ML20210N525

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Steps Taken to Review Agreement State Final Part 20 Equivalent Rules for Compatibility w/10CFR20.Concludes That New Mexico 10CFR20 Rule Meets Compatibility,Health & Safety Categories of New Policy
ML20210N525
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/18/1997
From: Lohaus P
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To: Garcia B
NEW MEXICO, STATE OF
Shared Package
ML20210N530 List:
References
NUDOCS 9708250342
Download: ML20210N525 (11)
v • d • e


Text

.. mar l

! w 5

j Mr. Benito Garcia, Chief Bureau of Hazardous and Radioact,ve.

g j g gg - h i g Meterials 1 l L Departrnent of Environment  ?

I 2044 Gaiisteo Road P.O. Box 26110 i

!l lI l

Santa Fe, NM 87502 9 l 1 d

Dear Mr. Garcia:

}

g Given the significance of the new Part 20 rule to both NRC and Agreement State h programs, NRC undertook a review of all Agreement State final Part 20 equiva'ent rules for i compatibility with 10 CFR Part 20. The review was conducted as a two step process. I '

The first step in.c,1ved a review by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), under contract with NRC, to identify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each Agreement State equivalent rule. A copy of the two volume ORNL report, dated August 31,1995, documenting their review of the New Mexico final Part 20 equivalent rule is enclosed for your information and use (Enclosure 1). The second part of the review l was conducted by NRC staff and consisted of a review of the differences and d inconsistencies identified by ORNL for compatibility and adequacy significance. H The NRC review focused on those provisions of the New Mexico rule that are required for compatibility or for health and safety under the new adequacy and compatibility policy statement approved by the Commission by Staff Requirements Memorandum dated June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes the new compatibility categories). The NRC review concluded that the New Mexico 10 CFR Part 20 equivalent rule meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the new policy.

If you have any questions regarding the compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, pier.;e contact me at (301) 415 2326 or Mr Tom >

. O'Brien of my staff at (301) 415-2308, or INTERNET: TJO@NRC. GOV.

Sincerely OrigMalSigned By:

PAUL H. LOHAUS j 9708250342 970818 PDR STPRG ESGNM PDR

  • Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs k) 3 e

Enclosures:

As stated i j i e Distribution: 1 DIR RF DCD (SP08) (Enclosure 1 to PDR SDroggitis n U n n ~n d;

. - and Central Files only) f s

CHackney, RIV PDR (YES V4 NO )

CHMaupin KNSchenider q NM File Past 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1) -

  • See Previous Concurrence T DOCUMENT NAME: . G:\TJO\NMEXREV.LTR, ASSOCIATED DOCUMENT: G:\TJO\NMEXREV.CHT -

T. w. . . , of twi. docum.at. nsdic.t. in th. nos: c = copy witnout att. chm.nti.nciosur. e - copy witn .et.cnm.nt/.nciosur. N = No copy ,

OFFICE OSP l OSP:SP OSP:DD OGC l OSP:Dk/ ' 4 y NAME. TO'Brien:nb CHMaupin PHLohaus FCameron RLBangart ' 3 DATF. 08/05/97* 03/05/97* 08/11/97

  • 08/14/97_* 08//6/97 2 OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-19, SP-P 1 2 4 8 b ,,, bbbEO 00N l($j[llllllll}g[ , (

t -J

d' 4

Mr. Benito Garcia, Chl:f Bur:cu cf Hazard:us cnd Radi:2ctiva Materials

- Department of Environment 2044 Galisteo Road P.O. Box 26110 /

. Santa Fe, NM 87502 /

Dear Mr.~ Garcia:

,/

Given the significance of the new Part 20 rule to both NRC and Agreement State

, programs, NHC undertook a review of all Agreement State final Part 20 equivalent rules for compatibility with 10 CFR Part 20; The review was conducted as'a two step process.

The first step Involved a review by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), under contract with NRC, to identify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each Agreement State equivalent rule, A copy of the two vo!urne ORNL report, dated August 31,1995, documenting their review of the New, Mexico final Part 20 equivalent rule is enclosed for your information and use (Enclosure' 1). The second part of the review was conducted by NRC staff and consisted of a revie'w of the differences and inconsistencies identified by ORNL for compatibility'and adequacy significance.

?

