ML20206F133
| ML20206F133 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Mcguire, Catawba, Sequoyah, Cook, McGuire, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 04/01/1987 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8704140143 | |
| Download: ML20206F133 (88) | |
Text
i DUKE POWER GOMPANY P.O. Box 33180 CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28242 HAL B. TUCKER Tetzenown vws emmesomwr (704) 373-4531 puotsaa emancernow April 1, 1987 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Doctament Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555
Subject:
Catawba Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370
Dear Sir:
In order to expedite resolution of issues concerning control of combustible gases in containment, Duke Power Company (Duke) has prepared a comparison of the results of analyses performed on ice condenser containments. The analyses results were obtained from publicly available data as follows:
Catawba MAAP runs performed by Duke Power Company. Reference April 25, 1986 letter from Hal B. Tucker to Harold R. Denton.
[
D. C. Cook MARCH runs performed by Battelle for Indiana and Michigan Electric Company. Reference April 23, 1986 letter from M. P. Alexich to Harold R. Denton.
McGuire MARCH runs performed for "An Analysis of Hydrogen Control Measures at McGuire Nuclear Station".
Sequoyah MARCH analyses presented in NUREG/CR-3912, SAND 83-0501, R2, December, 1984, " MARCH-HECTOR Analysis of Selected Accidents in an Ice-Condenser Containment". provides a summary of important parameters and timing; Enclosure 2 provides a list of data tabulations that were used in the comparisons; and provides a list of the comparison figures that follow.
Since the attached comparisons were made to assist the NRC Staff, no attempt has been made to draw any conclusions from the comparisons.
If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please advise.
Very truly yours, M k. '
/
Hal B. Tucker I\\
ROS/11/sbn 8704140143 870401 PDR ADOCK 05000315 I
\\\\
Enclosures P
U. S. Nuclect Regulatcry Cosmiccicn April 1,1987 Page Two xc:
Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administration U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. P. K. Van Doorn NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station Mr. W. T. Orders NRC Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear Station 4
ENCLOSURE 1 SUtetARY TABLE FOR COMPARISON OF IMPORTANT PARAMFTERS AND TIMING Sequence Timing (HR)
Recovered RCS MAX Break ECCS Press H Release Total 2
Computer Size Core Core ECCS Flowrate At CM Rate Frac Of Sequence Plant Code (in. dia)
Uncovered Melted Recovered (gpm)
(PSIA)
(1ba/ min)
Clad React SD Catawba MAAP2 2
0.75 1.2 1.25 700 600 217 0.81 2
0.54 0.89 1.0 550 629 172 0.78 2
70 0.75 SD McGuire MARCH 2
2 SD Sequoyah MARCH 2
0.59 1.1 0.7 40 0.75 2
SD Catawba W2 6
1.1 1.6 1.8 700 22 703 0.79 g
0.07 0.31 0.83 495 24 375 0.78 g
325 0.75 SD Sequoyah MARCH 6
0.68 1.0 1.0 1
i TMLU Catawba MAAP2 NA 1.85 2.4 2.25 200 2483 167 0.71 TMLU DC Cook MARCH NA 1.63 2.1 2.5 1100 2386 228 0.76 TMLU Sequoyah MARCH NA 2.3 2.6 2.36 70 0.75 l
SH Catawba MAAP2 2
1.3 1.8 2.0 800 550 213 0.73 j
2 l
I
ENCLOSURE 2 LIST OF TABLES Table la, Ib, Ic, 1d Data used for comparison of S D Sequences for Catawba (MAAP) g and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Table 2a, 2b, 2c Data used for comparison of S D Sequences for Catawba (MAAP) 2 and McGuire (MARCH)
Table 3a, 3b Data used for comparison of S D Sequences for Catawba (MAAP) 2 and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Table 4a, 4b, 4c,4d Data used for comparison of S D Sequences for Catawba (MAAP) y and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Table Sa, 5b, Sc Data used for comparison of S D Sequences for Catawba (MAAP) g and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Table 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d Data used for comparison of TMLU Sequences for Catawba (MAAP and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Table 7a, 7b Data used for comparison of TMLU Sequences for Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH) 1 J
y-
,.,-,,%-.-.-m-
,~..-.4
ENCLOSURE 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Comparison of S D Sequence parameters for Catawba (MAAP) and 2
D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Figure 2.
Comparison of S D Sequence parameters for Catawba (MAAP) and 2
McGuire (MARCH)
Figure 3 Comparison of S D Sequence parameters for Catawba (MAAP) and 2
Sequoyah (MARCH)
Figure 4 Comparison of S D Sequence parameters for Catawba (MAAP) and g
D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Figure 5 Comparison of S D sese.ence parameters for Catawba (MAAP) and g
Sequoyah (MARCH)
Figure 6 Comparison of TMLU Seuqence parameters for Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Figure 7 Comparison of TMLU Sequence parameters for Catawba (MAAP) and
.Sequoyah (MARCH)
Sheet 1 ef 3_
TABLE la - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES FOR 2
CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time H Mass Flow (lb/ min)
H Temperature ( F)
S/W Mass Flow (1b/hr)
S/W Energy Flow (Btu /hr) 2 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 0.00 0
0 591 574.1 0
0 0
0 0.01 0
0 620 574.1 8.53E5 1.29E6 5.52E8 7.31E8 0.02 0
0 608 574.1 8.48E5 9.00E5 5.31E8 5.10E8 0.03 0
0 599 574.9 7.99E5 8.09E5 4.92E8 4.36E8 0.04 0
0 594 574.9 7.88E5 8.09E5 4.78E8 4.36E8 0.05 0
0 591 574.9 7.79E5 8.09E5 4.70E8 4.36E8 0.10 0
0 583 574.9 7.61E5 8.09ES 4.50E8 4.36E8 0.20 0
0 579 576.9 7.52E5 8.28E5 4.42E8 4.69E8 0.31 0
0 570 580.2 7.31E5 8.52E5 4.23E8 5.27E8 0.41 0
0 571 580.2 2.12E5 8.52E5 2.52E8 5.27E8 0.51 0
0.88 569 620.4 2.10E5 1.72E5 2.49E8 2.18E8 0.61 0
0.88 563 620.4 2.02E5 1.72E5 2.40E8 2.18E8 I
0.71 0
0.88 567 620.4 2.09E5 1.72E5 2.48E8 2.18E8 0.81 0
6.05 574 669.1 2.06E5 1.18E5 2.46E8 1.52E8 I
0.92 0
44.68 636 722.3 1.81E5 6.79E4 2.30E8 8.67E7 1
She2t 2 cf 3 TABLE la - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES FOR 2
CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time H Mass Flow (lb/ min)
H Temperature ( F)
S/W Mass Flow (Ib/hr)
S/W Energy Flow (Btu /hr)
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook f
1.02 1.07 67.01 619 785.5 1.41E5 3.72E4 1.80E8 5.50E7 1.12 59.67 79.16 592 921.6 8.21E4 1.37E4 1.05E8 2.15E7 1.16 60.33 168.78 593 1178.1 6.61E4 1.81E4 8.54E7 2.92E7 1.20 52.83 97.23 597 1641.3 5.32E4 5.87E4 6.93E7 9.48E7 1.23 106.50 62.81 879 1973.7 3.09E4 8.83E4 4.54E7 1.76E8 1.27 216.67 37.08 1151 2322.2 1.75E4 1.25E5 2.80E7 2.58E8 1.29 102.83 24.28 1121 2364.4 9.31E4 1.38E5 1.47E8 2.83E8 1.31 57.17 17.15 1097 2248.8 1.07ES 1.38E5 1.68E8 2.86E8 1.33 17.33 12.56 1434 2086.5 1.55E5 1.37E5 2.71E8 2.74E8 1.36 22.33 8.41 874 1875.1 1.68E5 1.39E5 2.39E8 2.60E8 1.39 22.33 8.41 823 1875.1 1.66E5 1.39E5 2.31E8 2.60E8 1.42 19.83 5.05 913 1632.4 1.52E5 1.43E5 2.22E8 2.47E8 l
1.45 14.33 5.05 742 1632.4 1.94E5 1.43E5 2.58E8 2.47E8 l
1.52 5.72 2.57 820 1377.1 1.84E5 1.48E5 2.55E8 2.37E8 1.62 1.68 0.75 732 1092.2 1.86E5 1.39E5 2.47E8 2.09E8 1.72 1.23 0.25 677 976.2 1.91ES 1.19E5 2.46E8 1.71E8 l
1 l
l
~~~~~~~
)kro 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 ho E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E
/C 4
6 6
6 6
6 0
0 0
0 u
4 6
6 6
6 6
5 5
5 5
tC BD 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
(
wo l
!j F
f y
c gr
!j ea nb 8
S 7
8 8
8 8
8 7
8 t
Ew E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E c
a 3
5 7
1 5
8 7
2 3
0 i
Wt 4
2 9
9 2
1 0
5 2
0 h
/a S
SC 2
1 9
1 2
2 2
1 5
2 RO F
S
)k E
ro 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 C
ho E
E F
E E
E E
E E
E N
/C 2
3 3
3 3
3 4
4 4
4 E
b 0
4 4
4 4
4 5
5 5
5 U
)
lC Q
H (D
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
E C
S R
w s
A o
D M
l 2
(
F S
K s
F O
sa O
O ab 5
4 4
5 5
5 5
5 4
5.
