ML20210D787
| ML20210D787 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 09/11/1986 |
| From: | Mcdonald R ALABAMA POWER CO. |
| To: | Verrelli D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NT-86-0430, NT-86-430, NUDOCS 8609190321 | |
| Download: ML20210D787 (2) | |
Text
--
~
e NT-86-0430 Malling Address Alibims Power Company 600 North 18th Street Post office Box 2641
- Birmingham. Alabama 35291 Teleptione 205 783-6090 R. P. Mcdonald g{p l$ p l; l Senior Vice President Flintridge Building AlabamaPbwer t% sov: emente c a s e September 11, 1986 Docket No. 50-348 Docket No. 50-364 Mr. D. M. Verrelli U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W. Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30323
SUBJECT:
J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant NRC Inspection of July 11 - August 10, 1986 RE: Report Number 50-348/86-15 Report Number 50-364/86-15
Dear Mr. Verrelli:
This letter refers to the violation cited in the subject inspection reports which state: "During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on July 11 - August 10, 1986, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. We violation involved demonstration of auxiliary feedwater flow paths. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, I Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below: Technical Specification 4.7.1.2.2d requires that the auxiliary feedwater system be demonstrated operable prior to entry into Mode 2 i following each cold shutdown by performing a flow test to verify the i normal flow path from the condensate storage tank through each l auxiliary feedwater pump to its associated steam generator. I Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to demonstrate that the auxiliary feedwater flow paths were operable prior to entry into Mode 2 during the Unit 2 startup from cold shutdown on July 21, 1986. W is is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I)." hD D0!k [ ) G 'l0 1rb l
) + Mr. D. M. Verrelli september 11, 1986 i Page 2 I : i I Admission or Denial ? s ,\\ he above violation occurred as descriu-d in the subjedt report. / J a Reason for Violation he above violation was caused by personnel errer in that the-individual involved performed an inadequate review to ensure, surveillance was current prior to the mode change.' 1 Corrective Action Taken and ReFults Achieved s Upon discovery, the required surveillance was performed / immediately with satisfactory results. h is demonstrated that the 1 auxiliary feedwater flow paths were operable. g 3 Corrective Steps Taken to Avoid Further VJolat' ions [ he individual involved has been counseled for his failure to perform an adequa*+ teview. 4 ) k Date of Full Compliance July 24, 190i Affirmation I affirm that this response is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. %e information contained in this .0 letter is not considered to be of a proprietary nature. Yours very t ly, R. P. Mcdonald RPM:emb e 4 x 4 I i 1 i i e' t -}}