The NRC review focused on those provisions of the New Mexico rule that are required for compatibility or for health and sefety under,tfie new adequacy and compatibility policy statement approved by the Commission by' Staff Requirements Memorandum dated June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes th'e new compatibility categories). As a result of the f NRC review, the New Mexico 10 CFR,Part 20 equivalent rule meets the compatibility and health ana safety categories of the n'e w policy. '

/

If.you have any questions regarding the compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge re' port, please contact me at (301) 415-2326 or Mr. Tom O'Brien of my staff at (301),415-2308, or INTERNET: TJO@NRC. GOV.

/ Sincerely,

/

/

/

/-

/ Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director

/ Office of State Programs l

Enclosures:

/

As state /

Distribution:

DIR RF- DCD (SP08) (Enclosure 1 to PDR SD,roggitis and Central Files only)

CHackney, RIV PDR (YESy'_ NO,_,)

- CHMaupin KNSchenider

/NM File Part 20 File (w/o Enclosure 1)

  • See Previous Concurrence DOCUMENT NAME: G:\TJO\NMEXREV.LTR, ASSOCIATED DOCUMENT: G:FJO\NMEXREV.CHT

' T3 raceh,e e copy of thee document, bdicate in the box: 'C' = Copy without attachmeryt?Mc%Mre *E* = Copy with attachment! enclosure

  • N* = No copy OFFICE OSP l . OSP:SP l OSfilgD OGC OSP:D NAME TO'Brien:nb .
  • CHMaupin
  • PHLbhaus FCameron RLBangart DATE 08/ 0b/97 08/05/97 Og/j j /97 08/14/97* 03 / /97 OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG 19, SP-P 1 ,

.= -

_ yj z-l Mr. Benits Garcia, Chiif

~ '

2

Bureau cf H:zard:us' and Radicactive

- Meterialr, L . Department'of Environment i- .2044 Galisteo Road -

l P.O.~ Box 26110 - -

. Santa Fe,' NM 87502 = '

Dear Mr. Garcla:

b Given the significance of the new Part 20 rule to both RC and Agreement State programs, NRC undertook a review of all Agreement ato final Part 20 equivalent rules for l . compatibility with 10 CFR Part 20. The review was o'onducted as a two step process.

i The first step involved a review by Oak Ridge Natior%I Laboratory (ORNL),'under contract with NRC, to' identify any differences or inconsistencies between 10 CFR Part 20 and each ~

I

~

'  : Agreement State equivalent rule. - A copy of the tpo volume ORNL report, dated -

August 31,1995, documenting' their review of the New Mexico final Part 20 equivalent -

rule is enclosed for your information and use (Enclosure 1). The second part of the review

was conducted by NRC staff and consisted of a,/ review . the differences and .

p inconsistencies identified by ORNL for compatibility and adequacy significance.

l_

/

- The NRC review focused on those provisions /of the New Mexico rule that are required for

compatibility or for health and safety under,the new adequacy and compatibility policy j

U ' statement approved by the Commission by/ Staff Requirements Memorandum dated:

i- - June 30,1997 (Enclosure 2 describes the/new compatibility' categories).- As a result of the.

j  ; NRC reviesv, the New Mexico 10 CFR Par't 20 equivalent rule meets the compatibility-and- ,

4 health and safety categories of the new policy, q

, if you have any questions regarding t,he compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations'used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me at (301) 415 2326 or Mr. Tom '

O'Brien of my staff at (301) 415 2308, or INTERNET:-TJO@NRC. GOV.-

, - Sincerely, s

i

./h Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy' Director :

/' Office of State Programs.

h

Enclosures:

As stated '-

, Distribution:

'- . DlR RF:

l SDroggitis ' f DCD (SP08) (Enclosure 1 to PDR '

' and Central Files only) l3 CHackney, RIV PDR (YES V NO ' - )

~

!= ' CHMaupin L - KNSchenider ~

1

. NM File Part 20 File (w/o Enclosure -1) - '

l _

See Sevious Concurrence -

DOCUMEN NMEXREV.CHT  ;

jn w.. ,T.eNAME:/

w. G:\TJO\NMEX_REV.LTR,-
t. we m in. 6.m c - copy wanout ASSOCIATED n.cnm.rMchd. DOCUMENT:-' G-r - copy w, .n. m.nti.p3.ur. r - No copy OFFICE . - OSP - [t . OSP:SP l- (S%D l \0 7 / l ,, OSP:D l-NAME TO'Brien:nb * / CHMaupin *: PHLbnaus - FCaheron, RLBangart:

