ML20207R250
| ML20207R250 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 03/12/1987 |
| From: | Warembourg D PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO |
| To: | Berkow H NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| P-87098, NUDOCS 8703170022 | |
| Download: ML20207R250 (3) | |
Text
o 1
h#,tPublic Service-
-a.,*.
Comp.ny of Colorado 2420 W. 26th Avenue, Suite 1000, Denver, Colorado.80211
'\\ -
Ne.rbh 12, 1987 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P-87098 s
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission' ATTN:
Document Control Desk h
Washington, D.C.
20S55 Attention: Mr.H.N.Berkow,Dird; tor Standardization and Special-Projects Directorate
)
i Docket No. 50-267 L
SUBJECT:
CRDM Assemblies
REFERENCES:
(See Attacbed List)
Dear Mr. Berkow:
3 s
\\.
Our letter, Reference 1, transmitted to 'the NFC the resbita of a test on the CRDM assembly at 300 degrees Fahrenheit.
itis t(st program was originally set forth in our
- letter, P-85032,1. dated-January 30,1985 (Reference 9), which described the prograin in detail in terms of test durations and test pa amMers.
Following that submittal the CRD cperating temperatures, and 1pecifically 'the, proposed requalification program, were discussad extansively at the February 20-22 NRC/PSC on-site me: Hngs as documented,.cn pages 45 through 63, Volume I of,the February 21, 1985 trangript of these meetings contained in the attachments to the NRC letter of April 8,
1985 (Reference 8).
In addition, the proposed test was discussed in the NRC Safety Evaluation attached to the July 12,1985 l ett $r (Reference 7).
Various aspects of the program were discussed in a number of documents as referenced above.
m We have evaluated your letter of December 24,1986 (Reference 2)', and we agree with your Consultant's conclusion that the test program does not fulfill the requirements of the NRC Standard Review Plan.
Although the program as originally outlined was not based on the NRC Standard Review Plan, we believe we did proceed in good faith to complete the original program commitments culminating in our May 16, 1986 submittal.
' O,k O
0703170022 070312 i
\\g s
PDR ADOCK 05000267 P
PDR l
m i
g P-87098 6-
.Paga 2 12, 1987 qf,, March
.g We accept your letter of December 24, 1986 and given the evaluation and conclusions contained there4n, please consider our submittal of May 16, 1986, (Reference 1) as an informational report that is responsive to our original contnitments as outlined in P-85032.
g.
C We do not intend' to provide a specific response to the issues t
identified by Reference 2 (Appendix A Questions and Concerns).
We will, however, re-evaluate our CRD requalification program based on your most recent comments with the objective of resubmitting our
' program at a later date.
Tery truly yours, k W. J'Y
~
/
D. W. Warembourg, Manager Nuclear Engineering Division y
DWW:pa t
Attacament cc: Regional Administrator, Region IV Attention: Mr. J. E. Gagliardo, Chief s!
Reactor Projects Branch t
Mr. R. E. Fari ell Senior Resident Inspector 9
O i ' A.'
Fort St. Vrain v,
i 2
g
)
\\
f/'
4, \\
A I$
e fr.
i
Attachment to' P-87098
REFERENCES:
- 1) PSC Letter Warembourg to Berkow dated May 16, 1986, (P-86374)
- 2) NRC Letter Heitner to Williams dated December 24, 1986 (G-86664)
- 3) PSC Letter Warembourg to Berkow dated January 30, 1986 (P-86071) 4)PSCLetterWarembourg to Berkow dated December 19, 1985 (P-85478)
- 5) PSC Letter Brey to Berkow dated December 12, 1985 (P-85463) 6)PSCLetterWarembourg to Butcher dated November 5, 1985 (P-85380)
- 7) NRC Letter Johnson to Lee dated July 12, 1985 (G-85270)
- 8) NRC Letter Denise to Lee dated April 8, 1985 (G-85127)
- 9) PSC Letter Lee to
?ohnson dated January 30, 1985 (P-85032)
I I
=
.