ML20206H517

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of Allegation Review Committee 880721 Meeting Held by Telephone Re Encl Listed Allegations
ML20206H517
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 07/26/1988
From: Gower G
NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To:
NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
Shared Package
ML20206H498 List:
References
FOIA-88-472 NUDOCS 8811230218
Download: ML20206H517 (5)


Text

"*

tr

.h' D

~

Juiy 26*1988 MEMORANDUM FGR Allegation Review Consittes Mescers FROM:

George C. Gower Project Allegation Coordinator (PAL)

Comanche Peak PrcJect Divisi n Office of Special Prcjects

SUBJECT:

Minutes of Allegation Rcview Cosaittee (ARC) Meeting Held July 21, 1988 The twelfth seating of the ARC was held 7/21/88 by telephone. The telephone discussion took placs witn Phil McKee and George Gower at OWFN and Bob Warnick at the site. The allegations listed on attachcent 1 - e discussed as well as other satters related to the prog.ess and status of ot.

allegations in general.

The f ollowing notes briefly docuser.t the sigiificant cecisions made and actions taken.

1.

Sty 6Liggett'gol 0$P-88-A-00$0 Former ERASCO Jaployee alleged that procedural violations h4d occured while he wa1 employedt he said he was harassed and intialdated and finally he walked off the job.

He has filed a complaint with DOL.

Decision saJe to have Warnick folloa-up on the alleger's technical complaints decision to request 01 investigation is pending further revasw of the facts of the case.

SP-88-A-0051 Two former QC inspectors (civill reported, upon leaving the site after being laid off, that no one wts available to 10 QC inspections in the area nhere they worked. There were alleged implications of r aci al problems.

The OSP staff person advised them of f

their rights under 00L trovisions.

It was all6ged that another QC inspector at the site may have 'something on TUEC' and for OSP to check nie out.

They were informed that a check will es made of the person's quellitcations.

The OSP st4ff person that recetved the allegation was informed that no response was expected.

Warnick was to follow up on the technical aspects of the allegation and report the findings in an NRC IR.

og Further actions will depend on the findings that develoo.

n.

e4

$$ m 2.

&Qlt.IBl.6llt94tL901 f*

EleT 0$P-87-A-0021 00L casel this case is bel'teved to be one of five cases settled in the stipulation.

Staff review of sever 31 techntcal concerns yth is nearing soapletion and should shortly peralt a feedback letter to be prepared.

to o <

ag a os osp.87-A.0087 Alle;ed alssing rebar a fesdback/closecut letter has been prepared.

0$P-87-A-00B8 ASME concerns: there is unconfirmed information that the

(

alleger on this case any becces assottated with a newly formed group that site for intervener status at Comanche Peak. Inspection of the i

say

J 4

alleger's two remaining concerns is continuing.

OSP-87-A 0089 Suspected weld record f alsification; 01 report will be sent to Warntck for review orter to final closecut of the witter.

-0SP-87-A-0105 Alleged i rgroner orifices; final clesaout inf ormation is included in 08-44/40 14 and will be used to pravide feedback /closecut.

The allegations were nct substantiated OSP-98-A-0021 Alleged cover-up of technical concerns; status was given on the results of an analysis made to deterattie if issues in the case warranted a request for 01 tnvestigation.

There is still difficulty in proceeding with this cast because of unsettled clains for confidentiality. It appears. that sost, if not all, of the technical concerns have been addressed oy the staff at one time or another.

OSP-08-A-0024 Alleged Larroper layof f OSP staff has talksd with person alleger referred to about his concerns..

Warnick clans to do a complete review of TUEC's response to the alleger with respect to his technical The allegsr had Willed w.th DOL and his case is thought to be concerns.

one of the five cases that were included in the stipulation.

l OSP 08-A-0026 Alleged W h ! case; need for an 01 investigation is under ccnsideration.