2 DATE 08/05/97 i 08/05/97 Og/l /97 08/ W97 CB / /97 -

4 4 < OSP FLE CODE: SP-AG-19, SP-P '

t is

/

. l

., a v ,

i&a , , - -.r e. -- a n- ~ -- ~-+ ~~- -'r-

_ . _ . . . . . _ . _ . - _ _ .. . _ _ . _ __ m -

B.- Grrcin ' If you have any questions regarding these' comments, the compatibility criteria, the NRC regulations used in the review, or the Oak Ridge report, please contact me at < l

. (301) 415 2326 or Mr. Torr O'Brien of my staff at (301) 415 2308, or INTERNET:

' TJO@NRC. GOV.

-- e

/

Sincerely,  !

j

/

Paul H. Loha Deputy Director Office of Sthte Programs

/

Enclosures:

/

[ As stated /

\ /

/

l /

l /

l l

/

/

j'

/

f

/

/

/

/

i l

Distribution-DIR RF DCD (SP08) Enclosure 1 to PDR AND

/ PDR (YESf_ NO_) . Central Files only -

SDroggitjs CHackney, RIV '

CHMau' pin -

KNSchneider NM File l Part:20 File;(w/o Enclosure 1)

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\TJO\NMEXREV.LTR, ASSOCIATED DOCUMENT: G:\TJO\NMEXREV.CHT To tsceive a copy of thle document. indicate in the bos: 'C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E* = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N' = No copy OFFICE OSP ,

lC, OS4$J}4 OSP:DD l OGC l OSP:D l-NAME TO'Brien:ntrip ' PHLohaus FCameron RLBangart CHMa@lh DATE 08/6 /97 08/3 /97 07/ /97 07/ /97 07/ /97 l

OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-13

l. SP-P-1 L

FOR OSP FILES. -

l. -

REVIEW. OFLNEW MEXICO PART 20: EQUIVALENT REGULATIONS ~

i

[ 21 July 1997 ]

EXPLANATION OF ENTRIES UNDER "_Compat61e"

.[Y] .means the definehon or rule is deteemmed to be cv. .petible with 10 CFR Part 20

[N] means the definition or rule is detenmned ta be NOT compatible with Part 20 Desionaten Definition ' NRC Sechon State Sechon Compabbie A Absorbed dose 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 .[Y] i A Activity 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y) i A ' Adult. . 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y! t i A Airbome radioactive material '20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]' l A Airbome reGwecnvity area 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y] >

A ALARA ._

20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y] .

A Annuallimit on intake (ALI) 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]  !

A Background radiabon 20.1003. 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y] i

'A Bioassay - 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 -[Y] j A~ Byproduct material -

20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]. 1 A Class (lung class or inhalabon class) 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]- i

! A' Collective dose 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y] i

-A Committed dose equivalent :20.1003 , 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y] '!

A Commetted e5ective dose equivalent 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y] *1  !

D Controlled area 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y].T*2  !

A Declared pregnant woman 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]  ;

.j i +

1 L

i 1 Rule Review: [ Agreement State ] Part 20 equivalent compatibility rules

- Desianation Definition NRC Section State Section Compatible A Deep dose equivalent 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Derivea air concentration (DAC) 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 -[Y]

A Derived air concentration-hour (DAC-hour) 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y)

D Dose 201 003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Dose equivalent 20.2003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 - [Y]

A Dose limits { limits} 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

D Dosimetry processor 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Effective dose equivalent 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Embryo / fetus 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

C Entrance or access point 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Exposure 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [N] *3 A Extemal dose 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y)

A Extremity 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Eye dose equivalent 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A/D* Generally applicable environmental 4 4 _

i radiation standards 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y)

  • (A !st states with aueorty to reguhde urarnum mm acevty. D for states wthout authorty)

A Gray 20.1004 [Y]

A High radiation area 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y) i A Individual 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y)

A Individua! monitoring 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

C Individual monitoring devices 20.103 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]  ;

A Intemal dose 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

D Licensed [or registered] material 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

B Lost or missing licensed [or registered] 4 4 source of radiation { material} 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 - [Y]

A Member of the public 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Minor 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y) i A Monitoring 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y] *4 '

A Nonstochastic effect 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Occupational dose 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

1 2

z .-

- Rule Review: [ Av .c.i,in4 State ] Part 20 equivalent compatibihty rules Desionation Definition - NRC Sechon State Sechon Compabble D Planned special exposure'

'20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A- Public dose ~ 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

.A Quahty factor 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 M D Quarter 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y).

