ML20207C428

Intervenor Exhibit I-State-Z3-A,consisting of Draft Minutes of Meeting W/Fema Regional Assistance Committee on 860623 & 24

ML20207C428
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	05/20/1988
From:	AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
OL-I-STATE-Z3-A, NUDOCS 8808090212
Download: ML20207C428 (14)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

~

if [ - h b "

l DRAFT l

< c v3

• E m

u. y -

MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC ,

1 June 23 & 24, 1986 10 JJL 19 P6 :23 4 j NHY - Revision 2 in October (formal). Pen & ink changes Stil then. Language i within a catter of days. Would like to provide Fc M ip ;ajwo'r k lan. l BRA %5 FEMA - Try to identify all parts of the plan which will be affected by a change.

Nee the locations of the Federal Response Centers, airfields, etc. for l F,r. v.AC . Need specific locations. Provide coordination. Will facilities 1 (airfields, etc.) be adequate? Need reco==endations.

SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY A.l.b (2) Comp measures will be i outlined in = ore detail.

(3)

• Will a=end Appendix l ngie ,

l

• 1.4 will be modified I to show how the co= pac l works. 1

/~N o l C/

' Tidliness - Will be dealing with

• Is the timeliness used

q. M iaj m ien pathways. Need shorter sufficient?

analysis ti=e.

Need seceone at IFO to track the NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/ samples. So=eone :o detide which ,., g g-([4/F/(/g/r Obfficial Exh, No. 2 b~b a sample goes to which lab. FEMA is

,, g, 4, g satisfied with lab tujr around. Look ~" -

at coordination of F,ERMAP. IDENTIFIED M _ PECE!/ED

' N e e d t o d e.v e l o p e'/ screening program. >n'" "9 r ' ~

Two or three samples a day is inadequate.

~

~

State should do it at their own lab.

The appropriate person to discuss this -- - - C'IE bb. -

with would be Brookhaven Lab. Need to /NDE [ b% "u s b E_ a know ti=e fra=e. _I_

(5) We will use language out 8808090212 880520 o f TRERP PDR ADOCK 05000443 O PDR A.2.b RSA1079 Need the specifics.

t Z 5 - A p /rd . szo/er nt n. a,o 50 a,J i A / vl y 1 /4

y

. DRAFT MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC June 23 & 24, 1986 Page 2 SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY 1

/s A.3 We will update agree =ent with Rev. 2.

Need written agree =ent.

(2) Concern - We have not anticipated getting let-ters of agree =ent fec=

host co== unity's Red i Cross. We don't want the= to go to each = ass I care facility. l Just need general letter of agree =ent.

(5) Would like a list of desi=etry.

Yes, they have a list.

A.4 Will review roster and I will note ite=s that will require 24-hour

,3 coverage. j

) v a ke reference to exercise report.

'~'

Staffing another concern.

C.I.a Will =odify sections.

1 l

l C.I.b Cite who at the state will deal with these people.

Greater level of specifity regarding Coast Guard.

Want to know = ore about what the state will do other than the Feds.

C.3 Have resolved coor-dination between lab a:d EOF, turnaround time, etc. We have same response as A.l.b. We will =ake necessary procedures.

Co==unication between EOF & lab. Will n

w/

l e G

F '

DRAFT MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC

>\ June 23 & 24, 1986 Page 3

-s SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY f )

v there be a schedule provided for provi-sion of the equipment?

Radios will be in.

Who will we interface with?

. . r,C C.4 Don't understand what FEMA wants.

First sentence - Should be referenced in Section 2.8.5 and included in the agreement.

Second sentence - Need reference to emergency assistance; specifically for Seabrook Plant.

1 E.1 We assigned Department  ;

of Education to handle contacting schools.

7-(._) Calls are redundant.

1.ocal Transportation Coordinator will handle I contacting local l schools.

l E.2 Duty officer procedure j will be modified. Will have lab supervisor ini-tiate calls.

1 E.5 Socching specific regarding use of WOKQ?

Working on this. It can be resolved.

WOKQ was not in the original plan except for montoring WTSN. They will have a higher role in the plan. We feel that the E3S System applies.

Problem with hardware or names?

v' Not hardware. $roblemisWOKQwould lvi

• r

' 8' -

• DRAFT MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC June 23 & 24,'1986 Page 4 SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY ,

O have to have emergency power to go on to 24-hour operation.

• We are in the process of putting in a generator at WOKQ for this.

What kind of cessages will we give i out to the different emergency communication vehicles? (Radio, sirens, etc.) Different messages for different vehic'est f

Comm. with Mass. are addressed in Section 2.2.6. Do you want us to get away from our auto activation?

People in Mass, may hear the siren

, or radio.

People on the beach?

Close the beach.

