ML20206E430

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of Changes to Evaluation Criteria of NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,Rev 1
ML20206E430
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/28/1987
From:
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20206E400 List:
References
FOIA-88-280, FOIA-88-A-44, RTR-NUREG-0654, RTR-NUREG-654 FEMA-REP-1, NUDOCS 8811180076
Download: ML20206E430 (1)
v • d • e


Text

.

. _. 2 i

Summary of Chances NUREG-0654/ FEMA1. REP-1, Rev.The following is a summary of the 1.

The concept of "offsite response organization" is adopted and de Throu e.

tion"ghout the revised evaluation criteria "offsite response organiza-replaces references to Statt and local governments.

2.

In 'addition, for lack of partievaluation criteria were modified or added to compens planning process,cipation by State and local governrrents in the for these functions:

a.

authorization before implementing (A.2.a.). Identificat b.

Provision local officialsofinadditional an emergency personnel (C.5.). to advise and assist State and c.

actions to be taken (0.4., J 10.f.). Provision for advising S d.

Provision for coordinating local governments (E.8.). emergency messages with State and _

e.

Provision for comunications with non participating State and local emergency operations facilities (F.1.).

f.

Provision for public information describing the role of the offsite response tions during organization the energency (G.I.e. ).vs. the State and local organiza-

, g.

Establit: ment of an emergency operations center for use in '

directing and controlling offsite response functions ...

(H 3 )

' h.

, physical means (even though they night not have 4

bility) for activating the alert and notification systes.. (E 6 and J.9.).

, i.

ng O eral public (J 10.f.)Recomendation on the use of potassium i -

(

Q.

j. ,

y l

dd i

by State end local governments but not requirin N.6.).

. . . and s

/ .'

85 k.

gu.g% 1 ggd 1.

response organization who will be responders (0 3 ma.m c) '

Provision for offering training to non participating State and local governments and other organizations (0.6.). ' x) e.

_s .

i revisions to non participating State and local gov '

entities interfaces with which in its theolan offsite offsite f* response organization identWS

U.S. NUCLUAL3 MG3LA10RV 40MWhb vl'. g s . ca.... . . . . e- _

F0IA-88-280 ses.e-u r,,i

f. ~. \

I l '**"d' i

f. X 1d ' * *'

C

/)/

I RESPONSE TO FREEDOM CF **d INFORMATION ACT (FOlA) REQUEST g

\, l ooc it wei.. , ~ :

..ovm e.

Robert R. Belair PART l.-RECOAQs stLt ASto OR NOT LoCAT10 ts cA.<.ed aose.t No p, ,eco<ds .wt ect to P. .sw.c1 P.v. t a le c.t.d No .od.teca . gene, .coro. ..tect to th. .ov t h... bee toc.t.d

. . .w..o, ..at+. fo, pwba.c rocctea .e4 cocieg e to. N aC Ph.c oocw~,, s aa.

Ag.6c, e.c orss me,ect to t*. .ownt it.1... e.et..d e Ao,:.com __

irit M st .et N w . Washeroa. oC

..e,uno r. . uni ... .oeu.o ecc a ., . _ G - ...t ,~a... m ,,,.u.c .cc - .*c.,n er.4.eP,,s.com.-e, a x, ,u, .it., a.~

(X am irit o si. i. N w . w..sevoa. oC . . . ego ,<., r. rca ~~ . . e e.o

.....v. ,, ,,,u< -+

ts. eec=-.w, ,~,e e r. r ., ne o , ... io .u.o e s. woe. cor..wuo,,~.

  • e, r.s~~..

o< a s,,e , c.*

. . . .no.

....i., e.~

~a

.e c. n t 3. Nac em ox,,wi am irir x si. i N w . wu eror. oc . < .

C (ncio d a r s,m.a ten on he. ,ov m., oct.* .cce to .9 t*. ch. Ge. fo' coc,*9 '.co.e. pl.ced e tr. NaC Puta. ow=~t acom. Iris M si..et. N w . wnherce o

.w..>. c a..s. 'o *a e m u a ro *4 .* c .-ei ru.4 a n *'.o e e. com-'on-a, ~, x r. we,uno r. .. n . cw., 4 ,

a u c.,4. . e-no r. . .u .... . ... ..o . .%r e.o.. 4 . a.~ ,. .. , e, ... . . 4 4 ui ,oce i. vo, n ..n.,u w . ni4.. o

.cc..,.n.ama_ June _13j88(88-A-32) _

io. .sse.,ow ..r..

~

PAaf II A-4NFORMAtlON WITHMILO FaOM PUBLIC olSCt05Unt e e.,ii .x

...e u. r.soia ... ,+ . u w e.4 e .9 vo,r.....c,. c..

c. e , - .a r., .c.o<x a . 6.m,,,.ex.4e,r cn, w.~,4*
w. e C . . o A,, .. .. . sew, e n , , , . . , .

e

. %.. .ao.,o..

c.aer..u r.. o:a.s,*

,. . ..ree..es ... .e.v.

.a .. 2.v. i, seu e.,*se .* c , ,

w e.-.

KX

.*. Na e *->. cu ~i a = irit w si,ui. N w . was., ve. oc c ee.

You will be billed in the amount of $259.78 by NRC's Division of Accounting and Finance. (95 hours0.0011 days <br />0.0264 hours <br />1.570767e-4 weeks <br />3.61475e-5 months <br /> professional search and review 0$24.88 per hour; 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> clerical search and revew 0$11.78 per hour.)

l I

s'k g- a .T omatvoa. rres.wre mias . ..ico.es

_a - -

92e9*94147 vp

%"C 80 a M 464 ,e4 -

te

\

fotA NUMBth$3 F01A-88 ~0 Daft FIEEDOM CF.INFORMATION ACT RESPONSE gg g 1 1 sian PART ft 0- APPLtCASLt FitA (XIMPTIONS FWW* rw

_ are being withbeid in tFer entirety of in part undet FOtA Records subpect to the togtest that are dewribed n the enclosed Append.ces _M Demptons and for the reasons set forth telow pursuant to 5 U.S C. 562(td and 10 C/R 9.5f al of NRC Regulatons.