This case is thtught to be among those included in the stipulation. Case is beang reviewed for any tecnnical concerns needtng follow-up.

05F-66-A-0027 (sate as abeveJ OSF-98-A-0020 Weletng of hilts bolts to base-clatet a request for O!

tr.<estigetton has been prepared and ts in concurrence.

(OSP-08-04)

OSP-80-A-0029 Intentional disregard for )rscedurest Gower call'd the e

alleger on 7/21/08 to determine if he had any prob!Oas with OSP referral of his concerns to TUEC f or response, ett5er in their ortgtnal f orm or r2 written tc taove names.

Alleger said he would have to consult with his attorney etnce he was conteeplating a law sutte against his forter esployer.

He satd he would call back shortly with his response.

P 3.

Bt94l0iO9.DCift.5SEB.011 sett90s The status of the four allegations, listed on page two of attachaent one, were discussed.

TechntCal revtews are continuing; some results have been reported in irs already, These will te collected and, when complete, will te provided to the alleger as feedback and possib's closure.

4 5[3gg((ggggy3 Warnick was requested to review any files at the site that may contain documents related to the inspection / follow-up of allegations to make sure that the documents that suoport closure have been sent to OSP Hqt's and included in the official AMS files. Any questionacle records he came across were to be sent to Gower for revten and possible depostt in the l

files.

f

i'

o,

(

Tne next ARC seet'ing was scheduled to be held on August 18, 1988 at the s,te.

{.

W 1

George (

Gower Project Allegation Coordinator Comanche Peak Project Dtvision Office of Special Projects Enclosure Attachment i Distrttution CGRIMES PMckEE JLYONS 8ZALCMAN

e Statyst. test.dattu.LiQZ.elltsatto01 Gentect 052.dustet 00L case. 01 referral, letter to fu on 87-A-0021 several technical issues and "chilling effect" inquiry. Both responses have eeen received. Evaluations to be made.

87-A-0087 Alleged stssing rebar. Interviewt of those that eight have known about sitting rebar completed. Closecut pendinG.

ASME concerns. Interie FB ltr sent to 87-A-0088 alleger atth IR on 7/12/88.

Suspected falsification of weld records.

87-A-0089 Close out action pending.,

CLOSE0_. 01 self initiated bad bolts.

87-A-0100 W111 reopen if CP issues develop.

87-A-0105 Alleged taproper orifices installed; findings to appear in May/88 IR)

Closecut pending.

CLOSED. Alleged sisuse of adhestve tarkers.

68-A-0020 68 A-0021 Alleged wrongdonnq ey TV Electrict review of documents concleted, feedbact Itr cetng prepared.

CLOSED. Alleged grouttng prooless.

80-A-0023 Alleged wrongful lay-cif. Alleger 88-A-0024 contacted SAFETEAM report pending, furtner OSP contact may result.

Alleger has filed anth 00L.

00L caset 88-A-0026 Same as above.

88-A-0027 delding of Htitt bolts to base platet 88-A-0028 OSP nas requested 0! investigation tOSP-98-04)

I

Alleged intentional disregard f or parts of 88 A-0029 consturction procedure.

Gonse to call alleger to discuss ref erral of concerns to TUEC.

StitV11.DCift.ISE8.611r9sti90s 61199ft........Qif.6Llt981190.595.................C999t01 A-4 B4 A-0009 Pending evaluation of TU.Elec.

response; 2 concerns (JLyons &

MRunyan)

A-23 B4-A-0021 Pending eval. of TU response (JLyons+MRunyan)

A-44(CASE) 84-A-0022 Pending eval. of TU response (JLyons+Norkin+Terao+ Wagner +

Runyan)

A-47 84-A-0016 Pending eval, sf TU response (JLyons+ Wagner)

A-73 85-A-0089 Walsh/Osyte concerns. JLyons drafting FB/C0 letter.

( Above are all undergoing techntcal revtan for acceptance--Status of reviews requiredi 1

go,

--