ML20205T704
| ML20205T704 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 04/18/1986 |
| From: | Berry G, Chan E, Johari Moore, Treby S NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Callihan A, Cole R, Grossman H Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205T708 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#286-553 OL, NUDOCS 8606160172 | |
| Download: ML20205T704 (2) | |
Text
r MMAI ED CONN Ebrorne.ttG4 p KIGgo A'\\l h
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/
b I'y,2.q O '{ y E
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 I
JUNL 319808
,m O
April 18,1986 g ]"ib, 2[;iCl P
IIerbert Grossman,1 sq., Chairman Dr. Richard F. Cole Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555
,s Dr. A. Dixon Callihan Administrative Judge 102 Oak Lane Oak Ridge, TN 37830 In the Matter of Commonwealth Edison Company (Braidwood Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457
(> ( _
Dear Administrative Judges:
Enclosed is the NRC Staff's profiled direct testimony and exhibits for various subcontentions of Intervenors Rorem, et al. Amended Quality Assurance Contention.
No prefiled direct testimTnyls yet available for the following Subcontentions:
1, 3.A.4,
- 6. II,
7.A,
- 9. A,
9.E, 10.B.
10.C,10 E,11.C,12.11,12.I and the summary testimony of Messrs. Little and Gardner.
Direct testimony addressing the above contention items will be filed over the next few days.
Consistent with the agreement which Mr. Miller indicated to you in his April 11, 1986 letter, the parties have agreed that there will be a day for day extension with respect to the obligations of the other parties to file motions to strike on the Staff's profiled direct testimony on the items.
It also has been agreed that the above contention items would be heard towards the conclusion of the evidentiary hearings.
This agreement was accepted by Judge Grostman by telephone on April 7, 1986.
In addition, pending a decision by the Licensing Board on contention items which are the subject of motions for summary disposition, no direct testimony is being filed by the NRC Staff on those issues at this time.
$[
T m_30 Finally,
the Staff may offer the deposition testimony of certain individuals.
The Staff will consult with the other parties regarding an appropriate means of providing designations and counter-designations of the depositions to the Licensing Board.
Sincerely, Stuart A. Treby As intant Chief Hearip Counsel an9ce E/114{
bbh i lo 4
i CounselUor
,C Staff
(
& Y Wf re $>r i B
'ry
[
isel f NR Staff 2
lkiw(-
Elaine I.
?ha Counsel
'r N C Staff I
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encls. :
Service List l
l l