ML20205P728

Forwards Typed Rept Re Vendor Interface & Manual Control, Originally Submitted in Draft Form to N Merriweather. Notification of Content Changes & Typos Requested for Correction

ML20205P728
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	03/04/1987
From:	White R LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY
To:	Foster L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8704030355
Download: ML20205P728 (12)

Text

!..

/

," a R

Lawrenca Livem1 ore Naticmal Laboratory L__

March 4 m MAit 10 A B : I a,1987 j/

M2N Mr. Larry Foster U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30323

\\

SUBJECT:

VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNIT 1 Here is a typed version of your report for Vogtle that was previously submitted in draft form to Norm Merriweather.

If you see any glaring typos or content changes let me know and we will correct them with a revision.

A copy of this typed version has been sent to Norm under LLNL's letterhead to fulfill our contract obligation with the NRC.

Thanks for your help on this inspection.

Sincerely, Robert L. White Project Manager Nuclear Systems Safety Program RLW:bd l

Ohoh24 PDR University of Cahtornia Lawrence Liverrnare Narranal Laboratory csw

~

P.O. Box 45

^qiayj Mercury, Nevada 89023 gygg,,y j*

Q 1

Y'*;

MC l

1

/

LICENSEE EMPLOYEES CONTACTED

[

R. Johnson, Senior Procedure Specialist H. Beacher,_ Operation Assessment Program (OAP) Coordinator L.

Prill, Assistant OAP Coordinator M. Hairston, Comp.tiance Engineer B. Quick, Document Control C.

Belflower, Manager QA W. Watson, QA Engineer B. Hendrix, Supervisor, Preventative Maintenance (Advanced Technology)

Other employees contacted included engineers, document control, security, and office personnel.

I l

=_.._.

.l 2

~ VENDOR INTERFACE AND MANUAL CONTROL The inspector reviewed.the licensee's responses to Generic Letter 83-28, reviewed procedures, and examined the implementation of their program associated'with vendor interface and vendor manual control.

Their response described.the following program:

f Licensee response dated November 8, 1983 stated that a program would be established to maintain NSSS vendor, Westinghouse (H), interface and that an additional review would establish that all information is available and is being used.

The licensee also stated that vendor related' modifications would be reviewed and implemented or technical reasons for not implementing the recommended modification would be prepared.

i l

The licensee had prepared procedures to control the receipt, distribution, review, use, and control-of vendor drawings, manuals, and technical data.

Procedures to obtain, evaluate and use industry data had also been developed, and were being utilized during the preparation of plant procedures and instructions.

The inspector reviewed procedures, interviewed personnel, and observed implementation of the 4

program.

Licensee response dated April 28, 1986, stated'that all modifications recommended by Westinghouse (H), the NSSS s

-_.-_.y,

_y.,

y 4-,-

3 vendor,.would be. reviewed and implemented as necessary. 1The

- response further stated ~that the undervoltage trip assemblies in the reactor trip circuit breakers had!been-replaced as specified by the vendor.

Licensee's responses dated August 16, 1985 and October 20, 1986, addressed the revision of plant procedures and.

Technical Specifications (TS) to' incorporate testing'of the-

.m undervoltage and shunt-trip device contacts, and wiring, as recommended by the Westinghouse Owners Group-(WOG).

The.

4 response dated October 20, 1986, also stated that the i

licensee's maintenance engineering group would review the

)

updates to the WOG maintenance manual and make necessary changes to plant procedures in accordance-with the WOG Manual and WCAP-10835.

Discussion with licensee personnel l

and a review of procedures revealed that the licensee had procedures to control vendor manuals and other technical-information.

Procedures were being implemented except as-noted.

One problem identified by the inspector was that Procedure No.27765-C, Revision 5,

" Westinghouse type DS-416 Circuit Breaker Maintenance," did not reference the WOG Maintenance-Manual MUHN-2051, dated October 1984, but referenced a-i Bechtel number which was IX6AT01-571-2 this instruction i

{

manual is actually Westingh'ouse Instruction Book No. 02-X-l N071 dated July 1979.

Also this instruction book had been L

,~-.------e

-,.n-n

-,.-e,

-, n

,-.mm.

-n---+-

,,--v

-n-

)

~

4 received, reviewed, and approved.by Bechtel,.the licensee's A/E, but was marked for "information only". 'The' licensee j

stated that the "information only" mark was used during the

' construction phase.and was assigned " status per VEGP Project Reference Manual; therefore Procedure 27765-C and associated a

procedures for:RTB Maintenance were developed' from the original H in;struction book butihave been updated with current H technical data.

