ML20205F237

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from 10CFR50.62(c)(4) to Allow Plant to Use Injection Rate of 50 Gpm of 11.5 % Sodium Pentaborate Solution in Standby Liquid Control Sys
ML20205F237
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/24/1988
From: Capra R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20205F241 List:
References
NUDOCS 8810280020
Download: ML20205F237 (4)


Text

C 7590-01 UNITED STATES NilCLEAR REGULATORY COPNISSIOW POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET N0. 50-333 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission (the Consnission) is considering issuance of an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.62(c)(4) to Power Authority of the State of New York (the licensee), for the James A.

FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant located in Oswego, New York-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Identification of Proposed Action:

The exemption would grant relief from 10 CFR 50.62(c)(4) to allow the FitrPatrick plant to use an in,iection rate of 50 gal'ons per minute (gpm) of 11.5 weight percent sodium pentaborate solution in toe standby liouid control system (SLCS). The regulation requires that each boiiing water reactor must have a SLCS equivalent in contrcl capacity to 86 gpm with a boron concentration of 13 weight percent sodium pentaborate.

The Need for the Proposed Action:

The exemption is needed bec.5use the licensee proposes to depart from 10 i

CFR Part 50.62(c)(4) requirements, as a result of the FitzPatrick plant having a reactor vessel diameter which is smaller than that used to establish the minimum flow and boron content requirements set forth in the regulation, and the licensee's use of enriched boron in the sodium pentaborate solution.

In the GV

O-2 licensee's request for amendment dated August 24, 1988, the licensee proposed to use an injection rate of 50 gallons per ninute of 11.5 weight percent sodium pentaborate solution because its vessel diameter is 218 inches, in comparison to the 251 inches which is the basis for the 86 gallons per minute requirement, arid because the sodium pentaborate solution will be made up from boron enriched to 34.7 atom percent Boron-10 isotope.

Generic Letter 85-03 "Clarification of Equivalent Control Capacity for Sta.1dby Liquid Control Systems," dated January 28, 1985 states, in part:

The "equivalent in control capacity" wording was chosen to allow flexibility in implementation of the requirement.

The 86 gallons per minute and 13 weight percent sodium pentaborate concentration were values used in NEDE-24222, "Assessment of BWR Mitigation of ATWS, Volumes I and II," December 1979 for RWR/4, BWR/5, and BWR/6 plants with 251. inch diameter vessels.

NEDE-24222 recognized that different values would provide equivalent control capacity for smaller plants.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action:

The exemption provides a degree of protection for the FitzPatrick reactor equivalent to that required by the regulation for reactors with larger reactor vessels for prompt injection of negative reactivity into a boiling water reactor pressure vessel in the event of an Anticipated Transient Without Scram (ATWS). The exemption will not affect containment integrity, nor the probability of facility accidents.

Thus, post-accident radiological releases will not be greate" than previously determined, nor will the granting of the proposed exemption otherwise effect radiological plant effluents, or result in any significant occupational exposure. Likewise, the exemntion will not affect non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed exemption.

t.

. Alternatives to the Proposed Action:

Because it has been concluded that there is no measurable environmental impact associated with the proposed exemption, any alternatives to the exemption will have either no environmental impacts or greater environmental impacts.

The principal alternative to granting the exemption would be to deny the requested exemption.

Such action would not reduce environmental impacts of the FitzPatrick plant's operation and would not enhance the protection of the environment.

Alternative Use of Resources:

This does not involve the use of resources not previously considered in connection with the Final Environmental Statement (construction permit and operating license) for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.

Agencic. and Persons Consulted:

The NRC staff reviewed thu licensee's request and did not consult other agencies or persons.

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The Commission has de6 ermined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed exemption.

Based on the foregoing environmental l

assessment, the staff concludes that the proposed action will not have a significart effect on the quality of human environment.

l l

l I

-- 1s 4-For further information with respect to this action, see the request for amendment dated August 24, 1988, which is available for public inspection at the Comission's Public Documnt Room, 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, D.C. and at the Penfield Library, State University College of Oswego, Oswego, New York.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24thday of October

, 1988.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0PMISSION U 0. fe w 2 RobertA.Capra,Direefor Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects, I/II F

l l

f

-_-