ML20207H003
| ML20207H003 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 06/09/1999 |
| From: | Good G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Cottle W HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9906140260 | |
| Download: ML20207H003 (52) | |
Text
T
- "'%g UNITED STATES 8
y 1
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5
,E REGION IV
[
611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, sulTE 400
?g l
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-8064 June 9, 1999 William T. Cottle, President and Chief Executive Officer STP Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth, Texas 77483
Dear Mr. Cottle:
This refers to the meeting conducted in the Region IV office on Monday, April 19,1999. This meeting was conducted to discuss the South Texas Project emergency preparedness program status. Topics discussed included initiatives in the emergency preparedness program, future revisions to the emergency plan, and departmental performance indicators.
In acc ardance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
(' '_.
Gail M. Good, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosures:
- 1. Meeting Attendance List
- 2. Licensee Presentation Docket Nos.: 50-498 50-499 License Nos.: NPF-76 NPF-80 9906140260 990609 PDR ADOCK 05000498 F
I STP Nuclear Operating Company cc:
T. H. Cloninger, Vice President Engineering & Technical Services STP Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth, Texas 77483 S. M. Head, Supervisor, Licensing Quality & Licensing Department STP Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth, Texas 77483 A. Ramirez/C. M. Canady City of Austin Electric Utility Department 721 Barton Springs Road Austin, Texas 78704 Mr. M. T. Hardt/Mr. W. C. Gunst City Public Service Board P.O. Box 1771 San Antonio, Texas 78296 D. G. Tees /R. L. Balcom Houston Lighting & Power Company i
P.O. Box 1700 Houston, Texas 77251 Jon C. Wood '
Matthews & Branscomb One Alamo Center 106 S. St. Mary's Street, Suite 700 l
San Antonio, Texas 78205-3692 1
Jack R. Newman, Esq.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1800 M. Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036-5869 Mr. G. E. Vaughn/Mr. C. A. Johnson Central Power & Light Company P.O. Box 289 Mail Code: N5012 Wadsworth, Texas 77483
~
l
- STP Nuclear Operating Company
-3.
INPO Records Center 700 Galleria Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30339-5957 Bureau of Radiation Control State of Texas 1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas. 78756
' Mr. Jim Calloway Texas Public Utility Commission William B.Travis Building 1701 North Congress Avenue--
P.O. Box 13326 Austin, Texas 78701-3326 John Howard, Director
- Environmental and Natural Resources Policy Office of the Governor P.O. Box 12428 Austin, Texas 78711
-Judge, Matagorda County Matagorda County Courthouse 1700 Seventh Street Bay City, Texas 77414
)
)
t.
I
STP Nuclear Operating Company
-4 DISTRIBUTION with coov of Enclosures 1 and 2:
DMB (IE45)
RIV File PJElkmann, DRS\\PSB DISTRIBUTION without Enclosures 1 and 2:
Regional Administrator STP Resident inspector DRP Director DRS Director DRS-PSB Branch Chief (DRP/A)
- Project Engineer (DRP/A)
R. Bachmann, OGC (MS: 15-B-18)
Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)
MIS System RIV File i
DOCUMENT NAME: S:\\DRS\\DRSLTRS\\STP_MTG99_LTR.WPD To receive copy of document, Indicate in box: "C" = Copy without enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy RIV:PSB C:DRS\\PSB PJElkmann:nh Mb GMGoodCmW 06R/99 06/fy09 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
?
I STP Nuclear Operating Company
-4 DISTRIBUTION with coov of Enclosures 1 and 2:
DMB (IE45)
RIV File PJElkmann, DRS\\PSB I
i DISTRIBUTION without Enclosures 1 and 2:
Regional Administrator STP Resident inspector
}
DRP Director 1
DRS Director DRS-PSB Branch Chief (DRP/A) j Project Engineer (DRP/A)
R. Bachmann, OGC (MS: 15-B-18)
Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)
MIS System RIV File j
)
(
(
,.i1]
DOCUMENT NAME: S :\\D R S\\D R S LT R S\\STP_MTG 99_LT R.W P D To receive copy of document, Indicate in box: "C" = Copy ethout enclosures *E" = Copy wh enclosures "N" = No copy RIV:PSB l_
C:DRS\\PSB l
l l
PJElkmann:nh 97 GMGood6W 06R/99 06/P/99 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Enclosure i ATTENDANCE LIST
'Name Organization Position / Title Vkul. fit /A9tW Yfl'. ${,0$b
[P khst \\ LT uhlh hewcu STPMoc.
da & z Om ma <-
Q b inf.4 I
$1 f cr;6 A,nc 3 9 Fun Pmwu er f' 4o e-AMs doseon Tnpik NtLC Ph aa cmen G,a' mA oec nayasgylum
- STP7159A
- 9 E
E
~
STp MEETING AGENDA D: sired Outcome:
Review and discuss proposed Emergency Plan Revision 19 changes Identify the South Texas Project's Emergency Preparedness program strengths and areas identified for continuous improvement Discuss NRC's 82701 Inspection expectations prior to May 3-6,1999 Topic Presentor(>
How Time A. Introductions P. Serra Present 5 minutes Present/
- 3. Review Agenda / Desired Outcome P. Serra 5 minutes All Discuss Present/
C. Review Proposed Revision 19 Emergency Plan F. Puleo 20 minutes All Discuss Changes D. Program Strengths and Identified Areas for Present/
P. Serra 10 minutes Continuous Improvement Discuss Discuss strong management support Review Self Assessment, Corrective Action i
programs and areas identified for continuous improvement Review 1998 assistance visits, program peer reviews and STP's participation on industry task forces Discuss off-site relationships Discuss Emergency Response Division personnel F. Puleo Present/
E. Discuss Proposed Agenda and Expectations for 10 minutes P.E h ann Discuss NRC 82701 Inspection F. May 3-6,1999 G. Open Discussion All Discuss 10 minutes I
C3 Data;Fonns\\NRC Meeting Agenda doc
South Texas Project Emergency Plan I
Revision 19 Summary of Changes l
- 1. Editorials changes consisting of:
A. Title and name changes (list not all inclusive),
-Media Information Center to Joint Information Center j
-Chairman to Chairperson
)
-Tone Alert Radios to Alert Radios i
-Yankee Atomic to Duke Engineering B. Co-owners agreement addresses all Co-owners as owners verse singling out Houston Lighting and Power.
