ML20209H645

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Three Apps Inadvertently Omitted from Motion
ML20209H645
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 01/23/1987
From: Mcmurray C
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART, NEW YORK, STATE OF, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY
To: Kline J, Margulies M, Shon F
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#187-2403 OL-3, NUDOCS 8702060106
Download: ML20209H645 (9)


Text

bf f.f E Yb

~

- - ~

g KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART SoUIH LOBBY fTH floor EXCHANDEPIA G 1800 M STREET. N.W.

WASHINCiroN, D.C. 20036 5891 sta 3274o0 i

1438 MN f AVEp45 MIAML PL utst TELEPHONE 00D 7?S4000 0 05) 374 4112 TELEX *ecape n Oc ta is,, ogg, gygg,3 Tt1ECOPER 004 7748100 FIT'3BURCH, PA l'42 5J7v CHRISTOPHER M. McMURRAY g \\, n I, '%

cou r7S*54 January 23, 1987

^'/

4

,e At T

JAN 291987* ;

vCiTTING &

BY TELECOPY A SE3V;CE BRANCH E

A s:CY.HRC

/

59 Morton B. Margulies, Esq., Chairman Dr. Jerry R. Kline 4

Mr. Frederick J. Shon Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Reg.latory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Gentlemen:

Yesterday, counsel for Suffolk County, on behalf of all of the Governments, telecopied to you a Motion for Reconsideration of Schedule.

Unfortunately, we inadvertently neglected to include in the transmission the three appendices referenced in the Motion.

Those appendices are attached hereto and should be considered as part of the Governmer.ts ' Motion.

Sincerely, Christopher M. McMurray CMM: sir Attachments All counsel of record w/ attachments cc:

8702060106 870123 PDR ADOCK 05000322 O

PDR bd

Appendix A LILCO Transitio'n Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Eey to Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 s

I INADEQUATE BATDIG I(Inadequate) 1* (Inadequate - coneerns pertaining to LERO's legal authority identified during this review)

The element is inadequately addressed The element is inadequately addressed in the plan for the reason (s) stated in la the plan for the reason (s) (not related beid type. The plan and/or procedures to legal concerns) stated in bold type.

must b7 revised before the element can The plan and/or procedures must be be considered adequate.

revised before the element can be considered adequate.

i In addition, concerns pertaining to LERO's legal authority were identified by the RAC, and are described in Attachment 2

to the reviaw of.

Revision 5.

l l

l l

l l

LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1988 Page 11 of 15 NUREC-0654 i

_Flament Review Comment (s)

' -Rating t

0.k In resporse to an exercise issue, the plan has (Co ')

revised to add a traffle engineer to the staff j EOC to eval. sate any possible impediments; avae-l ation and to make recommendations on cessary changes to evacuation routes in to poten-tial impediments.

Procedures for, old workers,

.e., bus drivers, traffle gu! des, e., have been fled to include instruett make prompt not ations through their eo unleation network of any tential impedimen Provisions have been made to an RBS m e in the event that changes to cuation to es are necessary.

i Internal comm ca ons within the LERO EOC

, regarding assessm t of an response to evacuation Impediments tely addressed through modification the (esp. OPIP 3.8.3, Traffle Con 1). The Eva tion Route coordinator is respo e for obtaining odie updates from the Ev tion Route Spotters, for immediately repor road impediments or problems to the fic Control' Coordinator an oad Logistles

' rdinator (See OPIP 3.6.3, Sectio

.6.7) Lead fic Guides (at the staging areas) o report

/ any incident.

l J.10.1 See review of Revision 5.

A J.10.

See review of Revisfor. 5.

A l

I st..,aview of Revision 5.

J.12 See review.of Revision 5. In addition, the following I

comments are now applicable.

The LERO Reception Center previously designated at the Nassau County Veterans Memorial Coliseum has been changed to three (3) LILCO facilities located in Bellmore, Hicksville and Roslyn. The i

adequacy of these facilities as reception centers must be evaluated at a future exercise.

4

_ _ _.. ~

LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8 Consolidated RAC Review Dated December 15,1986 Page 12 of 15 MUREC-0654 Element Review comment (s) 1stina J.12 la addition to the change of Reception Center (s)

(Cont'd) locatlee, the plan specifles (see page 3.9-5 of Revisloa t) thst a aeroening process wul be used to ahoek etaenses for contamination.

