ML20206M598

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Des for Decommissioning of Plant.Crack & Leak in Holding Pond Does Not Assure Util Has Ability to Safely Contain & Store Radioactive Fuel Rods & Waste.Proposing That Des & Safstor Be Applied Generically Absurd
ML20206M598
Person / Time
Site: Humboldt Bay
Issue date: 08/12/1986
From: Blackberry B
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC
References
NUDOCS 8608210268
Download: ML20206M598 (2)


Text

q ( Sb- I3 %

9 0 ,\  %& '

TO: _U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

_ Subject : Response to the Draft-Environmental Impact Statement for Decommissioning The Eumboldt Bay Nuclear Reactor.

I have attended the Scoping Hearing.over a year and half ago. I have read the proposed Draft Environmental Impact Statement. I have called the NRC and talked to Peter Erickson regarding a ppublic hearing about ihe Draft and decommissioning process.

How can the NRC represent and protect public health and safety if the NRC is closed to public hearings and input? Why is the NRC and PG&E opposed to public input?- .

Such a skimpy, vague attempt to satisfy'the laws and rules requiring an Environ-mental Impact Statement for the decommissionin5 of a Nuclear Reactory - Setting the mode for future decommissioning.uith cuch an inadequate draft is shocking!

DENIAL OF PUBLIC INFUT SNAZY SAFSTOR CLOSED D00RS2&i, SECRECY BUILDING FAST-WITH GENERIC SLIDING IN TO SMOOTH THE WAY FOR NO ACTION DRESSED UP AS SAFE The fact that this draft is an example of what the NRC and Nuclear Industry's plan for the "DECCNMISSIONING PROCESS" is appauling and frightening.

THE NUKE IS HOT, WE DON'T WANT TO EE RADIATED,, YOU ARE RESPON31BLE FOR CONTAINING THIS FOISEN IN A SAFE, EFFICIbl4T AI.D TIMELY MAU!iER.

STOP MAKING TdE " WASTE " IF YOU DON'T HAVE A PLAN THAT IS HEALISTIC A:lD UOlihAELE TO l'ROIECT TEE 1 UELlC F9FM IT'S TOISEN.

<s-.+---

Speci fi c a.11y , the crack and look in the holding pond does not accure that P.G.LE. has the ability to safely contain and store the radioactive fuel rods and waste. Proposing that the Environmental Impnet Statement be Generic in absurd. And to propose that the SAFSTOR be generic is unbelievable. Specific site and environmental condition and assenennt are abcolutly nec6ssary.

I expect a public hearing to happen, y goo U.w N \

8608210268 860812 then/ t\O 1

PDR ADOCK 05000133 geMt., b%Nd

$ '] % (RedGh p b 1

.-_~~'**~~~l*nsus,,_,_,,,_ _

o

} i l

e '3  ; 2e F E l is y e  : iv 2 5 8 0Y fy .. t-K l -. . . - . . _ 1 _ _ _ - _