ML20206F222

Forwards Addl Info Re Facility & Status Rept for Performance Enhancement Program in Response to 860523 Request

ML20206F222
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Saint Vrain
Issue date:	06/17/1986
From:	Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:	Asselstine NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
NUDOCS 8606240344
Download: ML20206F222 (2)

Text

1 JUN 171986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Commissioner Asselstine FROM: Victor Stello, Jr.

Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING FORT ST. VRAIN On May 23, 1986, you met with Messrs. Miraglia, Berkow and Heitner of the NRR Staff concerning the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station. At the conclusion of that meeting, the staff agreed to provide to you certain additional information. The information requested is provided in Enclosures 1 and 2.

(Signed) Jack W. Roe l

tj Victor Stello, Jr.

t Executive Director for Operations

Enclosures:

1. Additional Information DISTRIBUTION: Docket No. 50-267 on Fort St. Vrain as Docket. File,

~ HDenton/DEisenhut Requested by Commissioner 'NRC PDR ~ JHeltemes, AE0D Asselstine Local PDR ED0 Reading SSPD Reading RFarrell, SRI

2. Status Report for Performance FMiraglia JJaudon, RIV Enhancement Program DCrutchfield RIreland, RIV (PSC Letter P-86357 dated HBerkow VStello May 9, 1986) 0 Lynch JRoe KHeitner TRehn cc: Chairman Palladino PNoonan JSniezek Commissioner Roberts EDO r/f Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Zech OPE OGC SECY CONTACT:

K. Heitner, NRR Ext. 28288 y DPWRL-B: DPWRL-B:SSPD DPWR B:aSPD DPW L '3:SSPD D -B:DIR PNo KHeitner:ac 0 Lynch pHBerkow FM' yjglia 6 06/lt/86 06/[j/86 06/H/86 0 7 /86 NRR [R ED HDe an VS lo 06/ 86 06 g,/86 8606240344 860617 PDR ADOCK 05000267 P PDR

Enclosure 1 Additional Information on Fort St. Vrain as Requested by Commissioner Asselstine Concern 1: Jumpering of safety circuits in the plant protective system (PPS) such that a manual scram is the only available option.

Response 1: The staff is aware of three temporary changes to the PPS involving jumpers. Certain relays on the moisture monitor which control the sample flows are jumpered out pending a permanent modification. This change has been reviewed and approved by the staff. An additional recorder for the moisture monitors has been jumpered into the PPS. Certain jumpers were placed on the start-up (source range) channels in order to isolate electrical noise in these channels.

However, the staff concludes the PPS is working as designed.

Concern 2: Obsolete selenium rectifiers being used as replacement equipment instead of silicon rectifiers.

Response 2: There are some selenium rectifiers in several pieces of Fort St. Vrain equipment as originally designed. (This reflects that the equipment was purchased about 1970 and may reflect

. still older designs.) These rectifiers are replaced when needed by qualified spares, some of which may still be selenium, but meet the original specifications, and are acceptable replacements.

Concern 3: Potential electrical noise problems in the PPS.

Response 3: Electrical noise has been identified as a problem by the licensee on the start-up (source range) channel of the PPS. ,

The licensee plans to reduce this noise through the  !

installation of shielded cable on this channel. Spurious trip actuations of the PPS during surveillance testing have been reported by the licensee over the last few months. It is the staff's conclusion that these are the result of personnel errors in carrying out routine surveillance testing of these PPS functions.

l l

Enclosure 2 1

I Public Service- ~m .

Company of Colo, ado P.O. Box 840 Denver, CO 80201 - 0840 (303) 571 - 7511 2420 W. 26th Avenue, Suite 100D, Denver, Colorado 80211 May 9, 1986 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P-86357 I

Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C. 20555 Attention: Mr. H. N. Berkow, Director Standardization and Special Projects l Directorate Docket No. 50-267

SUBJECT:

Status Report for Performance Enhancement Program

Dear Mr. Berkow:

is the fourth Status Report for the Performance Enhancement l Attached Program. It covers the three-month time period from January 1, 1986 through March 31, 1986. The report documents the verbal status report to be given to you in Arlington, Texas, on May 9, 1986 by Mr. .

R. F. Walker, President, Mr. H. L. Brey, Manager, Nuclear Licensing and Fuels Division, Mr. Ted Willey of The Training Company, and Mr.

W. D. Rodgers, Manager, Performance Enhancement Program.

This letter is consistent with our commitment made in the May 29, ]

1985 SALP meeting and PSC will continue to provide progress reports -

I on a quarterly basis if desired.

l

,  ;&a;;;;; 860509 , ob(

PDR ADOCK 0500 g7 P g

. -~ ~e

..-.no .o. - . . ~ . . . . . . - . .

m .e-~r.. . . . . . ~ . . . - . - . . . . - . . - - .

P-86357 Page 2 May 9, 1986 If you have any questions please contact Mr. W. D. Rodgers at (303) 480-6904.

Very truly yours, f

H. L. Brey, Managef Nuclear Licensing and Fue] s Division sme Attachment cc: K. Heitner, Fort St. Vrain Project Manager E. J. Butcher, Acting Chief, Operating Reactors Branch #3 t

9 i

1 lI L

e ll

i . . . _ _ . . . . . _. . . . . . . . . . .__._

CRG-86-012 Public Service Company of Colorado Performance Enhancement Program Quarterly Status Report - As of March 31, 1986 This report documents the status of Public Service Company of Colorado's Performance Enhancement Program (PEP) and covers the three-month time period from January 5, 1986 through March 31, 1986.