O ,)1 '

A'bya ##

b Procedure provides people.what to do. i Reconsider auto p siren,with Site Area Emergency. Coordinate with Maine also.

E.6 (1) They close the beaches.

Lifeguards tell people.

Word gets to lifeguards through radio com-1 munications.

Is this laid out in the procedure?

J DRED Procedure provides this information. ,

Want language to where lifeguards tell l people to get off the beach. l 1

Second Can you use NOAA also? US Coast Guard does i Paragraph this. Will use NOAA l also.  !

(2) Supplemental notification?

i ,

..e - - - - , - - - - - - - - --,,---w , , , . .----m, ,- ,---.e --.-,,g -,,y e, , , , . . - - - y c- ..n -

. . ORAFT .;

7 MINUTES OF MEETING WITH'RAC

., June 23 & 24, 1986

- Page 5 - !-

t i

f SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY

' (:) (2) Local _

Siren verification map indicates which sirens  !

have been activated-and which have not.  !

That does_not tell you that the sirens are going to activate. . It only tells j you whether or not the signal has gone i

off.

(9) Reviewed procedures. No.

dialog in Mass, before activating alert.- Mass 1 vill be given previous notification.

H.4 Need to increase number of-people doing the monitoring. Working on I decon monitoring.  :

i Are we changing the concept from monitoring at local EOC? Will they  :

() be screened at the E0C?

i No monitors at Access j Control Centers.  ;

Planning basis for evacuees?

20%

3 I l I H.7 (1) Separate set of appen-dixei for decon. moni-coring. Appendix C deals with field moni- .

toring. j l

4 j I.11 l l

Aerial Monitoring - Will be modified. More CAP,

. National Guard or Pease.

} CAP training is for aftermath. Cannot fly plane through plune. Have to fly 1

l

, .4 . _ - . , . - --. - _ ,_ . .. --.. _ __ _ - . - , , . _ , , . . . , . . . . . . _ . . - . ~ . . , . _ - _ _ . . . _ . , -

. DRAFT-MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC i June 23 & 24, 1986 Page 6 s

SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY over contaminated area after it is down. Would rather we use State-level resources or Federal. Concerned about contamination of aircraft and people in it. .

CAP has Government-owned aircrafts. They are very well qualified. We are looking at their being available. They are members of the Emergency Response Team ,

and are sponsored by the Air Force. They are trained in Air Monitoring Techniques. '

Should be looked at in ,

• that light.

Who is the primary Air Monitoring Group? //

(1) FJRMAC (2) Air National Guard

() '

(3) CAP We vill develop an Air Monitoring Procedure. ,

J.2 Specific citing? l J.10.a Need large-scale maps for evacuation &

evaluation purposes. Does local plan have a large scale map? Yes. Map does not show shelters.

The map has to show the population by j evacuation area. ,

l 1

i 2

J.10.g Document percentage of people who i 3

require transportation by the state. We are defining number l of people who might need l j a rice and we are esti- <

mating our transpor-tacion needs based on I

I e

.- . . , , . . ,. , . , . . ----w,,- ,- _ _ _ - - --,..n. , , . . .-,.,,,,7 , , - - - , , . - . . , , . - - . - . , , ,

e D RAFT MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC June 23 6 24, 1986 Page 7 s SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY d that figure and we will add a certain percentage over and above that.

(6) Training bus drivers in dosimetry training? We have trained so=e already.

(7) Coordinate with Mass. Do they have un-met needs?

J.10.j(1) If latest has map, forget it.

(2) Need control at state level and at local level. Misconception. Won't be a large nu=ber of people in an exclusion area.

(3) How will you control exclusionary (4) separate from EPZ7 Only people with Exclusionary passes will be allowed in Exclusionary Area. Will

(~)

x- use Troop A.

J.ll (4) Depart =ent of Public Health is responsible.

No comments.

l 1

J.12 (4) Need from either NH or the Red Cross letter of Agreement listing assignments l for Mass Care facilities.

K.3.a (2) Need dosimeters quickly available.

K.3.a Talk to RAD Health Specialist. Let HP take care of it. Don't bring to hospital. Hospitals aren't prepared to handle contamination.

L.1 Most current letters will be inserted in the

() plan.

I

o DRAFT MINUTES OF MEETING VITH RAC June 23 & 24, 1986 Page 8 g- SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY U Public Health - Nothing in the plan which indicated emergency functions.

M.2.d Confused.

Decontamination Drills (periodically) during regularly scheduled exercises.

P.7 Would like update in tabular form.

Would like sets for each of the RAC members.

4 U

a

• D RAFT

' MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC HOST COMMUNITY RFVIEW June 23 & 24, 1986

,O G NHY SECTION FEMA COMMENT A.I.d Personnel in charge - Explain the roles of the people.

The Mayor or Alderman don't have to do too much. We vill clarify roles.

