ML20210C142
| ML20210C142 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/01/1987 |
| From: | Reis E NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| CON-#287-3313 OL-3, NUDOCS 8705060090 | |
| Download: ML20210C142 (2) | |
Text
/
33/3 3 Kt
[k
,'o,,
UNITED STATES y
)y g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-f,4'E'ff 5,-
qj WASHINGTON, o. C. 20555
'87 NAy -4 All :26 May 1.1987 QFP u0Ce r_,.,
5 9 4.',i -
Mr. Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 In the Matter of Long Island Lighting Company (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)
Docket No. 50-322-OL-3
Dear Mr. Chilk:
I would like to draw your attention to an error in the "NRC Staff Response to LILCO Motion for Expedited Commission Consideration of Request to Authorize Operation of Shoreham at 25% of Full Power."
At page 5, a reference:
"See Attached Affidavit of Ronnie Lo, dated April 28, 1987," should have been deleted.
Please find attached a replacement page 5.
The Staff regrets any inconvenience caused by this correction.
Sincerely, (W
Edwin J. Reis Deputy Issistant General Counsel
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ encl.:
Service List Uh5060090870501 o
ADOCK 05000322
()1 PDR
4 t
' findings pursuant to 9 50.47(a)(1) and 5 50.57(a) and (c), prior to granting LILCO's Request. -
In sum, though not expressly filed pursuant to the provisions of I 50.57(c), LILCO's Request is proper under Commission regulations, and should be considered.
LILCO's Motion for expedited consideration of its request to be allowed to operate the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station at 25% of full power should be granted.
Construction of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station has been completed and all necessary findings to support low-power (5%) operation were made prior to issuance of such a license on July 3, 1985.
The plant has not been licensed to operate at higher power levels because of on-going adjudicatory proceedings involving the suff1-4 ciency of off-site emergency planning for full power operation and 4
LILCO alleges that there is an immediate need to operate that plant at i
a 25% power level pending the conclusion of the adjudicatory proceedings.
It is, therefore, appropriate to determine whether such operation can be conducted under the Commission's regulations and in accord with the public health and safety.
The Staff is developing a work scope and schedule for a review of the subject request on an expedited basis.
The Staff expects to establish 1
l 2/
In Philadelphia Electric Co.
(Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and :), CLI-85-16, 22 NRC 459 (1985), the Commission vacated as moot ALAB-809, 21 NRC 1605 (1985), where the Appeal Board had ruled that compliance with 10 C.F.R.
I 50.12(a) governing exemptions must be met when proceeding to show that a deficiency in (FOOTNOTE CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) i
.-