Incoming veldeles win be directed to monitoring stations where the veldele and elver wHl be shocked for contamination.

Aeoordlag to tids screening procedure, passengers of the veldale wu! also be assumed to be unoontaminated and a elena tag wHl be lasued to them if the &fver is below contamina-tion limits. nds screening procedure is laadaq==te since the applicable guidance requires the espabuity of monitoring witida about a 12 how period au residents and transients,in the plume EPZ arriving at tiie Reception Centers.

LERO is responsible for monitoring au evacuees arriving at reception centers. It is not adequate to plan for this monitoring with personas! and equipment when availahle.

It is not possRde to evaluate the number of personnel required for monitoring at the special population reception centers since the plan shows la procedure OPIP 3.8.5 pages 21-37, "to be arranged" fc3 most of the speelal population reception centers.

".eivioricas c.w m ure Con m n K.3.a See review of Revision 5. Several issues involving I

emergency worker knowledge and use of dosim identified at the February 13,198 ercise.

w This ele t has been rated in ate because

{

dosimetry an Ing were provided to the Bus Drivers used for scho acuation.

i (1)

Bus vers used for schoo cuation should trained in the use of dosimeters.

(2)

Adequate supplies of dosimetry should be provided for Bus Drivers used for school evacuation.

I

TOMM BOARD Appendix D THOMAS 8.SULOTTA Ceeseensten

'a=ta; *1~~<"

O

.Y E

d2'#,:::tatut i

=>#it'o*v".7ai i

TOWN HALL PLAZA HEMPSTEAD, N.Y.11550 t

Telephones 489 SOM January 6, 1987 Mr. William Catacosinos, Chairman Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801

Dear Mr. Catacosinos,

The Town Board of Hempstead has learned from press reports, statements of members of the public before the Board, and a review of pertinent portions of Revision 8 of LILCO'S emergency plan for the Shoreham nuclear power plant that LILCO is representing its property located at 2400 Sunrise Highway, Bellmore, to be a " reception center."

We understand that this " reception center" includes structures, facilities and services necessary to proce'ss tens of thousands of evacuees arriving in vehicles for monitoring for radiation and possibly for decontamination, as well as ancillary facilities and services for these persons.

To date, the subject property has been used by LILCO as an operations center in support of its supply of electrical power to Long Island residents and businesses.

It is our understanding that LILCO is continuing to use the property'as an operations, center, but that, in addition, LILCO claims the property for a new and expanded use as a " reception center."

We are taking this initiative to write in order to prevent any misunderstanding as to the use of the subject property.

As of today, the subject property located at l

2400 Sunrise Highway, Bellmore, is zoned Part Business /Part l

Residence B.

This classification permits the property i

to be used as it has been, as an operations center.

I l

o

,,,_,_,___,.,_er

~.

__-_s.

~ '~

s Page 2

)

2400 Sunrise Highway Bellmore, New York 11710 The present zoning does not permit the property to be used in a new and expanded way as a " reception center."

Accordingly, any representation by LILCO of the subject property as being a " reception center" or as permitting the new and expanded use described in LILCO'S Revision 8 of its emergency plan is contrary to the present zoning classification.

Any attempt by LILCO to use the Bellzure facility in this manner would violate local zoning laws.

Sincerely,

}

\\

/dnus mM 1 sY

~

Thomas S.

Gul'otti me's D. Berinett Presiding Supervisor rvisor

~

}

w

.n a

Eug b L. Weisbein

'/Gergor P.jPeters6n Cou ilman Counc 1rianN os h G. Aair r.

Martin B.

Bernstein

~

Cencilmp Councilman l

J6se B.'Mondello ' Y 2

.?

Richard V. Guardino, Jr.

/

.V Cou ilman Councilman

JOHN C.KIERNAN SUPE %ve:oa Appendix C Orrect or THE Suptavison TOWN or NORTH HEMPSTEAD TOWN HALL. MANHASSET. N Y llo30 na, o vsess es,oseo December 11, 1986 i

Honorable Administrative Judges Hon. John Frye, III, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Honorable Administrative Judges:

Please be advised that the Town of North Hempstead objects to the designation and proposed use of the Long Island Lighting Company's (hereinaf ter called LILCO) facility at Willis Avenue and the south service road of the Long Island Expressway in Roslyn as a reception and decontamination center as part of an evacuation plan in the event of a radiological accident at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.

Under no circumstances should this facility be approved or designated as an evacuation center.