C Mw E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E N
a 5
5 0
3 9
8 6
2 2
9 Wt 9
6 6
6 6
7 0
4 O
1 1
S C
/ a I
SC 1
9 7
4 5
5 6
4 4
5 R
A D
PM D
)
O N
Fk C
A o
( o 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 R
)
C O
P e
0 1
1 1
1 1
8 8
8 8
F A
rC 1
2 2
2 2
2 4
4 4
4 A
uD 9
8 8
8 8
8 7
7 7
7 D
M t
E
(
a S
r U
A e
B pa A
W mb T
A ew A
T Ta D
A t
1 9
1 7
7 1
0 7
2 7
C k
3 1
2 8
7 8
9 7
0 6
HC 6
6 6
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 a
l E
)
L nk B
io A
mo T
/ C 9
b 0
lC (D
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
w o
lF sa sb aw 0
Ma 6
8 8
5 5
0 0
5 5
3 6
3 8
t 7
a HC 1
1 8
0 0
0 1
0 5
0 e) 2 2
3 3
3 3
4 4
4 4
mr 8
9 0
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 iH T(
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
]
]j.
l I
I!
l l
l
-Sh:2t 1, of 1, TABLE lb - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP)ANDD.C.COOKfMARCH)
Time H Mass Flow / Steam-Water Mass Flow Enthalpy of Steam Water (BTU /lbul 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 0.00 0
0 0
0 0.01 0
0 647.13 567-0.02 0
0 626.18 567 0.03 0
0 615.77 539 0.04 0
0 606.60 539 0.05 0
0 603.34 539 0.10 0
0 591.33 539 0.20' 0
0 587.77 566 0.31 0
0 578.66 619 0.41 0
0 1188.68 619 0.51 0
3.07E-4 1185.71 1267 0.61 0
3.07E-4 1188.12 1267 0.71-0 3.07E-4 1186.60 1267 0.81 0
3.0SE-3 1194.17 1288 0.92 0
3.952-2 1270.72 1290 1.02 4.55E-4 1.03E-1 1276.60 1478 p
1.12 4.36E-2 3.47E-1 1278.93 1569 i
1.16 5.48E-2 5.59E-1 1291.98 1613 1.20-5.96E-2 9.94E-2 1302.63 1615 1.23 2.07E-1 4.27E-2 1469.26 1993 1.27 7.43E-1 1.76E-2 1600.00 2064 1.29 6.63E-2 1.06E-2 1578.95 2051 1.31 3.21E-2 7.56E-3 1570.10 2072 1.33 6.71E-3 5.50E-3 1748.38 2000 1.36 7.98E-3 3.63E-3 1422.62 1871 1.39 8.07E-3 3.63E-3 1391.57 1871 1.42'
.7.83E-3 2.12E-3 1461 1727 1.45 4.43E-3 2.12E-3 1330 1727 1.52 1.86E-3 1.04 E-3 1386 1601 1.62 5.42E-4 3.24E-4 1328 1504 1.72 3.86E-4 1.26E-4 1288 1437 1.82 4.8E-4 5.29E-5 1246 1412 1.92 1.06E-2 0
1295 683 2.03 6.77E-3 0
1312 683
-2.13 0
0 413 683 2.23 4.01E-5 0
395 683 2.33 6.75E-5 0
377 683 l
2.44 1.31E-4 0
336 591 2.54 0
0 378 591 2.64 8.45E-3 0
1269 591
[
2.74 0
0 364 591 l
l
i TABLE Ic - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES FOR 2
CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time Steam-Water /H Release Ratio 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 0.00 inf.
inf.
0.01-inf.
inf.
0.02 inf.
inf.
0.03 inf.
inf.
0.04 inf.
inf.
0.05 inf.
inf.
0.10 inf.
inf.
0.20 inf.
inf.
0.31 inf.
inf.
0.41 inf.
inf.
0.51 inf.
3.26E3 0.61 inf.
3.26E3 0.71 inf.
3.26E3 0.81 inf.
3.25E2 0.92 inf.
2.53E1 1.02 2.20E3 9.26 1.12 2.29El 2.88 1.16 1.82E1 1.79 1.20 1.68E1 1.01El 1.23 4.83 2.34E1 1.27 1.35 5.62E1 1.29 1.51El 9.43E1 1.31 3.12E1 1.32E2 1.33 1.49E2 1.82E2 1.36 1.25E2 2.75E2 1.39 1.24E2 2.75E2 1.42 1.28E2 4.72E2 1.45 2.26E2 4.72E2 1.52 5.38E2 9.62E2 1.62 1.85E3 3.09E3 1.72 2.59E3 7.94E3 1.82 2.08E3 1.89E4 1.92 9.43E1 inf.
2.03 1.48E2 inf.
2.13 inf.
inf.
2.23 2.49E4 inf.
2.33 1.48E4 inf.
2.44 7.63E3 inf.
2.54 inf.
inf.
2.64 1.18E2 inf.
2.74 inf.
inf.
Sh20t 1 ef 2 TABLE Id - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES FOR y
CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time Integrated H M ss (lba) a 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.02.
0.0 0.0 0.03 0.0 0.0 0.04 0.0 0.0 0.05 0.0 0.0 0.10 0.0 0.0 0.20 0.0 0.0 0.31 0.0 0.0 0.41 0.0 0.0 0.51 0.0 2.64 0.61 0.0 7.92 0.71 0.0 1.32E1 0.81 0.0 3.40E1 0.92 0.0 2.01E2 1.02 3.21 5.36E2 1.12 1.85E2 9.75E2 1.16 3.29E2 1.27E3 1.20 4.65E2 1.59E3 1.23 6.08E2 1.73E3 1.27 9.96E2 1.85E3 1.29 1.19E3 1.89E3 1.31 1.29E3 1.91E3 1.33 1.33E3 1.93E3 1.36 1.37E3 1.95E3 1.39 1.41E3 1.97E3 1.42 1.45E3 1.98E3 1.45 1.48E3 1.99E3 1.52 1.52E3 2.01E3
Shsst 2 ef 2 TABLE Id - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES FOR 2
CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time Integrated H Mass (1ba) 2 (Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 1.62 1.54E3 2.02E3 1.72 1.55E3 2.02E3 1.82 1.56E3 2.02E3 1.92 1.62E3 2.02E3 2.03 1.70E3 2.02E3 2.13 1.73E3 2.02E3 2.23 1.73E3 2.02E3 2.33 1.73E3 2.02E3 2.44 1.74E3 2.02E3 2.54 1.74E3 2.02E3 2.64 1.76E3 2.02E3 2.74 1.77E3 2.02E3
Figure 1 Ccaparisen of S D Ssquzncs Paramatcro y
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH) i Sheet 1 of 8 i
l CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK S2D SEQUENCE see-1 H
2 I
~
M A
S S 299-
~
F I
i L
[a,\\
Ov L
j L 199-B
/
\\
y I
\\
i J
V n
l 9
1 2
3 TIME CHRS) i
l i
Figure 1 Comparison of S D Sequence Parameters y
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
I Sheet 2 of 8 i
i CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK 1
2 i
S2D SEQUENCE l
i I
i H 2488-l 2
4 22te-fg T
'I l
E 2828-(
I M
i P 18Se-t
\\
E b
R 1848-
\\
i A
T 145e-t-
\\
u g
R 1288-i E
j 1e78-
\\
D
/
\\
E 889-A S
/
~ ~
j 888-p' t
_e V
p-See -,.........,........,,.........,
a 1
2 S
TIME CHRS)
I i
I I
l l
il(
-lllI l
l
,8
)
HC R
o A r M K
s
(
te k O
m o a o r C O
a P
C 1
C
,2 1
1 ec n D e
u d q n C
e a
.E
)
S S
)
C D P DN R
2A S A M E
H f
(
U o
8 7
SQ a
VS g
E E
n b f o w o M
s a i t 3 I
r a D
T a C t A2 s
p e
m r e o o h BS s
C F S W
N
,1 A
T 1
A er u
C g
i i
F I{g1 I{}5 p
L
!Ill!}
,B i. : -
- i.:
7 S
9 4
B 0
6 1
9 8
7 5
4 2
1 4
7 9
2 5
8 1
5 8
4 8
2 7
1 2
4 5
7 8
8 1
9 7
5 3
1 3
1 1
1 STEAM / WATER MASS FL pS HR llllljll l'
l
Figure 1 Comparison of S D Scqusnco Parameccro 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Sheet 4 of 8 CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK S2D SEQUENCE S
T E
A M
/
MA 8.BE+88-T E 7.8E+88-l 8.eE+88-i EN 5.eE+88-
/7
\\
i E
w R 4.eE+88-g 8
5 Y S.SE+88-
/
N\\
Q j
F 2.SE+88-
"N
//
L N
O 1.eE+88-
\\
M N/
9.SE+80- -,.........,.........