A Rad 20.1004 [Y]

A Radiation - -20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 '. [Y].

A Radiation area 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Reference Man 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 - -[Y]

A Rem .20.1004 [Y] .

C Resperatory protechve equipment { device} 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Restricted area - 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Sanitary sewerage 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Shallow dose equivalent 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y].

A ' Sievert 20.1004 [Y]

D Site boundary 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Source material 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Speaal nuclear material 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y)

A Stochastic effect 20.1003- 20 NMAC 3.1-106 - [Y]

A Survey .

20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y] *5 A Total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Unrestric'ed area 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Very high radiahon area 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

D Week 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Weegnting factor wr 20.1003 20 NF'r 3.1-106 [v]

A Whole body 20.1003 20 NfW 3.I-106 [Y]

A Wortung level (WL) 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Worlung level month (WLM) 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

A Year 20.1003 20 NMAC 3.1-106 [Y]

3

'[

. Rule Review: [ Agreement State ] Part 20 equivalent conwi Liity rules Div Desianation . NRC rule ' Rule subiect State Rule Compshbie 1 A 20.1004 Units of radiation dose 20 NMAC 3.1-117 [Y]

1 A 20.1005 Units of radioactivity 20 NMAC 3.1-118 '[Y]  ;

2 D 20.1008(b - e) Implementation, general 20 NMAC 3.1-403 [N] *6 2 D 20.1101 Radiabon protection programs 20 NMAC 3.1-404 [Y]- l 1 A 20.1201 Occupabonal dose limits for adults 20 NMAC 3.1-405 [Y]

i 1 A 20.1202 Requirements for summation of extemal and intemal doses 20 NMAC 3.1-406 [Y]

1 A '

20.1203 Determmation of extemal dose from airbome radioachve 20 NMAC 3.1-407L [Y]  :

material 1 A 20.1204(except c) Determinabon of intemal exposure 20 NMAC 3.1-408 [Y]

2 A 20.1204(c) 'Information on intemal exposure 20 NMAC 3.1-408 [Y]

1 D 20.1206' Planned speaal exposures -

20 NMAC 3.1-410 [Y]

1 A 20.1207 Occupational dose limits for menors 70 NMAC 3.1-411 [Y]

1 A 20.1208 Dose to an emb,ryo/ fetus 20 NMAC 3.1-412 [N] *7 ,

t 1 A 20.1301(a, b) Dose limits for individual members of the public 20 NMAC 3.1-413 [Y] *2 1 D 20.1302 Compliance with dose limits for individual members of 20 NMAC 3.1-414 [Y] *2 the public' i 2 D 20.1501(a, b) Surveys and monitonng - general 20 NMAC 3.1-41S [Y] .

4

~

Rule Review: [ Agreement State ] Part 20 equivalent compatiblity rules Div Desianation NRC rule Rule subietet State Rule Compatbie 1 D 20.1501(c)f5P requirement 20 NMAC 3.1-416 [i]

2 D 20.1502 Conditions requiring individual monitoring of extema! 20 NMAC 3.1-417 [Y] j and intemal occupational dose  !

1 D 20.1601(a - d) Control of access to high radiation areas 20 NMAC 3.1-418 [Y]

2 D 20.1601(e) Control not required for DOT package 20 NMAC 3.1-418 [Y]

2 D 20.1601(f) ~ Control not required for hospital rooms and areas 20 NMAC 3.1-419 [Y]

1 D 20.1602 . Control of access to very high radiation areas 20 NMAC 3.1-420 [Y]

1 D 20.1701 Use of process or oiber engineering controls 20 NMAC 3.1-421 [Y]

1 D 20.1702 Use of other controls 20 NMAC 3.1-422 [Y]

1 D 20.1703 Use of individual respiratory protection equipment 20 NMAC 3.1-423 [Y]

2 D 20.1801 Security of stored sources of radiation 20 NMAC 3.1-425 [Y]

2 D 20.1802 Control of material not in storage -20 NMAC 3.1-425 [Y] *2 1 A 20.1901 Caution signs 20 NMAC 3.1-427 [Y]

1 A 20.1902 Posting requirements 2t NMAC 3.1-428 [Y]

1 A 20.1904 Labeling containers 20 NMAC 3.1-430 [Y]

1 A 20.1905 Exceptions to labeling requirements 20 NMAC 3.1-431 [Y]

5

1 L

Rule Review: [ Av.;;..e-4 State ] Part 20 equivalent compatibhty rules

  • Qiv Dessonahon NRC rule Rule subiect State Rule Compshble

'2 D < 20.1906 Prix:edures for receivmg and opening packages ' 20 NMAC 3.1-432. - [Y]'-

