ML20207J025
| ML20207J025 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/01/1999 |
| From: | Jerome Murphy Committee To Review Generic Requirements |
| To: | Travers W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207J027 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-REGGD-01.XXX, RTR-REGGD-1.XXX, TASK-*****, TASK-RE NUDOCS 9903160168 | |
| Download: ML20207J025 (15) | |
Text
7 6
p**Co g
i UNITED STATES w
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
e WASHINGTON, D.C. - aaat
% %./
March 1,1999 i
MEMORANDUM TO:
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations FROM:
Joseph A. Murphy, Chairman
/
Committee To Review Generic qui ments
SUBJECT:
MINUTES OF THE CRGR MEETING NUMBER 317 The Committee To Review Generic Requirements (CRGR) met on Tuesday, March 17,1998, from 9:00 am to 12:00 noon. Attachment 1 contains the list of attendees.
D. Matthews (ARR) presented for CRGR review and endorsement the draft Regulatory Guide (DG-1069) titled " Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Plants During Permanent Shutdown and Decommissioning." Attachment 2-A contains the presentation material used by the staff. The Committee made various comments and reccmmendations, and asked that staff provide resolution of one particular comment - regarding applicability of 10 CFR Part 100 guidelines - to the CRGR staff for further consultation with the Committee. The Committee, however, did not wish to review the revised guide. Based on satisfactory resoluti6n of CRGR i
comments and recommendations, on April 6,1998, the Committee endorsed the revised guide for issuance for public comments (Attachment 2-B).
C. Haughney (NMSS) briefed the CRGR seeking Committee's advice on proposed modifications to address design deficiencies in the Amersham Model 660 Radiography Camera. The staff's presentation material is included as Attachment 3. The specific concems were those related to the possible failure of Amersham Model No. 660 radiography camera to satisfy the 30-foot drop, 40-inch puncture onto steel pin', and 30-minutes fire tests. At the time of CRGR briefing, Amersham had been conducting these tests and considering possible design modifications for incorporating them in the future production. In particular, two specific design modifications were under consideration. ' One of them was replacement of the carbon steel bolts with stainless stee!
bolts, and the other one was inclusion of an added shield collar. The Committee offered various comments. However, since this meeting, the Committee has been informed that the prototypes Model 660 camera with the latter modif!::ation had failed the drop test and, as a result, Amersham has decided to use over-pack instead.
/
I During a briefing at the 309* CRGR meeting, held on August 5,1997, the NMSS i
staff had indicated that a bulletin on the subject of puncture testing was being considered. Subsequently, at CRGR Meeting No. 333, which was held on 151005 November 27,1998, the staff briefed the Committee on the closure of Bulletin 97-02, " Puncture Testing of Shipping Packages Under 10 CFR Part 71."
3 L
- 7 gg FILE CENTER 9903160168 990301 MEETING 317 PDR g 4 q_.M c k k g^
PDR REVQP NROCROR
/
n 9 A m. g ypf b e
e
(
1 b
William D. Travers l In accordance with the EDO's July 18,1983 directive conceming " Feedback and Closure of CRGR Review", a written response is required from the cognizant office to report agreement or l
disagreement with the CRGR recommendations in these minutes. The response is to be l
forwarded to the CRGR Chairman and if there is disagreement with the CRGR recommendations, to the EDO for decision making.
Questions concerning these meeting minutes should be referred to Raji Tripathi (415-7584).
Attachments: As stated cc:
Commission (5)
SECY M. Knapp, DEDE F. Miraglia, DEDO J. Lieberman, OE M. Springer, ADM H. Bell, OlG K. Cyr, OGC J. Larkins, ACRS H. Miller, R-l L. Reyes, R-Il J. Dyer, R-Ill 1
E. Merschoff, R-IV C. Paperiello, NMSS A. Thadani, RES S. Collins, NRR J. Lieberman, OE D. Matthews, NRR C. Haughney, NMSS l
l
l I
l l
1 William D. Travers In accordance with the EDO's July 18,1983 directive concerning Feedback and Closure of l
CRGR Review", a written response is required from the cognizant office to report agreement or disagreement with the CRGR recommendations in these minutes. The response is to be forwarded to the CRGR Chairman and if there is disagreement with the CRGR recommendations, to the EDO for decision making.
Questions concerning these meeting ininutes should be referred to Raji Tripathi (415-7584).