{' 1. The weNo. .aiormate e propedy clasa#ed pweswe's to Esot avs Ordee 12X4 ttxtMPTCN 11 e

2. The 6 tex eformation reistas scder, to the etemal pe scerer twies sad procedw es of NmC. (D(MPTCN 21 r (DtMPfC:s h t 3 The methhow eformaoon e spoof <aPr esorreted from putac d.scic4w e tw s'atwte edicated -

Secuan 141a45 of the Atom tr**3v Act ahe Pohbts tPo oscicewte of pestacted Cata or forviv 8estricted Dra ia2 U S

' $xtee ta' os e Aton.c tecrv Act Ncm probants ce d4ciosw e of Unciass.f.d $a'eg.,a os sefor-wton ta2 V $ C 216h e

,0. ,,, re as- sma . D t o,1 N ., ,

. T, . .e,~.s e,or._ e a ,ade sur e- - or ,_,,,- a, . t.

The ef or**4tson e cor+sde'ed te De con # dentM tha'r*ss lp'o0rdia#Y) Wormation.

8 r

The efor-4 tea e cces. dred to to propreta'v eformatce pu swant to 10 CF A 2 730'duti e

The e#oe-ate nas swtat*ed sed ' Meted e cor4 ease bom a fose ga sow ce ow% sat to to CF A 2 79)d12e e rre d uo-, dea,.n 0xtosw.e o, p,edx.e, .n,,,,ce i~ ,

. ~ ,w e.or~,.e -s o, cie.a.ex, cess,e~e .x-s r.,t s.. ~, a,s (X ww iere to ca.d.,c re cie4a d a,t,we wxw e rep c+sa Two veoa,re v rs e.sase

,e e. .moeau, sey. nave o'facw een mese pews io .rmeseu t=a.* +e ce rese,e exm,.,ma

<ws noww ee en e ,xc es ce a t" cowwt snopy eto L. e orwecescre; procesa of Pe 89eMy IDtWPf CN 54 eaawa~ed e=esce c4 ;e socar paveN itxtvetcN $

6 N aatte4 elornt,on e eieeptH boa swt4 decice. e teca se .ts dwoswie noww resst e a oesa, w

7. The a+ree .nfeeate,.e cons,sts of evest$aicre ecoros co+ceed 'or taa eeforconent evreses and e te eg s

tecewse 4 cowld re,eal the scoce detecten, sad focu$ of esforcereget efforts and pgs towy n r %est9ators CtvM4% 71An Q4c otw e agwW eterdere a@ an omfof certeet POC@ipou. css ano* teem to taae acten so seve potente a'oego Decios,, e movid coaststea sa w as"acted evasca o8 pe wa' prwacy iDIVPT@N FiCH 4e"4: sow <ces @tMPT4N 1 De The c r-4!+e coes is of ea+es of edvowa a #N etav> eioreste t*e d wesse of *Na acv4,ee .ce-t tes of coe8 a

P Ami et C-OtNviNG CFflCtAt$

esc w e e <4 s oset f +d teice as dea v eg o.c.a's sad (*e 0<ecr Pw e swaat to 10 C'.It 9 9 41 o' 9 il e8 tP* U $ Nwc%e< AnAeice,(cewmase regwwces a sad mai ets proo a:toa or tsciowe e coevat to Fo Owed.c ete estaa, dea a s eat e a, be apoea6sd to tee (sec.de Deector 'o* Cte sto*s eso o'v4 son of #wie's a*4 Reco*ds. ONe e' Ad. war ston. tot agCoa0s otN go AppguAtt OssiciAt 0FeVW6f f tCiat fif ti 0881Cl su i'a' ex Regiona D dministratoro X William T. Russell Region 1 Hi tH3s H4  ;

X Thomas E. Murley Director, NRR H2 _

f I'

Pant 10 Arriat mioHrs a The den at t'y exh denyvg offi<J edent#ed n Part u C may to appes'ed to theforAppe becwtive Dwectoe Operstionsste d We on the envelope and in the letter or to Off6 eteg and must t,o made nehe 10 dan of vocop of tNs restense. Appea's must te oddressed as sopropna the Sec' eta y of the Cormvssen. U.S. %clev . gvlatory Commwon, Washington, DC 2V45. and should clea y s that n s aa "Arceal f'orn an inaial FO(A Dxson. U $. NUCLE AR RioVLATORY COMMIS$1C enac sonw ese Jon ti FOtA RESPONSE CONTINUATION s ee

88-260

- Re: F0!A. ,

APPEN0lX G RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE POR UNDER THE ABOVE REQUEST NUMBER ,

NUM8ER DATE DESCRIPTION 4

Memo from Edward Jordan to Regional Administrators, with attached

1. 4/27/88 (Deleted portions are outside the scope of the request.)

responses.

(6 pages) l-

[

4 a

e l

. 3. .

t i

~

Re: ro! A.88-280 APPENDIX H RECORDS TOTALLY WITHHELD

,NUM8E R. DATE DESCRIPTION & EXEMPTION

1. 2/19/88 Memo from Edwin Fox to lhor Husar, subject: Review / Comments Shoreham Offsite Emergency Plan, Rev. 9. (18 pages)

, Exemption 5

2. 3/28/88 Draf t memo from Thomas E. Murley to Victor Stello, subject:

Application of 10 CFR 50.47(c) - The Emergency Preparedness

, "Realism" Rule. (24 pages) Exemption 5

3. 4/11/88 Memo from Edwin Fox to lhor Husar, subject: Comments on the Preliminary Review of Revions 9 of the LILCO Plan for Shoreham.

(5pages) Exemption 5.

4. 5/4/88 Memo from Edwin Fox to lhor Husar, subject: Review of LILCO's Response to the 1986 Exercise Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Action. (24 pages) Exemption 5.

