ML20206C616

Memorandum & Order.* All Responses to Intervenors Joint Motion Seeking Directed Certification of Appeal Board 870320 Memorandum & Order Must Be Filed & Served by 870413.NRC Response Due on 870416.Served on 870407

ML20206C616
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	04/03/1987
From:	Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE
References
CON-#287-3015 OL, NUDOCS 8704130109
Download: ML20206C616 (2)

Text

-, -

1 jo/6 DOCMETED USNRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ' Y N'R - 7 N121 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING ' APPEAL BO45EEE Of SECRCIARY 00CKETING & SERVICE

. BRANCH Administrative Judges:.

Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman April 3, 1987 Gary J. Edles Howard A. Wilber SERVED APR -71927

)

In.the Matter of. )

)

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL. ) 50-444-OL

)

(Seabrook Station, Units 1 ) (Offsite Emergency Planning) and 2) )

)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER We received today the joint motion of several intervenors seeking directed certification of the Licensing Board's March 20, 1987 memorandum and order in the offsite emergency planning phase of this operating license proceeding involving the Seabrook nuclear facility. The accompanying certificate of service did not set forth-the date upon which the motion was served. In response to her inquiry, however, the Secretary to this Board has been orally advised by counsel for the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League (the individual signing the motion on behalf of all of the movants) that it was served by mail on March 27.

Counsel will file a corrected certificate of service reflecting that fact.

1 ffj4130109870403 g ADOCK 05000443 PDR JD S g ,

y ti

, jy a

+

2 In the circumstances, all reaponses to the motion other than that of the NRC staff must be filed and served by April 13; the staff's response will be due on April 16. See 10 CFR 2.730 (c); 2.710.

Because of the obvious desirability of relatively expeditious action on the motion, no extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of the most extraordinary cause.

We will expect the responses to the motion to address not merely the question whether the standards for directed certification are met in this instance but, additionally, the merits of each of the claims advanced by the movants.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD O.

C. J

~

Secr$n Shoemaker etary to the Appeal Board Mr. Edles did not participate in this order.

'm Im