This report has been compiled from status reports submitted monthly from each project manager. This is our fourth status report to the NRC regarding the PEP. We are a full year into this multi-year program.

Summary We have completed 17 of the 34 original projects and 18 of the current total of 43 projects. Forty-one project parts of eighty total project parts have also been completed. The primary emphasis in the PEP during the month has been on Project VII, Total Responsibility Management.

The following summarizes the status of the seven overall projects:

• Project I - Organizational Concerns overall, six of eight projects are complete. Hiring of new personnel has remained static compared to last quarter. The remaining eight positions require experienced nuclear personnel and candidates are being sought through professional recruiters ,

and additional advertising in industry publications.

• Project II - Master Planning and Scheduling

, 1 One of three projects are complete. We are developing our long-range planning techniques in conjunction with the upcoming EQ outage. Planning and Scheduling within Quality Assurance and Nuclear Licensing and Fuels divisions is in place. A policy defining a priority system and criteria for assigning priorities is being approved and will soon be implemented. As of April 1, i

1986, PSC created a Department Manager level position, Master Planning and Scheduling Manager. Mr. Duane Rodgers will fill this .new position and will assume responsibility for the Performance Enhancement Program as a part of his duties.

• Project III -

Establish Preventive Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Progress on the maintenance planning and scheduling is accelerating now that the maintenance planning group is in place and initial training is complete. One of three projects in this overall project is complete. The new engineered PM procedures d

are just being issued and have yet to be integrated with

. maintenance planning and scheduling. An increased rate of progress is expected over the next several months in implementing the scheduling of preventive maintenance.

. i

, : ..:.r.. : . . . . .

- = -

.

• Proicct IV - Upgrada Nucleer Policisn and Proceduren To-date, we have completed three of ten projects. Additionally,

, a key project part was completed in Project IV.4, Review Essential Regulatory Documents, which identified commitments from regulatory documents that had not previously been defined. This project responded to the management audit's concern that regulatory documents were not reviewed for regulatory intent relative to the HTGR technology.

• Project V - Improve Management and Nuclear Division Personnel i

Training  ;

i Training development continues to do well although some additional slippage in schedules has occurred. The three Operator positions' training materials are complete and INPO has ,

! completed its accreditation vicit. We are expecting that these l positions will soon receive INPO accreditation. Slippage is l occurring in the Quality Assurance and Nuclear Engineering '

divisions for the development of their training programs.

I

• Project VI - Plant Conduct of Operations  !

l We have four of seven projects in this area complete. A l contractor is now assisting us with implementation of Project  !

! VI.4, Implement Plant Signage Program. I

• Project VII - Total Responsibility Management 1 Developacnt of this project has been a major effort during this l quarter. Problem identification under Part 1 is complete. Under l Part 2, working groups were established and are developing '

corrective action in the 11 areas requiring improvement. The final list of action items from the working group will be approved and prioritized by management.

i j~ Exhibit I is the summary schedule Bar Chart. This schedule is Part B of the Nuclear Master Schedule. It shows the original schedule and progress to date in summary form for each project. Also, Exhibit II is a more detailed schedule of Project V.7, Develop Nuclear

! Production Division Training for INPO Accreditation.

The remain.4.ng sections of this report describe progress of each project, work completed, and problems encountered.

Proiect Completions l During the quarter, the following two projects were completed:

i Project II.1, Establish Maintenance Planning Group - D. Miller

• Project IV.6, Review and Revise Exclusion List and Related Procedures - T. Prenger l

l

._ .. . . . . . . . . . - . - . . . . . . . . - ~ . . . . . . - . . , . n. . - . . - - - \

.-,----.,-c- . - . - - . ~ - - - - , - - . - - . - - - - - - - - .

.-----.r ~---*--------~-----..----r- - - - - - - - * . --.v- =r-~ v *=---" "

- ~ - ~~~-

z: -

~~ --

, Proiset Chengne and Additiono ' ,

Thefollowingchangesand/oradditionsts'thePEPhavebeenmade:

• Project IV.4, Review Essential Rkoulatory Documents, is being restructured to break the remaining work into more manageable pieces. Part 2, Define Additional Ongoing Obligations, is being split into two parts. The revised Part 2, Review Past Active Commitments for Passive Commitments, is scheduled for a July 10 completion. It will ,research references from historical active commitments made to the NRC and verify that passive commitments are included in the current catalog of i passive commitments. Part 3, Review 10CFR and FSAR for '

Passive Commitments is expected to begin in June, 1986. It .

will research 10CFR and the FSV FSAR for additional  !

obligations. The end result of this project will be a complete Passive Commitment Catalog.

• Project V.4, Improve Quality Assurance Division Training, has been restructured. Part 2, Implementation is being split into two parts. The revised Part 2, Implement Primary Courses includes those courses scheduled for development in 1986. l Part 3, Implement Secondary Courses, are those courses scheduled for 1987. Part 3, Implement Remaining Courses, includes the courses that do not have scheduled completions.

l This restructuring also represents further slippage in the schedule of this project.

i

• Project V.6, Improve Licensing and Fuels Division Training, has also been restructured. Part 2, Implementation, is be'ing broken into three parts. The division elected to evaluate the work of several contractors bidding on training development before awarding contracts for the remaining courses. The restructuring reflects this approach. The revised Part 2, Implement Initial Four Courses, is scheduled for a September

'- 30, 1986 completion. Part 3 Implement Remaining Courses, is scheduled for year end. part 4, Develop NLF Training Procedures, is an increase in' project scope.