2 S
T e
1 U
TIME CHRS)
/
H R
L -
- mi ll
Figure 1 Comparison of S D Sequencs P rametsro 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Sheet 5 of 8 CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK S2D SEQUENCE R
A T
I O
OF e.758 -
H e.656-2 l
e.562-T O s.46e-l1 1
s e.s7s-1ll T
E 8.2s1 -
/ I
^
/
l N s.is7-M s.Se4-M s e.see-
=
c s
e 1
2 3
F TIME CHRS)
L O
W
l Figure 1 Comparison of S D Sequenes Pcrametcro 2
{
For Catawba (MAAF) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Sheet 6 of 8 I
i CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK l
E S2D SEQUENCE i
N T
H A
i L Sese-1 P
Y o
F l
S 2999 2 9
1 m
T l
E A
f
\\
~
M
/
M I
\\
A 1998-f
\\
T
/
\\- lxj T
e 4
l B
i T
i u
9-.
f
)
L 9
1 2
3 8
TIME CHRS)
M
Figura 1 Comparison cf S D Sequenca Parametcr3 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Sheet.7 of 8 CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK 1
S2D SEQUENCE i
W 1.00E+05-A T
i i
E R
1.00E+04-
/
1
/
T
/
O
/
\\
/
1.00E+03-H
\\
l I
2
\\
)
\\
?
M 1.OOE+02-g
/
\\
f 1
A i
S S
\\
/
f 1
1.00E+01-
\\
\\
4 0
~
\\ ll l
F L
\\;
W 1.00E+00-i.........
O 1
2 3
i TIME CHRS)
PLANT CATAWBA DCCOOK
Figuro 1 Comparison cf S D Sequenc3 P;raset ra 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Sheet 8 of 8 CATAW3A VS. D.C. COOK S2D SEQUENCE I
N 3.00E+03-T E
G R
A T
E 2.00E+03-D
/
H l
2
/
/
M l
A 1.00E+03-
/
S S
/
I L
/
B
/
/
M
- i.............".....i... verr..i.........
.........i.........i r
S O.00E+00-s 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 TIME CHRS)
PLANT CATAWBA DCCOOK
Shnt 1 of 2 Table 2a Data Used For Comparison of S D Sequences 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and McGuire (MARCH)
MCGUIRE CLASIX INPUT MARCH REACTOR COOLANT MASS AND ENERGY RELEASE RATES Time H O Mass Release Rate H O Energy Release Rate 2
2 (seconds)
(1ba/sec)
(Btu /sec) 5 0.0 197.2 1.167 x 10 2172 190.5 1.097 x 10' 0
2478 44.85 5.230 x 10 4
3180 53.53 6.547 x 10 4
3804 34.82 4.262 x 10 4
4428 21.40 2.842 x 10 0
4752 48.42 5.558 x 10 4
5700 19.42 2.182 x 10 4
6012 14.07 1.583 x 10 3
6960 5.253 5.989 x 10 3
7062 4.718 5.388 x 10 3
7206 4.060 4.693 x 10
--.,_,-,---,,,---m
-w r
-,n.----
v
--.-,---4.--
e a - ----
--r,+-.--w-----,
- - ~,,
Shactj[cfj[
Table 2a Data Used For Comparison of S D Sequences 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and McGuire (MARCH)
MCGUIRE CLASIX INPUT MARCH HYDROGEN GENERATION RATES AND TEMPERATURES Time H Mass Release Rate H Temperature 2
2 (seconds)
(1bs/sec)
(F) 0.0 0.0 61 3480 0.0 61 3804 0.0413 67 4116 0.260 1582 4428 0.740 795 4752 1.07 771 5700 0.430 612 6330 0.223 555 6648 0.160 535 6960 0.117 519 8070 0.0367 519
TABLE 2b - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES y
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND MCGUIRE (MARCH)
Time Steam-Water /H Release Ratio 2
(Hr)
McGuire 0.0 inf.
0.60 inf.
0.69 inf.
0.88 inf.
0.97 inf.
1.06 8.43E2
{
1.14 1.15E2 1.23 2.89El 1.32 4.53E1 1.58 4.52E1 1.67 4.69El l
1.76 4.48E1 1.85 6.25El 1.93 4.49El 1.96 4.03E1 2.00 5.28E1 2.24 1.11El
TABLE 2c - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES 2
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND MCGUIRE (MARCH)
Time Integrated H Mass (1ba) 2 (Hr)
McGuire O.0 0.0 0.97 0.0 1.06 6.69 1.14 5.01El i
1.23 2.12E2 1.32 5.05E2 1.58 1.21E3 1.76 1.42E3 1.85 1.48E3 1.93 1.52E3 2.24 1.61E3 i
~
r
-,m,~ w m mer--,-
,n
-r-,- - m -
,-cv
---m,--
-,-w
- - ~ ~ - - -. -
r,~--r--~,--
a,-
n--nr--,-,--
Figura 2 Comparicon of S D Sequ nco Pcramatars 2
For Catawbn (MAAP) cad McGuiro (MARCH)
I Sheet 1 of 8 l
CATAWBA VS. MCGUIRE i
S2D SEQUENCE i
see-H 2
M t
1 A
S S 200-F L
O u
L 198 2 B
S N
/
/
N M
/
N
/l N ~'~~~ A I
N g:,.........,.........,.........,......'.............,
m.
9.9 9.5 1.9 1.5 2.9 2.5 TIME <!RS)
PLANT CATAWBA MCGUIRE i
Comparison cf S D Sequenco P:rameters 2
Figura 2 F r Catawba (MAAP) and McGuiro (MARCH)
Sheet 2,of 8 CATAWBA VS. MCGUIRE S2D SEQUENCE H
2 1600-l\\
E 1488-l\\
M P 1299-
!k E
II R 1990-l A
f N
s\\
T ses-s u
~
/
R 698-I e
I
<ee-I D
E 290-S 8-0.9 8.5 1.8 1.5 2.9 2.5 p.
TIME CHRS)
PLANT CATAWBA MCGUIRE
\\
1 l
f CATAWBA VS. MCGUIRE i
s2o seauence l
Figure 2 Comparison of S D Sequence Parameters 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and McGuire (MARCH)
O 6.9E+98-Sheet 4 of 8 E
N 5.9E+98-E R
G 4.0E+98-i i
Y
\\
i
\\
F 3.9E+88-g j
L g
M O
\\. /.
\\
W 2.9E+08-i B
s /
N N
N I
T 1.9E+98-
\\ s~~~~_
U i
l H e.9E+00-3 R
l 8.9 0.5 1.9 I.5 2.0 7
i TIME ORS) i i
PLANT CATAWBA MCGUIRE I
i
f l
5 t
CATAWBA VS. MCGUIRE 1
l S2D SEm.ENCE i
Figure 2 Comparison of S D Sequence Parameters 2
1 For Catawba (MAAP) and McGuire (MARCH)
J Sheet 5 of 8_
l l
H 2
9.759-l T
O 9.656-l W B.562-I A
T 9.46e-l E
R 9.375-1 M 9.281-i l
A j
S 9.187-l S
9.994-F
_f-
\\
1 L 9.999- ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
O W
9.9 9.5 1.9 1.5 2.9 TIME CHRS) i PLANT CATAWBA MCGUIRE L
t
CATAWBA VS. MCGUIRE S2D SEO M vigur. 2 comparison or s n s.qu.nc. Par ter.
2 For Catawba (MAAP) and McGuire (MARCH) sheet 6 of 8 N
7 H 1see-A L 1600-P Y t400-
\\
/
/
\\
O 120e-r
~
/
iese-
/
W A
see-
/
T
/
E 60e-i R
40e-B T
{
e,
.........i.........i
/
B c.e e.s i.e i.s 2.e 1
M TIME CHRS)
.G ANT CATAWBA MCGUIRE
\\
Figura 2 Comparison cf S D Sequenco P'ramettra i
y For Catawba (MAAP) and McGuire (MARCH)
Sheet 7 of 8 CATAWBA VS. MCGUIRE l
S2D SEQUENCE I
r 1
W 1.00E+05-1 A
}
T E
l R
1.00E+04-l T
O
{
1.00E+03-H
\\
2
\\
M 1.00E+02-A
\\
f
/
S
\\
s/
^
l S
V]
1.00E+01-I F
l L
O l
W 1.00E+00-i i
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 i
TIME CHRS) 1 MCGUIRE i
PLANT CATAWBA l
l Figuro 2 Comparison cf S D Sequenca P;ramat ra 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and McGuire (MARCH)
[
Sheet 8 of 8 CATAWBA VS. MCGUIRE S2D SEQUENCE i
I N
i T
1.80E+03-1.60E+03-f'p j
R A
1.40E+03-
/
/
T E
1.20E+03-
/
1 D
l 1.00E+03-
/
)
H
/
2 8.00E+02'
/
/
M 6.00E+02-A
/
S 4.00E+02-S
/
2.00E+02-
/
L
/
l B
B.00E+00- ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
M S
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 TIME (MRS)
I MCGUIRE PLANT CATAWBA i
TABLE 3a - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES 2
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND SEQUOYAH (MARCH)
Sequoyah "A" CASES Time H Mass Flow (lb/ min)
H O Mass Flow (Ib/hr)
H /H O Flow Rate 2
2 2 2 (Hr)
Ratio 0.14 0
7.2E5 0
0.28 0
7.2E5 0
0.42 0
7.2E5 0
0.49 0
7.8E5 0
0.56 0
2.1ES 0
0.97 10.0 1.8E5 3.33E-3 1.11 20.0 1.8E5 6.67E-3 1.25 37.5 1.5ES 0.015 1.39 35.0 1.5E5 0.014 1.53 27.5 1.2E5 0.014 1.67 32.5 1.5E5 0.013 1.81 15.0 1.5ES 6E-3 1.94 15.0 1.5E5 6E-3 2.08 7.5 1.5E5 3E-3 2.22 5.0 1.65E5 1.82E-3 2.36 2.5 1.65E5 9.09E-4 2.64 1.0 1.8E5 3.33E-4
TABLE 3b - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES 2
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND SEQUOYAH (MARCH)
Time Steam Water /H Release Ratio 2
(Hr)
Sequoyah 0.14 inf.