C. Reformat of some paragraphs within sections of the Plan to be consistent throughout each section.
D. Address changes to EPA-400, changed whole body to TEDE added Thyroid CDE and other EPA-400 dated material.
D. Updated maps to reflect changes within County and 10 Mile EPZ.
- 2. Improved and defined 0554 Table B-1 onshift ** RP positions within Section C of STP Emergency Plan. Duty Maintenance Supervisor and Chemistry Technician.
1
- 3. Changed onsite Control Room Communicator from Chemistry Technician to any qualified communicator.
{
4.
Joint Information Center changes:
i A. Staffed by the STP Nuclear Operating Company with service agreement to
{
include Co-owmers on an as needed basis.,
{
B. Site Public Affairs and Communications Group provides information to the Co-owners verse the former HL&P only.
j C. Revised the facility layout and provided a " Typical" floor plan of the JIC.
- 5. Changed " actual" elevated samples to " simulated" elevated samples during Drills and Exercises.
The above summary of revisions to the STP Emergency Plan have not been ' Plant Organizational Review Committec * (PORC) approved as of April 19,1999.
1 I
i
Strong Management Support for Emergency Preparedness EP Program inclusion in STP Business Plan Goals Self Assessment Monthly Report (presented to the Senior Management Team) that rolls up to STP Business Plan The Nuclear Group Policy ties performance in the Emergency Response Organization to annual merit compensation Demonstrated team /ER facility ownership a
by Emergency Response Organization team members and facility managers Demonstrated support of the Emergency Response drill and exercise schedule f.-wg i 4, 1 s
,STP
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION NUMBER REV.
No.
NUCLEAR GROUP POLICY NGP-150 2
PAGE 1
OF 1
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EFFECTIVE DATE 01/23/95 APPROVED:
> n p-= coman;;.
Group Vee President. Nuclear The Emergency Preparedness Program has been develo. ped and shall be maintained to prepare and coordinate the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STPEGS) response
)
to an emergency condition at either of the STPEGS units.
j All employees, consultants, and vendors of the STPEGS are responsible for fulfilling the responsibilities and requirements assigned under the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures. As such, employees who have been requested to serve on the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) will be evaluated on their performance. Employee performance will be evaluated by the appropriate level of management within their Emergency Response Facility and fonvarded to the employee's line management for inclusion in the employee's annual performance appraisal process.
The Emergency Director (ED) designated in the Seuth Texas Project Electric Generating Station Emergency Plan represents Houston Lighting & Power (the NRC licensed operating co-owner) as the highest authority in responding to, mitigating and recovering from the effects of an emergency condition at the STPEGS. The ED serves as the head of the South Texas Project Emergency Response Organization and is authorized to commit necessary resources for the i
Project Manager (all four owners) in the event the South Texas Project Emergency Plan is activated.
Houston Lighting & Power Executive Management actively supports the Emergency Director on implementation of the Emergency Plan.
i
L.
1
\\
1999 E-PLAN DRILIJACTIVITIES DATES i
January 13 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR-991 January 20 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR-991 January 27 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR-991 February 3 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR-991 February 10 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR-991 February 16 Red Team Joint Information Center Workshop February 17 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR 992 February 22 Red Team Operations Support Center Workshop February 23 Red Team Technical Support Center Workshop February 24 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR 992 February 25 Red Team Emergency Operations Facility Workshop March 3 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR 992 March 10 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR 992 March 17 Licensed Operator Requal Simulator Scenarios for LOR 992 March 3 Combined Functional Drill for Red Team (0700 to 1100)
I March 22-25 NRC Walkthroughs for 2 Operating Crews; 82701 Inspection April 26-29 Hurricane Polly Exercise May 19 MS-1; Medical Services Exercise June 15 White Team Joint Information Center Workshop June 21 White Team Operations Support Center Workshop June 22 White Team Technical Support Center Workshop June 24 White Team Emergency Operations Center Workshop June 28 Combined Functional Drill for Red Team Julyl Combined Functional Drill for White Team -
July 21 Dress Rehearsal for Red Team August 18 Evaluated Exercise for Red Team September 22 Blue Team Severe Accident Management Drill November 29 Blue Team Operations Support Center Workshop November 30 Blue Team Technical Support Center Workshop December 2 Blue Team Joint Information Center Workshop December 2 Blue Team Emergency Operations Center Workshop December 8 Combined Functional Drill for Blue Team l
n Approved: Managerbergency Response l
Nf
/
f Approved: Plant Managed Unit 1 Appro'ved: Plant Manager-Unit 2 i
4
Self Assessment
- The Emergency Response Division has comprehensive self-assessment tools in place to measure its performance and progress toward meeting goals and commitments.
- Division personnel actively participate in and use the station's Corrective Action Program.
Areas in need of continuous improvement:
i 1998 Evaluated Exercise demonstrated our need to review the fundamentals with the ERO Maintaining Emergency Response j
Organization training qualifications Conservative decision-making STP
,g.
l s,lll si j l
_m a
i M
b p
3 8e
.i t
~
g g
i
.O 2
=
h E
k 5
mE D-it l
w Y
~
58 E l,a gl85 a,,
l llb o* l
$]
k kN_ h i
_ ~h
-,n$%nltJfb yd Mp3 Q
~yMY'4
.:s,.y : y ;. _._%j K (y;.W
=
.;jf Gf;:
[;!y'f:;%1g4}. A 4;'
[
._. ;: ?). Q he:
Qw g
'g 4
z ~ ' [.ygge.
y g
?
(.; );
's
.)8 w.
f.g 8 a
. s _M e.:v.d _4-
~
r 4.p,y, op.ra.j.,A-r,.
a :4.1_.A
_P_igshMaff 3
g eM&Mu.. -
- n. G.a ~
b
.e g.7 7
h hY..
$hff ':.
???
?. ;
.a b\\
5
.. ~ a,. x. :, w ww, a.a. m.3.w' c
)
- 5?s :l':.ffn$.tcV::'hh?.N.
.1 h f$
._ & % f:?N $$ g
~
j g.
..:. / 7 i.. y V
.7.
ey 1
~
M g
Z
>9 Z
Z b
g o
o
\\
$h C
l8l.ls 8
2 e
4 f
5 3,
i a
e Eh g g g a @.. n E j
g
~
22 m@-
c V
oa R
Ag g
M "E
bh M
z v"a AE
~
z g
N g
g<
ag e:p 4
- u p-.
