ML20209J251

Advises That Rev 13 to ETR-1001, Nuclear QA Program Manual Acceptable.Rev Updates Rept to Reflect Organizational Changes,Changes to QA Program to Accommodate Organizational Changes & to Update Reg Guide Commitments

ML20209J251
Person / Time
Issue date:	05/01/1987
From:	Miller H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Mazo B EBASCO SERVICES, INC.
References
REF-QA-99900505 NUDOCS 8705040248
Download: ML20209J251 (3)

Text

I 4

f 4

UNITED STATES 8

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{

)

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20666

,/

ggy 1 367 Docket No. 99900505 Mr. Bertrand R. Mazo, Vice President Corporate Quality Programs Ebasco Services Incorporated Two World Trade Center New York, NY 10048-0752

SUBJECT:

NRC ACCEPTANCE OF EBASCO QA TOPICAL REPORT We have completed our review of the proposed Revision 13 to the Ebasco quality assurance topical report, ETR-1001, " Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual." Proposed Revision 13 was submitted with your letter of December 29, 1986; and, in response to staff questions of February 17, 1987, i

modified by Ebasco letter dated March 17, 1987. This revision updates the topical report to reflect organizational changes, to reflect changes to the QA program to accommodate the organizational changes, to update Regulatory Guide commitments, and to make other changes of an editorial nature.

Based on our review of the changes proposed in Revision 13, we find that the revised topical report continues to meet the criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and is, therefore, acceptable. Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that our conclusion regarding this report is ir, validated, we will notify you. You will be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire. Changes to the QA topical report should be reported to the NRC in accordance with the provisions for holders of construction permits as described in 10 CFR 50.55(f)(3) except that the second copy of the submittal should go to the Quality Assurance Branch, Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation, NRR, U.S. NRC, Washington, D.C. 20555 (instead of to the NRC Vendor Program Branch).

To use this topical report in future nuclear power plant license applications, you need only to have it referenced in Section 17 of the SAR. Should it be referenced in an SAR for a new facility, the basis of our evaluation will be the acceptance criteria in the latest revision of the Standard Review Plan Section 17.1 (currently Revision 2). Appropriate changes nay be necessary at that time.

00 g

I l

4 Bertrand R. Mazo <

Please replace our previous acceptance letter with a copy of this letter, identify the report as Revision 13 of ETR-1001, and forward seven copies to the Document Control Desk, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.

20555.

Sincerely, h-Hu t J. Miller, Acting Director Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

~

O 1

4

5 Bertrand R. Mazo Distribution:

Cm,a :016 u em QAB Reading DLPQE Reading EWMerschoff

~

JSpraul, NRR FCHawkins, NRR ABBeach, NRR HJMiller, NRR i

1 4

4 i

I i

I nre acceptance ltr/NP s

i JAB:DLPQE:NRR[QA h f:NRR C:QAB:0.

NitR QE:NRR i

i JGSpraul:nkp 5C Sins ABBeac!

let 'l H<

iller j 04/A/87 04/jy87 04/26/07 04/p/87

,m..

~.-

-y---

,,-.,._,_._,.u-7 3

-