ML20206K319

Advises That Readministration of Reactor Operator Exam Scheduled for 881205.Requirements for Facility Review of Exam Encl

ML20206K319
Person / Time
Site:	University of Lowell
Issue date:	11/23/1988
From:	Eselgroth P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:	Beghian L MASSACHUSETTS, UNIV. OF, LOWELL, MA (FORMERLY LOWELL
References
NUDOCS 8811290359
Download: ML20206K319 (2)

Text

_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - . _ _ _ _ _

gy 8 8 W Docket No: 50-223 University of Lowell ATTN: Dr. Leon E. Beghien Vice President for Research 1 University Avenue Lewell, Massachusetts 01854 Gentlemen:

Subject:

REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSING EXN11 NATION In a tilephone conversation between Mr. L. Bobek, Chief Operator, and Mr. E.

Yachimiak, Operations Engineer, arrangenents were made '9r the re-administra-tion of a Rector Operator (RO) examination at the NRC Region 1 offices in King of of Prussia, Pennsylvania. The written eyemination is scheduled for December 5, 1988.

The facility staff review of the written examination will be conducted in accordance with requirements specified in Enclosure 1 "Requirements for Facility Review of Written Examination."

Thank you for your consideration in this natter. If you have r.ny questions regarding the examination and requirements, please contact me at (215) 337-5211.

Sincerely, ert sinn tiensa h* t PETER W. ESFLG.'10TH Peter W. Eselgroth, Chief Pressurized Water Reactor Section Operations Branch, DRS

Enclosure:

Facility Review Requirements cc w/ enclosure:

T. Wallace, Reactor Supervisor bec w/ enclosure:

DRP Section Chief Chief Examiner OL File

!A th 11/1 8 11/2f/88 0FFICIAL RECORD C0F1 8811290359 691123 -TE"~o / M'y@';

PDP ADOCV 050002:3 V PDC [

L- .___ _ _ _ _ _ .

y. ..

ENCLOSURE 1 REQUIREltENTS FOR FACILITY REVIEW Of WRITTEtt EXMiltlATION

1. There shall be no review of the written examination by the facility staff before or during the administration of the examination. Following the administration of the written examinatien, the facility staff shall be provided a marked-up copy of the examination and the answer key.

2. The facility will have five (5) working days from the day of receipt of the written examination to provide formal coment submittal. The submittal will be made to the responsible Regional Office by the highest ,

level of corporate managerent for plant operations, e.g., Vice President for Nuclear Operations. A copy of the submittal will be forwarded to the chief examiner, as appropriate. Coments not submitted within five (5) working days will be considered for inclusion in the grading process on a case basis by the Regional Office section leader. Should the coment subnittal deadline not be met , a long delay for finalization of the examination results may occur.

3. The following format should be adhered to the submittal of specific coments:

a. Listing of fiRC Question, answer and reference,

b. Facility coment.

c. Supporting documentation.

NOTES:

1. No change to the examination will be made without submittal of complete, current, and approved reference material.

2. Comments made without a concise facility recomendation will not be addressed.

%