4 I

e s

r _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - - _ _ _

o s,

  • g u.s. NUCLEAR REGulATCCY COMMISSION cyst

+

e. "' ,'

IW f '

RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (F0IA) REQUEST d' ' '" * *

( ...e J g 2 1 1988 DOCatt 1%%f tt A li 6# apphrodel m#

,blPART 1.-RICORDS RELEASED OR NOT LOC ATf D ISee eveaed besesi No aW *ecords evbsect to me *eowest have boea located Ni, s klacraf agency <econds evenct to be reavest Pave taga located Am, . m .1 to r4 0 1717 M Stron N W.. Washegton. DC

, r.t ..e .e~.d e A,pe,d . I ..e e.d .. .se .o. ,C.<t .,d .-g e re N.C , em . . .

_ Ageog y records twbrect 10 the roQwest that 3 9 dentded e ApC4^6 _ s'e t4.Ag are$e 4= 6Jat4 for putd4 e$gecteoe ed Copyeg en tP4 NRC PwPec Occ.,*eet Room,1717 ed $t' set. N W . Wuk*afon. DC. e 8 'Cdd, weer the IOf A a mte' v ead f e4 wester Paa4 f PT Sta 4 ho* t@eg FadSe St 834tne for htdee eteec'ce

/ The mor$eogrete*y we'taoA Of the D'c@ctal O Pat yow ag'eed to 4cCopt # 4 to #Dhore Co%e betsom'.-ee,".ad

.nd Co,mg c e4 %RC Pwe < oawmeet a*m. iti? H st<eet sW w aerea

.te.e.,

  • =th 4 fremt4' ODC et,. ee . 'e*59< w*e t*4 s oia (mCic ted a WD"*4 ten Or' how yow way otte e Etett 10 and IN the'getfo' CoCveg '4Co'ds 64pteJ e tP4 h AC Petd< Ooces*4at Room.1717 H $treet, N W , Wan%egior DC Ageacy 'ecn stetWI to 1*e 'ty.est s's eacicted Arv ocpl< sb4 ste*ge foe coces of t*4 reco'dt p'ov*ded eM ca,*e*t proced.*es Fe Acted iP f e coveats secte*

SNosos tutm1 to tre re4.est ##se 84e9 f ede"ed to e^otte' IP34'3' # gen yf esi 90 ' teve* end ddect setDoPle to yow le ve* of AR C s resscote to the 'eqvesi. no bi*** ecleom 4 24.Ag tatea oc spceal LePe' daied PART,Il A-l%FCRM AflON WITHHELD FROM PUS'.tC DISCLOSyst Cease c'er-con e tee roowwed reco<cs 4 tem

  • tkted fece m.t4< d scicsw<e ow s aat to toe Fola eienwo sesc~ted e e4 fo, t*e veasces stated e een n arc e

Scre S C. and D Amy 'Pened poMeet of Pe dawmeets for **<h only pe9 of Pe recoed 4 terg *We44 e's t4 9g *eSe as adatae fo' Dwbl.C etGecten and tieveg r the psRC Pwem< Docweem Room.1717 H 5t m N W . Weskeroa DC e a ' ode' wnde< tm>s FC4 Aw a ate' aad 'to.es e< c4w Come*ats b b A Sec KN4 OfV e Af 48.0 8KC8DS

\.

osn,-.>.

,p a - q_.Lut h cLS-M

%:C # 0 m t.4 464 se -

iw

e Re: FolA-88-280 APPENDIX E Doucments Already Available in the POR <

FEMA Support for

l. 05/23/88 Memo from F. Congel to Richard Krimm, subject:

NRC Licensing of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, regarding LILCO submission of Revision 10 of offsite plan. POR Accession No. 8805310042

2. 05/19/88 Letter from T. Murley to John Leonard, regarding NRC participation in federally graded exercise of Shoreham Emergency Plan. ?DR Accession No. 8805260249
3. 02/08/88 Mero from F. Congel to R. Krimm, subject: FEMA Support for NRC Licensing of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, enclosing LILCO letter transmitting Shoreham Prompt Notification Design Report.
  • POR Accession No. 8802160246 4 02/08/88 Hemo from F. Congel to R. Krimm, subject: FEMA Support for NRC Licensing of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, enclosing LILC0 letter dated 12/18/87 requesting a full-participation exercise.

POR Accession No. 8802170005

5. 01/25/88 Letter from John Leonard, subject: Submission of the Long Is16.id Lighting Company's Revised Prompt Notification System Design Repcrt.

POR Accession No. 8802030181 f

I f

r P

n .

Re: F01A-88-280 APPENDIX F Documents Being Placed in the POR

1. 05/24/88 Letter from J. Leonard, subject: Shoreham Offsite Emergency Plan: Rev. 10. (14 pages)
2. 05/20/88 Memo from F. Congel to R. Krimm, subject: Objectives for the Shoreham F:.ercise (2 pages)
3. 05/12/88 Agenda for 5/12/88 FEFA Meeting (1 page)'

4 05/05/88 Draf t Discussion Points - FEMA Necting 5/6/88 (2 pages)

5. 05/05/88 Shoreham Plan Review and Exercise (Litigation) Schedule - PERT Chart (3 pages)
6. 05/03/88 Letter from D. Crocker to S. Brown, subject: Connecticut Exercise Participation (2 pages)
7. 04/29/88 Meeting Attendance Record and related records from 4/19/88 FEMA Meeting (4 pages)
8. 04/22/88 Memo from J. Stohr to R. Krimm, subject: Exercise Schedule for Shoreham - [ deleted portions are outside the scope of request.]