. 'gu s'{.
- <.; ?) 9{
,.,(.. -..
- y. f.
g
. '....:., 7.c,
z j
Q.,,,.:' J g j.;.;:);.;L :.
4.~
7f : y
.,a g
f..
g h
L.
sg :
g:
c:e g
J. :..... : a. q, _._
< k.[_~~gl h hki.y.{l f 3
d!;
~
'"*1
. Bg 3
g a
g
- h. a.
,u 1
z m
y b
l-tll55 l ll i ;
e s
m E
5 i
j kh f i
$8E g
e o
k I
E 6g g
3 i
o EE
$ *.~
3l31 c
E i
g
~
/
y l ?)el;.($hs.
]
m o,
u j
g g
7
.3 g,,
m L...
te
, STPEGS M rch - 1999 1
Emergency Response Divisi:n's
)
Performance Annunciator Window Report
{
Window No.1 ERO STAFFING ADEQUACY j
Four Quarters I
Cclor GREEN 2::t".".
^4:
1".;:
r:
Owner
- ~
i i
Emergency Response Organization Facility Managers Emergency Planner - L. Meier J:stification The following Performance Indicator reflects, by facility, those members of the Emergency Response Organization who are required as minimum staffing by Table C-1 of the Emergency Plan or who are rccommended for minimum staffing.
J:cuary - Criteria = GREEN - During January, all table C-1 minimum staffing duty Emergency Response Organization positions have been continuously filled three deep with qualified personnel AND all Table C-1 minimum staffing positions for the onshift Emergency Response Organization have been continuously filled with qualified personnel.
February - Criteria = GREEN - During February, all table C-1 minimum staffing duty Emergency Response Organization positions have been continuously filled three deep with qualified personnel AND all Table C-1 i
minimum staffing positions for the onshift Emergency Response Organization have been continuously filled with qualified personnel.
M rch - Criteria = GREEN - During March, all table C-1 minimum staffing duty Emergency Response Organization positions have been continuously filled three deep with qualified personnel AND all Table C-1 minimum staffing positions for the onshift Emergency Response Organization have been continuously filled with qualified personnel.
Documentation Emergency Response Organization Procedures OPGP05-ZV-0003, OPGP05-ZV-0006, and OPGP05-ZT-0139.
Mm99 Apnl 12.1999 Page I of 30
Wi::d:w Nr.1 - ERO St:ffing Adequr.cy Pege 2 cf 2 WF Criteria 2
GREEN All Table C-1 minimum staffmg duty Emergency Response Organization positions are filled three deep AND, as determined by the quarterly Emergency Response Organization roster review, all Table C-1 minimum staffing positions for the onshift Emergency Response Organization are filled with qualified (in accordance with 0GP03-ZT-0139
" Emergency Preparedness Training Program) personnel.
1.5 WHITE Any Table C-1 minimum stafling duty Emergency Response Organization position is not filled three deep AND there are no Table C-1 minimum staffing position, which is only, filled one deep.
1 YELLOW Any Table C-1 minimum staffing duty Emergency Response Organization position is filled one deep and there are no Table C-1 minimum staffing positions unfilled.
O RED Any Table C-1 minimum stafTmg duty Emergency Response Organization position has no one filling the position OR as determined by the quarterly Emergency Response Organization roster review, any Table C-1 minimum staffing position for the onshift Emergency Response Organization is not filled with qualified (in accordance with OGP03-ZT-0139 " Emergency Preparedness Training Program) personnel OR as determined in the previous quarterly Emergency Response Organization roster review, any Table C-1 minimum staffing position for the onshift Emergency Response Organization is still not filled with qualified (in accordance with OOP03-ZT-0139 " Emergency Preparedness Training Program) personnel.
- WF Weight Factor Mar 49 ADf11 11 1999 Page 2 of 30
STPEGS Merch - 1999 Emergency Response Divisios's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No. 2 STAFF AUGMENTATION Four Quarters Cclor GREEN t;:'c."::
4:
it T./.
^
"'"C'""
Owner Emergency Response Organization Facility Managers Emergency Planner - F. Puleo Justification The following Performance Indicator reflects the capability of those members of the Emergency Response Organization required by Table C-1 of the Emergency Plan or who are recommended for minimum Facility stafring to respond within the approximate 60 to 75 minute time frame.
l January - Criteria = GREEN -No staff augmentation drills were conducted during January 1999.
February - Criteria = GREEN - No staff augmentation drills were conducted during February 1999.
Mrrch - Criteria = GREEN - No staff augmentation drills were conducted during March 1999.
Documentation WF Criteria The following is based on last test / drill performed during the quarter:
1 GREEN 100% of the Table C-1 and minimum staffing positions available to respond within 60 and 75 minutes.
.75 WHITE 100% of the Table C-1 responders are available to respond within 60 and 75 minutes.- No less than two (2) minimum stafTmg positions left unfilled and unable to respond within 75 minutes.
Mar 99 April 12 1999 Page 3 of 30
Wind:w N2. 2 - Stiff Augmentation Pcge 2 cf 2
.5 YELLOW One (1) of the Table C-1 responders is unavailable to respond within 60 minutes and/or no more than three (3) minimum staffing positions are unavailable to respond within 75 minutes.
0
' RED
- t Two (2) of the Table C-1 responders unavailable to respond within 60 minutes and/or > three (3) minimum staffing positions are unavailable to respond within 75 minutes.
- WF - Weight Factor Mar 49 Apni 12.1999 Page 4 of 30
STPEGS March - 1999 Emergency Response Division's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No. 3 DRILL & EXERCISE EFFECTIVENESS Four Quarters C: lor GREEN G""
- ," 2:
C; i'.1:
P.J.
Mar Green June.
Sept -
Dee.
Owner Emergency Response or Program Owner Emergency Planner - K. Keyes Justification An Exercise and various Combined Functional Drills will be conducted annually at the Station to demonstrate the effectiveness of the Station's Emergency Preparedness effort.
J=uary - Criteria = GREEN - No activity in this area during January.
Fchruary - Criteria = GREEN -No activity in this area during February.
M:rch - Criteria = GREEN - A modified Combined Functional Drill was conducted on March 3 for the Technical Support Center, Operations Support Center, Emergency Operations Facility, and Joint Information Center, the Control Room was simulated by a phone cell. There were no weaknesses identified in any of the facilities.