Project V.10, Investigate Training Simulator, is new. We have work in progress to demonstrate our ability to simulate Helium

! Circulator and Auxilaries for one loop of a Fort St. Vrain specific control room simulator. Due to the importance of this work, the project is being monitored as a part of the PEP. We should have an Action Plan presentation to Management l within three months. .

l Project VII, Total Responsibility Management has been renamed.

i l

4 I

4 l

.. , . . .. .-..v .. -- -- -----

n .

l

i 8

3 i

5 8

• e T

PueLIC StaVICE C0eIPAlff 0F CORARADO HUCLEAR MASTER SCNEDULE 1

Suseinar SCmEDoLE a&R CnAnT 4 1 i EXNIBIT I PART Ss Performance Enhancement Program AS OFs March 31, 1996 i

[r PROJECT TINETABLE SCNEDULED 1986 3ggy I , PRO- 80U8 8

JBCT REF. DESCRIPTIOIf RESPOtfSISLE START COcePLETE J F j M A N J J A S 04 01 02 03

.i7

! I. OaGnatIRATIOes&L COceCEAIIS

I.1 E.2 Formalise Action Plan, Beer- D. Picard Complete

• ganisation and Performance Rnhancement Program j

I.2 A.1 Document Chartere, seiselone and Finaction Statemente

, Part 1, Develop Charters D. Picard Complete

, Port 2 Update Procedures D. Picard Complete I.3 A.9 Document Policy on Comment- N. Eachary Complete

'j cation and Staff Neetinge I.4 E.1 Evalmete Staffing levels L. Brey Part 1, Evaluate and Approve Complete Staffing

-t Part 2, mira New Personnel 8say 1 Apr 38(R) FFFFFFFFEREsESSE i

4 I.s 3.6 Complete temoloar Production J. Gatus Complete 13 organisational changes

1. J '

I.6 E.3 Evaluate Engineering and Warenbourg Complete E.4 Licensing and Fuele at

, Fort St. Train q, I.7 Complete organisation D. modgers

) . Doolston Gride

! Part 1 - Implement Corporate Complete j Grid

Part 2 - Develop and Implement Nold FFFFFFFFREEE i ;

1 stoclear Deciolon Gelde I.8 Evaluate Staff Setention D. Bodgere Complete

}*

1 4 . II. DIASTER PLABIIBIteG AIID SCIIEDULIIIG E. .

] II.1 A.2 Betablish Neclear Master D. Picard Complete i

I

. Planning and Scheduling Function .;

e 1

,t *

'j I .

. I!

a l

PUBLIC StaVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 4

UUCLEAR NASTER SCNEDULE

• SUINtARY SCHEDULE BAR CMART EXNIBIT I

, PART 5: Performance Enhancement Program -

AS OF March 31, 1906 PROJECT TIMETABLE SCNEDULED 1906

PRD- NUS 1937 JpCT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J F A M N J J A S 04 01 OI 03 7

II.2 A.4 Develop Annual and Imag- C. Fuller

, mange Schedules

]

Part 1, Initial Schedule Complete Part 2, complete Schedule Dependent-II.3 OXX(EST)XXX0 l II.3 A.2 Implement Planning and Sche-

• dell Methode & Procedures i* Part , Initial Definition D. Picard Complete i Part 2, NED Implementation R. Crean Aug 5 Aug 15(al FFFFFFFFFFFF EXXXEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 1

Part 3, NLF Implementation R. Nuoted Complete FF

', Part 4, 04 Implementation Part 5, NPD Implementation N.

D.

Ferrie Miller Complate Aug 5 Apr 30(R)

FFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFFFEXXX e

III. ESTASLISE PRETBIrFIVE MAINFBIIAIBCE

'}~ PLAmusuG AND m.- w TUG

!I i*

III.1 a.2 Establish Maintenance D. Miller Complete FFFFFFFF

} Planning Group 1

III.2 S.3 Define Maintenance Planning D. Miller and Scheduling Function j Part 1, Initial Definition Complete a

4 Part 2, Implementation Jul 15 Jun 2Sim) FFFFFFFFFFFFREEEEEEEEEE i' . =

j~ III.3 B.4 Develop Preventive Mainte- F. Isowachek nonce Engineering Program l Part 1 Initial perinition Complete i

I Part 2, Pee Development, Aug 5 Apr 15(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFBE Baleting Critical Signifi-

) oant Componente

} Part 3, PH Development, Jan 2 Dec 31 FFFIXXXXXXX3 KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ' '

meaninder of Critical -

Significant Componente Part 4, poet Maintenance Complete Testing Procedure l

l i

A l

I'

1!

• 4

-t . -

j I

s 1

' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF C01ARADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCNEDULE SUMetARY SCHEDULE RAR CNART

• EXNIRIT I PART Ds Performance Enhancement Program  ?

AS OFs March 31, 1986 t

PROJECT TIMETABLE SCREDULED 1986 PRO- IsUS 1987 JECT REF. DESCRIPTION REsposeSIBLE START COMPLETE J F A M M J J A S 04 01 02 g3 III.4 Evaluate Davie-Resee Event D. Rodgere Part 1 - Initial Review Complete Part 2 - Detail Evaluation Rold XXXXXXXXXXXX IV. UPGRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AMD

- ~ .

t IV.1 R.1 Review and Revloe Design J. Reesy Apr 1 Apr 30(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFBERE A.S Change Modification Process IV.2 C.1 Implement NRC Commitment D. Goes Complete Ii Control Progras.

