ML20210N540

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Deposition of M Kobi.* Notice of M Kobi 870210 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Examining Factual Issues of Encl 860813 Memorandum & Order Following Prehearing Conference.Related Correspondence
ML20210N540
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/04/1987
From: Johnson G
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20210N538 List:
References
CIV-PEN, EA-84-137, NUDOCS 8702130152
Download: ML20210N540 (4)


Text

__

February 4, 1987 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COfe MISSION BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE In the f3atter of

)

)

Docket No. 50-320 GPU NUCTJ:AR CORPORATION

)

(Civil Penalty)

)

License No. DPR-73 (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,

)

EA 84-137 Unit No. 2)

)

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF MARK KOBI Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. I 2.740a of the United States Nuclear Regula-tory Commission Rules of Practice, Mark Kobi, c/o J. Patrick Hickey, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trorbridge, 2300 N Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

20037, is hereby given notice and reonested to appear at the offic-es of the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 100 Brown Street, Middletown, PA at ten o' clock in the morning (10 :00 a.m. ),

on February 10, 1987, to give testimony by deposition on oral examination before a notary public from Ace Federal Reporters, Inc., 444 North Capi-tol Street, Washington, D.C.

20001 in the above-caption matter.

Mr. Kobi will be examined as to the factual issues covered by the Presid-ing Officer's Memorandum and Order Following Prehearing Conference, dated August 13, 1966 (attached).

Mr. Kobi is further instructed to bring to the deposition all notes, memoranda, files, and documents (in-cluding personal notes and documents) in his possession, custody, or control, other than those already provided to the NRC by GPU Nuclear Corporation during discovery in this proceeding, that relate to Richard 8702130152 870204 PDR ADOCK 05000320 0

PDR

Parks, allegations made by Mr. Parks, or investigation of,_ inquiry into, or evaluation of such allegations.

O f,

/ (6~ ; L

': /

L%

George E.l Johnson;'

Counsel for NRC~ Staff Dated at Bethesda, ?!aryland this 4th day of February,1987 i

i I

t I

l l

l

?

. ~ ~

o *,

/

,/

BC7 023 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE i

Ivan W. Smith In the Matter of lI h

Docket No. 50-320 M General Public Utilities Nuclear h

License No. OPR-73 Corporation p)

EA 84-137

[ASLBPNo. 86-534-01-0L]

(Three Mile Island, Unit No. 2) 1 (C_ivil Penalty)

August 13, 1986

(.

1, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING CONFERENCE s

Counsel for General Public Utilities and Counsel for the NRC Staff 4

joined me in a prehearing conference at Bethesda, Maryland on July 30, i

1986.

Discovery is authert' zed to begin immediately. The parties and I have agreed that discovery may be had under the following broad issues:

1.

Whether the NRC is barred from imposing a civil penalty in this proceeding due to the dismissal with prejudice of the Department of Labor proceedings charging discrimination against l

Parks.

I l

2.

Whether Parks' replacement as Alternate Startup and Test Supervisor on February 23, 1983 constituted retaliation against Parks contrary to 10 CFR 5 50.7.

3.

Whether Parks' interview by Messrs. Hofmann and Wheeler on i

March 14, 1983 constituted retaliation against Parks contrary to i

10 CFR i 50.7.

l

(

c. p\\ w'w t

. 3 -.,

s

  • j, 4

t

-2 j

4 Whether Parks' rermval as the primary Site Operations Department representative on the Test Working Group for the polar' f

crane project on March 17. 1983 was involuntary and if so, whether it constituted retaliation against Parks contrary to 10 CFR i 50.7.

5.

Whether Parks' placement on* leave of absence with pay on f

March 24, 1983 10 CFR i 50.7. constituted retaligtto,n against Parks contrary to 6.

Based on resolution of the issues (1)-(5) above:

whether Licensee violated NRC requirements as set a.

forth in the Notice of Violation and Prtposed Imposition of Civil Penalty issued on August.12,1985; and b.

whether, on the basis of such violation, the March 4 1986 Order Imposing Civil Penalty,should be sustained.

Discovery, including answers to discovery requests, should be completed by February 1.1987.

The parties should prepare for an evidentiary hearing in the Spring of 1987. Further prehearing requirements will be addressed in subsequent orders.

?

J/YA Ivan W. Smith ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE Bethesda, Maryland August 13, 1986 e

i