Documentation STPEGS' Emerpncy Response 1996 Master Integrated Schedule.
NUREG 0654 Emergency Plan - STPEGS - Section N WF Criteria "Self-Critique of ER" If area was not inspected or weakness /open items remain unresolved during current quarter, then Color from previous quarter remains for current quarter. (Findings, Deficiencies, and Weaknesses count as Weaknesses.)
Mar 99 Apnl 12,1999 Page 5 of 20
1 J
' ' Window No. 3 - Drill & Exercise Effectiveness Page 2 of 2 2
GREEN.
Unresolved Weakness /Open items s one (1) weakness, and/or s 2 open items / concerns.
I 1.5 '
WHITE
. Unresolved Weakness /Open items s 2 weaknesses and/or s 4 open items / concerns.
{
1 1'
YELLOW Unresolved Weakness /Open items s four (4) weaknesses and/or s 5 open items / concerns.
O RED Unresolved Weakness /Open items or any violation 2 five (5) weaknesses and/or 2 6 open items / concerns 1
- WF - Weight Factor I
)
1 1
i 1
Mar 49 Apnl 12.1999 Page 6 of 30
. STPEGS March - 1999 Emergency Respons: Division's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No. 4 PROMPT ALERT NOTIFICATION SYSTEM Four Quarters Ccl:r GREEN OT" C:
it O.
- ^
Owner infonnation Services, Emergency Response Division, and Public Information Emergency Planner - J. Enoch Justification Federal guidance states that availability of the system should be greater than 90% on average over the year (See
{
FEMA-REP-10 @ p E-10). At the South Texas Project, the Prompt Alert Notification System includes sirens and Tone Alert radios.
Sirens Tone Alerts Sirens Tone Alerts A.
Ist Quarter 97.84 %
2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter B.
Annual Siren Test will be conducted on May 12,1999.
i January - Criteria = GREEN - Siren operability was 98.38%. Siren tests during January were conducted per procedure OPGP05-ZV-0008, " Siren System Activation, Testing, and Documentation."
Fcbruary - Criteria = GREEN - Siren opernbility was 96.77%. Siren tests during February were conducted per procedure OPGP05-ZV-0008, " Siren System Activation, Testing, and Documentation."
M rch - Criteria = GREEN - Siren operability was 98.38%. Siren tests dunng March were conducted per procedure OPGP05-ZV-0008, " Siren System Activation, Testing, and Documentation." New digital alert radio distribution was begun. Note: A biweekly siren test was missed during the month of March requiring the generation of a Condition Report.
Mm99 Apnl 12.1999 Page 7 of 30
Window N:. 4 - Prompt Al:rt N:tificiti:n Syst:m Pcge 2 cf 2 Documentation Quarterly Inspections and Inventory Record
- WF Criteria
-2 GREEN Availability 2 96% and action taken to respond to TAR survey.
1.5 WHITE -
Availability 2 93% and action taken to respond to TAR survey.
. 1 YELLOW Availability 2 90% and action taken to respond to TAR survey. RED Annual availability 5 90% and/or no survey action taken regarding Tone Alert Radios.
- WF - Weight Factor i
1 Mar 99 Apnl 12,1999 Page 8 of 30
r STPEGS M:rch - 1999 Emergency Response Division's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No. 5 SITE ACCOUNTABILITY Four Quarters Cefor GREEN C""
i';:t
^4:
it 7.;'
Mar Gews Jose.
Sept.
Dec Owner South Texas Electric Generating Station's Station Managers Emergency Planner - F. Puleo Justification This is a key performance indicator, which is reported monthly in the South Texas Project 1999-2003 Business Plan.
Jaruary - Criteria = GREEN -No Assembly and Accountability drills were conducted during January 1999.
February - Criteria = GREEN - No Assembly and Accountability drills were conducted during February 1999.
M:rch - Criteria = GREEN - Assembly and Accountability conducted during the March 3 drill was completed in less than 25 minutes with 100% of site population accounted for.
Documentation WF Criteria 1
GREEN 100% of site population accounted for in s 25 minutes.
.75 WHITE 100% of the site population accounted for in s 30 minutes.
.5 YELLOW
< 100% of the site accounted for within 30 to 45 minutes.
O RED
< 100% of the site population accounted for within 45 minutes.
- WF - Weight Factor Mu99 Aoni 12.1999 Page 9 of 30
STPEGS March - 1999 Emtrg:ncy Response Division's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No. 6 EFFECTIVENESS OF RESPONSE TO ACTUAL EVENTS Four Quarters Celor GREEN 2;:c'O C:
it T.J.
Mar.Grwe June.
Seps.
Dec.
Owner President and Chief Executive Officer j
j Emergency Planner-F. Puleo Justification Jrnuary - Criteria ::= GREEN - No events were declared in January 1999.
F:.bruary - Criteria = GREEN - No events were declared in February 1999.
M:rch - Criteria = GREEN - No events were declared in March 1999.
D:cumentation WF Criteria 1
GREEN Effective response as determined by STPNOC'S's Emergency Response Division's Management, the NRC and/or FEMA.
.75 WHITE No event - unassessed or self-assessed as WHITE.
.5 YELLOW Incomplete response (Classification, Notification, Time, Mitigation) 0 RED Inadequate response - Response in violation of Station License, Emergency Response and/or Regulatory Criteria.
Note:
Default to GREEN when no actual response evaluated.
- WF'- Weight Factor Mar 99 Apnt 12.1999 Page 10 of 30 j
l l
STPEGS Merch - 1999 Emergency R:sponse Divisi:n's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No. 7 PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM Four Quarters Cclor WHITE Ot' Zl' it t'
Mac. Green June.
Sept.
Dec I
Owner Public Information Organization Emergency Planner - L. Barton 1
Justification i
Agricultural Brochure is available. Calendars are mailed to residents within the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone. Brochures are stocked in public places.
Selected area telephone books contain Emergency Preparedness information.
Jrzuary - Criteria =WIIITE - The 1999 Emergency Preparedness Calendar was mailed December 8,1998 to residents in the 10-mile radius of the plant. This is the primary method of providing public information to the public. However, the calendar was released without a number for Spanish speaking information line.
Compensatory actions are in place. The " Facts for Visitors" brochure is in the process of reprinting.