IV.3 C.2 Document Procedures for D. Goes Complete Regulatory correspondence

! Deview IV.4 C.3 Deview Essential Regulatory J. Williams Documente Part 1, Review Essential cumplete FFFFFFFFFFFF Regulatory Documente Part 2, Review Past Active Feb 1 Jul le FFFFFFFF EXXXXXXXXXXXXX Commitas.ste for Pamelve commitmente Part 3, Review 10CFR & Jun 1 (To be est.)

j , FSAR for Paeoive Com- XXXXX(EST) XXXXXXXXXX0 1 mitments IV.S A.6 Review and Revloe Nuclear Production Procedures il Part 1, Initial Definition C. Fuller Complete i

Part 2, Nuclear Production C. Fuller Jul 1 Apr 30(R) FFFFFFFFFFEEBEEE ii Procedures Development fart 3, Review and Revloe C. Fuller Aug 2 amargency Procedures Mar 31 87(R)FFFFFFFFXXXXKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

. IV.6 Review and Revloe Bacluelon T. Pronger Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF List and Deleted Procedures i

i

I l

ja '

9 PUSLIC SERVIC* COMPANY OF COEARADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCNEDULE

SUMMARY

SCNEDULE RAR CRART a

' EXNIBIT I PART Rs Performance Enhancement Program # i 2

AS Ore March 31, 1906 i PROJSCT TIMBTASLE PR.- N.S k ED.L. i,0. i,01 JACT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J F M A M J J A S 04 Q1 02 03

~~ ~~-~~

r IV.7 Revloe Technical Specifi-catione i'

Part 1, Develop and Submit J. Gram 11mg Apr 1 Aug 15(R) FFFFXXXXXXXM(YXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX for NBC Approval

). Part 2, Implement and

• C. Fuller Aug 16 (R) Next Train at Plant Refueling X (EST) XXX0 IV.0 Revices and Revloe Nuclear M. Deuss 1} Engineering Diviolon Procedures

Part 1, Revise Procedures May 1 Jul 31(R) i* FFFFFFFFFFFFPFFFREEEEEEEEEEE

^!

IV.9 Revieta and Revise Level I Plant Procedures (P & G)

Part 1, Revise 'P' Procedure C. Fuller Sep 3 Jul 31 .

Part 2, Revise 'G' Procedure F. Novechek Sep 3 FFFFFFFFFFFFEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Jul 31 FFFFFFFFFFFF EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IV.10 Revient an'd Revise Level I M. Ferris Sep 3 Sep 30(R) 04 Procedures (0) FFFFFFFFFFFFEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXBEEEEEEE V. IMPhovE ==w====T AND mucLEAR Drvrsrou =-_ --TRArwrus V.1 A.3 Conduct Management Skille M. McNulty Upgrade Part 1, Initial Definition Complete Part 2, Implementation of. Complete Core Coursee .

5 v.2 A.10 Review Membership in L. Brey Complete

• Industry Organisatione V.3 R.7 Enhance 10CFRSS.S. Training Part 1, Conduct Training J. Johne Complete

~ Part 2, Update Text Data D. Goes Apr 1 Dec 1 3ase FFFFFFFFFFFFKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX l Part 3, Train NED Personnel J. Johne Complete F Y.4 D.1 Improve Quality Assurance M. Ferrie

. D.2 Diviolon Training i D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete

'4 Part 2, Implement Primary Jun 3 Dec 06 FFFFFFFFFFEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Courses Part 3, Implement Secondary Jan 07 Dec 07 j1 Coursee XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX0 Part 4, Implement Remaining To be Established Courses Jk i

l

I . -

1 i

i i

PUBLIC SERVICE COIIPANT OF COLORADO

.; NUCLEAR MASTER SCNEDULE SUDOIARY SCNEDULE SAR CNART .

< ~

EXNIBIT I i

PART Se Performance Enhancement Program  ? AS OFs March 31, 1906 PROJSCT TIMETABLE 1

SCNEDULED 1986 1987 PRO- NOS j JBCT REF. DESCRIPTICII RESPOIeSISLB START COBIPLETE J F M A N J J A 8 04 01 02 03 l -- , -----

7

'l V.S D.1 D.2 Improve IIuclear Engineering Diviolon Training M. Deum

]

D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete

' { Part 2 Complete Procedure Oct 14 Jun 38 FFFFFFFFFFFF EXXXXXXXXXXX

Imeson Plane 4 r Part 3, Job and Task Analysis IIov 4 Sep 30 FFFFFXXXXXXN EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX j Part 4, Implementation Oct 1 Oct 1980(Est) XXXXXXIESTlXXXXXX4

! V.6 D.1 Improve Licensing and Fuela R. Noeted

, D.2 Division Training j D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete

' - Part 2, Implement Initial Sep 2 Sep 39 FFFFFFFFFFFF KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Four Courses i

Part 3, Implement Semain- May 1 Dec 31(R) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ing Courses

Part 4, Develop NLF Mar 3 Jun 39 XXX3 EXXXXXXXXXXX Training Procedures V.7 D.1 Develop Nuclear Production T. Boret D2 Diviolon Training for INFO D.3 I

Accreditation '

D.4 Part 1, Operator Accredita- Complete FFFF

!, tion Training j

Part 2, IIon-Operator Accre. Jul 1 Deo 31 FFFFFFFFFFFF EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ditation Training V.8 p.5 Consolidate Site Training T. soret complete V.9 D.6 Retrain Licensed Personnel T. Boret Part 1, Training Program Complete Development Part 2, Conduct Training Oct 1(R) Sep 30 FFFFFFFFFFFF PFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3

l V.10 Design and Implement S. Willford To be Established i Training Simulator

., VI. PLAlf? COIIDOCT OF OPERATICIIS

VI.1 A.0 Forma 11oe Plant Tour Proce- C. Fuller Complete

} deres and Reporting j 3 VI.2 Revloe Conduct of Operations C. Fuller Complete j VI.3 Document Supervisor C. Fuller Complete

! Responelbilities Jk 1 .

