ML20206J209
| ML20206J209 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/24/1986 |
| From: | Hoyt H Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| References | |
| CON-#286-697 82-471-02-OL, 82-471-2-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8606270035 | |
| Download: ML20206J209 (2) | |
Text
I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD DOLMETED
" RC Before Administrative Judges:
Helen F. Hoyt, Chairperson Emeth A. Luebke 3 JE 26 A8:18 Jerry Harbour FFICE OF 5E;;ayy In the Matter of Docker E g dI450L 5.' L44-OL PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY (ASLBPNo. 82-471-02-0L) 0F NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al.
(Offsite Emergency Planning)
(Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2)
)
June 24, 1986 NN dOhkDj ORDER (Granting Motions To Compel Responses To Applicants' Interrogatories)
On April 28, 1986, Applicants served interrogatories (in-hand or by Federal Express) on the following:
Town of Brentwood Town of Seabrook Town of North Hampton Town of Salisbury City of Newburyport Town of Amesbury Town of Rye Town of Newbury City of Portsmouth The due date for responses to the interrogatories, as established by our Order of January 17, 1986, was Nay 14, 1986.
On May 16,1986, Applicants filed a Motion To Compel Response To Interrogatories addressed to each of the towns listed above and the City of Portsmouth.
l 0
DO PD l
G 956E
I 2
A search of the Board's records establishes that no response has been received nor has any of the entities applied for a protective order pursuant to paragraph 10 CFR 2.740(c). Accordingly, pursuant to the authority of Section 2.740(f)(1), the Applicants' Motion To Compel is granted. The Towns of Breptwood, Seabrook, North Hampton, Salisbury, Newburyport, Amesbury, Rye, Newbury and The City of Portsmouth are required to answer or respond to Applicants' Offsite EP Interrogatories And Request For The Production Of Documents addressed to each of these entities by in-hand delivery to the Board and the Applicants no later than July 3, 1986.
Failure to answer or respond silall not be excused on the ground that the discovery sought is objectionable unless the person or party failing to answer or respond has applied for a protective order pursuant to 10 CFR 2.740(c).
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LIC SING BOARD
~~
v )(
Helen F. Hoyt, Chairperg h Administrative Judge Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 24th day of June 1986.
1
.