February - Criteria = GREEN - Mailed out letter including a Spanish speaking information line sticker to all residents, businesses, special facilities, and recreational areas listed within the ten-mile emergency planning zone. The letter written in English and Spanish includes instructions on placing the sticker on the back of the calendar and telephone numbers for emergency information in the unlikely event of an event at the South Texas Project. The " Facts for Visitors" brochure is in the process of reprinting.
Mirch - Criteria = GREEN - Telephone book advertisement was placed with Southern Directories in March for the newest revision of the countywide telephone book. The " Facts for Visitors" brochure is ready to go to the printer, but printing may be held up because of the FCC counterproposal.
Mn99 Apnt 82 m Page 11 of 30
r Wi d;w Nr. 7 - Public Ef:rm:ti:n Pr: gram '
PZge2cf2 9.
Documentation Published Public Information Materials.
WF Criteria 1
GREEN Calendar, brochures, telephone book notices are good to excellent, and special requests from the State responded to in a timely manner. Media Briefings are accurate and timely.
-.75 -
WHITE Calendar, brochure, telephone book are adequate and special requests from State responded to in a timely manner. Media Briefing results are s results ofprevious year.
.5 YELLOW A portion, or portions, of the materials are inadequate, or special requests from State are not responded to in a timely manner, Media Briefing results are significantly < the results of previous year. Missed internal commitment, but not regulatory requirement.
0 RED Calendar, brochures, or telephone book notices not mailed / delivered to 10 mile-EPZ residents or Media Briefing results are significantly < the results of previous year, such that immediate corrective actions are necessary.
'WF - Weight Factor M,99 Apnt 12,1999 Page 12 of 30
, STPEGS March - 1999 Emergency Resp:nse Divisids Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No. 8 50.54(t) QA AUDIT / SURVEILLANCE STRENGTHS / UNRESOLVED WEAKNESSES ALSO SELF-IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCY (S) OR CONCERN (S)
Four Quarters C: lor GREEN i';:#_""
C:
0;:
?."
u.cn w.
o Owner South Texas Electric Generation Station's Station Managers Emergency Planner-F. Puleo J stification Conduct of our annual independent program assessment is a Regulatory requirement per 10 CFR 50.
Surveillances are conducted as part of the ER program.
January - Criteria = GREEN - Less than three (3) CAQDs written during the month.
February - Criteria = GREEN - Less than three (3) CAQDs written during the month.
March - Criteria = GREEN - Less than three (3) CAQDs written during the month.
Documentation 10 CFR 50.54 (t), Audit Report WF Criteria 1
GREEN
$ 3 CAQDs
.75 WlilTE 4 - 5 CAQDs per month,1 CAQS or 1 open SCAQ
.5 YELLOW 6 - 10 CAQDs per month,2 CAQSs, or 1 NRC violation (non-cited) or 2 open SCAQ(s)
M 199 Apnl 12.1999 -
Page 13 of 30
Wird:w N:. 8 - 50.54(t) QA Audit /Surveill:nce Strengths /Unres:lv:;d Weiknesses Pege 2 cf 2 Also Self-Identified Deficiency (s) er Ccncern(s) 0 RED
> 10 CAQDs per month,1 SCAQ, or 1 FEMA deficiency, or i NRC violation
- (cited), or 3 CAQS N:te: Issue is defined as audit deficiency or concern assigned to the Emergency Preparedness Program for resolution.
l 1
i Apnl 12,1999 Pagt 14 Of 30
STPEGS Mrrch - 1999 Emergency Respons: Division's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No. 9 FEMA EVALUATION RESULTS Four Quarters Cclor GREEN C"
,Ti"e~
C:
it T./.
Mae. Gnee Jose.
Sept.
Des.
Owner Emergency Response Division & Public Information Emergency Planner - L. Barton Justification The use of FEMA evaluations to analyze the number and type ofissues that result from the conduct of Full Participation Exercises and state and local plan reviews serve as the bench mark for assessing the level of the offsite response capability.
Jruary - Criteria = GREEN - Received FEMA Medical Services Report for the November 18,1998 graded medical services exercise. There were no identified Deficieacies, Areas Requiring Corrective Action, or Areas Recommended for Improvement.
February - Criteria = GREEN - No FEMA graded exercises were scheduled for the month of February.
M:rch - Criteria = GREEN - No FEMA graded exercises were scheduled for the month of March.
Documentation Federal Evaluation reports for Full Participation Exercises or Medical Services Exercise.s for the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station.
WF Criteria 2
GREEN No Exercise or plan review related Deficiencies are pending and the average number of Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCAs) per station EPZ $3.
1.5 WHITE No Exercise or plan review related Deficiencies are pending and the average number of ARCAs per station EPZ are 4 - 5.
Mar 99 Apnl t2.1999
. Page 15 of 30
Window No. 9 - FEMA Evaluation Results Pcge 2 of 2 YELLOW No Exercise or plan review related Deficiencies are pending and the average number of ARCAs per station EPZ are 6 - 10.
O RED Exercise or plan review related Deficiencies that require remedial action are pending or there is a potential adverse impact to the State's 350 Certification or 2 10 ARCAs.
- WF - Weight Factor l
i 4
MW Apnl 12.1999 Page 16of 30
STPEGS Mrrch - 1999 Emergency Response Divisi:n's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No.10 NRC STRENGTHS AND UNRESOLVED WEAKNESSES /OPEN ITEMS Four Quarters Cclor i
GREEN GRm 2;:!","
C it..
"/.
u.c.
s Owner Emergency Response and/or wecific program owners Emergency Planner-F. Puleo Justification SALP Core EP Inspection and biennial evaluated exercise are Regulatory mandated.
Jruary - Criteria = GREEN - One (1) NRC weakness remains open (1998 Graded Exercise). One (1) corrective action to this weakness remains open, all actions scheduled for completion by February 15,1999.
)
February - Criteria = GREEN - One (1) NRC weakness remains open (1998 Graded Exercise). All corrective actions to this weakness are completed.
l M:rch - Criteria = GREEN - One (1) NRC weakness remains open (1998 Graded Exercise). All corrective actions to this weakness are completed.