1; 1

1

s 1

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COIARADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCNEDULE

SUMMARY

SCNEDULE BAR CMART

• EXNIBIT I PART Ba Performance Enhancement Program AS OFs March 31, 1986 e

PROJ8CT TIMETABLE

-l SCEEDULED 1986 1987 i PRO- NUS

'i JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J F M A M J J A S 04 02 Q1 Q3 l --  ; p -----

1

! VI.4 Implement Plant Signage C. Fuller Feb 3 Jul 31 FFFFFFFF (XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Program VI.S complete Facilities F. Movechek Complete Planning stedy ,

I VI.6 Improve Parte Management J. Reesy l System j Part 1, Initial Asseeement Apr 1 Apr 15 (R) FFFFFFFFEREE EE Part 2, Implementation Apr 15(RIDet. la X(EST)XXS Part 1 VI.7 Establish Component Shelf-Life Program

• Part 1, Complete Aging M. Miehoff Complete FFFF ,

Study Part 2, Install e- , - nt J. Reesy Feb 3(p) May 31(R) FFFFXXX3 EEEEEEEE Shelf-Life Program ,

I:

I VII. TOFAL RESPONSIBILITY MANAGEMENT '

VII.1 Problem Identiftoation, T. Milley i

Ownership and Action i Planning Pert I, Identiflostion Complete FFFF

.j i' of Probleme I'* Part 2, Define Action Feb 15 Apr 15(R) FFFFX3 tX Itema Part 3, Develop Action Apr 15 May 31(3) XXXXXX Plane 4

'l l

EINIBIT II

, Publio Service Company of Colorado *

' Performance Enhancement Progran -

! Project v.7 - Develop Nuclear Production Diviolon Training i

,for INPO Accreditation Forcent Complete Schedule Project Timetable Anlye Desgn Devel Eval Start submit comp 1 1985 - 1986 Proj Description Sum Phase Phase Phase Phase SER SER(*) (6) M/J J/A S/O N/D J/F M/A M/J J/A S/O N/D i Part 1 Operator Accreditation q ----

1. Non Licensed Reactor Operator 100 100 100 100 80 100 Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

• g 2 Licensed Beactor Operator 100 100 100 100 80 100 Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF a 3 3 Senior Beactor Operator s ISO 100 ISO 100 80 100 Complete Shift Sepervisor FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

• 4 .

Part 2 Won-operator Accreditation 4 Chemistry Technician 59 100 8 25 80 70 1/05 9/86 12/06 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

5. Blootrical asaintenance Personnel 22 60 le 15 88 70 1/05 8

9/06 12/06 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• g i 6 seechanical staintenance Personnel 61 99 15 26 80 70 1/95 '

9/06 12/84 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFIFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• 0

7. Technical Advisore 25 50 15 30 80 70 12/04 l 9/86 12/06 arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrraFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• g

8. Instrument Technician 70 95 38 38 80 70 3/05 9/06 12/06 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFI XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• f f 9 Radiological Protection Tech. 62 100 7 33 80 70 6/85 y -

9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFfFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX lr 10. Technical Staff & Managers 42 67 7 25 80 70 6/85 9/86 12/06 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0

l * . e

, A

!i (1)not Ilotes Schedule le for eutuaitting the Self Evaluation Report (SER) to IMPO and implementing the training programe at PSC

j -

for achieving INFO Board Accreditation.

?;

I a

i

= -

PROJECT I - ORGANIZATIONAL CONCERNS PROJECT I.1 - FORMALIZE ACTION PLAN, REORGANIZATION AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM - Doug Picard - Complete PROJECT I.2 -

DOCUMENT CHARTERS, MISSION AND FUNCTION STATEMENTS - '

Doug Picard - Complete PROJECT I.3 - DOCUMENT POLICY ON COMMUNICATIONS'AND STAFF MEETINGS -

Mike Zachary - Complete PROJECT I.4 - EVALUATE STAFFING LEVELS - Larry Brey f

Part 1 - Evaluate and Approve Staffing - Complete Part 2 - Hire New Personnel

1. The status of the new positions is as follows:

a. 5 of 5 filled in QA.

b. 43 of 46 filled in NPD.

c. 5 of 9 filled in NLF.

d. 16 of 17 filled in NED, 18th requisition was cancelled.

e. 1 of 1 filled in Administration.

'f . 70 of 78 filled in total or 90 percent.

2. The actual number of people hired for the PEP has not changed but these counts show an adjustment due to a reporting error.

3. Overall, there are approximately 24 positions open. Eight of

. these are from the original seventy-eight approved in this project.

PROJECT I.5 -

COMPLETE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES -

Jack Gahm - Complete PROJECT I.6 -

EVALUATE ENGINEERING AND LICENSING AND FUELS AT FORT

, ST. VRAIN - Don Warembourg - Complete PROJECT I.7 - COMPLETE ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION GRIDS - Duane Rodgers Part 1 - Implement Corporate Grid - Complete 4

Part 2 - Develop and Implement Nuclear Decision Grids - Hold

1. Only limited progress during the quarter. l

2. Project has been placed on hold until after EQ.

1 PROJECT I.8 - EVALUATE STAFF RETENTION - Duane Rodgers - Complete l l

1

'I

_;7- ~ -: -___ 22 . 2- . - - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - = T' .W - -- - - = - -

PROJECT II - MASTER PLANNING _AND SCHEDULING l PROJECT II.1 - ESTABLISH NUCLEAR MAST P.ANNING AND SCHEDULING -

l , Doug Picard - Complete i

PROJECT II.2 - DEVELOP ANNUAL AND LONG-RANGE SCHEDULES - Chuck Fuller l

Part 1 - Initial Schedule - Complete PROJECT II.3 -

IMPLEMENT PLANNING AND' SCHEDULING METHODS AND  !