The licensee explained why the WOG Maintenance Manuals and.H Technical Bullentins were not-4 l

referenced, but that the technical information had been incorporated-into the current procedure..This is dicussed further in Section 9 of this report.- The 1984 WOG

. Maintenance Manual (identified 'as Log No. - 2X6AT01-10,000).

l was'just recently (October 14,-1986) ~ put in'the' licensee's review cycle per Procedure No. 00108-0 " Control, Review, Approval and Use of Vendor Documents and Revision.". The i

j technical reviewer had~ stated on the review. sheet that this I

manual was applicable.to the installed reactor trip breakers i

and that the manual was approved for plant use.

The 1986 I

WOG " Draft RTB Maintenance Manual" No. MPM-WOGRTSDS416-00 l

was transmitted to the licensee by H letter W'G-86-269' dated O

September 25, 1986;-however, no response to.or review-of this document could be identified.

The WOG letter states i

that a formal' revision is scheduled for late November, 1986.

The licensee had not received this revision as of December j

18, 1986.

The licensee stated that the manual would be

.. - - ~.. --_._---,_.. _ _ - -.

.,-_-,,..,.n.

w

5 reviewed per Procedure 00108-C, Revision 4, and that, plant procedures would be revised as approved.

The inspector selected several vendor technical manuals in the licensee's review cycle.(per Procedure -00108-C) to determine if the manuals were controlled and if the procedure'was being implemented.

Following is a list of vendor manuals and review status sheets examined:

VM-1169, Differental Pressure Transmitter.Model 752, ITT Barton.

4 VM-0214, Reactor Trip Circuit Breaker.

VM-1173, Milton Roy Metering Pump Installation Manual.

IX3AC01-10004, Brown Boveri, IM Type CO Overcurrent Relay.

Instruction Manual H I.L.41-101Q for Overcurrent Relays.

VM-1193, Instruction for Magnetic Contactor.

IX4AF05-256/3, Containment Building Sump Pump-Magnetrol Switches.

VM-654, Multi Amp Instruction Book.

VM-696, Honeywell Multi Point Recorder MDLS 111 and 112 4

Operators Manual.

2X6AUO1-10011, IM Operator Interface Modules, H No.,TP 181.

)

i

6 VM-730, RTD and Thermocouple Handbook (Reference Table).

The above manuals and instruction books were transmitted for review by the Document Control Section.

Each document has a control number assigned by document control.

The inspector observed that several of the manuals were being reviewed per Revision 3 of Procedure 00108-C instead of Revision 4 (latest issue).

The licensee explained that these manuals had been distributed for review prior to issue of Revision 4 of Procedure 00108-C.

The licensee stated that they would determine if Revision 4 affected the Technical area, and if so, they would evaluate the need for a re-review of manuals.

Vendor manuals, drawings, and other documentation are controlled and stored by the Document Control Department.

They receive, distribute, control and store vendor manuals and associated documentation per Procedure 00108-C and 00101-C " Drawing Control".

The inspector inspected the document control area to determine if documents were being received, controlled, distributed, and stored per procedure.

Several documents referenced in operating and maintenance 4

procedures were selected for examination and were found to be controlled as required by procedure.

Following is a list of manuals and documents examined:

Westinghouse Process Specification 29272, Revision 9.

Instruction Manual IX6AUO1-526, Process Instrumentation and

7 1

Control.

Specifiction 1X6AUO1-766, Rosemont Pressure Transmitter.

VM-1057, Ingress Release for VMS Operating System.

1X6AA10-132 and 133, Manuals for Process Control System' Scaling.

f Instruction Manual 1X6AUO2-286 for E Series 252 Indicator.

AX2AG07-211, Containment Escape Lock.

AX2AF04-24, IM Post Tension System Work Platform.

1X1AQ06-10000, Johnson Controls, Vogtle Design and Reference Manual (Security System).

The licensee has computer systems (NORMS and NOMIS) which contain indexes of all vendor manuals, procedures, specifications, technical bulk equipment tag numbers, and other technical information received from INPO, NRC, vendors, and other industry sources.

These programs are controlled by procedures as described below.

Procedure No. 00414-C, Revision 3, Operational Assessment Program established organizational responsibilities and implementation instructions to assure that operational information is supplied to appropriate plant personnel.

This program addresses requirements of NUREGS Q660 and 737, and includes control of industry event reports [LERs, SERs, SOERs, Nuclear Network, and the Nuclear Operations and

g.

Maintenance Information Service (NOMIS)] to keep plant personnel informed of current information.