I Documentation NRC Inspection Report (s)
N:te: This is a key Perfonnance indicator, which is reported monthly, in the South Texas Project 1999-2003 Performance Measure Report.
l WF Criteria NRC Strengths and Weaknesses:
If area was not inspected during current quarter or. if the weakness' or open item remains unresolved, then color from previous quarter remains for current quarter (violations count as weaknesses).
l 2
GREEN Weaknesses = (0), No cited violations for the Quarter and/or s two (2) open items.
l i
Mar 99 Apnl 12,1999 Page 17 of 30 i
Wird:w Ne.10 - NRC Strengths end Unr: solved We:kness:s/ Ope:a Items Page 2 cf 2 l.5 WHITE Weaknesses s one (1), one (1) non-cited violations and/or s three (3) open items.
l 1
YELLOW Weaknesses s two (2), one (1) non-cited violations and/or s four (4) open items.
i 0
RED Weaknesses s three (3), and/or s five (5) open items, > two (2) non-cited violations or
> one (1) cited violation.
N:te: Any Notice of Violation (NOV) received which is unresolved, will be considered a significant weakness and therefore receive a RED indicator for the quarter.
- WF - Weight Factor l
1 l
)
Mar 99 Apnl 12,1999 Page 18 cf 30
)
STPEGS MIrch - 1999 Emergency Response Divisi:n's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No.11 SIX YEAR PLAN - STRENGTHS AND UNRESOLVED ISSUES Four Quarters C: lor GREEN C""
t;:!",."
ft:
it..
T./.
u.,. c 4...
s.,
w.
Owner Emergency Response Emergency Planner - F. Puleo Justification The Emergency Response Division has developed a Six Year Plan outlining the Business strategy to use in order to meet the Station's Business Plan Objectives.
March 18 %
June Sept Dec Jmuary - Criteria = GREEN - 5% of 1999 Plan tasks completed.
February - Criteria = GREEN - 12% of 1999 Plan tasks completed.
)
M:rch - Criteria = GREEN - 18% of 1999 Plan tasks completed.
)
D:cumentation Six Year Plan I
WF Criteria Expect to complete / address 15% of tasks within 1999 Six Year Plan during ist Quarter, a total of 35% during 2nd Quader, a total of 80% of the tasks during the 3rd Quarter, and 100% by the end of the 4th Quarter.
i 1
GREEN Exceed expected percentage for completion, resolution, or approved deferral.
.75 WHITE Meet expected percentage for addressing tasks, resolve or approve deferral.
unw
- oni12.ioo9 rage 19er 30
7:-
Six Ye:r Pl:t-Strengths c d Unres:lved Issres p;8e 2 cf 3 4
3
[. YELLOW s 20% of tasks not met, resolved, or deferred.
O '.
-RED 2: 33% of tasks ' ot met, resolved, or deferred.
n
'WF - Weight Factor.
]
4 i
l e
9 e
MW*
Apnl 12,1999 Page 20 of 30 a
Six Year Plad-Str:ngths and Unresolved Issu:s P:ge 3 cf 3 SIX YEAR PLAN 1st Quarter - January through March Total # of Tasks:
100 Total # Complete / Addressed:
18
% Complete.
18 %
Challenges: Annual QA Audit (completed Feb.), Dialogics testing, preparation for March 3 Drill.
2"' Quarter-April through June Total # ofTasks:
- Total # Complete / Addressed:
% Complete:
Challenges: Preparation for NRC inspection week of May 3-7.
Marv9 Apnl12, p Page 21 of 30
..STPEGS M rch - 1999 Emergency Response Division's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No.12 EMERGENCY RESPONSE FACILITY READINESS Four Quarters Cclor GREEN G""
Fe. Geese Ma Aug g
Mar. Crees Jene.
sepe.
Dec.
J. Sheppard R. Masse F. Wiens Emergency Planner - V. Wagnon Justification The indicator of the overall status of the equipment availability portion of the Performance Annunciator Window program reflects the adequacy of the programmatic aspects of the program.
Jrnuary - Criteria = GREEN - Utilities 100%. All Communications 100%.
February-Criteria = GREEN - All Facilities 100%. All Communications 99%. The RSCL line first identified at the EOF was out of service due to AT&T problems from 2/22 (1200) to 2/23/99 (0700).
i M:rch - Criteria = GREEN - All Facilities 100%. All Communications 100%. The U2 TSC Diesel was out of service for planned maintenance on 3/1/99. The U2 TSC was unavailable due to failed heaters from 3/16/99 l
to 3/18/99. The U2 TSC was out of service for maintenance to the diesel supply transformer on 3/25/99 from 06:00 to 20:00.
l D:cumentation Emergency Preparedness Equipment Availability Annunciator Window WF Criteria Communications Facilities 2
GREEN 100% No backup - 98% w/ backup 93.33% per drill / scheduled interval 1.5 WHITE 98% No backup - 90% w/ backup 90.00% per drill /scl eduled interval 1
YELLOW 90% No backup - 80% w/ backup 86.67% per drill / scheduled interval 0
RED 90% No backup < 80% w/ backup 83.33% per drill / scheduled interval
- WF - Weight Factor e
S,ni i:.1999 Page22 or 3o
EMERGENCY RESPONSE FACILITY READINESS
+
1.
Communication Systems January 100 July February 99 August l
March 100 September l
April October May November June December II.
Facility Inventories January - March CR1 100 %
CR2 100 %
Mat. Gen.
100 %
Wagner 100 %
TSC1 100 %
TSC 2 100 %
OF Team A 100 %
OF Team B 100 %
AEOF 100 %
EOF 100 %
S/C Kit A 100 %
S/C Kit B 100 %
OSC1 100 %
OSC 2 100 %
S/C Kit C 100 %
S/C Kit D 100 %
Rad Van 100 %
EHD 100 %
S/C Kit E 100 %
S/C Kit F 100 %
Site Amb. 100 %
Transp.
