ML20206U904

Summary of 990504 Meeting with EOI in Rockville,Maryland Re Integrated Nuclear Security Plan Being Proposed by EOI for All EOI Sites.List of Meeting Attendees & Copy of Meeting Presentation Matl Encl

ML20206U904
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	05/19/1999
From:	Chandu Patel NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:	NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
References
NUDOCS 9905260051
Download: ML20206U904 (9)

Text

o

~

May 19,-1999 L LICENSEE: Entergy Operations, Inc.

l FACILITY: Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3

SUMMARY

OF MEETING WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. ON INTEGRATED SECURITY PLAN On May 4,1999, members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) met with representatives of Entergy Operations, Inc. (EOI), at Rockville, Maryland, to discuss the Integrated Nuclear Security Plan being proposed by EOl for all EOl sites. EOl provided a broad overview of its approach for developing one plan for all sites that will meet the requirements of applicable regulations. The NRC staff and EOl agreed that the application will be submitted under the requirements of 10 CFR 50.90.

The NRC staff expressed the opinion that EOl should minimize changes to each site's existing security plan while the staff is reviewing the integrated plan. This may help the staff in utilizing its resources in a more efficient manner. EOl requested that the staff complete its review within 6 months. However, the staff mentioned that EOl that the review schedule will be established after EOI submits its plan and the Project Manager discusses the proposed schedule with the appropriate Branch Chief. EOl is expecting to submit the new security plan in June 1999.

A list of Attendees is provided as Enclosure 1. A copy of presentation material is provided as Enclosure 2.

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Chandu P. Patel, Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate IV & Decommissioning Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-382 DISTRIBUTION

Enclosures:

As stated (2) hard coDV e-mail Docket Filei ' J. Zwolinski/S. Black cc w/encls: See next page PUBLIC S. Richards PDIV-1 Reading R. Rosano OGC ACRS R. Albert B. Manili D. Lange (DJL) l/I gg l K. Brockman 1 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\Pdiv-1\Waterford\MTS5499.WPD vo ,.c.w . em e m nocum.nt. **.t. m m. no, c.cwo .nci s.c m u.ne w . No em bg gy OFFICE PM/PDIV-1 E LA/PDIVrh N SC/PDIV-1 (

NAME CPatel:dt LBerry b RGramm b

. DATE h M /99 h/ h /99 (/ % /99 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9905260051 990519 i PDR ADOCK 05000302 i F PDR y

t Waterford Generating Station 3 cc:

Administrator Regional Administrator, Region IV Louisiana Radiation Protection Division U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 82135 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Baton Rouge, LA 70884-2135 Arlington,TX 76011

- Vice President, Operations Resident inspector /Waterford NPS Support Post Office Box 822 1 Entergy Operations, Inc. Killona, LA 70066 I P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286 Parish President Council St. Charles Parish Director P. O. Box 302 Nuclear Safety & Regulatory Affairs Hahnville, LA 70057 Entergy Operations, Inc.

P. O. Box B Executive Vice-President Killona, LA 70066 and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.

Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway P. O. Box 31995 P. O. Box 651 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Jackson, MS 39205 Chairman General Manager Plant Operations Louisiana Public Service Commission Entergy Operations, Inc. One American Place, Suite 1630 P. O. Box B Baton Rouge, LA 70825-1697 Killona, LA 70066 ,

Mr. Charles M. Dugger i Licensing Manager Vice President Operations i Entergy Operations, Inc. Entergy Operations, Inc.

P. O. Box B P. O. Box B Killona, LA 70066 Killona, LA 70066 Winston & Strawn 1400 L Street, NW.

Washington, DC 20005-3502 l

i i

May 1999

t 1 List of Attendees Meetina with Enterav Ooeraisons. Inc.

May 4.1999 Name Oraanization Chandu Patel NRR Richard Rosano NRR Ron Albert NRR Barry Manill NRR Robert Gramm NRR H. F. Skip Cooper Entergy Operations Les England Entergy Operations

)

l i

l ENCLOSURE 1 1

c .

t l Entergy Integrated Nuclear Security Plan l

.: = =. = = -.

l l

Entergy Operations, Inc.

May 1999  !

1 l

l Agenda  !

. = = - = = = ,

l I Meeting Goals j i

l I Current Security Programs  !

I I New INSP and IST&QP  !

I Benefits of Changes i I Schedule i

1 ;

ENCIDSURE 2 1

i . ..____ ___-. .

)

t Meeting Goals

. ;;.=gre- , .c _.__

E Discuss I why we are changing the plans I methodology for making the change I schedule for the change I NRC suggestions and feedback Current Security Programs a.--= = w. .

I 4 programs (plan + contingencies +T&Q)

I different companies I construction phase I different requirements due to plant ages and experiences 2

Current Security Programs

~ - . .1. . ._ .---

I Makes working together as a company difficult I Fosters different approaches to solving common issues (e.g. compliance) l I

I Requires the same change to be submitted and reviewed four times integrated Nuclear Security Plan & T&Q Plan

- - = = = . w.. -

I Apply one plan to all sites I Make the requirements the same for all sites I Meet requirements of applicable regulations 3

INSP Benefits 2.;m.e. _,.

I Reduce burden of future changes to the plan (i.e., change it once vs. four times).

I Implement the lessons learned from the years of program implementation across all of the sites.

I Remove this block to solving issues consistently between sites.

I Allow sites to share resources.

NRC Benefits

======.=_...

I Consistent security philosophy I EOI not site specific I Consistent issue resolution I problem @ 1 plant; solution @ 4 plants I Greater efficiency I fewer Plan changes I reduce redundant inspections 4

t Changs Process --

z: =  :.-.m__

l I Develop Inte9Tated Nuclear Security Plan  !

I Develop justifications for changes to each l

Security Plan I Submit revised plan for NRC review and ,

approval l l

1 l

1

= -w n -_ -

Examine Draft Submittal 5

)

i r.

Schedule l I Submit new INSP & IST&Q in May,1999 I NRC approval in 4th QTR 1999 I 6 month NRC review / comment resolution I Implementation 2nd Qtr 2000 l I 6 month phased implementation period NRC Feedback

- .: ,. = .:.= . . . _ a .

I Submittal level of detail l

I Amount of interaction (e.g., meetings)

I Schedule 6

. . - - . _ . . - . . _ . . .