0.28 inf.
0.42 inf.
0.49 inf.
0.56 inf.
0.97 3.00E2 1.11 1.50E2 1.25 6.67El 1.39 7.14E1 1.53 7.15El 1.67 7.69El 1.81 1.67E2 1.94 1.67E2 2.08 3.33E2 2.22 5.49E2 2.36 1.10E3 2.64 3.00E3
TABLE 3c - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCESFORCATAWBA(MAAP)kND SEQUOYAH (MARCH)
Time Integrated H, Mass (lba)
(Hr)
Sequ8yah 0.14 0.0
)
O.56 0.0 0.97 1.23E2 1.11 2.49E2 1.25 4.91E2 1.39 1.22E3 1.53 1.48E3 1.67 1.73E3 1.81 1.93E3 1.94 2.05E3 2.08 2.14E3 2.22 2.19E3 2.36 2.20E3 2.64 2.26E3 l
l l
l
Figure 3 Comparie n cf S D S:quenco Pcrametsrs 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Sheet 1 of 5 i
CATAWBA VS. A CASES S2D SEQUENCE q
)
SSS-H i
2 i
H A
l S
l C 288,
i l
F L
.i o
y L 128-B S
t i
/
l N
/
m-s I
/
NA N
~~~
0.8 9.5 1.8 1.5 2.8 2.6 S.e 7
TIME CHRS)
PLEASE CHANG PLANT ACASES CATAWSAc l
4
CATAWBA VS. A CASES S2D SEQUENCE W
Figure 3 Comparison of S D Sequence Parameters 2
j A
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
~
Sheet 2 of 5 E
R 800000-
_/I M 700000 -
l
~
i A
S 600000-S j
500000-i F
\\
+
L 400000-1 0
}
j W 300000-L 200000-
~"
B
/~
S 100000-
/
y 8~...........................i.........i..................i i
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 TIME CHRS) e ACASES CATAWBA PLANT
Figure 3 Corparison cf S D Ssqu ncs Parametero 2
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Sheet 3 of 5 CATAWBA VS. A CASES S2D SEQUENCE H
i 2
i 1
O 9.758-W j
A S.666-i T
i E e.562-I R
l 8.469-M l
A 9.375-S S 9.281-1 5
F 9.187-L0 9.994-W
\\
i e.ees-.''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''5 R
)
A e.e e.5 1.9 1.5 2.8 2.
T TIME CHRS) j I
l O
PLANT ACASES CATAWBA i
l i
i l
CATAWBA VS. SEQUOYAH S2D SEQUENCE Figure 3 Comparison of S D Sequence Farameters 2
W t.00E+06-For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
A Sheet 4 of 5 E
R 1.00E+04-T 1
0 1.00E+03-r l
H
/
2
/
/
M 1.00E+02-
/
\\
/
A u
S 1.00E+01-F L
0 W
1.00E+00- i......................................................,
O.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 TIME CHRS)
SEQUOYAH PLANT CATAWBA
4 CATAWBA VS. SEQUOYAH S2D SEQUENCE i
I Figure 3 Comparison of S D Sequence Parameters 2
~
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
E sheet 5 of 5 G
R A
1 T
/.
E 2.00E+03-
/
o f
H 2
/
/
M
/
l A
1.00E+03-
/
)
S f
S
/
4 l
/
L B
/
M
~~
/
)
S O.00E+00- i.......... '........i.........i.........
.........i 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 TIME CHRS) i i
PLANT CATAlJBA SEQUOYAH
She t 1,cf 3_
TABLE 4a - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES g
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK-(MARCH)
Time H Mass Flow (lb/ min)
H Temperature ( F)
S/W Mass Flow (lb/hr)
S/W Energy Flow (Btu /hr) 2 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 9
0.00 0
0 591 574.1 0
0 0
0 0.01 0
0 575 575.6 6.69E6 7.31E6 3.90E9 4.00E9 0.02 0
0 576 575.6 6.71E6 7.31E6 3.92E9 4.00E9 0.03 0
0 568 575.6 1.91E6 7.31E6 2.27E9 4.00E9 0.04 0
0 559 575.6 1.72E6 7.31E6 2.05E9 4.00E9 0.05 0
0 544 575.6 1.37E6 7.31E6 1.66E9 4.00E9 0.06 0
0 535 572.2 1.16E6 1.02E6 1.41E9 1.45E9 0.07 0
0 534 572.2 1.05E6 1.02E6 1.30E9 1.45E9 0.08 0
0 527 572.2 9.39E5 1.02E6 1.16E9 1.45E9 0.09 0
0 518 572.2 8.31E5 1.02E6 1.03E9 1.45E9 0.10 0
0 519 572.2 7.82E5 1.02E6 9.73E8 1.45E9 0.20 0
15.13 442 706.5 3.04E5 1.01ES 3.75E8 1.37E8 0.30 0
38.63 437 758.7 2.58E5 3.91E4 3.19E8 4.20E6 0.40 0
18.37 424 752.6 1.43E5 3.25E2 1.77E8 5.36E5 0.50 0
6.59 422 704.6 1.74E5 1.12E1 2.15E8 1.59E4 0.60 0
4.59 413 669.1 1.97ES 3.31 2.42E8 4.61E3 0.71 0
1.19 404 659.0 2.03E5 0
2.48E8 1681.92 0.81 0
4.93 403 651.1 1.96E5 2.16 2.40E8 3000.82 0.91 0
2.12 427 651.1 1.92E5 0.94 2.38E8 724.57
She t 2 cf 3 TABLE 4a - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SE W CES g
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH) h, Mass Flow (1b/ min)
H Temperature ( F)
S/W Mass Flow (1b/hr)
S/W Energy Flow (Btu /hr)
Tim'.
2 (Hr)
Catreba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 1.01 0
111.77 427 832.9 1.86E5 770.4 2.30E8 3.47E5 1.11 0
11.30 392 2651.7 1.78E5 1.82E5 2.17E8 4.04E8 I
1.12 0
0 412 2862.6 1.61E5 2.84E5 1.98E8 7.76E8 1.31 0
0 499 2110.0 1.22E5 2.44E5 1.56E8 5.40E8 1.42 0.31 0
601 1910.5 7.72E4 1.05E5 1.03E8 2.00E8 1.46 1.06 0
592 1910.5 6.36E4 1.05E5 8.45E7 2.00E8 1.48 3.17 0
618 1910.5 6.03E4 1.05E5 8.09E7 2.00E8 l
1.50 8.28 0
566 1910.5 5.07E4 1.05E5 6.68E7 2.00E8 1.52 17.00 0
577 1910.5 4.25E4 1.05E5 5.62E7 2.00E8 1.54 33.50 0
604 1910.5 3.65E4 1.05E5 4.88E7 2.00E8 1.56 41.17 0
617 1617.1 2.89E4 1.19E5 3.88E7 2.19E8 1.58 43.17 0
624 1617.1 2.25E4 1.19ES 3.03E7 2.19E8 1.60 40.83 0
597 1617.1 1.73E4 1.19E5 2.31E7 2.19E8 1.62 29.50 0
582 1617.1 1.51E4 1.19ES 2.00E7 2.19E8 1.64 17.83 0
575 1475.1 1.01E4 1.21E5 1.34E7 2.26E8 l
1.66 13.50 0
540 1475.1 6.44E3 1.21E5 8.41E6 2.26E8 1.68 7.37 0
537 1475.1 3.58E3 1.21ES 4.67E6 2.26E8 1.70 0.06 0
538 1475.1 4.17E3 1.13E5 5.44E6 2.26E8 1.72 0
0 517 1313.8 0
1.13E5 0
1.97E8 1.76 0.18 0
537 1313.8 1.65E2 1.13E5 2.15E5 1.97E8
Sh zt'3 cf 3' TABLE 4n - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S d SEQUENCES y
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time H Mass Flow (1b/ min)
H Temperature ( F)
S/W Mass Flow (Ib/hr)
,S/W Energy Flow.(Btu /hr) 2 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 1.83 0.11 0
542 1166.9 8.09El 9.25E4 1.06E5 1.49E8 1.85 703.33 0
1201 1166.9 0
9.25E4 0
1.49E8 1.87 178.33 0
1050 1166.9 9.65E4 9.25E4 1.51E8 1.49E8 1.89 39.33 0
734 1166.9 9.75E4 9.25E4 1.36E8 1.49E8 1.91 0.08 0
1185 1166.9 2.30E5 9.25E4 3.74E8 1.49E8 1.93 14.37 0
811 1166.9 1.46E5 9.25E4 2.09E8 1.49E8 1.95 5.28 0
893 1166.9 1.55E5 9.25E4 2.29E8 1.49E8 1.97 4.55 0
819 1166.9 1.30E5 9.25E4 1.87E8 1.49E8 1.99 1.57 0
831 1062.5 1.65ES 2.22E5 2.38E8 2.28E8 2.01 2.13 0
707 1062.5 1.67E5 2.22E5 2.31E8 2.28E8 4
Shest J[ of 2 TABLE 4b - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES g
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time H Mass Flow /Stean-Water Mass Flow Enthalpy of Steam Water (Btu /lb) 2 (Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 0.00 0
0 0
0 0.01 0
0 582.96 547.20 0.02 0