(3pages)

9. 04/07/88 Meeting Attendance Record and related documents from Shoreham Scheduling Meeting (9 pages)
10. 03/14/88 NRC/FEPA Meeting (5 pages)
11. 02/02/88 ShorehamStatus(3pages)
12. 01/28/88 Letter from D. Crocker to FEMA Region 11 Regional Assistance CommitteeMembers, subject: Transmittal of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Local Off site Emergency Response Plan, Revision 9(1page)
13. 01/27/88 Memo from F. Congel to R. Krim, subject: FEMA Support for NRC Licensing of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, regarding Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Local Offsite Radiological Emergency ResponsePlan(2pages) 14, 01/25/88 Memo from F. Congel to R. Krimm, subject: Emergency Plan Review Coordination fo' Shoreham (2 pages)
15. 12/07/87 Notes on Shoreham (4 pages)
16. Undated Review of Shoreham public emergency information materials (13 pages)

.. g Re: F01A-88-280-APPENDIXf(Con't)

17. Undated Shoreham - Seabrook Exercise History (3 pages)
18. Undated Shoreham Status as of 4/11/88 (1 page)
19. Undated ShorehamBackground(5pages)
20. Undated NRCShorehamObserver/VistorPlan(4pages)
21. Undated 1988 LILCO Emergency Preparedness Exercise Scenario (3 pages)
22. Undated Chart-ExerciseSchedule(1page)
23. Undated Realism Contained in the Shoreham Plan (2 pages) 24 Undated Scheduled Shoreham Exercise Events (1 page)
25. Undated Stanby and Report Chart (3 pages)
26. Undated Listing-Shoreham RAC (2 pages)
27. Undated Shoraham Background (5 pages)
28. Undated Shoreham Exercise: EX-3 Dates (1 page)
29. Undated Status of Open issues in Shoreham Proceeding (11 pages)
30. Undated ShorehamLicensingProceeding(8pages)
31. Undated Testimony on status of emergency planning for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant (4 pages) a T

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION w ri ' s.

g yy siti , e, Q

m ,t

.e....s "' s; ~

f

~

RESPONSE TO FREEDOM CF I" l l ' *'

INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST UUL 7 1988 (et... Docaat nevwsaa Si w encereaus b _ f PAR r 1.-RECOADS Rit(ASED OR NOT LOC AT10 (See cAecaed 6oseel 1

No agercy *ecorde swbrut to t>4 'eowest #4ve besa located Nu theral egency 'eco*0s pubpect to P4 reqweet Pave been located a>e ei'ead, avestatde for pwt4 wton and coccag e tes NRC P AAc Occwn" *w A gene, t.y.oros Abrect to t*e eeomi tPat s's oeeteed e Appe%s 1717 H $t'est N W., Washegion. DC s's berg *e$e esadat9e for pi.b'c esCH1ca sed cc9ying e t** N AC Pwb%c DotwNM '

Agency records svbrect to the roovest tkst a o deatded e Age %: _

Room.171? a $Peet. N W . Wn rfoe OC. e e tcMe' w a n dee tmo poia n.+ce' sad teoweste, name r

s fr.e e onpeceretary we' son of tee pac +ctai s> 1741 vow ag eed to a cept e as toephone cea e utoa arth e ere-t** of et sta t 4 mee be.ng made e.alare 'or DC e a 'cade* wr ee' tNo Fot A em, and reovecei eame and coyg e' ?e NRC PwtM Occwe ent Room.1717 H $tieet NA West ngtoa Inclosed e r4o'*4 tem on hon yow PJ, obta.* Sccess to a*d t*e cha*ges *or copgeg 8eco'$s placed e t*e N AC Pwtdic Docwmeat Room.1717 H $Neet, Agency roccr 3s sub,*ct to t*e 'eSest s's enclosed APy ecol.cabe CP4'ge for cog +s of t*e 'ecords peovded sad ga,-eat o'CN edw*es s'e eoted e the c Records eht to t*e roomt m ,e t+ea e re'ened to emot* er F ede o' age ^cytesi foe rev4* eM d< rect sesscese to vow in wwe cd N AC s sesconto to the tMwest. no fwves r scwn a teet, tshem om ec.cese teaev caled P arf it A-INFCRM ATION WITHHILD th0M PutttC DISCLOSumt Ce'u.a ety son .m tre roowesmf records 4 te.rg

  • t**e4d ',oa put4 Omosw e pwwaat to t*4 f o' A eiewt'oas sese. bed e sad var t** <enors s'ated r e Pe1 n toes S. C 494 D Aa, re ened serices of t>4 dorweerts fos **ch only 941 of t*e 'ecoed 4 teeg
  • t**e4 a e te N *ade avaJab4 for pwt4 esc +ction and cope g e to N AC P264 Occwneat Room,17t7 H $t'oet. N W . W u*egice. DC. e a foW wMee rm.s 80' A wn ete' and M,,es'er men Corveats a

l' e t 0*'t C T oa . sos 0. out amo esconog h.M _ '=a f M _

L 2.5 s'A #1+0- 3y t e s o n M .a .e4 ..

r.

Re: F01A-88-280 APPEN0!X C Documents Being Placed in the PDR Note to E. Jordan from B. Weiss;

Subject:

Exercise Guidance

1. 02/11/88 .For Exercises Without State and Locals (23 pages)
2. 04/08/88 Meeting Notes by B. G iss on FEMA Meetic9 with LILCO (4 pages)
3. 04/08/88 BriefingNotes,FEMAApril8,1988MeetingwithLILCO(6pages)

Letter from 1. Freilicher to F. Mancuso, attaching 4/?7/88

4. 04/15/88 response (2pages)
5. 04/26/88 Note to D. Donovan from B. Weiss;

Subject:

Draf t Shoreham ControlPlan(24pagec)

"Realism Contained In the Shoreham Plan" - Originated by B.

6. Undated Weiss (1 page) 5'eeting Notes by B. Weiss on Meeting with LILCO, FEMA, and NRC
7. 04/27/88 on 04/27/88 (4 pages)

Support to Memorandum for C. Karnrerer from E.

