ML20205H291
| ML20205H291 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/15/1986 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205H282 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-295-86-11, 50-304-86-10, NUDOCS 8608200045 | |
| Download: ML20205H291 (1) | |
See also: IR 05000295/1986011
Text
_
.
_
a
,
6.
Preventive and corrective maintenance operations which could
have an ef fect on the safety of the facility."
Zion Administrative Procedure, ZAP 3-51-1, Origination and Routing
of Work Requests, requires the following:
The operating shift supervisors are required upon the completion
a.
of the repair work, to record the tests and specify who will
perform the tests by checking the appropriate box,
b.
The operating engineer is to make a final review of the work
request, then sign and date the appropriate block.
The master mechanic / maintenance staff engineer is to review the
c.
work request and initial to indicate receipt and acceptance.
The operating shif t supervisor (SRO licensed only), is to sign
d.
the block that gives authorization to start the work.
TS 6.2.A.6 was not adhered to in that for Zion Work Request Z48625,
dated March 2, 1986:
The incorrect box was checked for the test required /no test
a.
required section of the work request form by the SCRE
(operating shif t supervisor),
b.
The operating engineer reviewed, signed and dated the
appropriate block.
However, in his review he failed to realize
that a surveillance test was not required.
The maintenance staff engineer who received the work request
c.
failed to initial the form.
d.
Shif t authorization to start work was not obtained, and the
block was not signed.
The above are considered additional examples of a violation
(295/86011-01; 304/86010-03).
Two violations and no deviations were identified.
10.
Operational Safety Verification and Engineered Safety Features System
Walkdown
The inspectors observed control room operations, reviewed applicable logs
and conducted discussions with control room operators from April 14
through June 13, 1986.
During these discussions and observations, the
l
inspectors ascertained that the operators were alert, fully cognizant of
'
plant conditions, attentive to changes in those conditions, and took prompt
action when appropriate.
The inspectors verified the operability of
selected emergency systems, reviewed tagout records and verified proper
return to service of affected components. Tours of the auxiliary and
turbine buildings were conducted to observe plant equipment conditions,
including potential fire hazards, fluid leaks, and excessivt vibratius ar.d
8609200045 860815
ADOCK 05000295
G
p;
__