ML20210M537

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 861117-21 & 1208-23
ML20210M537
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 01/22/1987
From: Richards S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20210M507 List:
References
50-312-86-38, NUDOCS 8702120565
Download: ML20210M537 (1)


Text

_

3 1

i 1

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Sacramento Municipal Utility District Docket No. 50-312 P. O. Box 15830 License No. DPR-54 Sacramento, California 95813 As a result of the inspection conducted during the period of November 17-21 and December 8-23, 1986, and in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the following violation was identified:

-10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures and Drawings, states in part, that " Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."

QA Procedure, Policy Section V, Instructions, Procedures and Drawings, Section 4.3, states " Instructions, procedures, or drawings require applicable quantitative and/or qualitative acceptance criteria for verifying that the activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."

Contrary to the above, on June 26, 1986, procedure SP 201.10B for functional testing of snubbers did not include appropriate acceptance-criteria for lock-up velocity.

Specifically, the velocity was not corrected for temperature as recommended by the respective vendors.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District is required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in~ reply, including:

(1) corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further items of noncompliance; and, (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

M 23}$

b Date S. Richards, Chief Engineering Section 8702120565 870122

{DR ADOCK 05000312 PDR