8. 04/28/88 FEMA for Shorehan and Seabrook Exercises 2 pages)Jordan (

Subject:

Request for

9. 04/29/88 Letter to J. Bellows from E. Jordan;

Subject:

Shoreham Exercise (1 page)

Assistance for June 7-9, 1988 Memorandum for W. J. Olmstead, J. P. Stohr, and F. J. Congel

10. 04/29/88 from R. L. Spessard;

Subject:

Oraft Offsite Control Plan forShorehamExercise(2pages) to G. Zech from B. Weiss;

Subject:

Telephone Conversation

11. 05/03/88 NotewithD.Donovanand1.Husar, FEMA (1page)

Impressions of FEMA

12. 05/03/88 Note to G. Zech from B. Weiss;

Subject:

04/29/88 MeetingwithLILCO(5pages)

Telephone Conversation .

13. 05/04/88 Note to files from B. Weiss;

Subject:

Shor;'am/Seabrook (1 page) with W. Olmstead, OGC, re:

"Response Report to Our Invitations to Participate in Our

14. 05/06/88 GradedExercise."(34pages)

Telecon with E. Reis,

15. 05/09/88 Note to files from B. Weiss;

Subject:

OGC, re: ShorehamControlPlan(1page)

(

16. 05/19/88 Memorandum from C. Daverio to D. Crocker, subject: Your 5/17/88 Memorandum Listing Required Resources for the June FEMA-graded Exercise of LERO (3 pages)
17. Undated LILCO Position on Connecticut Non-Participation (1 page)
18. Undated "Confidential: Scenario Information." (3 pages)
19. Undated "Confidential: Scenario Information." (3 pages)
20. Undated News Article: "LILC0 A> pears on the Ver Licensing Effort for Saoreham Plant." (ge of Giving Up its 1 page)
21. 01/22/? News Article: "Talks Intensif) .o Scrap Shorehav, but not LILCO."

(1 page)

22. Undated News Article: "LILCO, State Talks Over Plant Reach A Delicate Point." (1 page) i

m ..

, ,, U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMSS$10N uc scua ceove st @sinis, w

ae , % . ~ IA-88-280

'" ^

awosu nn s

RESPONSE TO FREEDOM CF l'" F XI ""*

INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST *'"

M 13 M wcs n .ie ine -.e.,

stoutSten Robert R. Belair PART I -RiconDS 8t(Lt ASED OR Not LOC 110 (See caecse; 6eseet No avowv tecortis swbet to the %est Pave bee located No addrtsotal agency escores subsect to P4 'eowesi >4ie teem loca'ed Ageacy esco,os oteact to Pe 'sowest t*Jt a o coatded e Acceede 1797 H $treet. N W . Washeg'O. DC . a>e 4-esty ever'stne tot pwbi4 esc +ctea 6^4 toovW e te N AC PR Occwee*1 # ccr=

Agence 9cor$s swt,ted to P4 feqwest that 4's demVed e AN+ com,1717 H S t'oet. N W , Waskegica DC. e a ' ceder vade' '. 4 FO' A aw+te and r oc 8'e bed *430 westee name#vedatse 'O' Dwtat ef tectca omd Copreg e tN N AC Pwtec Docwvt

%w ,, ,0.s. e. r. o,es.m s, r.1. .,.eed t. eue,i e . te we tir.,e.s.w , . -e.-e 0, , , ... e ~. t.eg .., ,,,,,o ,o, . 4 co._,

end Sovieg #1 Pe NRf PvtJ< Occweemt Acom 1717 H Sceet. N W , Washegtoa DC . e a 'cee' wnde* v the 80'A a r-ce, e%v cowes ee meme

( Cloted a r9er istem te Pce vow Per ottae 4(C(se to 49d l>$ Cb4'ges fo8 Co9veg 'eco'es Peced e tN N AC Pwtac Doemat n oc , trip M $ eet, N W Washegioa *e: .

l@ eat, tocords swt'Mt to P4 rowest e o eached A*f acca etW c c*sige for co0+e of t*e es: ores p<ov.ded esd ta,* eat proce$,'es te acted e te e commeets section Records owbvect W t>4 reQwest *be teem 'e's"ed te amef*4' Fede>S' 8;e^ Cries' 'o' resen 4*d darect 'espoete te vow la inee of NGC's aeswee to tk4 %est no 4've actoa e toeg tanee oa actes' ee' 44ted P ART li A-IN804MA710% WITHMELO im0M Ptsetic DISCLosung Cow e'e-me e *. ,*es ed .u es e bem **.4 + wuc eywe ev s.. no re *0a e.e , w seew e+d e . d.

boes 9 C e4 C Aa re,e,w sSt..es e P. u su tr.e NRC PW Docw eeat Room.1717 M St'est. N '.t . W ask*yca. DC e a 'o dc wNe tm o 80*0A aW4 and re.a. eve %+4v te

' Ccrents i

k 4

m A C ' - -

3

- OC% M'$C$ +18 40 aggoeC'S

! b

--A - -

l l

o e.

Kr w te~ v ow w ,.

. ., 1 ma , i POO M 444 ee . _ _ , , _ _ l 1

1

c ...

4 a

Re: FC:2-ia-280 APPEN0!X 0 t::, rents Being Placed in the PDR

1. 05/24/88 Merc fron : aig Conklin to Distribution, subjec:: Shoreha?

Emergency :aeparedness Exercise (Inspection Rep:*:

No. 50-3C ii-05. (2 pages)

2. 05/18/88 Mere froe .*cseph Scinto to Thomas Murley, subje::: Shoreham PID Findi g L!LICO Reception Centers Adequate beder Appendix E to Part $*. and NUREG 0654. ( 2 pages)
3. 05/11/88 Letter fruc Edwin Reis to Williar. Cunning Re: SP:reham. (1 page) 4 03/14/B8 Mere fror Ecwin Reis to Thomas Murley, subject: Shoreham Schedule.

(1 page)

5. 12/10/87 Memo fror Jares Murray to Thomas Murley, subject: Shoreham P!D Finding Stope of Emergency Exercise Inacequate Lnder Appendix E to Part 5:. (2 pages) 6 Undated Oraf t mest from Ed Reir. to Jim Murray, subject: C5en issues in Shorebun Proceeding. (5 pages)
7. Undated Issues in OL-3 Remand Proceeding on Realism issues (CL186-13).