Vendor reports, Vogtle reports, and NRC event reports'are also received and evaluated by the licensee.

i l

Procedure 80009-C, Revision 4,

" Operational Assessment Program - Coordination" describes how the licensee coordinates and assures that nuclear information from vendors, industry and NRC is evaluated and used at the Vogtle Plant.

Procedure 00405-C, Revision 3,

" Commitment Identification, Tracking, and Implementation" provides instructions and responsibilities to further assure that actions and commitments on technical information are tracked from initiation to final completion.

The licensee receives a periodic Technical Bulletin Index from Westinghouse (NSSS vendor).

This index includes a list l

of H Technical Bulletins and Data Letters pertinent to equipment and systems supplied by Westinghouse.

The 4

licensee supplied the inspector with the latest E Index No.

WNSID-TB-86-04 dated June 18, 1986.

The Operational t-Assessment Program (OAP) controls the receipt, distribution, and storage of H Technical Bullentins, NRC Bulletins, NRC Information Notices, INPO SERs and SOERs, GE SIta, and other technical information.

Information is retrievable on the

,e

-,w,,,

---

,--.n--,n

~,

w

,--v----

},

w

,I i

)~9 9

k computer and the hard copies are filed in the OAP office, sTheinspectorrandomlyselectedsomeNRCIEBs,HTBs,-(E s

SILs, and INPO SERs and confirmed that the system used to control.this information was working.

During the' data-examination, the licensee'could not find HTB 83-03

" Reactor Trip Breaker Testing" in the files or in-the computer..Further investigation revealed that HTB 83-03'was.

l.

~

originally specified as NSD-TB-83-03 and was filed in NRC-IEB Folder 83-001.

The licensee agreed to' prepare a file.

f;L folder for HTB 83-03 and to enter HTB 83-03 into the

\\

computer data.

The following file folders were examined and found adequate (except for HTB 83-03).

1 HTB 86-07, Auxiliary Pump Assembly HTBsB3-02~R1, RTB Maintenance HTB 83-03 (missing) RTB Testing HTB 85-17, DS Breakers Spring Release Latch Lever-HTB 84-09R2, Primary Leak at Seal Tables HTB 84-02R1, DS Breakers Wire Damage IEB 82-001 s

IEB 83-004 IEB 83-008 IEB 83-001 IEN 84-05 IEN 83-03 IEN 84-34 SER 86-021

Y w-10' SER-85-044 SER 33-85 SOER 85-004

'SOER 84-003 4

i '

SOER'82 :The. licensee site QA group had performed an audit of the plant's vendor manaul control. program in May 1985.

A follow-up QA. surveillance was performed on September 16,

.1986.

.The audit report identified some inadequacies with' Procedure 00108-C and references used in plant procedures.

The inspector confirmed some of the QA audit findings during this inspection and discussed these with licensee personnel.

~

Some corrective ~ actions to-the site QA. audit:have been-corrected by procedure revisions;-however, the use of incorrect references in procedures has not been corrected in all cases.

An example is not specifying WOG Reactor Trip Breaker Maintenance Manual and NTBs in Procedure No. 27767-C, RT Breaker Switchgear Inspection and-Maintenance.

Other procedures and documents reviewed are listed below:

J Materials Record Transmittals for the NORMS Computer System.

H Technical Bulletin Indexes No. NSD-TB-83-03 and No. NSID-TB-86-04.

Computer Record Search for DS 416 Reactor Trip Circuit Breaker.

i i

i

~

J

~..

'kh a

11_

, i.. ('

Computer Record Search for HTBs, NRC IEBs', and INPO

-Documents.

?

Procedure 27767-C,' Revision 0, RT Breaker <Switchgear 1

Inspection and Maintenance.

Procedure 00414-C, Revision 3, Operational Assessment

~

's.'

Program.

't i

Procedure D0101-C,- Revision 5, Drawirig" Control.

Procedure:27765-C, Revision:5, H Type DS 416 C'ircuit Breaker Maintenance.

=t N-VEGP. Project Reference Manual, Revision'5, pages C5-7 and C5-8, Supplier Documentation Control.

o,3 Equipment Maintenance Checklists'Nos. 11606S600 2RTA-E-6M 1

-u and 18M-for R Trip Switchgear.

!I Preventative Maintenance Turnover Package Approval per-

{

4 i

s Procedure 20015-C for RTBreakers dated Novmaber ~ 20, 1986.

Within the area examined, no violations or deviations-were identified.

s

\\-

k

't l

?-

. g t..

_.. ~,

_._,m,

.