Indeed, we believe that the traffic problems, environmental dangers, the size of the facility itself and local zoning laws render such a proposed use illegal and inappropriate.

The property was acquired by LILCO on March 17, 1923.

Since that time, the property has been used only for the normal business operations of LILCO--general operations yard, office building and substation.

From time to time, f rom the 1920's to the 1950's there was also a farm stand operated on part of the property.

It has never been used for anything approaching an evacuation center in the event of a radiological accident.

Such a use is not an ordinary use by a public utility and is not a permitted use under the zoning code of the Town of North Hempstead.

The property was rezoned by the Town on August 16, 1955, from Residence C to Business A.

Although LILCO has not submitted any applications to the Town for a zoning code change or variance or any detailed plans for the proposed evacuation and reception center, the Town has reviewed a drawing indicating how the site would be used.

LILCO

Administrative Judges December.ll, 1986 Page Two proposes to store equipment and decontamination trailers in the northeast corner of the property.

The storage of such trailers is not a permitted use under the Business A zone and would violate the Town toning Code.

Moreover, LILCO's proposal to use trailers for monitoring and decontamination brings into play some other provisions of the Town's zoning code.

Section 70-203 states in.part as follows:

Section 70-203.

Public health, safety and general welfare.

A.

No trade, industry, purpose or use shall be conducted in such a manner as to create corro-sive or toxic fumes, gas, smoke or odors, ob-noxious dust, vapor or wastes, offensive noise i

or vibration, which may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare.

It is our position that any decontamination acti-vity on the site would violate this section.

Our examination of LILCO's drawing also indicated i

that the site itself is totally inadequate to accommodate the proposed use and handle the expected volume of people and automobiles.

Our records indicate that the site is approximately 600,000 square feet (or about 7.3 acres), and approximately 35 percent of the site is presently covered with buildings or landscaping.

That would leave about l

390,000 square feet left for the evacuation center activity.

It' is our further understanding that LILCO's proposed plan would direct approximately 40,000 people to this site.

Putting aside for a moment the other traffic problems in the area, we believe that a conservative estimate would be that some 13,000 cars would be directed to this site (12,100 is the number contained in LILCO's traffic study).

In discussions with both our Planning Department, Building Department and our Board of zoning and Appeal's personnel, it is our calculation (using parking space sizes and aisle and exit lane dimensions below our Code standards).

that.LILCO will not be able to handle more than 1,100 cars at any one time on the site.

In fact, we believe that is a generous estimate.

Clearly, given the confusion and fear which would accompany an actual evacuation and the time nec-essary to check each vehicle and the occupants, this site just is not big enough to handle the projected volume.

It should be noted that the Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum parking area designated in the previous LILCO plan is approximately 53

Adainistrativo Judges December 11, 1986 Page Three acres.

Many critics of this earlier plan using the Coliseum l

thought that the site was inadequate.

Therefore, _ we would request that you carefully consider whether the three new LILCO sites are sufficient to meet the projected demand.

The i

Town is concerned that there would be thousands of cars backed up on line waiting to gain entrance to the site or that there would be cars driving through the surrounding neighborhood trying to gain an alternate access route to the site.

We have reviewed the traffic report. prepared by KLD Associates in connection with LILCO's proposed plan.

The Town does not share the view that the traffic could be properly handled.

The exit from the westbound Long Island Expressway for Willis Avenue in one of the worst in the County.

Under normal rush hour conditions there are traffic tie ups at this exit.

We urge you to carefully review the traffic report and to make an independent assessment of the traffic conditions.

The Willis Avenue /Long Island Express-way intersection is one of the most important for north-south travel in the Town of North Hempstead.

Finally, the Town is concerned about the effect that the use of this facility for decontamination purposes could have on the quality of our groundwater supply.

The contamination of the groundwater from wastewater runoff could threaten the health and safety of our residents.

This issue should not be treated lightly.

As you know, Long Island has no alternate source of drinking water and the possible dangers to our groundwater must be given paramount consideration.

We respectfully request that you reject the use of the Roslyn facility as part of the LILCO evacuation plan.

V uly yours, John B.

iernan Superv o

/

ddt--

Jerome J. Weinstein Ge

. Cunn gham Councilman C un Iman

/

  1. A2 79 a Au
  • /, Charles J. Fuschillo oseph A. Guarino mn Councilman

.JBK:1

-