(15pages

.-, 4 m .,

[*% _

l ' * 't IX)l renat s

RESPONSE TO FREEDSM CF '

gg g INFORMATION ACT (FOlA) REQUST cu it e.. . s. s .,,,. ,

I seoyggiga l

Robert R. Belair PART 1.- AIC0 ADS Atti AS40 cm NOT LOCATIO tie. cAec.es seen N. .,*T, .er ords ..tect t. IN m t h.v. b a loc.i.S (

s **we eeux .mn. e. . i n e w..

.. _q ..,,,,c.w .,, e eeu w .,4c.,,

. ..saee m ew.~.,a m a . ..ii.c.w .,n ... e u ea, *.

XX w,.u,.. a si i . w we.vre. oc i

B ... e.v.= .....e4 e.,

ea. eu<w .no coe,y , e, sa e em on -

a ,ee,...,a . e u n. . m nsen ....wi. ' 4 4u.a+. _

ce et M si wi a w . wner.a. oc. . so.,

s a o., r. 8 0'* ai," r .9 e.e ..ii., a., i.,,e e  !

..X.X.. ~ n e ,.,.a. . y u......:

ts.a m , ,,... e r.,, .iecv .r si.xc.. ..i.u w...,....u, ,a.- .,o.. m. s ota ve., . . . .,.,

.-ec., ,. . sac em e..~ai am int a so t *

  • wnure oc . , . w..

,e. f., corr eg .. won pt.:.s e e. sac P gia.c Dx.e.=q a.om, itg? H g,,wt. N W , wnugt.e DC c'.,* ' a h.* y -4, et., ecc t ad i c lacic d a

,mi. cw

. . :. u ,co. e . ...., ... .. 4 . , .cu.c.w c .. a e., c e r .u .....ou .* . .-. i eu m.n .. ee . c.

4,.~,

_ -u i. ,,,,

. ,,,a u-o. r. ,mni .. s.e ...... te cor., r. .< .;.~,,co , ... . . r. .,x i . ..

) - ,* uw . e.y i... r .n..n.w w.,

. r. . ... a.

ha . e s a e . ,ww PART al A-lNFORM AfiCN WITHMILO f pOM PygLIC Ol5Ctosynt

.e.,o. . e..% . r...>4 e..- e v.c eu w. .....-n. r. r o.a ...-cw. o.w.o.w . 9 r. ..or. ....a e e.o .x c.n., .,v,* , r. m .,e r..xee4e,e,. * .4 ... e. , . . i., ,,,eu r.c.c - .a.ec . ,

a .~,

re o aa, ,r.n mem a snrn

r. so.e.8 s.wn u e.~ oc ni a .,-. . i .*.cm . w.. .~ . e u o, s e.~4. re - ... -.

i~a.unc e e..t ; o c c.,~wi.

In a June 27. 1988 telephone conversation with Ms Natalie Brown of my staff. Naima Said of your office eliminated those records that were served via the service list in 50-324-OL-03. 05 and 06 dockets from the scope of this request.

1 i

l l

l i

  • MM

- I augame ea 7 g -g saqv.rjl r

,a y s .

g3 _ ,

tu tw-% _

4

,* ,j us n op *) *3 rn-T',,, 11 L n.

3

...s

. W v & m__-

f.:.< C 7 0 m u .6. s e -

.O

... . s ,

i Re: F01A-88-280 l

APPENDIX A Documnts Already Available in the PDR i 0 1. 04/20/88 letter from John Leonard to NRC. Accession No. 8804280081 [

2. 01/22/88 Letter from John Leonard to NRC. Accession No. 8801280365
3. Undated Letter from John Leonard to NRC. Accession No. 8712220308 i E

t r

f{s u W

7 t

.4 . . .o .

Ae: F01 A.88-280 APPEN0lX B Documents 8eing Placed in the POR ,

1. 05/02/88 letter from J. D. Jamison and G. A. Stoetzel to C. G. Amato, subject: Shoreham Scenario Review. (4 p jes) ,
2. 04/29/88 t;ews article: "State won't take part in tests at Shoreham."

(2 pages)

3. 04/27/88 Letter from F. Mancuso to tra Freilicher regarding June.

exercise. (1 page) 4 04/19/B8 Letter fran D. Crocker to W. Lazarus, subject: R ev i',ed ,

Exercise Objectives. (1 page)

5. 04/16/88 letter from D. Crocker tc P Lazarus, subject: Transmittal .

of SNPS-LERO 1988 Exercisa ,cenario. (1 page)

I

6. 04/12/88 Letter from W. Lazarus to D. Crocker, subject: Review c/

On-site Exercise,Objecitves Keek of June for13, Shoreham 1988. (2 pagesEmergency) Preparedness ,

[

f r

j [

t i

f i

5

  • S

./,

KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART powett ,tAcs SoVTH Lo68Y 9TH FloCe H HAM

  • twt IK10 M FTRIZT. N W. k)STC**. uA esip TASKN. oTON. D C, :00 4 5e91 ism ana H3 BAJCMt1 AWN (4

% ,L 1113f RN D I4*330 OM) IMI13 nux em n oc u ,[.

naccm :::, .iac ,nnuca ,A inn in, t

tells Hu,op RCetAT R MLA!A dmint0Ji May 23, 1988

[REEDOM ACT REQMST OF WOMON HAND DELIVERED Director, Offica of Administration rgp /f,g),/Q Nuclear Regulatory Commission la National Bank Building & 'd $ '2 4?

7735 Old Georgetown goad Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Re: Freedom of Information Act Request _

Gentlemen:

On behalf of our client, Suffolk County, Long Island, New as York, we request, pursuant to the Fre.edom of Information Act, amended, 5 U.S.C. 5 552 ("rOIA'), and the ru)es of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") issued thereunder, memoranda, 10 C.F.R.

notes, reports, Part 9, copies of all correspondence, draf ts, or other recorded materials regardless 1987 or dated of physical form more recently, 1,

or characteristic dated November in the possession or control of the NRC ("records") relating to:

(1) a Federal Emergency Management ("FEMA")-graded exercise concerning the adequacy of radiological emergenef response planning and preparedness for the Shoreham (2) Revision Nuclear Power 9 of the Long Station located in Long Company're Island Lighting Island, New York; emergency plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, including any review of that plan by the FEMA Regional Assistance Committee or any members theroof.

