ML20209E395

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Confirmation or Update of Previous Response Re Planned Schedule to Enter Into Agreement with Nrc.Nrc Considers Draft Application Package to Be Completed When NRC Is in Receipt of All of Listed Info
ML20209E395
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/29/1999
From: Lohaus P
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To: Ball J
MINNESOTA, STATE OF
References
NUDOCS 9907150021
Download: ML20209E395 (4)


Text

V 3

, M ur uq UNITED STATES

.4

[$ t, j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1-

'% . . . . . p June 29, 1999 Ms. Judith Ball, Manager Section of Asbestos, Indoor Air, Lead,  ;

and Radiation l Division of Environmental Health I Department of Health I 121 E. Seventh Place, Suite 220 P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, MN 55164-0975

Dear Ms. Ball:

l l

To assist us in the development of the planning assumptions to support our Fiscal Year 2001-02 budget, we corresponded with you on December 18,1998, requesting information regarding

_your schedule to enter into an Agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). In particular, we requested your target dates for submitting a complete draft application package  !

. for NRC staff review, and for submitting a formal request for the Agreement from the Governor to the Chairman. You responded to this request in a letter to me dated January 8,1999. We are again asking that you confirm, or update your previous response regarding your planned l schedule to enter into an Agreement.

We consider a draft application package to be complete when NRC is in receipt of all of the following information:

1. Draft letter from the Governor to the Chairman making the certifications required by the Atomic Energy Act, and requesting an agreement.  ;
2. Copies of the State's statutes or legislation authorizing the radiation control program and o assumption of regulatory authority under an agreement.

'i 3. Copies of the State's radiation control regulations.

4. ' Narrative description of the State's radiation control program.
5. Copies of all State implementing procedures and guidance documents for licensing, inspection, enforcement, incident response, response to allegations, and updating of State regulations.

l 6. - Copies of sample forms and licenses.

7. Copies of all position descriptions.

8.' identification of all personnel that will be working in the program and their resumes.

9907150021 990629 PDR STPRO ESOMN f.q-PDR Y Y-MA-U

1 4

~

Judith Ball JUli 2 S1999

9. Analysis demonstrating that the program meets the criteria set out in the 1981 and 1983 policy statements. The integrated Mate. rials Performance Evaluation Program common and applicable non-common performance indicator criteria in Management Directive 5.6 may also provide insights on areas that you may want to address in the analysb.

NRC staff would conduct a comketeness review of your draft application for an agreement, a1d provide comments to you, within 3-4 months of receipt. NRC staff would expect to cc,mplete processing of a fornlal request for an agreemant from the Govemor within 5-7 months of receipt.  !

" Processing" of the hrmal request includes staff and Commission review of the proposed j agreement and app,roval for publication in the Fec'gLaj Reaister for public review and comment, resolution of public comments, and final Commission review and approval of the agreement.

Following Commission approval, up to one month may be necessary to schedule and hold a j signing ceremony, if desired by the State. The agreement is also usually made effective one month following the date of signature to provide time for an orderly transition in regulatory authority (e.g., transfer license and inspection files).

1 If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me or Cardelia H. Maupin of my i staff (301) 415-2312 or Intemet: CHM @NRC. GOV.

Sincerely, )

\ W llaul H. Lo aus, Dire 6 r QW Office of State Programs l

. Judith Ball JUN 2 S1999 i

9. Analysis demonstrating that the program meets the criteria set out in the 1981 and 1983 policy statements. The Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program common ,

and applicable non common performance indicator criteria in Management Directive 5.6 may also provide insights on areas that you may want to address in the analysis.

NRC s.aff would conduct a completeness review of your draft application for an agreement, and provide comments to you, within 3-4 months of receipt. NRC staff would expect to complete processing of a formal request for an agreement from the Governor within 5-7 months of receipt.

"Processhg" of the formal request includes staff and Commission review of the proposed agreement and approval for publication in the Federal Reoister for public review and comment, resolution of public comments, and final Commission review and approval of the agreement.

Following Commission approval, up to one month may be necessary to schedule and hold a signing ceremony, if desired by the State. The agreement is also usually made effective one month following the date of signature to provide time for an orderly transition in regulatory authority (e.g., transfer license and inspection files).

If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me or Cardella H. Maupin of my staff (301) 415-2312 or Internet: CHM @NRC. GOV. l Sincerely, l OdginalSIGned By:

PAULH.LOHAUS Paul H. Lohaus, Director Office of State Programs Distribution:

DIR RF DCD (SP07)

SDroggitis PDR (YES/)

JLynch, R(lll)_ BGUsilton Minnesota File

  • See previous concurrence DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ CHM \ BALL-MN 99,WPD T3 receive a cop r of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" a Copy G4hoO ttachment/ enclosure "E" e Cop f with attachment / enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE OSP OSP:  %$l NAEE CHMaupin:gd PHLohauA /C' DATE 06/28/99* 06/8/93 OSP FILE CODE: SP-NA-11

r s

. Judith Ball L

9. Analysis demonstrating that the program meets the criteria set out in the 1981 and 1983 policy stat ents. The Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program common and applica e non-common performance indicator criteria in Management Directive 5.6 may also pro e insights on areas that you may want to address in the analysis.  ;

i 1

Assuming there are no jor issues, NRC staff would expect to complete a review of a draft application for an agreem t, and provide comments to you for resolution, within 6 months of ]

q receipt. NRC staff would e ect to complete processing of a formal request for an agreement j from the Governor within 5-7 onths of receipt. " Processing" of the formal request includes  !

staff and Commission review o the proposed agreement and approval for publication in the Federal Reoister for public reviekand comment, resolution of public comments, and final Commission review and approvalbf the agreement. Following Commission approval, up to one month may be necessary to schedule and hold a signing ceremony, if desired by the State. The l agreement is also usually made effective s one month following the date of signature to provide l time for an orderly transition in regulato(y authority (e.g., transfer license and inspection files). l

\

If you have any questions concerning this\ letter, please contact me or Cardelia H. Maupin of my staff (301) 415-2312 or Internet: CHM @NRC. GOV,

\

Si cerely, Paul H.1 aus, h Director Office of St. ate Programs N

\

l l

l l

N Distribution: \

DIR RF DCD (SP07) \

SDroggitis JLynch, R(lli)

PDR (YES()

BGUsilton

\

i Minnesota File l

i DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ CHM \ BALL-MN.WPD Ta receive a cop r of this doqument Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copt with attachment / enclosure "N" a No copy OFFICE n%\ l OSP:D l l NAME CHMa\1Vktsd' PHLohaus

~

DATE 060T)/99 06/ /99 OSP FILE CODE: SP-NA-11 J