0 584.20 547.20 0.03 0
0 1188.48 547.20 0.04 0
0 1191.86 547.20 0.05 0
0 1211.68 547.20 0.06 0
0 1215.52 1421.57 0.07 0
0 1238.10 1421.57 0.08 0
0 1235.36 1421.57 0.09 0
0 1239.47 1421.57 0.10 0
0 1244.25 1421.57 0.20 0
8.99E-3 1233.56 1356.44 0.30 0
5.93E-2 1236.43 1074.17 0.40 0
3.39 1237.76 1649.23 0.50 0
35.30 1235.63 1419.64 0.60 0
83.20 1228.43 1393.75 0.71 0
DIVIDING BY ZERO-1221.67 UNDEFINED 0.81 0
136.94 1224.49 1389.27 0.91 0
135.32 1239.58 770.82 1.01 0
8.70 1236.56-450.42 1.11 0
3.73E-3 1219.10 2219.78 1.21 0
0 1229.81 2732.39 1.31 0
0 1278.69 2213.11 1.42 2.41E-4 0
1334.20 1904.76 1.46 1.00E-3 0
1328.62 1904.76 1.48 3.15E-3 0
1341.63 1904.76 1.50 9.80E-3 0
1317.55 1904.76 1.52 2.4E-2 0
1322.35 1904.76 1.54 5.52E-2 0
1336.99 1904.76 1.56 8.55E-2 0
1342.56 1840.34
. _ - _ = _ _
Shsat 2 cf 2 TABLE 4b - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES g
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time H Mass Flow / Steam-Water Mass Flow Enthalpy of Steam Water (Btu /lb) 2 (Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 1.58 1.15E-1 0
1346.67 1840.34 1.60 1.42E-1 0
1335.26 1840.34 1.62 1.17E-1 0
1324.50 1840.34 1.64 1.06E-1 0
1326.73 1867.77 1.66 1.26E-1 0
1305.90 1867.77 1.68 1.24E-1 0
1304.47 1867.77 1.70 8.63E-4 0
1304.56 1867.77 1.72 0
0 UNDEFINED 1743.36 1.76 6.55E-2 0
1303.03 1743.36 1.83 8.16E-2 0
1310.26 1610.81 1.85 UNDEFINED 0
UNDEFINED 1610.81 1.87 1.11E-1 0
1564.77 1610.81 1.89 2.42E-2 0
1394.87 1610.81 1.91 2.09E-5 0
1626.09 1610.81 1.93 5.91E-3 0
1431.51 1610.81 1.95 2.04E-3 0
1477.42 1610.81 1.97 2.1E-3 0
1438.46 1610.81 1.99 5.71E-4 0
1442.42 1027.03 2.01 7.65E-4 1383.23 1027.03
TABLE 4c - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES j
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time Steam-Water /H Release Ratio 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 0.0 inf.
inf.
0.01 inf.
inf.
0.02 inf.
inf.
0.03 inf.
inf.
0.04 inf.
inf.
0.05 inf.
inf.
0.06 inf.
inf.
0.07 inf.
inf.
0.08 inf.
inf.
0.09 inf.
inf.
0.10 inf.
inf.
0.20 inf.
1.11E2 0.30 inf.
1.69El 0.40 inf.
2.95E-1 0.50 inf.
2.83E-2 0.60 inf.
1.20E-2 0.71 inf.
0.0 0.81 inf.
7.30E-3 0.91 inf.
7.39E-3 1.01 inf.
1.15E-1 1.11 inf.
2.68E-2 1.21 inf.
inf.
1.31 inf.
inf.
1.42 4.15E3 inf.
1.46 1.00E3 inf.
1.48 3.17E2 inf.
1.50 1.02E2 inf.
1.52 4.17El inf.
1.54 1.81El inf.
1.56 1.17El inf.
1.58 8.70 inf.
1.60 7.04 inf.
1.62 8.55 inf.
1.64 9.43 inf.
1.66 7.94 inf.
1.68 8.06 inf.
- 1. '/ 0 1.16E3 inf.
1.72 inf.
inf.
1.76 1.53E1 inf.
1.83 1.23E1 inf.
1.85 0.0 inf.
1.87 9.01 inf.
1.89 4.13E1 inf.
1.91 4.78E4 inf.
1.93 1.69E2 inf.
I 1.95 4.90E2 inf.
1.97 4.76E2 inf.
1.99 1.75E3 inf.
2.01 1.31E3 inf.
Sh:ct I cf 2 TABLE 4d - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES g
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time Integrated Mass of H2 (1ba)
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 0.00 0
0 0.01 0
0 0.02 0
0 0.03 0
0 0.04 0
0 0.05 0
0 0.06 0
0 0.07 0
0 0.08 0
0 0.09 0
0 0.10 0
0 0.20 0
45.39 0.30 0
206.67 I
0.40 0
377.67 0.50 0
452.55 0.60 0
486.09 0.71 0
505.16 0.81 0
523.52 0.91 0
544.67 l
1.01 0
886.34 l
1.11 0
1.26E3 1.21 0
1.26E3 1.31 0
1.26E3 1.42 1.02 1.26E3 1.46 2.66 1.26E3 1.48 5.20 1.26E3 1.50 12.07 1.26E3 1.52 27.24 1.26E3
Shsstj[ofj[
TABLE 4d - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES y
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time Integrated Mass of H.j (lba)
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 1.54 57.54 1.26E3 1.56 102.34 1.26E3 1.58 152.94 1.26E3 1.60 203.34 1.26E3 1.62 245.54 1.26E3 1.64 273.94 1.26E3 1.66 292.74 1.26E3 1.68 305.26 1.26E3 1.70 309.72 1.26E3 1.72 309.75 1.26E3 1.76 309.97 1.26E3 1.83 310.58 1.26E3 1.85 732.64 1.26E3 1.87 1.26E3 1.26E3 1.89 1.39E3 1.26E3 1.91 1.41E3 1.26E3 1.93 1.42E3 1.26E3 1.95 1.43E3 1.26E3 1.97 1.44E3 1.26E3 1.99 1.44E3 1.26E3 2.01 1.44E3 1.26E3
li!l,
,)
8 3
H C
R s A 4
r M K
e
(
2 te k O
m o a o r C O
a P
C C
ec n D a
L u d C
'8 q n e a E
S C
)
DN 1
)
D P gA S
S A E
^
R M
5 U
f
(
H o
8 SQ C
a E
n b f VS E
o w o s a i t 1 M
r a AD I
a C t p
e t
BS 2
T m r e o o h C F S W
1 A
/g\\
T
/_
A 4
C er 6
u g
i 8
F s
' 8 O
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
H2 MASS FL0W LSS/yN lI l
llIIj llI1 l
I 1
Figure 4 Comparison of S D Sequence Parameters g
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH j
Sheet 2 of 8 1
i CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK S1D SEQUENCE 1
i a
3899-H f\\
l 2
r\\
i
\\
T 1.
I E
\\
n
(
)
P RB88-
\\._
3 E
g i
R A
I 4
w 1.\\
T 1
u i
R 1
E 1988-I J
n
. I-_
/
l E
G
~
F 8
i i
l 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 S.8 l
TIME CHRS) i i
Figure 4 Comparison of S D Sequence Paramatcro g
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH Sheet 3 of 8 CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK S1D SEQUENCE S
T E
A M
/
1 w seassee-AT 7eesome- '!
ER 6e00eee-L i
M Seeeees-L A
l' j
S 4eeeees-l S seseeme-1 F
l L 20008e9-I(
0 w leasese-m e.
S 9.e e.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 S.e
/
TIME CHRS)
H R
Figure 4 Comparison of S D Sequence Farameters g
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH Shset 4 of 8, CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK SID SEQUENCE S
T E
A N
l
/ 4.8E+99--,
l y
y I
A l
T l
E e
R S.9E+89i L
I h
E
[
i N
E i
R 2.8E+89-I i
G Y
.g F
1 L 1.EE+89-g O
W
/ \\
e
\\.
i
-h j
T e.8E+0e- -
'.6 U
0 1.2 1.8 2.4 S.8
/
0.0 H
TIHE CHRS)
R t
l
Figure 4 Comparison of S D Sequ nce Peramatsro g
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH Sheet 5 of 8 1
i CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK i
S1D SEQUENCE i
R A
T 1
I I
O 148-i
/\\
o I
1 r tas-
/
g I
I H
a tes-
/
/
j T
/
1 O
se-f
,l i
i I
s 1
l T
u-I E
/
- L A
f L
H I
j H
/
I[
A me-
/
s I
\\\\
~
S
',,,' /
e-r F
L e
I 2
8 l
0 w
TIHE CHRS) i l
i
i Figure 4 Comparison of S D Sequence Parcaeters g
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH Sheet 6 of 8 1
CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK E
N SID SEQUENCE T
H i
A L 3898-i P
A l
Y
/\\
i o
/
\\
/
\\
F g
t S 2000-y i
y j
sm
\\
E l
w A
b A
T,/ '
l
\\
/ -
f H
w
- [
V
\\
l.
