ML20205H291

Corrected Page 10 to Insp Repts 50-295/86-11 & 50-304/86-10 Re Operational Safety Verification & ESF Sys Walkdown

ML20205H291
Person / Time
Site:	Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date:	08/15/1986
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20205H282	List: ML20205H277 ML20205H291
References
50-295-86-11, 50-304-86-10, NUDOCS 8608200045
Download: ML20205H291 (1)

See also: IR 05000295/1986011

Text

_ . _

a ,

6. Preventive and corrective maintenance operations which could l

have an ef fect on the safety of the facility."

Zion Administrative Procedure, ZAP 3-51-1, Origination and Routing

of Work Requests, requires the following:

a. The operating shift supervisors are required upon the completion

of the repair work, to record the tests and specify who will  !

perform the tests by checking the appropriate box,

b. The operating engineer is to make a final review of the work

request, then sign and date the appropriate block.

c. The master mechanic / maintenance staff engineer is to review the

work request and initial to indicate receipt and acceptance.

d. The operating shif t supervisor (SRO licensed only), is to sign

the block that gives authorization to start the work.

TS 6.2.A.6 was not adhered to in that for Zion Work Request Z48625,

dated March 2, 1986:

a. The incorrect box was checked for the test required /no test

required section of the work request form by the SCRE

(operating shif t supervisor),

b. The operating engineer reviewed, signed and dated the

appropriate block. However, in his review he failed to realize

that a surveillance test was not required.

c. The maintenance staff engineer who received the work request

failed to initial the form.

d. Shif t authorization to start work was not obtained, and the

block was not signed.

The above are considered additional examples of a violation

(295/86011-01; 304/86010-03).

Two violations and no deviations were identified.

10.

Operational Safety Verification and Engineered Safety Features System

Walkdown

The inspectors observed control room operations, reviewed applicable logs

and conducted discussions with control room operators from April 14

through June 13, 1986. During these discussions and observations, the l

'

inspectors ascertained that the operators were alert, fully cognizant of

plant conditions,

action attentive to changes in those conditions, and took prompt

when appropriate. The inspectors verified the operability of

selected emergency systems, reviewed tagout records and verified proper

return to service of affected components. Tours of the auxiliary and

turbine buildings were conducted to observe plant equipment conditions,

including potential fire hazards, fluid leaks, and excessivt vibratius ar.d

8609200045 860815

PDR ADOCK 05000295

G PDR p;

__