ML20207C092
| ML20207C092 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 07/26/1988 |
| From: | Calvo J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207C095 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8808050038 | |
| Download: ML20207C092 (2) | |
Text
l l
7590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ARKANSAS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, DOCKET NOS. 50-313 AND 50-368 I
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING 0F N0 SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Comission) is considering granting an Exemption from 10 CFR 50.71(e) to Arkansas Power and Light Company (AP&L or the licensee) for a one-time 90 day schedular extension of the required due date for the annual revision to the Final Safety Analysis Reports (FSAR) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, (ANO-1 and 2) located in Pope County, Arkansas.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Identification of Proposed Action:
The proposed exemption would allow the licensee to submit the 1988 annual FSAR updates for ANO-1 and 2 on October 20, 1988, 90 days after the July 22 date required by 10 CFR 50.71(e). The proposed exemption was requested by the licensee oy letter dated May 13, 1988.
The Need for the Proposed Action:
The proposed exemption is necessary to provide the licensee additional time to complete their Safety Analysis Report Upgrade Project and incorporate all the improvements derived therefrom in the 1988 annual FSAR revision.
Envir0nmental Impacts of the Proposed Action:
The proposed exemption does not affect radiological plant effluents.
Therefore, the Comission concludes that there are no significent radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed exemption.
geosoo30080726 ADOCK 05000333 p
PNU
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed exemption involves features located entirely within the restricted L eas as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
It does not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Therefore, the Cormiission concludes that there are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed exemption.
The Comission has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed exemption.
Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, we conclude that the proporeI action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's letter dated May 13, 1988. The letter is available for public inspection at the Comission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.,
and at the Tomlinson Library, Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, Arkansas 72801.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 26th day of July 1988.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO!i
'4. %
t Jose A. Calvo, Director Project Directorate - IV Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
-