Without limiting this request, but merely to assist the NRC in id.antifying records which are responsive to this request, we i direct the NRC's attention to a document entitled "Milestones for It Shoreham Exercise Evaluation and Plan Review," copy enclosed.

is our understanding that this document may depict some of the activities that have been underway concerning such an exercise or any plan review. We also suggest that records responsive to this request may be in the possession of Edvin Fox, member of the FEMA Region II Regional Assistance Committee, who is with the NRC's regional office in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.

}

S $2 ? ?v U !)[ fg

> u ',

X1RXPAT1UCK & LOCXHART Director, Offico of Adminiotration May 23, 1986 Page 2 In the event that access is denied to any of the records  :

responsive to this request, please supply the following informations

a. Identify the record or withheld portion of the record and specify the statutory basis for the denial, as well as your reason f or believing that an exemption applies, as required by 10 C. F. R. 5 9.10(b) .
b. Segregate the nonexempt from the allegedly exempt '

portion of any withheld records and release the former, as re ,uired by 10 C.F.M. 5 9.5(bl.

f

c. Supply a detailed statement of the content of tne withheld record or portion thereof, along with the date on which .

l that record or portion thereof was written; its section heading or title; and on identification of any persons or entities who have received copies of such records or portions thereof, as required by applicable case law. Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820, 826-827 (D.C. Cir.197 3 ) .

d. Separately state your reasons for not invoking your discretionary power tes release the allegedly exempt records or portions thereof. ,

i The undersigned will pay charges for search time and copying fees, as provided by NRC regulations, 10 C.F.R. 5 9.14. If search and copying fees to be incurred by the unde rsigned will exceed $2,000.00, please notify Naima Said at (202) 778-9149 I bef or e this sum is exceeded. Any questions or comments concerning this request may also be directed to Ms. Said.

We expect to receive your response to this FOIA request within ten (10) working days of your receipt of this request, as required by the FOIA, and as set forth at 10 C.F.R. $ 9.9(a).  ;

Sincerel ' i

) J-7 iy ,

-f Robert R. Belair ,

r

[

l P

c

.......,, , * .*. *; 7 *,,s ,~ . ' ; " : * * '.,, : .

. s , ,.

EUJJTONES FOR_ S110REUAM EXERCISE. EVAUJATION AND Pildt REVIEW _

D s of May 11, 1984 i

No later than Days Prior To Exercise Required Action Exercise Plan o Region II RAC Heating Mar 3 TEMA/NRC guidance to Region Mar 7 o LILCO submits of f-site exercise objectives to Region II for approval Mar 24 o TEMA Region II sends exercise objectives to RAC for review Mar 28 75 Days State and Licensee jointly Mar 31 develop and submit exercise (Mar 2 4)

  • objectives to FEMA and Nuclear Reg".latory commission (NRC) Regional Offices.

o Region II/RAC provide written cursory review to TEMA HQ Apr 4 RAC submits comments on exercise objectives to Region II Apr 11 ,

60 Days TEMA and NRC Regional Offices Apr 15 complete reviews of objectives (Apr 8)

  • and extent of play after meeting with licensee / state, if,necessary.

o RAC submits completed plan review comments to Region II Apr 18 o LILCO response to 1986 de'fi-ciency,and ARCA charts. Apr 18

) 46 Days State and licenser eubmit exercise Apr 22 scenario to FEMA , NRC Regions for review 1

a- O

.'.r.... . .. . . r .

t ',**

o LILCO submits exercise scenario to Region for approval Apr 19 o Region II consolidates RAC plan review comments Apr 25 o RAC plan review consolidation meeting Apr 28 o Region II submits approved LILCO off-site exercise objectives to FEMA HQ May 4 o FEMA Region II sub5[ts to FEMA HQ approval of scenario and recommendations on extent exercise play. May M 35 Days' FEMA and NRC Regions contact or '

May 10 neet with State and licensee to discuss nodifications and complete the scenario. Agreed upon changoJ or modifications should be cocu-mented and distributed.

o completed plan review forwarded to FEMA HQ Mayjf o FEMA HQ submits approved LILC0 off-site exercise objectives to NRC for deterninstion for "qual-o ifying exercise a under NRC rules May CS o NBC provides written deternina-tion to FEMA for "qualifying exercise" under NRC rules. May $4 o NRC/ FEMA approve extent of exer-cise play. May $$

o Final date for submission of plan revisions by LILCO

  • to FEMA Region II May 10 32 Days Regional Assistance Committee May 18 '

(RAC) Chair calls Controller's meeting to develop coordination of exercise, o FEMA HQ forwards plan review to NRC Hay 1$

2

e B 25 Days FEMA and HRC Regions develop May 13 specific post-exercise act- 4 ivity schedule for debrief-ings and meetings with the state.

1 14 Days The RAC Chal.r (and NRC team May 24 i leader as available) develops evaluator action plan (where stationed, how many from each organization, what to look for) . ,

The product o.t this will be the exercise evaluator packet which includes the specific evaluation location assignment. The packet should provides o portions of the plan applicable to their assignment; o A list of all exercise evaluators and their assignmentst o A time-line of events; o scenario technical data as required for those assigned; o Past exercise findings; o Applicable controller nessage31 o Applicable reference materials; o Logistic information and o Log forms for taking notes.

1 day All rederal evaluators, both Jun 6 onsite and offsite, meet in thh exercise area to receive orient-ation and final instructions.

o Shoreham Exetcise Jun 7-9 3

e 4 .. . ,

Exercise Day Conduct E:<crcise. Evaluatcrs hold Jun 7-$ '

Exit Interviews with participants (at assigned locations). j

  • Reflects NRC request to change exercise to week of June 4 from Jume 13.