PROCEDURES - Doug dicard Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete '

Part 2 - NED Implementation - R. Craun

1. Superproject has been selected as the PC-based scheduling system (PREMIS is the mainframe system). The PC software is being acquired.

2. The manhour collection system has been implemented for NED- I Site. This system, although being used by NED-Site, is still being debugged. The completion of output reports by systems personnel is being delayed Jar other higher priority work.

3. A procedure to process and estimate AR's, CN's, TCR's has been prepared with the exception of the areas dealing with a new priority system. i Part 3 - NLF Implementation - R. Husted - Complete -

1. In January, the divisional procedure for planning and scheduling was issued and training conducted. This project part is now complete.

Part 4 - QA Implementation - M. Ferris - Complete

1. 'The first QA schedule was issued in January.

2. Training in the planning and scheduling procedures was conducted in February. This project part is now complete.

Part 5 - NPD Implementation - D. Miller

1. Progress is accelerating now that the staff organization is in place and initial training has been accomplished.

2. We are using long-range planning techniques for the upcoming EQ outage. The procedures should be well defined and tested for the next refueling outage.

._ . . . . . .-. -- -... -,.- --- ,--- - +.-a - * - * - *

• 7

PROJECT ~II 1 - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING PROJECT III.1 - ESTABLISH MAINTENANCE PLANNING GROUP - Dave Miller -

Complete

1. Hiring and initial staff training are complete. This project is now complete.

PROJECT III.2 - DEFINE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING FUNCTION -

Dave Miller Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implementation

1. Pr' ogress is accelerating now that the staff organization is in place and initial training has been accomplished.

4 PROJECT III.3 - DEVELOP PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING PROGRAM -

Frank Novachek .

Part 1 - Initial Definition - Co?.plete Part 2 - PM Development, Existing Critical Significant Components

1. Additional support has been obtained to prevent slippage as a result of EQ activities.

2. This project part now includes only 191 procedures - reduced

. from 351. Sixty-nine procedures are transferred to Part 3, PM  !

Development - Remainder of Critical Significant Components, and 91 have been cancelled due to duplication and redundancy.

3. Of the 191 procedures, 86 have been issued and 105 are in the review and approval cycle.

'4. The 69 procedures transferred to Part 3, PM Development Remainder of Critical Significant Components was .because insufficient supporting information (controlled or non-controlled) was available to justify their use as originally written.

l

5. Completion of this part has been extended to April 15.

Part 3 - PM Development, Remainder of Critical Significant Components

1. There are now over #0( procedures being addressed in this l project part, includinP th- procedures that .were transferre.d  !

from Part 2, PM Jo931oga ant - Existing Critical Significant '

Components. To-da:q. 15 p:ocedures have been issued and 15 more are in development.

Part 4 - Post Maintenance Testing Procedure - Complete Project III.4 - Evaluate Davis-Besse Event - D. Rodgers I

. . . . . . . . . -. . ....-... . , ,- ..-~ -.., .- .

'_ ~. Part 1 - Initiel R~.vicw - Comploto Part 2 - Detail Evaluation - Hold

1. EQ has had a negative impact on progress. Action Plans are being developed. A completion date for the project cannot, be established until the Action Plans are compiled.

2. Project has been placed in hold status until after EQ.

4 I

e 6

. . i

.. PROJECT IV - UPGRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PROJECT IV.1 - REVIEW AND REVISE DESIGN CHANGE MODIFICATION PROCESS -

. Jack Reesy

1. Final comments have been received on the new ED-100, CN 1 Preparation and Document Control and ENG-1, Control of Modifications and Documentation Changes. These are now being i routed for final approval and issue. i

2. Licensing has determined that the FSAR must be revised and written approval received from the NRC before the DCN

.(Document Change Notice) process can be implemented for i safety-related design documents.  ;

3. The tasks remaining in this project need to be identified.

Two known tasks remaining are training and approval of the FSAR change referenced above.

PROJECT IV.2 -

IMPLEMENT COMMITMENT CONTROL PROGRAM - Dave Goss -

Complete PROJECT IV.3 -

DOCUMENT PROCEDURES FOR REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE REVIEW - Dave Goss - Complete PROJECT IV.4 - REVIEW ESSENTIAL REGULATORY DOCUMENTS - Jack Williams Part 1 - Review Essential Regulatory Documents - Complete

1. The final eight passive commitments needing sign-off by the i responsible department is now complete.

2. The QA Section of the Passive Commitment Catalog was completed in February.

'3. This project part is now complete.

Part 2 - Review Past Active Commitments for Passive Commitments

1. Some difficulty was encountered in the assembly of past correspondence from the STAIRS correspondence database. This has been resolved by using ATMS (word processing) files instead of STAIRS. Schedule impact is not expected.

2. The correspondence relating to past commitments is being assembled. The correspondence is being reviewed and passive commitments documented.

