ML20210Q227
| ML20210Q227 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/12/1999 |
| From: | Vietticook A NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | Travers W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 SECY-97-144-C, SECY-97-304-C, SECY-99-159-C, NUDOCS 9908130182 | |
| Download: ML20210Q227 (2) | |
Text
soooooooooooooooseeoooo.*
. RELEASEDTOTHE PDR i'
UNITED STATES h M
[ *g *
~ da19 ffDaiS )
g j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555-0001 s
DO@SO9069999900904e8083 o,
August 12, 1999 1 ug SECRETARY MEMORANDUM TO: William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary M~
SUBJECT:
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-99-159 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REQUIREMENTS MEMORANDUM (SRM) SECY-97-304, FEBRUARY 5,1998, " RESPONSE TO SRM: SECY-97-144,
' POTENTIAL POLICY ISSUES RAISED BY NON-OWNER OPERATORS'"
The Commission has disapproved publication of the draft regulatory guide for public comment on " Criterion for Triggering a Review Under 10 CFR 50.80 for Non-Owner Operator Service Companies." The staff should revise the draft regulatory guide to address the following comments and resubmit it to the Commission for approval prior to publication.
(EDO) (SECY Suspense: 9/20/99)
- 1. Clarify that there are two types of criteria, those that will automatically trigger a 50.80 review (those that affect licensed activities) and those that can be considered collectively before a 50.80 review is required.
- 2. Make clear what decision-making activities automatically trigger review under 650.80.
Provide any appropriate bounding of the broad statements of pertinent types of licensed activity. Identify and segregate with greater clarity the most important examples of a licensed activity that would individually trigger the need for $50.80 review. Do not intersperse these examples of automatically triggered reviews with examples of collective review.
- 3. Similar attention should be given to amplification of the areas of activity that will be examined collectively in determining the need for $50.80 review. Provide any appropriate bounding of this criteria. Improve the clarity of the examples. The draft 'O should contain more than 3 such examples. If the staff uses examples such as those presented in SECY 99-159, the examples should be representative and illustrative of the basic principles, should be well articulated, and should contain appropriate caveats for their use.
1sen7g f / l'
~
9908130182 990812 PDR 10CFR h /7 PT9.7 PDR .
A-
t cc: Chairman Dieus-Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan Commissioner Merrifield OGC CIO CFO OCA OiG ,
OPA .
i Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail)
.~ .