ML20207Q281

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Order.* Oral Argument on FEMA Pending Petition Seeking Leave to Appeal from Portions of ASLB 861211 Order Re Emergency Planning Will Be Heard on 870205 in Bethesda,Md.Served on 870122
ML20207Q281
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 01/21/1987
From: Shoemaker C
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:
Federal Emergency Management Agency, NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY
References
CON-#187-2260 OL-5, NUDOCS 8701270121
Download: ML20207Q281 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

} &O i

COP E:L:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WRC NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAI7BoMd2 M1 :16 Administrative Judges: gg, , ,

BUCKt%u A '*OU Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman Jandary>21, 1987 Gary J. Edles Howard A. Wilber

) SERVED.M M 22 BB7 In the Matter of )

)

LONG 1SLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-5

)

(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, ) (EP Exercise)

Unit 1) )

)

ORDER Oral argument on the pending petition of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) seeking leave to appeal from portions of the Licensing Board's December 11,-1986 order in the emergency planning exercise phase of this operating license proceeding will.be heard at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, February 5, 1987, in the NRC Public Hearing Room, Fifth Floor, 4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.1 The order of presentation and time allotments are as follows:

FEMA - 30 minutes Applicant Long Island Lighting Company -

30 minutes Intervenors Suffolk County, et al. -

30 minutes I

This date was previously agreed upon by counsel for the parties.

2 1270 k[5 o 2 090

a 2

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff -

30 minutes FEMA and the' applicant may, if they so desire, reserve a reasonable portion of their time for rebuttal.2 The parties are to provide the Secretary to this Board, by letter mailed no later than January 30, 1987, with the name of the counsel who will present argument on its or their behalf.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD C. -- h 5 = ,1N~

C. Jhan Shoemaker Secreary to the Appeal Board 2

In addition, those two parties may arrange for a different allocation of the one hour provided for the argument of their side of the controversy.