100 %
Amb.-BC 100 %
Amb.-Pal 100 %
l j
Mar 99 Apnl 12.1999 Page 23 of 30 1
3
Avail:bility Retings
- 1. Communication Systems Hours /
Availability Operable Date(s)
Yes No State & County Ringdown March 1999 100 %
X a
Corporate Ringdown March 1999 100 %
X
. HL&P Dispatcher Ringdown -
March 1999 100 %
X 800 MHz phone radio Security Ringdown Line March 1999 100 %
X Telephone System March 1999 100 %
X~
Radio Communication March 1999 100 %
X Plant Public Address & Alarm System March 1999 100 %
X Pager System March 1999 100 %
X Maintenance Jack Communication System March 1999 100 %
X Communication Console System March 1999 100 %
X s'TS 2,000 System March 1999 100 %
X
{
l Cantrol Room Direct Line to Bay City March 1999 100 %
X Microwave Line to Electric Tower March 1999 100 %
X l
Ringdewn Line to ECDC March 1999 100 %
X i
I If any communication system or facility was inoperable during the month / quarter, indicate the following:
Dayfrime Day / rime M: nth Inoperable Location Reason Returned To Servie January 01/04/99 - 0700 U2 TSC Diesel Planned Maintenance 01/06/99 - 0900 01/07/99 - 0700 EOF Diesel Planned Maintenance 01/07/99 - 1700 February 02/15/99 - 0400 Ul TSC Diesel Planned Maintenance 02/17/99 - 1630 02/22/99 - 0400 U2 TSC Diesel Planned Maintenance 02/26/99 - 1500 02/22/99 - 1200 RSCL Line AT&T Problem 02/23/99 - 0700 Mar 99 Apnl 12.1999 Page 24 of 30
Day / Time Day / rime M: nth Inoperable Location Reason Returned To Service March 03/01/99 - 0500 U2 TSC Diesel Planned Maintenance 03/01/99 - 1700 03/16/99 - 0500 U2 TSC HVAC Failed Heaters 03/18/99 - 1700 03/25/99 - 0600 U2 TSC Diesel Supply Transformer 03/22/99 - 2000 l
Ms99 Apnl12,19%
Page 25 of 30 l
. Emerg:ncy Fccility IcVesteri s & Insp;cti:ns YES NO I.
Emergeney Response Division 1.
' a.
Perform frequent periodic inspection and walkdowns of:
TSC - Unit 1 X
OSC - Unit 1 X
TSC - Unit 2 X
OSC - Unit 2 X
EOF X
- b. Perform quarterly inspection of:
AEOF X
1 Offsite ERF's X
2.
Inventories completed.
X
{
Quaiterly inventory schedule.
J 3.
ERF restock of supplies.
X II.
Generation Support Department 1.
Replace radiation detection and respiratory X
proter. ion equipment in lockers, etc.
2.
Conduct inventories of Offsite Field Team X
i kits, the Rad Van kit, ambulances.
I III.
P_Iant Operations l
1.
Perform inventory inspections of Control X
Room Emergency Equipment Mar 99 April 12.1999 Page 26 of 30
I.
STPEGS March - 1999 Emergency Response Division's Performance Annunciator Window Report l
Window No.13 i
EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION TRAINING QUALIFICATION i
Four Quarters Color GREEN G""
M:*tJ.
0"";.
it..
T..
u... c s
~.
Owner Emergency Response Organization personnel Emergency Planner - L. Meier Justification To ensure the Station's personnel maintain a state of readiness, the Emergency Preparedness Program has been designed to provide training to individuals responsible for implementing the Emergency Response Plan.
J:nuary - Criteria = WIIITE - Training attendance rate is 94%. Roster fill is 99%. The following Emergency Response Organization Roster positions are vacant:
Emergency Operations Facility - Red Team Support Organization Director Joint Information Center - White Team MM/RC Staff 5 Blue Team MM/RC Staff 6 Red Team MM/RC Staff 7 Red Team MR Staff 1 February - Criteria = GREEN - Training attendance rate is 99%. Roster fill is 99%. The following Emergency Response Organization Roster positions are vacant:
Blue Team MM/RC Staff 6 - 30 days Red Team MR Staff 1 - 30 days March - Criteria = GREEN - Training attendance rate is 100%. Roster fill is 100%. There are no vacancies on the Emergency Response Organization roster.
l Mu90 Apnt u.1999 Page 27 of 30
Window %.13 - Emergency Response Organization Trainir; Qualification Page 2 of 2 Documentation 10 CFR 50 Appendix E
- QA Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures Audit. EP Quarterly Self-Assessment.
Emergency Plan - Section M WF Criteria -
2 GREEN-All of the following:
- Scheduled Training accomplished on schedule,
- Feedback forms average or above,
- 2 95% scheduled attendees attend training
- Management oversight criteria OPGP03-ZA-0019 met
- < 8 ERO Roster vacancies (98% fill) 1.5 WHITE Any of the following:
- Postponement of an EPT 250 Requalification opportunity and rescheduling is complete.
j 94% scheduled attendees attend training j 20 ERO Roster vacancies (95% fill)
]
l YELLOW Any of the following:
- Postponement of an EPT 250 Requalification opportunities and rescheduling is not complete. 90% scheduled attendees attend training
- Management oversight criteria OPGP03-ZA-0019 not met
- Feedback forms average unsatisfactory 32 ERO Roster vacancies (92% fill) 0
_ RED Any of the following:
- Cancellation of EPT 250 Requalification opportunity with no opportunity for makeup
- s 80% scheduled personnel attend traimng
- > 33 ERO Roster vacancies (< 92% fill) i
- WF - Weight Factor Mar 99 Apnl 12. I999 Page 28 of 30
STPEGS Merch - 1999 Emergency Response Division's Performance Annunciator Window Report Window No.14 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM O&M BUDGET PERFORMANCE Four Quarters Color GREEN GMN Jae. Grues AprW.
July.
Oct -
Feb. Green May.
Aeg.
Nov.
u.,.
J...
se,..
Owner Emergency Response Division and Program Support Justification South Texas Project 1996-2000 Performance Measures January - Criteria = GREEN - Total O&M 2.22% under budget for the month of December 1998.
Inside Labor /OT/ Overhead & Burden................
............<3.65 % Under B udget 3
All Other O&M........................................................<5.25 % Under B udget All O&M Excluding Fees...........................................<. I '1 % Under Budget February - Criteria = GREEN -Total O&M 1.0% under budget for the month of January 1999, insi de Labor /OT/O verhead & B urden............................ <5.0% Under B udget All Other O& M.....................................................<8.0% Under B udget Documentation Approved Annual Capital & O&M budget - Cost Center 933.
WF Criteria 1
GREEN s 5% under budget
.75 WHITE g 9% over budget, or > 5% s 19% under budget.
r M#N Apnl 12. WM Page 29 of 30
Win'dow #.14 - Emerg:ncy Prep;rednzss Pr: gram Page 2 ef 2 O&M Budget Performance
.5 YELLOW
>9% s 10% over budget or >l9% under budget 0
RED-
> 10% over budget.
