ML20210C349
| ML20210C349 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/04/1987 |
| From: | Miller H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Lewis J GENERAL ATOMICS (FORMERLY GA TECHNOLOGIES, INC./GENER |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900402 NUDOCS 8705060166 | |
| Download: ML20210C349 (3) | |
Text
_
l
.7
/
o UNITE 3 STATES
)
E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
ij.
.I wasmorow, o.c.zoess n
W 4 BST Docket No. 99900402 Mr. John H. Lewis, Program Engineer Licensing GA Technologies Inc.
P. O. Box 85608 San Diego, CA 92138
Dear Mr. Lewis:
SUBJECT:
NRC ACCEPTANCE OF GA TECHNOLOGIES QA TOPICAL REPORT We have completed our review of the proposed Revision 9 to the GA Technologies quality assurance topical report, GA-A13010A, " Quality Assurance Program."
Proposed Revision 9 was submitted with your letter of November 13, 1986; and, in response to staff questions telephoned to GA on January 29, 1937, modified by GA letter dated April 6, 1987. This revision updates the topical report to reflect organizational changes, to reflect changes to the QA program to accom-modate the organizational changes, to update Regulatory Guide comitments, and to make other changes of an editorial nature.
Based on our review of the changes proposed in Revision 9, we find that the revised topical report continues to meet the criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and is, therefore, acceptable.
Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that our conclusion regarding this report is invalidated, we will notify you. You will be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire. Changes to the QA topical report should be reported to the NRC in accordance with the provisions for holders of construction permits as describedin10CFR50.55(f)(3)exceptthatthesecondcopyofthesubmittal should go to the Quality Assurance Branch, Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation, NRR, U.S. NRC, Washington, D.C. 20555 (instead of to theNRCVendorProgramBranch).
To use this topical report in future nuclear power plant license applications, you need only to have it referenced in Section 17 of the SAR. Should it be referenced in an SAR for a new facility, the basis of our evaluation will be the acceptance criteria in the latest revision of the Standard Review Plan Section 17.1 (currently Revision 2). Appropriate changes may be necessary at that time.
I N
o
((D B705060166 870504 D
PDR GA999 ENVGAT I
99900402 PDR 1
L
i
'4 2-John H. Lewis Please replace our previous acceptance letter with a copy of this letter, identify the report as Revision 9 of GA-A13010A, and forward seven copies to the Document Control Desk, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C.
20555.
Sincerely, f&d*
Hu rt J. Miller, Acting Director Di ision of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation.
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation m.
4 John H. Lewis Distribution:
DCS 016 QAB Reading DLPQE Reading EWMerschoff JSpraul, NRR FCHawkins, NRR ABBeach, NRR HJMiller, NRR i
nrc acceptance ltr/NP l
ABucac)(h' )k:NRR p0:DLPQE:NRRJGSpraul:nkp etFCm/, kins QAP QE:HRR C:QAB:D D 0LPQE:NRR
)
HJMiller l
04/yl/87 04/gf/87 04//g87 04/jt/87
,