ML20205G292

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-333/87-02 on 870112-16 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted:Vital Area Door Found Unlocked But Equipped W/Alarm
ML20205G292
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/25/1987
From: Keimig R, Madden W, Martin W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20205G247 List:
References
50-333-87-02, 50-333-87-2, NUDOCS 8703310419
Download: ML20205G292 (4)


See also: IR 05000333/1987002

Text

-

- .

.

,.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

t

REGION I

Report No.

50-333/87-02

Docket No.

50-333

License No.

DRP-59

Licensee:

Power Authority of the State of New York

10 Columbus Circle

New York, New York 10019

Facility Name: James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant

Inspection At:

Scriba, New York

Inspection Conducted: January 12-16, 1967

Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: November 24-26, 1986

Type of Inspection:

Routine. Unannounced Physical Security Inspection

.

Inspectors:

N/V"

d*d'f-E?

'

falterG.MartiWPhy

a

ecurity Inspector

date

n

e

J- > G E']

'

-

, Tliam J. Madden,Q hy.si

curity Inspector

date

W

Approved by:

p.

R . 2 f-f 7

-

ichard R. Keumig; rhief

afeguards Section

date

Nuclear Materials Sa

y and Safeguards Branch

Inspection Summary: Unannounced, Physical Security Inspection on January 12-16,

1987 (Report No. 50-333/87-02)

i

Areas Inspected:

Security Program Audits; Records and Reports; Testing and

Maintenance; Locks, Keys and Combinations; Physical Barriers - Protected and

-

Vital Areas; Compensatory Measures; Access Control - Personnel, Packages and

Vehicles; Communications; Personnel Training and Qualifications - General

Requirements, and the Status of Inspector Follow up Items.

Results:

The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas

.,

examined, except as follows: a vital area door was found unlocked, but

alarmed.

4

8703310419 870323

l

PDR

ADOCK 0500

3

G

-

,

- - , . - - - - -

-

. - _ . .

- - .

- . _ .

-

. - . . . - . . . - - --

- -_ _. -

.

..

OETAILS

1.

Key Persons Contacted

R. Converse, Resident Manager

W. Fernandes, Superintendent

R. Patch, Quality Assurance Superintendent

T. Teifke, Security / Safety / Fire Protection Superintendent

J. Haley, Security Supervisor

E. Sackman, Manager of Security Compliance

A. Luptak, USNRC, Senior Resident Inspector

The inspectors also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of

the proprietary guard force.

2.

Exit Interview

The inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in

paragraph I at the conclusion of the inspection on January 14, 1987. At

that time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and

findings presented.

At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the

licensee by the inspectors.

3.

Security Program Audit

The inspectors reviewed the annual Quality Assurance Audit (No. 599) of

the security program performed during November and December,1986.

The

findings of the audit were reviewed and the inspectors noted that the

licensee had completed corrective action with regard to the findings.

The inspectors also reviewed supplemental audits and staff reviews

performed by representatives of the Corporate Security Division.

Six

visits for the purpose of conducting these audits and reviews were made

during 1986.

The inspectors found these audits and reviews to be

comprehensive in scope and performed by qualified and experienced

personnel familiar with the security program performance objectives.

At the request of the licensee, the inspectors met with the Quality

Assurance Superintendent and the Corporate Manager of Compliance on

i

January 15, 1987 to discuss planned improvements to increase the

effectiveness of the Quality Assurance audit program for the annual

security audit. The inspectors were informed that a more comprehensive

Quality Assurance audit program was being developed to place more emphasis

on the detailed requirements contained in the NRC-approved Security,

Safeguards Contingency, and Training and Qualifications Plans.

This is an Inspector Follow-up Item (IFI No. 87-02-01).

.

.

'

3

4.

Records and Reports

The inspectors reviewed records and reports including, but not limited

to, alarm records, key control records, training records, security shift

assignment records, and computer input authorization records. All

records and reports were complete, properly maintained and readily

accessible.

5.

Testing and Maintenance

The inspectors reviewed a selected number of maintenance procedures and

records.

It appeared that the program assures that security related

equipment is properly maintained to meet the required performance

objectives.

The inspectors noted that maintenance and repairs are

generally conducted in a timely manner.

6.

Locks, Keys, and Combinations

The inspectors confirmed that the licensee's key and lock control program

was being administered in accordance with Security Procedure 5.1.9

(Key / Lock Control) and the NRC-approved security plan.

The inspectors

also verified the accountability of the vital area keys controlled by the

shift sergeant.

7.

Physical Barriers - Protected Area

The inspectors observed the entire protected area barrier and determined

that the licensee is maintaining it in accordance with the NRC-approved

security plan.

8.

Physical Barriers - Vital Areas

The inspectors observed that the licensee, with the excep' ion of the

apparent violation cited below, maintained the physical bacriers surround-

ing the vital areas in conformance with the NRC-approved security plan,

p p .7.tn,rc

m.ggg , 7 7; ,7

llliO'i

l:';fRPUi!UC

'

p ' ~ s

, 5 " * y ,.

n * t j

,

lit! r t:;P

.-

- -

- - -

.

.

.

.

4

The inspectors cited this as an apparent violation of NRC requirements and

the NRC-approved security plan.

(50-333/87-02-01)

t

9.

Compensatory Measures

The inspectors observed that the implementation of compensatory measures

was consistent with the requirements of the NRC-approved Safeguards

Contingency Plan. The inspectors observed the implementation of a com-

pensatory measure during a temporary loss of a perimeter intrusion detec-

tion zone on January 14, 1987. All actions were reviewed and found to be

consistent with Paragraph 7.2.4.1 of implementing procedure No. 6 to the

Safeguards Contingency Plan.

The zone was repaired, tested and promptly

restored.

10.

Access Control - Personnel

The inspectors observed that the licensee controlled access to the

protected and vital areas in accordance with the NRC-approved security

plan and the implementing procedures. Search equipment was adequate and

appropriate for its intended use.

11. Access Control - Packages

.

The inspectors observed the processing of packages and material into the

protected area and found the procedure to be in conformance with the

NRC-approved security plan.

12. Access Control - Vehicles

The inspectors observed the control of vehicles entering the protected

area and found the procedure to be in accordance with NRC-approved

security plan.

13.

Communications

The inspectors observed requested testing of communications capabilities

between the Central Alarm Station (CAS) and required on and off-site

locations on January 13, 1987.

They were foand to be in accordance with

'

Security Procedure 5.1.10 (Communications) and the NRC-approved security

plan.

14.

Personnel Training and Qualifications - General Requirements

The inspectors reviewed selected training records and procedures and

found them to be in accordance with the NRC-approved training and

qualifications plan.

.

_

.-. _ - -

_--

. - .

_ _ -

-

-

-

. _ _ .