3. A tape from Louisiana Power and Light has been received. It contains light water reactor 10CFR passive commitments. We are evaluating this information for use in Part 3, Review FSAR 1 and 10CFR for Passive Commitments. We hope to use the light l water commitments as a basis for defining HTGR passive commitments.

l 1

-3 1

l l

. _ . _ a 3.__

..: ~~

~ ~ ~~^ ~-- -

-- .- . . . . . .- -.: ~ ..

PROJECT IV.5 - REVIEW AND REVISE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION PROCEDURES -

Chuck Fullar

, Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Nuclear Production Procedures Development .

1. All 58 System Operating Procedures (SOP's) are in the revision process - 51 are being walked-down by Operations and the i remainder in various stages of revision. Operators have had to make extensive revisions to the initial drafts. To date, no procedures have been issued for this rewrite effort.

2. All 464 results procedures have been rewritten. Approximately 68% have been issued.

1 Part 3 - Review and Revise Emergency Procedures

1. This project is being bid. All bids have been received and final selection is waiting management approval.

i PROJECT IV.6 -

REVIEW AND REVISE EXCLUSION LIST AND RELATED ,

PROCEDURES - Tim Prenger - Complete I

1. The new procedure Q-4, Procurement System, has been issued and l j the exclusion list has been eliminated. This project is now l complete.

l PROJECT IV.7 - REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - Jim Gramling

. Part 1 - Develop and Submit for NRC Approval I

1. Technical Specifications for helium circulators,. steam generators, and PCRV liner cooling system were revised and submitted to the NRC. This submittal addresses concepts that

. affect the entire upgrade program.

2. The Significant Hazards Analysis is still in process.

3. Justification for the criteria for redundancy in safe shutdown cooling systems was submitted to NRC.

4. New specifications for station batteries need to be developed based upon NRC questions.

5. Responses to NRC reviewer questions regarding diesel generator surveillance practices and spent fuel storage facility ventilation were prepared.

6. NRC comments on November 30 Final Draft have not been received as expected by January 31.

PROJECT IV.8 - REVIEW AND REVISE ENGINEERING PROCEDURES - Mike Daum 4 i

l l

_9_

l l

\

I l_

~- --

L x _ . . :2:=r::_- - . - - - . -

c

~ ~

_..u. . ._. . . . . . . . . .. . . _ . . _ . . .

Part 1 - Ravinn Procedurno ,

1. All ENG and STD procedures have been revised. The CWP Manual

., is the remaining procedure requiring revision.

2. The CWP Manual will be replaced with two Site Engineering

, Manager Administrative Procedures (SEMAP's). Issuing these procedures is contingent on revisions to Level I procedure G-9, Controlled Work Procedures.

PROJECT IV.9 - REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I PLANT PROCEDURES (P & G) -

Jack Gahm Part 1 - Revise 'P' Procedures - Chuck Fuller

1. Four of nine P procedures are complete. All others are on schedule.

2. A concern was expressed that other concurrent efforts to revise procedures are not well coordinated with this project.

For example, some of these procedures must be revised for EQ.

Part 2 - Revise 'G' Procedures - Frank Novachek

1. All 14 are in the revision process. One is complete and ready for review, approval, and reissue.

PROJECT IV.10 -

REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES - Mike Ferris

1. Four of nineteen procedures are complete and have been issued.

Five other procedures are in various stages of development.

2. The completion date has been extended to September 30, 1986 from July 31, 1986.

t l

l

3- ,

, PROJECT V - IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NUCLEAR DIVISION TRAINING PROJECT V.1 -

CONDUCT MANAGEMENT SKILLS UPGRADE - Martin McNulty -

Complete PROJECT V.2 -

REVIEW MEMBERSHIP IN INDUSTRY ORGANIZATIONS - Larry Brey - Complete PROJECT V.3 - ENHANCE 10CFR50.59 TRAINING - Mike Holmes Part 1 - Conduct Training - Jeff Johr',- Complete Part 2 - Update Text Data Base - Dave Goss

1. The additional 'G' letters (104 that were never received by PSC) have now been input.

2. The scope of this project has been expanded to include correspondence from 1968-1980 such as NRC correspondence not sent to PSC, documents received from NRC but not input, and

'P' letters not input. Older correspondence will also be numbered with the P and G system now in place. Project duration is not expected to change as a result of this additional work.

Part 3 - Train NED Personnel - Jeff Johns - Complete

1. This project part was completed in January. Training was given to the Electrical section of NED Nuclear Design, and Special Projects and Nuclear Site Engineering departments.

PROJECT V.4 -

IMPROVE QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION TRAINING - Mike Ferris

, Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implementation

1. This project part is being split into three parts. One part I will be courses scheduled for completion in 1986, a second part is those scheduled for 1987 and a third part is for those courses not yet scheduled. This represents further slippage of this schedule.

2. Progress has been limited due to QA training personnel's involvement in EQ and other activities.

PROJECT V.5 -

IMPROVE NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAINING - Mike Daum Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Complete Procedure Training Lesson Plans

1. Six of seventeen procedure training lesson plans are complete.

All others are in process.

i

.y.--. ..;_.___ ...-;__._, ,

. r . r. , .,. m - y. : . - _ -- - -. .- . _. - - - - - . -.-.,:--.

. .. . . ..c.... - -

.; _ , n ._

. 4

,' J. 2. Savoral ruch lescon planc that aro rsquircd for EQ hava reducsd attsntien to plannsd activition.

3 l

i

,, Part 3 - Job and Task Analysis

1. This project was showing good progress through January. Since l then, progress has been hindered by rush lesson plans and related training required for EQ. Emphasis has been placed on procedural training rather than technical training in the last few months.