Attachments: As stated cc:
Commission (5)
SECY j
M. Knapp, DEDE F. Miraglia, DEDO J. Lieberman, OE M. Springer, ADM H. Bell, OlG K. Cyr, OGC J. Larkins, ACRS H. Miller, R-1 L. Reyes, R-Il J. Dyer, R-Ill
{
E. Merschoff, R-IV C. Paperiello, NMSS A. Thadani, RES S. Collins, NRR J. Lieberman, OE D. Matthews, NRR C. Haughney, NMSS Distribution:
j File Center (w/att.)
PDR (NRC/CRGR)
CRGR SF CRGR CF JMitchell JJohnson, OCM STreby BSheron SShankman DDambly ASingV LThonus l
EComell MMasnik DTiktinsky RChappell RHuang NOsgood l
D DOCUMENT NAME: S:\\CRGR\\MITS-317.WPD To _ sve a copy. indicate "C" = Copy w/o attachment / enclosure: *A* s Copy with attactwnent/ enclosure;"N" = No copy. NO MARK = NO COPYf OFC CRGR C
CpRggg C
NAME RTnpathi Om o i, 4;i,a OFFICIAL RECORD COPY l
l I
l
. _ - - ~
A Attendance List CRGR No. 317 Meeting (March 17,1998)
CRGR MEMBERS NRC STAFF T. Martin (Chairman)
D. Matthews, NRR F. Miraglia L.Thonus,NRR D. Ross M. Masnik, NRR D. Dambly E. Cornell!, NRR S. Shankrnan for M. Knapp C. Haughney, NMSS J. Dyer (via video teleconferencing)
D. Tiktinsky, NMSS R. Chappell, NMSS CRGR STAFF N. Osgood, NMSS D. Huang, NMSS R. Tripathi ACRS STAFF A. Singh l
l l-ATTACHMENT 1 l
Minutes of CRGR Meeting No. 317, March 17,1998 r
O s.
Minutes of CRGR Meeting No. 317, March 17,1998 PRESENTATION MATERIAL USED BY THE STAFF ATTACHMENT 2-A
,f- - s,,,
j
{
? DRAFT RG 1969 1
JULY 29,1996 DECOMMISSIONING AMENDMENT i
50.48(f) FOR 50.82(a)(1) REACTORS l
s MAINTAIN FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAMS l
i O=v b
N i
i 4 b!
t
i
?
,f.....,,
(g.....)OBJECTIVES 50.48(f) l PREVENT FIRES RAPIDLY DETECT FIRES I
MIN:MIZE SAFETY IMPACT OF FIRES
\\
t l
l i
(
i
I t
,f.-- s,,
i
?
DECOMMISSIONING CONDITIONS
%,...../
i RCS BOUNDARY NOT APPLICABLE i
t i
SAFE SHUTDOWN NOT APPLICABLE i
?
50.34(a)(1) 25 REM NOT APPLICABLE i
i' TYPICALLY NO OFFSITE E-PLAN I
I i
l l
i
i l
p~ s,,
}
!&,...../
1 DECOMMISSIONING PHASES
\\
\\
SAFSTOR i
\\
ACTIVE DECOMMISSIONING 4
ISFSI VS POOL i
i t
.s- ~s.
(y..... ).,
DG 1969 OBJECTIVES i
i PREVENT FIRES i
RAPIDLY DETECT FIRES l
t MINIMIZE SAFETYIMPACT OF FIRES l
1 r
i
---]
[
e s
.... s l
{
i DRAFT GUIDE 1969 FIRE HAZARDS ANALYSIS FLEXIBLE & ADAPTABLE i
REFERENCES INDUSTRY STANDARDS ALTERNATE METHODS ACCEPTABLE 1
l i
)
i f.. s
{,y. ) SAFETYJMPACT BREAKDOWN OF DEFENCE IN DEPTH DISPERSABLE RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS i
t WORKERS, PUBLIC, OR ENVIRONMENT f
r s
1 g
)
7"~ %
{g.....,1RISK ASSESMENT LIMITATIONS NO PRA's DECOMMISSIONING REACTORS i
NO DATABASE i
i s
TIME / ACTIVITY DEPENDENCY e
a i
l I
~
l 1
{
l REGULATORY IMPACT l
50.48 (f) NOT A BACKFIT
\\
DG 1069 IMPLEMENTS 50.48 (f) i r
SHUTDOWN FPP BASED ON OPERATING FPP
\\
50.48 (f) / DG 1069 REDUCTION FROM OPERATION l
l I
l I
i i
Miriutes of CRGR Meeting No. 317, March 17,1998 l
1 i
i 1 -B l
l l