A 1888-g i
j T
i E
\\
R l
\\d J
B j
T l
U 8-L 8
1 2
8 B
l M
TIME CNRS) i
CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK SID SEQUENCE j
Figure 4 Comparison of S D Sequence Par m ters g
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH W
1.00E+05-A Sheet 7 of 8 T
l E
~
i R
1.00E+04-T 1.00E+03 H
2 i
M 1.00E+02 2 g
A
\\
s
\\
s 1.00E+0!-
F i
L O
W 1.00E+00-1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I O.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 TIME CHRS)
PLANT CATAWBA
--- DCCOOK 1
i
CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK SID SEQUENCE Figure 4 Comparison of S D Sequence Parameters g
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH T
Sheet 8 of 8 E
1.50E+03-G
(
R 1.31E+03-
_ _ L. _
A
/ _ _ _ _ __
T 1.13E+03-
/
E
/
l D
9.38E+02-
/
H 7.50E+02-2
~~~
/
5.63E+02-M A
3.75E+02-
[
l S
/
S 1.88E+02-
/
7
'./
L 0.00E+00-B
'''''I M
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 S
TIME CHRS) i DCCOOK PLANT CATAWBA l
TABLE Sa - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES g
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND SEQUOYAH (MARCH)
Sequoyah "F" CASES l
Tina H Mass Flow (1b/ min)
H O Mass Flow (1b/hr)
H /H O Mass Flow 2
2 2 2 (Hr)
Ratio 0.07 0
5.7E6 0
0.27 0
2.1E6 0
0.42 0
3.0E5 0
0.69 0
3.05E5 0
0.83 0
1.5ES 0
0.97 60.0 0
1.11 250.0 0
1.25 0
3.0E5 0
1.32 40.0 3.0E5 8E-3 1.39 0
3.0E5 0
1 1.94 0
3.0E5 0
l
TABLE Sb - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES FORCATAWBA(MAAP)ANDSEQUOYkH(MARCH)
Time Steam-Water /H Release Ratio 2
(Hr)
Sequoyah 0.07 inf.
0.27 inf.
0.42 inf.
0.69 inf.
0.83 inf.
0.97 0.0 1.11 0.0 1.25 inf.
1.32 1.25E2 1.39 inf.
1.94 inf.
4 n..-
n
,-,,,.,,7
...n--,
TABLE Sc - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF S D SEQUENCES y
FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND SEQUOYAH (MARCH)
Time Integrated H Mass (lba) 2 (Hr)
"F" Cases 0.07 0
0.027 0
0.42 0
0.69 0
0.83 0
0.97 252.00 1.11 1.55E3 1.25 2.60E3 1.32 2.68E3 1.39 2.76E3 1.94 2.76E3
Figure 5 Comparisen of S D S2qu:nm Pa m et m g
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Sheet 1 of 5 CATAWBA VS. F CASES Slp SEQUENCE H
i 2
899-i M
l A 789-i S
S 698-
\\
I F 580~
L O 498-i W
l 399-
\\
B 299-
/
S
/
\\
/ les-
/
\\
l 5
\\^
^
e-3 N
O.O 9.5 1.9 1.5 2.9 TIME CHRS) i l
1 I
PLANT CATAWBA FCASES l
1
Figure 5 Comparicon cf S D SIqu:nca Parametero g
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Sheet 2 of 5 i
CATAWBA VS. F CASES e
4 S1D SEQUENCE j
l i
W 7eessee-A
- 1 _.
T E 80898e8-R g
H Seesees-
\\,
\\
s s
\\
s 4esseee-
\\
l
\\
F g
.i L Seessee-
\\
)
O
\\
u 2eessee-
\\
L
\\
B
\\
l s leasese-N i
/
\\-
~
l y
g 4,.........,...... ~...,.........,....... A e.e e.5 I.e i.6 2.8 i
TIME CHRs) 1 2
k' PLANT CATAWBA FCASES ti i
1
Figura 5 Comparison of S D Scquines Parametcra g
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Sheet 3 of 5 CATAWBA VS. F CASES SID SEQUENCE i
H
{
2 i
T I
O 9.iSS-W
)
A 9.131-1 T
E 9.112 -
i R 9.994-n A 9.975-S S 9.966-i i
F 9.937-j L
1 O 9.919-l W
^_
9.999-8 R
A 9.9 9.5 1.9 1.5 2.0 T
1 l
I TIME CHRS) j O
4 PLANT CATAWBA FCASES i
1 f
l CATAWBA VS. SEQUOYAH l
S1D SEQUENCE Figure 5 Comparison of S D Sequence Parameters g
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Sheet 4 of s_
A T
E l
l l
R 1.00E+04-l i
l T
l 1
O 1.00E+03-l l
l H
l 1
2 1
M 1.00E+02-A S
S 1.00E+01-F L
0 W
1.00E+00-i l
l l
l l
l 1
I I
I 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 TIME CHRS) i PLANT CATAWBA
--- SEQUOYAH
Figura 5 Comp ristn cf S D S:qu:nco Pamtm g
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Sheet 5 of 5_
CATAWBA VS. S3QUOYAH S1D SEQUENCE I
N 3.00E+03-T E
~--------'
G j
R 4
A T
/
i E
2.00E+03-
/
D
/
I H
f 2
7 M
l
\\
A 1.00E+03-
/
S l
S j
j I
L
/
j B
j p
S 0.00E+00- i.........i......'...i.........i.........,
I 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 TIME CHRS)
PLANT CATAWBA SEQUOYAH i
Sheet 1 cf 3 TABLE 6a - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D.-C. COOK.(MARCH)
Time H Mass Flow (lb/ min)
H Temperature ( F)
S/W Mass Flow (1b/hr)
S/W Energy Flow (Btu /hr) 2 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 0.00 0
0 120 574.1 0
8.81E4 0
5.55E7 i
0.50 0
0 123 574.1 0
0 0
0 4
1.02 0
0 123 574.1 0
2.24E5 0
1.42E8 4
1.22 0
0 165 574.1 0
2.52E5 0
1.70E8 1.32 0
0 241 651.6 3.80E5 1.42E6 4.41E8 1.02E9 1.42 0
0 232 657.4 6.91E3 2.84E5 8.02E6 3.76E8 1.53 0
0 252 657.4 1.55E5 2.84E5 1.81E8 3.76E8 1.63 0
0 306 657.4 3.81E6 2.84E5 2.06E9-3.76E8 1.73 0
0 250 660.2 7.52E4 1.21E5 8.75E7 1.36E8 I
1.83 0
0.33 270 663.5 3.64E5 4.40E4 4.26E8 4.91E7 1.93 0
0.33 272 663.5 3.57E5 4.40E4 4.18E8 4.91E7 2.01 0
1.15 257 667.1 4.29E4 2.65E4 5.00E7 2.82E7 2.06 0.22 1.15 263 667.1 2.48E4 2.65E4 2.90E7 2.82E7 2.07 0
1.15 265 667.1 2.75E5 2.65E4 3.21E8 2.82E7 2.09 0
1.15 259 667.7 4.45E4 2.65E4 5.19E7 2.82E7 2.11 0
1.15 262 667.7 1.98E5 1.32E4 2.31E8 1.49E7 2.13 0
1.15 260 667.7 4.28E4 1.32E4 5.00E7 1.49E7 2.14 0
1.15 258 677.7 2.64E4 1.32E4 3.08E7 1.49E7 2.16 0
1.15 263 667.7 1.77E5 1.32E4 2.07E8 1.49E7
Sheet 2 cf 3 TABLE 6a - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCE)
Time H Mass Flow (1b/ min)
H Temperature ( F)
S/W Mass Flow (lb/hr)
S/W Energy Flow (Btu /hr) 2 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook-Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 2.18 0
1.15 260 667.7 3.61E4 1.32E4 4.21E7 1.49E7 2.20 0
1.56 261 667.7 9.35E4 1.22E4 1.09E8 1.52E7 2.21 0
1.56 263 667.7 1.34E5 1.22E4 1.57E8 1.52E7 2.23 0
1.56 257 667.7 4.14E3 1.22E4' 4.83E6 1.52E7 i
2.25 0
1.56 259 667.7 3.43E4 1.22E4 4.00E7 1.52E7 i
j 2.27 0
1.56 257 667.7 3.08E3 1.22E4 3.59E6 1.52E7 l
2.28 0
1.56 258 667.7 6.70E3 1.22E4 7.82E6 1.52E7 1
l 2.30 0
1.56 259 667.7 2.08E4 1.22E4 2.43E7 1.52E7 j
2.32 0
1.56 261 667.7 6.64E4 1.22E4 7.75E7 1.52E7 2.33 0
