ML20206A740
| ML20206A740 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/11/1999 |
| From: | Diaz N NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Merrifield J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9904290012 | |
| Download: ML20206A740 (2) | |
Text
[
UNITED STA S
-g %
/
NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION o
g y
WASHINGTON, o.c. 20555 COMJSM-99-001
] gg db CoMMisstoNER March 2,1999 Q#M iow=f N b pJws.
...u.s.a......
RELEAS D TO THE oDR'**;
MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Jackson Commissioner Dicus f
fg,27 Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan lmg/L..!. ale
... * * * * *
- mar FROM:
Commissioner Merrifield f-
\\
SUBJECT:
SCHEDULE FOR FINAL RULEMAKING CONCERNING
{
10 CFR PART 35, MEDICAL USE OF BYPRODUCT MATERIAL j
By Staff Requirements Memorandum dated November 13,1998, the Commission directed the staff to provide to the Commission by June 28,1999 a final revised rule for 10 CFR Part 35, Medical Use of Byproduct Material. By the normal Commission procedure, the paper would be due to the EDO by June 21,1999. I am also aware of the desire of the Chairman for an earlier decision on this issue and the staff is currently working on a May 22,1999 due date to the EDO and a May 28.1999 due date to the Commission. The staff is under intense pressure to achieve these due dates; and I have every confidence that they will attempt to achieve the j
deadlines with the best product possible. However, I am very concemed that the staff does not have adequate time to evaluate the large number of significant and relevant public comments and provide a thoughtful analysis, complete with an adequate senior management review, within the due date. Therefore I propose that we extend the due date; not for the purpose of obtaining additional public comments, but to allow the staff to do an adequate analysis for the Commission to make an informed decision. Specifically, I propose that the final rulem'aking package be due to the Commission en Auaust 30.1999. This package would contain the recommended final rule language and associated OMB package. Once the Commission SRM was issued on the rule language, I propose that the staff be allowed three months from the date E:"O iP HJrof the SRM to provide the supporting Standard Review Plan and a revised Medical Policy Statement for Commission consideration. In addition, I propose that the staff (in concert with the ACMUI) provide the Commission briefing tentatively scheduled for Ma_tch26J999 The 3 M 9 M drpose of this meeting is to summarize the staff's efforts to date, provide the initial staff p
position concernng the finalization of the rule language, summarize important disagreements either between the staff and industry or among the industry, and to seek specific Commission guidance in areas where policy decisions need to be made.
)d I know that this is a complex, controversial issue that has been in progress for over two years. I am sensitive to the fact that the Commission, as a regulatory body, needs to take timely action in revising regulations and cannot allow decisions on complex issues to be unnecessarily g c) delayed. But in an issue of this magnitude, I would prefer that the staff have adequate time to conduct an analysis of both the public comments and of reasonable alternatives so that the 3 $ Md"
_; (7 nco009 9904290012 990311 PDR COMMS NRCC fg6
@.f CORRESPONDENCE PDR XD
~
)) ^
.s k Commission can make an informed decision. A decision on this COMSECY needs to be made in relative short order in order for it to have a positive effect on the staff spending more time developing a reasoned approach.
cc: