ML20205R410
| ML20205R410 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07000371 |
| Issue date: | 02/03/1987 |
| From: | Kaufman N UNITED NUCLEAR CORP. (SUBS. OF UNC, INC.) |
| To: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205R333 | List: |
| References | |
| NIS-87-2-8, NUDOCS 8704060336 | |
| Download: ML20205R410 (4) | |
Text
,
e UnC DRVAL PRODUCTS gg(~*'~
Division of UNC Incorporated 67 Sandy Desert Road Telephone 203/848-1511 gge uncasvme, connecticut 06382-0981 In Reply Please Refer To:
NIS-87-2-8 February 3, 1987 Mr. Thomas T. Martin, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
Subject:
USNRC Inspection 70-371/86-07 Ref:
Letter T. T. Martin to N.
C.
Kaufman dated Jan.
7, 1987
Dear Sir,
This letter is in response to the referenced letter, which presented the results of the subject inspection. As can be seen from the details in the attachment to this letter, we have taken prompt, effective action to address the items of NRC concern presented.
Very truly tirs,
- G A N.
C.
KAUFMAN President NCK/jmp cc:
R. J.
Gregg W.
F. Kirk Attachment 40gjk[7o$
1 C
/
OSSPO551
y.
~
- r.
p, i
1 Attachment to Letter N.
C.
Kaufman to T. T. Martin Reply to NRC Inspection 86-07 i
' t Accendix A and Item 3.d of Details-Internal Review and Audits:
t While all'of the backup records in support of these inspections were available, we acknowledge that the computerized summary record was not l
up to date.
l 1
l 1.
Corrective Steos which have been taken and the results i
achieved; The Computer record system has been updated to~ include the i
supplementary floor review written record data. The written i
instruction concerning internal inspections has.been revised to clarify requirements. Responsible personnel have been instructed to assure all records of inspections are summarized on the computerized record system.
2.
Corrective Steos which will be taken to avoid further 1
misunderstandinas; 1
See above 3.
The date when full comoliance will be achieved; 1
We are currently in full compliance Although not required to reply to the-following items, we'have in the past established this practice. We are making these comments:
Item 2.a'of Details - Housekeepina-Emeraency Earess from Annex III East End No emergency exits were " blocked" at the time, although the area was l
congested, for the reason cited by the inspector in the report. Egress from non-work " nooks and crannies" was difficult but not unreasonable upon review and discussion with area. workers. Upon return from the i
annual ~ shutdown, space availability and access / egress were considerably improved. This condition has continued to be maintained.
4 1
4 m
-,--.--tw' mw*
- - - + + -.
-, = ---,,--~.
--r--
vr
-n
~ ----
e
+
Item 3.a of Details - Facility Modifications i
This information was sent by letter W. F. Kirk to W. T. Crow dated August 26, 1986.
Item 3.b of Details - Residual Storace Cabinet An internal notice of violation was issued to Unit I, Quality Control Inspection. Corrective reinstruction of both Unit I Q.C.
and the Metallurgical / Chemical Laboratories personnel was documented on the need to maintain correct and up-to-date balance logs.
Item 6 of Details - Emeraency Prenaredness - Emeraency Exitina
(
from SAS (Security Secondarv Alarm Station) j The steep normal access inside stairs are considered to be satisfactory under normal and emergency use by Security and j
Safety personnel for the small number of officers involved. These personnel must meet stringent' physical and agility tests. The alternate evacuation route of trap door / chain ladder is also considered satisfactory (as limited.by security access restrictions), and has been tested.
e i
4 T
4 6
/
t i
e
~
=,
- + - -
r-,
v-r
-v y---
1c. rep.---,---
m--
- w,--
-r
--..-v
- - - - -,,, -,...-.3 r-
,-v-