ML20205N154
| ML20205N154 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 03/17/1987 |
| From: | Cunningham A, Decker T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205N119 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-87-22, 50-425-87-21, NUDOCS 8704020607 | |
| Download: ML20205N154 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000424/1987022
Text
_
-.
_
_
- _.
_.-
_
. _ . _ .
.
_.
.
-
/je Retog'o
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N
!
'
f
MEGION 11
[
n
- t
j
101 MARIETTA STREET,N.W.
ATL ANTA, GEOMGIA 30323
9.....l
%
,
'
MAR 10 W
'
Report No.: 50-424/87-22,50-425/87-21
I
Licensee: Georgia Power Company
!
P. O. Box 4545
Atlanta, GA 30302
l
'
Docket Nos.: 50-424, 50-425
License Nos.: CPPR-108, CPPR-109
l
Facility Name: Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
Inspection Conducted: March 5-11,1987
l
Inspector; b b ' 7 h
3//7/67
Y'A.L.Cunningham
Date Signed
i
Approved by: MJ/#2h
/i
M// 7/ A'7
IF T. R. Decker, Section Chief
Date Signed
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
j
SUMMARY
Scope:
This special, announced inspection involved the evaluation of the
licensee's responses and corrective actions addressing the remaining items
I
identified during the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Appraisal conducted
March 10-21, 1986.
.
'
Results: No violations or deviations were identified.
l
0704020607 07031'/
.
POR
ADUCK 0D000424
l
0
PDH
1
, - - - . _ , - - . - - . - - . - ,_,,, - - _ ,._ . . - _--. -
- - . - . - _. __ _ - .
, , _ ,
-. __
-
_
.
_.
-
.-._
_
-
-
_.
_
l
.
REPORT DETAILS
!
1.
Persons Contacted
Licensee Employees
'
P. D. Rice Vice President, Vogtle Project Director
G. Bockhold, Jr., General Manager, Nuclear Operations
- P. D. Rushton, Manager, Plant Training and Emergency Preparedness
- J. N. Roberts, Emergency Preparedness Supervisor
- C. E. Belflwer, Quality Assurance Site Manager
- C. L. Cross, Senior Regulatory Specialist
l
- Attended exit interview
I
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection scope and findings were sumarized on March 6,1987, with
those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
The allegation listed
herein was also discussed with licensee representatives.
The licensee's
commitment to implement required corrective actions, and the status of
completion of such actions were discussed via telephone on March 9, 1987
and March 11, 1987, respectively.
The licensee did not identify as
'
proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector
during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters
This subject was not addressed during the inspection.
No enforcement
items were identified during the radiological emergency preparedness
appraisal.
4.
EmergencyPreparednessItems(255558)
This section addresses the status of corrective actions implemented by the
licensee in response to incomplete items identified during the March 1986
Radiological Emergency Preparedness Appraisal.
a.
(Closed)
Incomplete
Item (50-424/86-12-21, 50-425/86-18-21):
Corrplete installation and testing of Control Room equipment used in
accident detection, mitigation, classification, notification and
protective action recommendations.
Inspection enqfirmed that all
equipment was installed, tested and released for the cited functions.
b.
(Closed)
Incomplete
item (50-424/86-12-23,
50-425/86-18-23):
Completion of the installation and testing of the TSC ventilation
system, and qualification of cognizant aersonnel in operation and
maintenance of same.
Inspection disclosed that the subject
ventilation system was completed, tested, and cognizant personnel
wero trained in operation and maintenance uf the system.
l
-
- - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
--
- -
-
.l
'
.
2
.
c.
(Closed)
Incomplete Item (50-424/86-12-24, 50-425/86-18-24):
Complete installation and testing of TSC electrical distribution
system and qualification of personnel to operate and maintain same.
Inspection disclosed that installation of the subject system and
qualification of cognizant personnel to maintain same were completed,
d.
(Closed)
Incomplete Item (50-424/86-12-64,
50-425/86-18-64):
Revision of EPIPs to include reserve emergency supplies and
equipment, the stocking plan for the warehouse, and designation of
primary
locations.
Inspection disclosed that emergency
equipment / instruments were standard plant equipment and HP
departments stocked adequate sup) lies of spare equipment and
instruments to replace those requ' ring repair or calibration.
The
availability of reserve instruments / equipment to supplement those
i
removed for repair or calibration is consistent with guidance
'
promulgated in Section II.H.10 of NUREG-0654.
5.
Allegation
,
a.
Allegation (RII-87-A-0035)
Notification of Unit 2 construction workers of Unit 1 emergency.
Concern
!
A concerned individual stated that there was no equipment (e.g., loud
l
speakers) to alert Unit 2 construction workers in the event of a
nuclear or non-nuclear Unit 1 emergency.
The only method available
to warn the workers was by informally passing the information from
person to person.
Discussion
l
An onsite Region Il inspector informed licensee representatives of
!
the subject concern on March 6,1987, and promptly initiated a
,
detailed review and investigation of the alleged problem.
'
Investigation disclosed that a site warning system, consisting of a
siren / speaker, was in place and operational.
It was also verified
that mandatory training and orientation of Unit 2 construction
workers regarding site emergency conditions, notification signals,
and required responsive actions was completed and documented prior to
site receipt of nuclear fuels.
The subject training is assigned as a
condition of employment.
Investigation also disclosed that the
notification signal was readily audible throughout the site; however,
the signal was inaudible in certain areas of the Unit 2 power block,
namely:
containment, Auxiliary Building, turbine deck, and other
high ambient noise and/or isolated zones.
Verbal discussions were
held with cognizant management who concurred with the findings, and
comitted to promptly determine and implement the most feasible
corrective actions.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
- - -
- -
- -
-
-
.
_.
-
_ _ .
-
. _ _ .
'
.
.
3
Conclusions
The allegation is correct in that the site emergency notification
'
signal cannot be heard in areas of the Unit 2 power block designated
above.
Discussions with cognizant licensee management via telephone
i
on March 9,1987, and March 11, 1987, disclosed that corrective
'
action involving installation of alert sirens in the referenced
designated areas of Unit 2 power block was in progress and scheduled
for completion and operational testing prior to March 12, 1987.
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/87-22-01, 50-425/87-21-01:
Verify
operation and adequacy of the site emergency notification signal
within Unit 2 power block, including system control, procedures, and
required training.
6.
InspectorFollowup(92801)
(Closed) IN-86-98:
Offsite Medical Services.
The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) has developed a Guidance Memorandum MS-1
!
" Medical Services" that addresses implementation of the Commission policy
'
on offsite medical services.
Since this guidance is related to
rovisions of medical services for members of the general public
l
p(offsite) this is an area evaluated by FEMA.
j
I
i
j
i
.
!
)
i
1
1
!
i
l
l
.
I
1
I
.
.
. -
. .
- ~
_
_ . . , _ _ _ _ _-___-- _,__ _ _ _-.-_.__ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ .
_ . - - _ -
_ _ - _