1.56 265 667.7 1.43E5 1.22E4 1.67E8 1.52E7 2.35 25.00 1.56 259 667.7 5.89E3 1.22E4 6.87E6 1.52E7 2.39 25.00 1.56 263 667.7 7.50E4 1.22E4 8.76E7 1.52E7 2.40 25.00 1.56 265 667.7 1.02E5 1.22E4 1.19E8 1.52E7 2.42 25.00 0
264 668.8 6.32E4 0
7.39E7 0
1 2.44 25.00 0
266 668.8 9.80E4 0
1.15E8 0
2.47 25.00 0
266 668.8 7.05E4 0
8.24E7 0
1 2.49 25.00 0
265 668.8 2.82E4 0
3.30E7 0
2.50 33.33 0
268 668.8 7.13E4 0
8.34E7 0
2.52 33.33 0
267 668.8 5.42E4 0
6.34E7 0
i
Sheet 3 (f 3, TABLE 6a - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH) 1 Time H Mass Flow (lb/ min)
H Temperature ( F)
S/W Mass Flow (lb/hr)
S/W Energy Flow (Btu /hr) 2 2
4 (Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 2.54 940.00 19.78 268 670.2 3.15E4 1.14E5 3.69E7 1.40E8 2.56 0
24.55 270 670.2 8.24E4 1.42E5 9.65E7 1.97E8 2.57 83.33 24.55 271 670.2 8.78E4 1.42E5 1.03E8 1.97E8 2.59 83.33 4.79 270 670.2 4.36E4 2.77E4 5.10E7 5.10E7 2.61 166.67 0
271 674.4 6.61E4 0
7.74E7 0
2.62 166.67 0
271 674.4 5.41E4 0
6.34E7 0
2.64 16.67 0
270 674.4 7.63E3 0
8.93E6 0
2.66 33.33 169.57 273 782.6 1.77E4 4.43E5 2.07E7 5.72E8 2.70 166.67 135.46 278 1014.2 1.54E5 3.46E5 1.81E8 4.40E8 2.75 33.33 88.77 278 1363.7 4.80E4 2.82E5 5.63E7 4.06E8 2.81 16.67 42.36 281 1870.9 1.06E5 1.88E5 1.24E8 3.23E8 2.90 5.00 19.43 281 2137.1 3.72E4 1.15E5 4.37E7 2.23E8 3.00 5.00 10.58 289 2330.5 1.67ES 9.12E4 1.96E8 2.11E8 3.25 1.67 1.78 293 2366.3 5.72E4 2.05E4 6.74E7 4.11E7 3.55 1.67 1.24 301 2366.3 5.57E4 1.43E4 6.57E7 2.87E7 4.06 1.67 0
318 2366.3 2.60E5 1.78E5 3.08E8 1.22E8 l
Shost 1,of 2 TABLE 6b - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
TMLU Time H Mass Flow / Steam-Water Mass Flow Entalpy of Steam-Water (Btu /lb) 2 Ratio (Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 0.00 0
0 0.50 0
0 1.02 0
0 634 1.22 0
0 675 1.32 0
0 1161 718 1.42 0
0 1161 1324 1.53 0
0 1168 1324 1.63 0
0 541 1324 1.73 0
0 1164 1124 1.83 0
4.5E-4 1170 1116 1.93 0
4.5E-4 1171 1116 2.01 0
2.60E-3 1166 1064 2.06 5.32E-4 2.60E-3 1169 1064 2.07 0
2.60E-3 1167 1064 2.09 0
2.60E-3 1166 1064 2.11 0
5.23E-3 1167 1129 2.13 0
5.23E-3 1168 1129 2.14 0
5.23E-3 1167 1129 2.16 0
5.23E-3 1169 1129 2.18 0
5.23E-3 1166 1129 2.20 0
7.67E-3 1166 1246 2.21 0
7.67E-3 1172 1246 2.23 0
7.67E-3 1167 1246 2.25 0
7.67E-3 1166 1246 2.27 0
7.67E-3 1166 1246 2.28 0
7.67E-3 1167 1246 1
Shastj[cf][
TABLE 6b - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
TMLU t
Time-H Mass Flow / Steam-Water Mass Flow Entalpy of Steam-Water (Btu /lb) 2 Ratio (Hr)
Catawba DC Cook Catawba DC Cook 2.30 0
7.67E-3 1168 1246 2.32 0
7.67E-3 1167 1246 j
2.33 0
7.67E-3 1168 1246 l
2.35 2.55E-1 7.67E-3 1166 1246 2.39 2E-2 7.67E-3 1168 1246 2.40 1.47E-2 7.67E-3 1167 1246 2.42 2.37E-2 2.44 1.53E-2 2.47 2.13E-2 2.49 5.32E-2 l
2.50 2.80E-2 l
2.52 3.69E-2 2.54 1.79 1.04E-2 1171 1228 2.56 0
1.04E-2 1171 1387 2.57 5.69E-2 1.04E-2 1173 1387 2.59 1.15E-1 1.04E-2 1170 1841 2.61 1.51E-1 2.62 1.85E-1 2.64 1.31E-1 2.66 1.13E-1 2.30E-2 1169 1291 2.70 6.49E-2 2.35E-2 1175 1272 2.75 4.17E-2 1.89E-2 1173 1440 2.81 9.44E-3 1.35E-2 1170 1718 2.90 8.06E-3 1.01E-2 1175 1939 3.00 1.80E-3 6.96E-3 1174 2314 3.25 1.75E-3 5.21E-3 1178 2005 3.55 1.80E-3 5.20E-3 1180 2007 4.06 3.85E-4 0
1185 685
Sheet 1 of 2 j
TABLE 6c - DATA USED FOR COMPARISION OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time Steam-Water H Release Ratio 2
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 0.00 inf.
inf.
0.50 inf.
inf.
1.02 inf.
inf.
1.22 inf.
inf.
1.32 inf.
inf.
1.42 inf.
inf.
1.53 inf.
inf.
1.63 inf.
inf.
1.73 inf.
inf.
1.83 inf.
2.22E3 1.93 inf.
2.22E3 2.01 inf.
3.85E2 2.06 4.87E3 3.85E2 2.07 inf.
3.85E2 2.09 inf.
3.85E2 2.11 inf.
1.91E2 2.13 inf.
1.91E2 2.14 inf.
1.91E2 2.16 inf.
1.91E2 2.18 inf.
1.91E2 2.20 inf.
1.30E2 2.21 inf.
1.30E2 2.23 inf.
1.30E2 2.25 inf.
1.30E2 2.27 inf.
1.30E2 2.28 inf.
1.30E2 2.30 inf.
1.30E2 2.32 inf.
1.30E2
Shestj[afj[-
TABLE 6c - DATA USED FOR COMPARISION OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Time Steam-Water H Release Ratio y
(Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 2.33 inf.
1.30E2 2.35 3.92 1.30E2 2.39 5.00E1 1.30E2 2.40 6.80E1 1.30E2 2.42 4.22E1 0.b 2.44 6.54E1 0.0 2.47 4.69El 0.0 2.49 1.88E1 0.0 2.50 3.57El 0.0 2.52 2.71El 0.0 2.54 5.59El 9.62E1 2.56 inf.
9.62E1 2.57 1.76El 9.62E1 2.59 8.70 9.62El' 2.61 6.62 0.0 2.62 5.41 0.0 2.64 7.63 0.0 2.66 8.85 4.35El 2.70 1.54E1 4.26El 2.75 2.40E1 5.29El 2.81 1.06E+2 7.41El 2.90 1.24E2 9.90E1 3.00 5.56E2 1.44E2 3.25 5.71E2 1.92E2 3.55 5.56E2 1.92E2 4.06 2.60E3 inf.
Shoct 1 ef 2 TABLE 6d - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH) i Time
~ Integrated H Mass (lba) 2 (Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 0.00 0
0 0.50 0
0 1.02 0
0 1.22 0
0 1.32 0
0 1.42 0
0 1.53 0
0 1.63 0
0 1.73 0
0 4
1.83 0
0.99 1.93 0
2.97 2.01 0
6.52 2.06 0.33 9.97 2.07 0.33 10.66 2.09 0.33 12.04 2.11 0.33 13.42 2.13 0.33 14.80 2.14 0.33 15.49 2.16 0.33 16.87 i
2.18 0.33 18.25 2.20 0.33 19.88 4
i.
2.21 0.33 20.81 1
2.23 0.33 22.68 2.25 0.33 24.56 2.27 0.33 26.43 2.28 0.33 27.37 2.30 0.33 29.24 l
2.32 0.33 31.11 2.33 0.33 32.05
Sh;ctj[efj[
TABLE 6d'- DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND D. C. COOK (MARCH)
Tina Integrated H Mass (1bm) 2 (Hr)
Catawba DC Cook 2.35 15.33 33.92 2.39 75.33 37.66 2.40 90.33 38.60 2.42 120.33 39.53 2.44 150.33 39.53 2.47 195.33 39.53 2.49 225.33 39.53 2.50 242.83 39.53 2.52 282.83 39.53 2.54 866.83 51.40 2.56 1.43E3 77.99 2.57 1.45E3 92.73 2.59 1.55E3 110.33 2.61 1.70E3 113.21 2.62 1.80E3 113.21 2.64 1.91E3 113.21 2.66 1.94E3 214.95 2.70 2.18E3 580.98 2.75 2.48E3 917.33 3
2.81 2.57E3 1.15E3 2.90
'z. 53E3 1.32E3 3.00 2.56E3 1.41E3 3.25 2.71E3 1.50E3 3.55 2.74E3 1.53E3 4.06 2.79E3 1.55E3 l
(
. -.w-
_my_
..,-... _. - - - -,... ~ _ - - - -.,,
y,,,,,,w._,,,,
,..,...,,.,..y,m..,_-,_,,.7-,,
...-,__,ym--,.,
-_.w_.,___.-4
l.