2 C '20.2001 Waste disposal - general requwements 20 NMAC 3.1-433 [Y] .

'2 D 20.2002 Method for obtaining approval of proposed disposal 20 NMAC 3.1434 [Y] *8  :

procedures 2 A-(a)(2) & (3) 20.2003 Desposal by release into sanitary sewerage 20 NMAC 3.1-435 [Y]

C - (a) (4) i

.D - (a)(1) & (b) .;

2 B 20.2006 Transfer for disposal and mandests 20 IWAC 3.1-438 -

[Y]

1 D. '20.2104(except f) Determmahon of prior occupahonal dose 20 NMAC 3.1-409 [Y] : *2. ,

(C r semes % yenned e expopewe-) ,

2 .C 20.2201(except c) Reports of Stolen, Lost, or Messmg Licensed or Registered 20 NMAC 3.1-451 [Y]

Sources of Radiahon

i 1 C 20.2202(except e) Nohficahon of incidents ' 20 NMAC 3.1-452 [Y] . .

2 C - (a),' (b) 20.2203 Reports of Exposures, Radiahon Levels, and Concentrahons 20 NMAC 3.1-453 [Y]

D - (d) ' of Radioactive Matenal Exceedog the Limits  ;

NRC - (c)  !

2 D 20.2204 Reports of Planned ~W Exposures 20 NMAC 3.1-454 [Y]

! 1 C 20 Appendix A Protechon Factors for Respirators 20 NMAC Appx A [Y] .

1 A 20 Appendix B All's and DAC's; emuent concentrabons; concentrabons ~20 NMAC Appx B [N] '9 l for release to sewenge l

6  !

i.  ;

^

, . - .- ,& , . .y ,

m . _,._y._... . _ . - __ .~ . .

m ,

l Rule Review: [ Agreement State ]; Part 20 equivalent compahtdety rules ,

Div Des.sqnaten NRC rule ' Rule subiect State Rule Compabble 1 .A 20 Appendix'C' . Quantities of Imensed material requinng labelmg 20 NMAC Appx C [Y]  !

NOTES-i

1. Judged as coir.fmin although there is an otmous typour itical error. the term "if is used instead of the term "or.  ;

' 2. The definition of a controlled area has been omitted and the State has chosen not to adopt the " controlled area" concept. See ORNL major point

  1. 1. ,
3. Two def;nitions are made for the same term (exposure). It is not clear which definition should be used i 1
4. Judged as compatible although there is an otmous typographical error the term "or" is used instead of the term "or.
5. Judged as compatible although NM hmits the definition of survey to evaluabons conducted under specrfic condsbons 1
6. NM has omitted the equivalent of 20.1008(b),' which requires the licensee to comply with Part 20 requirements if they are.more restnctve than j existing license conditions. , j

~

7. NM adds an attemative method to determine the DDE to the'embryonetus. .

There is a significant typographical error in the NM equivalent of 1208(d) with respect to units conversien. The term "O.05 rem (mSv)" should read "0.05 rem (0.5 mSv)".

5

8. Judged as coirgiible although the term " occupational" has been added to precede ALI thereby infemng there is another type of All. l
9. Several issues are noted for this provisim. Overall, the NM equivalent is not compatible with the Appendix B Part 20 equevalent. 1
a. The NM desud;06 of the weightmg tactor incorrectly references the locat;06 of the dia g factar values as "4.3". The correct reference  :

is 20 NMAC 3.1-402.  !

i error in that the numencal value *10 (used in the definsbon of DAC) is meant to be 10*.

b. There is an obvious typo vi.f sical ~i
c. . In the " Releases to Sanitary Sewers" provision, NM uses a CEDE value of 0.05 rem instead of the CFR value of 0.5 rem.

[

i I

7L t i

t 1

I

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20210N525&oldid=3309627"