ML20207Q559

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ro:During Internal Review of Records for First Quarter 1986, Discovered Failure to Provide Written 15-day Notification of 860207 Contaminated Water in Containment Vessel Sump.Caused by Oversight
ML20207Q559
Person / Time
Site: Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 12/22/1986
From: Heward R
SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL CORP.
To: Elsasser T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
SNEC-86-0079, SNEC-86-79, NUDOCS 8701270545
Download: ML20207Q559 (4)


Text

-

c ME SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL CORPORATION GENERAL P U B LIC UTILITIES SYSTEM P SNEC Jersey Central Power & Light Company Pennsylvania Electric Company PE JC Metropolitan Edison Company MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE:

100 INTERPACE PARKWAY 201-263-6500

' PARSIPPANY, N.J. 07054 December 22, 1986 SNEC-86-0079 Mr. Thomas Elsasser Section Chief of Reactor Projects Section 3-C U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19063 Docket No. 50-146 License No. DPR-4

SUBJECT:

CONTAMINATED WATER IN THE CONTAINMENT SUMP

Dear Mr. Elsasser:

An internal review of our records for the first quarter of 1986 indicates that a 15 day written notification of water in the lower portion of the Saxton Nuclear Experimental Facility's containment vessel (CV) was not transmitted to your offices. Telephone notification of the presence and analyses results of the water was made on February 20, 1986 to Mr. R. Summers, Region I, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SNEC Technical Specifications require a followup report within 15 days per Section B, paragraph 5. This omission is the result of an inadvertent oversight. Notification of this oversight was made by our licensing representatives to Mr. Don Haverkamp, Region I, U.S.

NRC, who advised us to submit the written notification late.

The water in question was observed in the CV sump during the first quarter inspection of the facility on February 7, 1986. A sample was taken and analyzed for radionuclide content. The results are presented in Exhibit 1.

Both cesium-134 and 137, and strontium-90 were found to exceed the units set forth in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, " Limits for Unrestricted Release".

The presence of this water poses no threat to the environment or to the 'public health and safety, since there are no release paths from the CV sump to the environment. When appropriate, the water will be properly disposed of as it it has been in the past.

s 5

[ y

Mr. Thomas Ele: sacr Decembar 22, 1986 The water originates from condensation on the inside of the CV. The condensation is a consequence of a breather pipe installed during decommissioning, which permits the CV to breathe when changes in atmospheric temperature occur.

It is apparent that the influx of water to the sump cannot be readily terminated without installation of a systen to control the internal atmosphere of the CV. This action is not deemed necessary since the water has no pathway to the external environment. We will continue to periodically monitor, remove, and take the appropriate steps to secure and dispose of this water.

If you have any questions concerning this report, please call me at (201) 316-7594.

Sincerely, R. W. Heward, Jr.

h SNEC President RWH/GGB/cb:0231S Attachment cc: R. E. Carter, NRC T. Weadock, NRC D. Haverkamp, NRC l

l

, EXHIBIT 1 Results of SNEC Water February 7,1986 10 CFR 20 App. B(a)

Isotope CV Water Taole II, Col. 2 Limits gnce_ntration(uCi/ml) (uCi/ml)

Cs-134 1.1E-S (b) 9.0E-6 (S)

Cs-137 1.9E-3 (b) 2.0E-5 (S)

Sr-90(c) 1.2E-5 (b) 3.0E-7 (S)

(a) Values listed are the more restrictive between soluble (S) and insoluble (I).

(b) Exceed published limits.

(c) Number is lower than originally reported due to chemical re-preparation and re-analysis.

i

. - - - _. _m- ,