ML20206L720
| ML20206L720 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle |
| Issue date: | 06/26/1986 |
| From: | Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206L726 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8606300412 | |
| Download: ML20206L720 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000424/1986042
Text
,
!
.
~%,
UNITED STATES
[
g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
l;
- l
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%, . . . . . p#
33126 1986
Docket No. 50-424
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Roger D. Walker, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
Region II
FROM:
Brian K. Grimes, Director
Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor,
and Technical Training Center Programs
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
SUBJECT:
IE DRAFT LETTER TO GEORGIA POWER COMPANY (GPC)
~
FORWARDING INSPECTION REPORT FOR MODULE 13C
READINESS REVIEW
.
.This memorandum forwards IE's draft letter and the inspection report
for module 13C to you for subsequent transmittal to GPC, since Region II
,
'
is the coordinating office for the Vogtle Readiness Review.
The inspection
report documents IE's inspection of the Stone and Webster Engineering
Corporation's (SWEC) depth of review associated with the Independent Design
Review (IDR) chapter. This inspection report completes IE's initial technical
review of Module'13C as requested in Roger D. Walker's memorandum dated
December 4,1985.
,
,
pT <t ,L
,AM
Brian K. Grimes, Director
Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor,
and Technical Training Center Programs
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Enclosures:
As stated
8606300412 860626
ADOCK 05000424
G
L
.
I
Docket No. 50-424
Georgia Power Company
ATTN: Mr. R.J. Kelly
Executive Vice President
P.O. Box 4545
Atlanta, Georgia 30302
Dear Mr. Kelly:
On May 5, 1986 through May 7, 1986, the NRC performed an inspection
at the Vogtle job site of Readiness Review Module 13C - Chapter 7.C
" Independent Design Review." The objective of the inspection was to
ensure that Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC), the
Independent Design Review (IDR) contractor, had performed a thorough
review of the Readiness Review module chapter, as well as to ensure
that appropriate corrective action had been implemented by GPC, where
necessary. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed
inspection report and have been discussed with your staff during our
, inspection exit briefing.
Based on this inspection, we believe that the 1DR for Module 13C was
-
performed competently and effectively.
Minor comments are presented
in the enclosed inspection report.
Your resolution of IDR Findings
-
1, 2 and 7 will be examined during the next inspection of the IDR
portion of your Readiness Review Program.
. . -
.
'
Sincerely,
J. Nelson Grace
Regional Administrator
a
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
7,
.
,
'I/
Mr. R. J. Kelly
-2-
Distribution:
DC5
NRC PDR
Local POR
QA8 Reading
DQAVT Reading
JMTaylor, IE
RHVollmer, IE
BKGrimes, IE
HJMiller, IE
GTAnkrum,
EVImbro, IE
HBWang,
RWParkhill, IE
WMHill, IE
-
HTThompson, NRR
TMNovak, NRR
MAMiller, NRR
._
RDWalker, RII
~
JRHarris, RII
MVSinkule, RII
<
JJLenahan, RII
GHarstead, HEA
.-.
.
I
$
!
,