A.l.b Refer to by the reference (the Act or whatever) the covns will find this beneficial.

Last Para Should have Reception Centers at Host on Pg. 2 Co=munities.

E.1 & Alert all Host E.2 Co=munities.

We thought it was adequate.

A

\

Pg. 10 Don't understand.

1. 6 Reception Center Manager.

O O

l

' J l -

D RAFT 1

MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC  !

l RAC REVIEW OF THE MUNICIPAL (EPZ COMMUNITIES)

June 23 & 24, 1986

(:) SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY i

E.2 Traffic control. Precautionary evacuation.

E.7 Have n3C Jeen corrections.

Planned for it to stay in the state plans.

H.7 Survey meters?

Appropriate measures will be added.

J.9 Establish a criteria to deal with the l evacuation of the Municiple EOC.

1 J.10.c How are transients going to be notified?  ;

We have special facility  ;

plans for special faci- l r- lities. The same as the ,

(_T / rest of the general public.

J.10.d RAC not in favor of early release from l schools if it will mean that children are trapped at home. They are meas =- 8 better off at school.

1 1

l l

1 O

- . . _.. . ~ . . .-. .- . . . . .

I '

. D RAFT j 1

A MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC SUPPLEMENTAL June 23 & 24, 1986 O SECTION FEMA C0KMENT NHY A.l.b' (3) Sample Coordinator function. Be careful about. loading down the Accident Aseessor. .

>> There is another' person who works with him.

A.2.a Organization Chart of DPHS and minimum functions that need to be fulfilled.

A.3 "Activation". Would not be Red Cross i decision. Should be that of State or local. Change "Activation" to "Operation". O.K, Say "Reception Center will be activated by  ? 0.K.

E.1 Change "as available" to "as assigned".

E.1.2 Happy with changes E.6 #6 Don't want a estimate; want the actual aumbers.

E.6.8 Does the State Department of Agri culture have lists of farmers, ete? Yes Put that in the plan. It might be useful to note which towns get notified first. Depending on which way l the wind is blowing, .i that is how they know l which town to notify )

first. l I:

F.1.e Want a diagram.

F.3 Want a summary of testing in the plan.

(:) .

.4 DRAFT MINUTES OF MEETING WITH RAC June 23 & 24, 1986 Page 2 SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY fx

', )

G.1 Strike botom comment. Will have T.V.

(ESS).

G.4.c Want concept -eworded. Need more detail.

H.4 Will up the number of individuals available to do the job.

1 H.7 (2) Will get the right number. l l

1.7 1 & 2 are very sketchy. l Advise will be down.

1 I.8 (4) Other survey instruments - .'ided?

(~'j (7) Base iodine on field instr .ents.

N/

(8) Strike out.

J.2 Say it is in Seabrook Town Plan.

J.10.b Sketchy.

J.10.e AddK/ItoHealthCareFacilities.

J.10.m Open Issue in general about the adequacy of protective use for people on the beach.

J.10.5 List bus companies and drivers.

J.11 Should say that they have that and it includes addresses and phone numbers.

, Lists are available at the DOA with

/ 2 addresses and phone numbers.

V

DRAFT MINUrES OF MEETING WITH RAC June 23 & 24, 1986 Page 3 SECTION FEMA COMMENT NHY-

.Ct Be sure that the Department of Agriculture has a list of people who will be doing this besides the USDA people.

EBS message might not be five hours.

May want to have a second EBS message.

Our concern is for the people. Would rather have the people go to shelters. We would rather not send out too many message so as not to confuse people.

Appendix T is not too appropriate.

We will modify 2.5 and 2.6.

J.12 Not appropriate to use a medical tag.

Will consider.

Keep a log of people who are monitored

('}

's/ and those who were found to be centaminated.

Letters of Agreement at the Reception 4 Centers. Munici facilities do ,

not need letters of aggreement.

Because it is a man-made disaster, they need special training for decon., etc.

It is in the plan so we  ;

don't need letters. j J.12 (7) Take a look at Decontamination Procedure.

K.3 High range dosimetry are recom= ended by FEMA. Make them available to other people.

L.1 13 hospitals and ambulances with no one to coordinate. Add a simple statement I to that effect stating that we have  !

people.

L. j

4

' DRAFT MINUTES OF MEETING WITF. RAC t June 23 & 24,'1986 Page 4 i FEMA COMMENT t;. Y  :

SECTION O

M.1 Draft EPA reentry projected dose rate. <

-l 1

i l

l 1

1 I

i i

1 l

l O

l 1

i l

1 l

1 l

I i

O 1

l

. . _ , . _ . _ . _ . , . _ _ _ . . _ , ....._ ._ ._. _ ___ _ ._,_ - _.. .._._... .._._. ..._ ...- .._.___, ...,.....