) PROJECT V.6 - IMPROVE LICENSING AND FUELS TRAINING - Bob Husted Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete The approach to this project has been revised. In the bid evaluation and selection process, PSC elected to evaluate the performance of ,

several c.a. tractors and complete the first four courses before proceeding to the remaining courses. Part 2, Implement Initial Four Courses is scheduled for completion September 30, 1986 and Part 3, Implement Remaining courses is now scheduled for a year-end completion. Additionally, Part 4, Develop NLF Training Procedures, is an expansion of project scope to address divisional training procedures.

Part 2 - Implement Initial Four Courses

1. A new training engineer has been hired in the division.

i

2. Contracts have been awarded for the initial four courses.

. Part 4 - Develop NLF Training Procedures

1. Progress is limited since project has just begun.

PROJECT V.7 - DEVELOP NUCLEAR PRODUCTION DIVISION TRAINING FOR INPO ACCREDITATION - Ted Borst Part 1 - Operator Accreditation Training - Complete

1. Two more operator positions were completed in January. The project part is now complete.

2. INPO visited Fort St. Vrain in mid-March to review the three I

! positions for accreditation. We are waiting the results of l this visit. l 1

Part 2 - Non Operator Accreditation j

l. Work has continued on most of the seven positions with the l l exception of Electrical Maintenance. EQ has impacted progress

( on the Electrical Maintenance position.

2. The development of these courses is on schedule although in l previous reporting periods the project was ahead of schedule.

PROJECT V.8 - CONSOLIDATE SITE TRAINING - Ted Borst - Complete l

l l

wh  %

% .a se . esi ea w

. . s e -

PROJECT V.9 - RETRAIN LICENSED PERSONNEL - T3d Bernt Part 1 - Training Program Development - Complete Part 2 - Conduct Training

1. The sixth rotation is nearly complete. Overall,' the retraining is 71% complete, j PROJECT V.10 - INVESTIGATE TRAINING SIMULATOR - S. Wilford

1. This is a new project that will address the development of a i

plant-specific control room simulator for Fort St. Vrain. A prototype of System 21 (Helium Circulators) has been developed and has been very effectively utilized in operator training.

i An Action Plan and schedule is being prepared.

j 1

_ _ _ _ , _ ~ **" '* r5 ? ** P,* ?!_

, lL~',C _

• _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __._,.___._..,__,,,-_,.____,,_.,J,.Jr_,_,_,. __

. s

's PROJECT VI - PLANT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS e.. ~ q~ ,

PROJECT VI.1 - FORMALIZE PLANT TOUR PROCEDUR.: '~AilD REPORTING - Chuck Fuller - Complete , ,'

~

PROJECT VI.2 -

REVISE CONDUCT OF PLANT OPERATIONS - Chuck Fuller -

Complete .-

PROJECT VI.3 - DOCUMENT SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES - Chuck Fuller -

, Complete

! PROJECT VI.4 - IMPLEMENT PLANT SIGNAGE PROGRAM - Chuck Fuller

1. This project has been taken out of " hold" status and has been restarted. There are approximately 6,000 signs included in the scope of the project.

2. Proto-Power Management has been selected for the work.

Contractor personnel began in February. Expected Completion

is July 31, 1986.

PROJECT VI.5 - COMPLETE FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY - Frank Novachek -

{ Complete 1

PROJECT VI.6 - IMPROVE PARTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - Jack Reesy 1

Part 1 ' Initial Assessment L 1. New procedures are being issued that when issued, should J

! complete this project. -

PROJECT VI.7 - ESTABLISH COMPONENT SHELF-LIFE PROGRAM - Jack Reesy/ Mike Niehoff Part 1 - Complete Aging Study - Mike Niehoff - Complete

1. The ,Sargent & Lundy aging study is complete.

4 Part 2 - Install Component Shelf-Life Program - Jack Reesy

1. The aging results are being reviewed to determine life information. This information will be analyzed to establish shelf-life in a mild environment.

! l l

l i

i l

. . . . . - ...,..,y 7, . . . - . . . .. . . . - -. - . . -

J

PROJECT VII - TOTAL RESPONSICILITY MANAGEMENT 4.

PROJECT VII.1 - PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION, OWNERSHIP AND ACTION PLANNING

. - T. Willey Development of this new project has been our major emphasis during the last month of the quarter. This project is divided into five phases or parts:

Part 1 - Problem Identification and Ownership (Identify Problems / Issues, Consolidate into Workable Areas)

Part 2 - Action Planning (Problem Resolutions and Formulation of Proposed Actions that Should be Considered)

Part 3 - Action Plan Development / Implementation (Review All Proposed Action Plans from Part 2, Select Appropriate Plans, Develop Overall Implementation Program)

Part 4 - Systems Assessment (Develop and Implement Methods to Assess Effectiveness of Implemented Action Plans)

I Part 5 - Final Report (To Include Recommendations for Continuing Activities) j Part 1 - Problem Identification - Complete Eighteen meetings were held with groups of employees. These groups were made up of a cross section of employees from Division

. Managers to Union employees. The purpose of the meetings was to identify problem areas for further investigation. A total of 11 Areas of Concern were identified for further action. Part 1 of Project VII, Total Responsibility Management, is now complete.

Part 2 - Action Planning Seperate Task Groups of seven to fourteen were appointed to study each of the 11 Areas of Concern. A total of 39 group meetings were held to further define each problem area and to propose solutions to these problems for action by PSC management under Part 3 of the project. Part 2 is approximately 75% complete.

..y .. _ -. .-

.- . . .y - _ _-- ___