Figure 6 Comparison of TMLU S:qu nes Pcramstars For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH) i f
Sheet I of 8 I
l CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK TMLU SEQUENCE l
H 1999-l 2
988-M A
888-S S
790-1' F
688-1 L
0 See-M i
4ee-l L
S SOS-S
/
288-M I
198-N M_
i g_.
...,.........y........
y..
e 1
2 3
4 S
TIME <NRS) i I
I i
i
l i
Figure 6 Compari::on of TMLU Sr,qusacs Pcrametcro j
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Sheet 2 of 8 I
i CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK l
THLU SEQUENCE
'I I
Sese:
H li 2
T r
E
/
i M
/
P 2008-E f
R 1
A I
T U
1 1
I R
f i
E lese; j
y
\\
I
_ /-.
G
[
f-p-
e-i...................
e 1
2 3
4 5
TIME CHRS)
)
l
\\
4 i
Figure 6 Comparison of TMLU Sequence Parametsro i
For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH) l Sheet 3 of 8 CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK I
3 l
TMLU SEQUENCE l
S T
E i
A i
M 4999998-
/
M A
T E 38eeesei R
M A
S 2900000-
]
S i
i 1
y 3
4 T
LO 1808088i lItl w
I~3bkw h
s
/
t
,_ i...................,.........,.........,.........,
j 4
H e
1 2
3 4
5 R
TIME CHRS)
I I
I i
t
'I
IllIjlll!1I i5
)H C
s R r A b
e M K
4 t
(
e m k O
a o r o a C O
P e C C
c n
e D u
q d CE e n
.C 3
S a
)
U
)
N DE S
L P M A R
T A U
k H
M Q
f
(
C o
8, SE a
S E
n b f V
o w o s a M
i t 4,
U I
r a L
,g T
a C t p
e m r e BT o o h C F S W
1 A
\\
\\
l T
f lI A
6
,1 C
e ru g
iF T,
0
- ~::-
9 9
9 0
e 8
8 0
+
+
+
E+
E E
E0 e
9 e.
B s
2 1
STEAM / MATER ENERGY Fuo eT R
Il l
-llllllI
l Figure 6 Comparison of TMLU Sequence Parameters For Catauba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Sheet 5 of 8 CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK R
TMLU SEQUENCE A
T I
O O 2.98-F 1.78-H 2 1.56-T 1.33-O 1.11-S T 9.89-E A 9.67-M 8.44-M A 8.22-s a. 8e,.........,.....O F
1 2
3 4
5 L
O TIME CHRS)
\\
M I
\\
l
Figure 6 Comparicen of TMLU S quenco Parametsro For Catawba (MAAP) cnd D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Sheet 6 of 8 CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK TMLU SEQUENCE E
NT N
A L 2488-b Y 2218-jg
/
\\
3 O 2929-
/
\\
F 1838-
/
\\
s
\\
d
\\
T 1848-E
\\
A 1458-
[
g
- 1268-f g
~d
\\
1878-
\\
l
\\
T E
\\
R l
See-B T
580-
''''''''''''''s''''s
'3 U
3 4
5 3
/
1 2
L TIME CHRS)
B M
J CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK l
TMLU SEQUENCE
]
y Figure 6 Comparison of TMLU Sequence Farameters l
A For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
Sheet 7 of 8_
R 1.00E+04-T
~
1.00E+03j g
0 i
H i
I, i
2 1.00E+02-
-~,
i i
\\
n A
1.00E+015 j
S 4
i S
1.00E+00- '
F L
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
3 3
3 3
4 4
0 W
0 2
5 7
0 2
5 7
0 2
5 7
0 2
5 7
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
TIME CHRS) a l
PLANT CATAWBA DCCOOK l
l CATAWBA VS. D.C. COOK TMLU SEQUENCE I
Figure 6 Comparison of TMLU Sequence Parameters N
T For Catawba (MAAP) and D. C. Cook (MARCH)
E sheet 8 of a G
I R
3.OOE+03-A T
i E
D 2.OOE+03i 4
H
)
2
/
l
- 1. OOE-r03 i
/
i M
i
/
)
A
)',f l
S i
I S
0.OOE+002 l
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i L
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
3 3
3 3
4 4
B l
M O
2 5
7 0
2 5
7 0
2 5
7 0
2 5
7 0
2 S
O 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
j TIME CHRS)
I l
PLANT CATAWBA DCCOOK 1
u
TABLE 7a - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND SEQUOYAH (MARCH)
TMLU Sequoyah "L" CASES Time H Mass Flow H O Mass Flow H /H O Mass Flow 2
2 2 2 (Hr)
(lb/ min)
(lb/hr)
Ratio 0.56 0
1.5E4 0
1.11 0
1.2E5 0
1.67 0
3.3E5 0
2.22 0
3E5 0
2.50 0
2.7E5 0
2.78 40.0 2.4E5 1E-2 2.92 65.0 1.5E5 2.6E-2 3.06 35.0 1.2E5 1.75E-2 3.33 5.0 1.8E5 1.67E-3 3.61 2.5 2.1ES 7.14E-4 3.89 0
1.5E5 0
TABLE 7b - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR' CATAWBA (MAAP) AND SEQUOYAH (MARCH)
Time Steam-Water /H Release Ratio 2
(Hr)
Sequoyah 0.56 inf.
1.11 inf.
1.67 inf.
2.22 inf.
2.50 inf.
1 2.78 1.00E2 f
2.92 3.85El 3.06 5.71El 3.33 5.99E2 3.61 1.40E3 3.89 inf.
J b
'l i
a i
f k
TABLE 7c - DATA USED FOR COMPARISON OF TMLU SEQUENCES FOR CATAWBA (MAAP) AND SEQUOYAH (MARCH) 1 Time (Hr)
Integrated H Mass For "L" Cases (lba) 0.56 0
1.11 0
1.67 0
2.22 0
2.50 0
2.78 336.00 2.92 777.00 3.06 1.20E3 3.33 1.52E3 3.61 1.58E3 3.89 1.60E3 l
l l
\\
fllll\\llIllIll)l(1lll/
ii
,l l
e 5
4 5
5 3
~
y S
)
e E
o H r C S
I s R b
3 A
t A e M C
m(
S L
ar h E
a a P y o Il S
5 a u c q I
A 2
n e e S u
C q d
)
- n S a E
S C
LN R
U
)
L P e
H M A
.E T A I
C M
U SQ 2
A f
(
c 5
E B
E a
VS M
W n b f o w o I
A c a T
T i
t 1
AU 5
A r a a C t L
C p
e BH 5
m r e o o h 1
T C F S WAT 3
.s A
1 C
7 ar T
ug N
s.
A i
F L
I e
P e
I e
~
8 e
e 0
e 0
0 e0 e
e 8
e e
0 e
0 0
e0 e
9 s
S 7
S 5
4 s2 f
1 H2 HASS FLOW LBS/HIN Ill1\\lll\\lllllf!
l'
i 1
'l I
Figure 7 Compariccn cf TMLU Scqusacs Pcrametero For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH) i 3
1 1
Sheet 2 of 5-l i.
CATAWBA VS. L CASES TMLU SEQUENCE i
W A 499mMMt -
T E
R
[
M 3999999i A
S i
s i
i F 2999999i j
L 1
0 l
M i
i
{
L 1 NamMun -
i B
S j
/
Vh-y
,j j
j 9.9 9.5 1.9 l.S 2.9 2.5 3.9 3.5 4.9 i
I TIME Chits)
PLANT CATAWBA LCASES l
1
(
t i
I 1
l Figure 7 Comp ricon cf TMLU S:qu nco Pcrameccra j
For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH) i Sheet 3 of 5 t
i CATAWBA VS. L CASES i
TMLU SEQUENCE H
2 T
O 2.98-l W 1.78-1 A
I T 1.56-i E
l R I.33-l M 1.11-A j
S 9.89-S l
9.e7-F L 9.44-O W 9.22-R 9.99-l A
T 9.9 9.5 1.9 1.5 2.9 2.5 3.9 3.5 4.9 l
I O
TIME CHRS) 1 I
PLANT CATAWSA LCASES f
1
CATAWBA VS. SEQUOYAH TMLU SEQUENCE Figure 7 Comparison of TMLU Sequence Parameters W
A For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
Sheet 4 of 5, E
l R
1.00E+04-T 1.00E+03j 0
H
/
)
2 1.00E+02i
/
b M
l A
1.00E+01i l
S S
1.00E+00 2 F
L 0
0 0
0 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 3
3 3
3 4
4 O
W 0
2 5
7 0
2 5
7 0
2 5
7 0
2 5
7 0
2 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 TIME CHRS)
PLANT CATAWBA SEQUOYAH
CATAWBA VS. SEQUOYAH TMLU SEQUENCE
.I Figure 7 Comparison of TMLU Sequence Parameters For Catawba (MAAP) and Sequoyah (MARCH)
E Sheet 5 of 5 G
R 3.00E+03-A T
i E
D 2.00E+03i H
2 5
'/
1.00E+03i
/
M
/
A
/
S i
}" /
S O.OOE+002 l
l l
8 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I L
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
3 3
3 3
4 4
B M
0 2
5 7
0 2
5 7
0 2
5 7
0 2
5 7
0 2
S O
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 TIME CHRS)
PLANT CATAWBA SEQUOYAH 1