- WF - Weight Factor Mar 99
- Aprd 12,1999 Page 30of 30
Assistance Visits, Program Peer Reviews, and STP's Participation on Industry issue Task Forces
- NEl Emergency Preparedness Benchmarking Task Force (Febniary - June 1998)
- Cooper Station Assistance Visit (March 1998)
Note: County Judge. Sheriff, County Emergency Management also participated.
= Industry Event Seminar - Three Mile Island (April 1998) l
- Braidwood Benchmarking Visit (May 1998)
- Seabrook Benchmarking Visit (May 1998)
- Environmental Monitoring Drill with the Bureau of Radiological Controls at Comanche Peak (June 1998)
I<
Assistance Visits, Program Peer Reviews, and STP's Participation on. Industry issue Task Forces
- Waterford Benchmarking Visit (July 199s)
Note: STP OSC Coordinators participated.
j
= Industry Peers Assisted With Annual STP Exeroise (August 199s)
- NEl Performance Indicator Task Force (November - December 1998)
- Millstone Assistance Visit (December 199s)
[
1
.STA
Off-Site Relationships Off-site Emergency Response relations with community, county, state and federal entities remain excellent.
Matagorda County received no ARCA's or Deficiencies from FEMA in 1998 Graded Exercise.
State of Texas - Bureau of Radiological Controls received one ARCA for not issuing Protective Action Recommendations beyond 10 miles.
County cooperated closely with STP during 1998 severe weather season.
I o
"A STP
Emergency Response Division Personnel
)
- Emergency Response Division personnel have numerous years of industry experience.
I They are we I respected by STP management and peers to perform their assigned tasks.
- STP has hired a contractor to determine Emergency Response Y2K status /
compliance and establish contingency planning where required.
As of April 1999, one open position exists -
will post the position in May 1999.
f n
i STP
o 9
la s
3 I
d m -._
e 8
n s
o r
4 6
n 6
1 x n a d n
_V n e p
m a&
s ro 7 4 i
x 3 r a
-_T ois el 7 e r r a
t u yx t e
P pm d
sak7 at nCO r
o n
l
, S.
et a
s ici wneya pni s
o,sa,n n
vi 1
rnM2 aaCki
, e r
h
, e.ic 1
et na a
r
_ ta eun7 nr e
es aon te p
oGrC nmhAmh I h m,
umla x_ CaioYS a%d,,,
a d m e
mhc t
r a r
SmA r
o s e
ot o
cs o,
s s - -
osds dii u
C c.
s u
CdiP h
o ELV n
C o
i t
t o roWh a
s te d
n i
n h
oe e
ce g
n c
y l
s e
m eo t
zw ar ds a
c ae tu.
m s
ei d
i i r n
a s
e n
i cu 7 p o, na n
na n
n enl t,
eM5 ae al a, md gt eWOme.)
p y
r m u
1 Sa8 u,
.s
=P n
t n,
sn ma 1
u r nenm-.
yn e
i r
i a
.ds i
s=xa m
Ra e =n y d icx e
m s *8aa"tmos n a atc e
=t n
a an e, t p w w,'
s o n
Et a
rn _.
= e mb ea m
s euatagsd sr sg mt
.S n
mre e o e.'
aros r
or PmEP
.E
'ptoMdpAfoRp6-r r
o r J
a Ch
& C t
k s
ro i
e e
n ah de c i, w
g l
h n
b m y
tas p$,
to mi n
ic u
r s
co7 a
r o
en6 e
n r
t, a
_ m elalar a
uo p
,s i s P, n n i i i
pE7 po ni r em.
e sn at 8
u n f
a Sex o
'a sp m p.at s a. a. m
=
c f o en s
nomt e, n
,-.mr f
f z
aJ
= moe r w.
s
.,o Z mr r eu ss o
a
.,P a
t Ain9 er3 PmET,E f pt r
S
_ePor o
r ge a9 aS 5
c 0
g9 nl I
4 8
i au x l
r 1 Ma i
bO n
na laS P
tne mr s
ot sos o
ui n
u ae gt pe n,o, n
o es r t n
r tK Paa5 m
oa.
p a,s Pl ic5 o
s a
f ek tntc n
ns,n e.aeh nB9 dose e,i e r
as m m P, o.m, e _ p o r e
m a
sM4 d i l
ca ei t
w e s s R, ida6 m
J t
s 4
e o
r r
,n
" a r
r r rypun e
Aie8
_ Srd 7 n
. 'p
, oo
- t on x e
p 2
s1 s o
.nx a
. lo e ta age n
r
.r
' & E D,u Q o== p s t. e., P,,
- p m i e
- m, -
f oi E
anns
,a ni mn OCu r
f es r eg e e e
v o
v -. n t
d r ea C
L r OEPe o
c A
pn jl s
u s
e eF 49 5 m
e m
9 n
e o
r R
rm-s c
a s
p 5
x 4 l
n s
e ogo P,
5 1
d o
e n
1 4 5 n#
n p
e 7
R, e
s 5 s
isPl 7 x i 7 n o R,
ta u
t 5 on a.
e e
y 9
s s r
v eP e
x gi c
I r
t
~
t 6
s Ie r ai J
. e a
ei d8 e y n
iWo e
s
.s n
pSex Ke e P
Et n
.o r
uF nK Ma n x
.m.mE s
c
.e. ms vm r
e n
n S
e.eFmaeea g
O ix i e r
e ei p
. v., rumgmk eg at e
v t
r v aov aar ac o
T
. r a er ee e
KMLVO TOMf Dp m
.3J E
tron ph p a6 uH68 l
Ss7s x Ku 3R I
Ci i!;
i Expectations - NRC 82701 Inspection-(May 3-5,1999)
)
= Proposed Agenda i
Simulator Walk-Through Scenario a
)
Open Discussion I
.o i
,Q c
Tentative NRC Inspection j
1 Schedule Week of May 3,1999
- Monday May 3.1999 14-1600 Facility walk-through within the Protected Area 16-1730 Emergency Operations Facility walk-through, Dose Assessment
]
interview.
Tdesday Mav 4.1999 07-830 Open l
830-900 Entrance
)
3Vednesday May 5.1999 09-1530-Simulator walk-through 2 Onshift Crews Thursday May 6.1999 07-1530 Open f
1630 Exit
-