a), (b) 202203 ~ Reports of F n R=rE=han Levels, and Concentrations RH4.53

! D -(d) of P=Gaar*we Malenal Exceeding the Luvuts 4 %

NRC - (c) i 2 202204 Reports of Planned Spe: sal Fe=es D RH4.54 [Y]

1 C 20 Appendix A Protechon Factors for Resprators Appendix A [W 4

1 A 20 Appendix B ' All's and DAC's; effluent concentrations; concentrahons Appendix B for release to sewerage 1 A 20 Appendix C Quantees of licensed matenal requinng labeling Appendix C tY]

1 6

4 i

1 1

Rule Review: [ Ay;e.ie A State ] Part 20 equwalent competitAty rules

, - @ Designaten NRC rule Rule subiect State Rule Competitie i a Desensbon NRC rule Rule subsect State Rule M 2 8 20 Appendix F LLW transfer for disposal and mondests Appendu D [Y]  !

NOTES:

5 1,

d k

e

~

1 l -

i

?

s l

7 il 1

1

. Rule Review: [ 4_..,ord State ] Part 20 equwalent compebbihty requwements Desonsbon Defirwhon NRC Sechon State Secbon Compatible

- Becquerei 20.1005 0 Cune 20.1005 0 U.S. Der-i% erd of Energy { Department} 20.1003 0 Dhr Desenshon NRC rule Rule sutnect State Rule Compatible 2' -

20.1603(see note) Control of access to very high radabon areas - 0 m

3 4-4 - " NOTE " 10 CFR 20.1603 replaced by Part 36 e5ective 7/1/93 "

Part 36 wNI be a Division 2 compatibiNty requirement eWocWwe July 1,1996 i

1 i

s k

8 i

1

_ _ _ - .

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20210R164&oldid=3308309"