ML20206U296

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That NRC Recently Received Info Re Activities at Byron.Details Encl for Evaluation.Requests That Results of Evaluation of Matter Be Submitted to Region III within 30 Days of Date of Ltr
ML20206U296
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/26/1998
From: Clayton H
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Kingsley O
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20206U278 List:
References
NUDOCS 9905250148
Download: ML20206U296 (4)


Text

r 3., am i m.) um we a n a w, e L, s..s ac nu, w.% 111 e u 2.5, u.ia f

i

.i

$k

$$ aec,

UNITED STATES v

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION og REGloN m y

g tr.

j so1 wARRENVILLE RoAo t,

g usLE. ILUNots 60632-4351 August 26,1998 Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley President, Nuclear Generation Group Commonwealth Edison Company ATTN: Regulatory Services Executive Towers West 111 1400 Opus Place, Suite 500 Downers Grove, IL 60515

Dear Mr. Kingsley:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) recently received information conceming activities at Byron. The details are enclosed for your evaluation.

We request that the results of your evaluation of this matter be submitted to Region 111 within 30 days of the date of this letter. Your response to this request should not be docketed, and should be sent in an envelope addressed to the Region til Enforcement / investigations Officer.

We also request that your response contain no personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you Inu21 specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.790(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable rerponse, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.

The NRC review of your response will include whether: (a) the organization or individual conducting the evaluation was independent; (b) the evaluation 'was of sufficient depth and scope; (c) appropriate root causes and generic implications were considered, if the concems were substantiated; and (d) the corrective actions, both planned and completed, were sufficient to correct the specific example (s) and generic implications and to prevent recurrence.

The enclosure to this letter should be controlled and distribution should be limited to personnel with a "need to know" until your evaluation has been completed and reviewed by NRC Region Ill. The enclosure to this letter is considered "NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE."

4 9905250148 990513 PDR ADOCK 05000454 P

PDR

/

h i

o.m : ee nus we an o geTe t.s..sxc at.uiu.s sii g oza (;;>;3

)

O. Kingsley We appreciate your cooperation and will gladly discuss any questions you may have concerning this information.

Sincerely, D&

. Brent Clayton Enforcement / Investigations Officer 1

Enclosure:

Details (NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE) -

cc w/ encl: K. Graesser, Site V.P.

l 1

i l

05/24/99 17:06 FA.\\ 630 515 1078 L'. S..N RC REG I O.N 1II

@ 025'033 1

NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE ENCLOSURE Piease reference tracking number 98-A-0134 in your response.

Details An individual declined to provide their name to the NRC when raising safety concems because the individual believed that in doing so, the individual would have to file a contact report with the licensee.

On approximately June 11,1997, the NRC referred a similar concern to Comed. Comed responded to the NRC by letter dated July 25,1997.

The NRC is concerned that this issue had been identified again.

Your review of this issue should indude as a minimum:

1.

Clarification of the expectation that all contact with the NRC must be documented on a contact sheet.

2.

Recent actions taken to assure worker understanding of management's expectations pertaining to contacts by employees and contractors with the NRC.

l l

l NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE i

l i

03'24/99 17:06 FAX 630 515 1076 l'.S.NRC REGION III 10026/033 O. Kingsiey We appreciate your cooperation and will gladly discuss any questions you may have concerning this information.

Since:.2iy, H. Brent Clayton Enforcement / investigations Officer

Enclosure:

Details l

(NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE) cc w/ encl: K. Graesser, Site V.P.

bec w/ encl: AMS File No. Rlli-98-A-0134 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\EICS\\AMS-LTRS\\98-A-134.121 0FFICE RIII N

RIII _., W NAME Doornbos fbD ClaythaAh (

C DATE 8/ u /98 8/ 4/ ' /98 1

0FFICIAl. RECORD COPY l

l l

l