1  !

s k

t I

j e I

I t

]

i l

d i

) .

l {

i -

?

?

c L

t 9

b l

t i

i 6

4 t i

..v- m..- .- - . ,,,... . _ . , , _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ ,

. 8 D 091T Mr. Dave McLoughlin Deputy AssCciott Director State and Lccal Programs and Support Federal Emerger.cy Mar.agemer.t Agency Washirgten, DC 20472

Dear Mr. McLoughlin:

This responds to your October 28, 1907 letter to re regarding the assur;tions preser.ted in the October 21, 1987 metrorardum from Frank Congel, MC, to Richard Krim, F EFA , for the FEPA review cf of fsite plars submittec' by a utility. You propose tnat assumption Number 3 be reworded. We agree; there-fere, the three assumptiers are:

In developing evaluation criteria and in reviewing utility spensored of f site en+rge9cy response plans, FEMA should assume that in an actual energency, state and local officials will (1) esercise their best efferts to protect the health and safety of the public.

(2) cooperate with the utility and follow the utility offsite plan, and (3) have resources sufficient to irplement those portions of the utility of fsite plan where state or local response is necessary.

We also accept the procedure outlined in your letter foi noticing the avail-abilicy of the utility plan evaluation criteria for public cornment in the Federal Register, while using the criteria os an interim basis, as NRC preposed at the October 15, 1987 meeting.

Because of the strong consensus amofig the FEKA/NRC Task Force merbers as evider.ced by their ear'y delivery of the draft criteria, I do not believe that it will be necessary for us to meet or. November 13, 1987, as we had planned.

If you have any questions, please call me at 492-7511.

Sincerely, Origtrel signed by Vicur Stello Victor Stello, Jr.

b ecutive Director for Operations DISTRIBUTIO_N:

5ee page 2 ,

ley W s d ello I7 --

1 87 11/ /87 g 11/ { /87 C/ RR D/DREP/MR ADhARA P RR PE%ARR  ; e'ws FJCongel RWStarostecki odolak:sc FKintor D p/4/87 11 11/4/87 11 /87 11/6/87 11/g/87 27_l l l 2GsM XA JP

I c.

f(DN, i Federal Emergency Management Agency j!

  • Washington, D.C. 20472 OCT 2 8 :; r Mr. Victor Stello Exect tive Director for Operatiens U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Wast.ington, D.C. 20555 D Nt Mr. Stello:

We have reviewed the assur7tions, presented in the October 21,1987 merorande from Frara Congel of your staff to Richard Krirn of my staff, which you wish the Federal Eme.tency Kmagement Agency (FD%) to use in evaluatirs radiological ernergency respnse plans sutnitted by a utility in trose cases where State ard/or local governments do ret participate in offsite energency plannirs artuM nuclear power plants.

I belle /e that this issue is of such importance that you ard I srould correspond directly on the agreements that we .vached at our meetits on October 15, 1987, ard on related matters.

We can accept tentatively asstrptions rrebers 1 aM 2 as stated in Mr. Corgel's October 21,1987 mer:oraMtn, but we suggest alternative Widirs for ntnter 3, as follows:

(3) have the resources sufficient to imple,ent trose portions of the utility offsite plan where State or local response is recessary.

This charge clarifies that FD%, in its etaluation of the utility plan', will rot be required to review the existence or adequacy of State and local resources.

'Ihis alternative en$1rg is consistent with the appmach presented in Mr. Congel's aerorsMtn which calls for the asstnptions that State and local'govenveents will res;cM aM follow the utility offsite plan in an actual emergency. The alternative ordirs reflects my understandirs of your position on the resources issue, as discussed in our meetits of October 15, 1987. ,-

/

As stated in our meetirs of October 15, 1987, since the with *he Nuclear Regulatory Conmission (NRC) ard are ed bas,assunptions originate on general presumption rathei than specific verif*.ed facts, PD9A will ret be'in a position to deterd the asstr.ptions in 20 regulatory proceedirgs. It is expected that the NRC will deterd the asstaptions in hearirgs and in other legal and public forms.

Let me reiterate that what we agree to at this/me ti is tentative. As we proceed jointly with 20 in the pmject concernirs criteria for the evaluation of a utility plan, there may be a need to add or delete asstrptions or make other charges. However, asstr.ptions 1, 2 ard rewrded 3 arculd provide a workind framework for the criteria effort. -

i

/fC n::: w w; in yp*.

f?lII * " * " ~ '

r '

~

'/

i

.?.

During our meeting on October 15, 1987, you and I also discussed sending

' out the criteria for public coment prior to using it for the evaluation of aa of fsite radiological emergency response plan subsitted by a utility. As an alternative, you proposed a procedure whereby af ter concurrence by FEMA and NRC, the utility plan criteria would be used on an interim basis to revieu the utility plan for the Massachusetts part of the Seabrook Emergency Planning Zone, according to the provisions of the FEMA /NRC Memorandum of Understanding. At the same time, a notice would be published in the Federal Register that the criteria are available for coment. Copies would also be sent to States and other parties for coment. A similar process was used in 1980 for the publication of NUREG-0654/ FEMA-rep 1, Rev. 1. Based on this Drecedent, we accept this procedure, with the understanding that any appropriate thanges in the criteria will be made promptly after review of the public

oment s . Since we are proceding on the basis that any revised criteria vill be applicable to plan development as well as evaluation, there should also be an understanding that any of fsite utility plan reviewed under tne Interia criteria might also require changes due to the revised, final criteria. r

.a st ' - I wish to thank you for arranging for the additional resources placed it fisposal to assist us in carrying out the proja-t on the utility plan tva. .ive criteria.

'f you have any questions, please call me at 646-M92. '

$1n ere1y, .

W&

fx Dave McLoughlin Deputy Associate Director <

State and Local Programs and Support 4

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20206E430&oldid=3324720"