ML20205E732
| ML20205E732 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/27/1999 |
| From: | Lohaus P NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP) |
| To: | Fletcher R MARYLAND, STATE OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205E736 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9904060010 | |
| Download: ML20205E732 (4) | |
Text
-4
.a
.n
- MAR 2 71999 Mr. Roland Fletcher, Manager Radiological Health Program Maryland Department of the Environment
.2500 Broening Highway . 4 L Baltimore, MD 21224
Dear Mr. Fletcher:
As requested, we have reviewed the proposed transportation and record keeping requirements for termination or transfer of licensed activities amendments to the Maryland State Regulations
' for the Control of lonizing Radiation Part T and Sections C.32, C.38, D.1109, and D.1301 dated February 22,1999.' The regulations were reviewed by comparison to the equivalent NRC regulations in 10 CFR Parts 30 and 71. We have also discussed our review of the regulations with Ray Manley on March 10,1999.
A-s a result of our review, we have two comments that have been identified in the enclosure.
Please note that we have limited our review to regulationsi required for compatibility and/or health and safety. Under our current procedure, a finding that a State regulation meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the equivalent NRC regulation may only be made based on a review of the final State regulation. However, we have determined that if your proposed regulations were adopted incorporating the comments and without other significant change, they would meet the compatibility and health and safety categories established in OSP Procedure SA-200 (formerly, B.7).
We request that when th'e proposed regulations are adopted and published as final regulations, l t a copy.of the "as published" regulations be provided for our review. As requested in OSP Procedure SA-201, Review of State Reaulations (November 10,1998), please highlight the final changes and send one copy in a computer readable format, if possible.
if you have any questions regarding the comments, the compatibility and health and safety categories, or any of the NRC regulations used in this review, please contact me or Duncan 1 White, Regional State Agreements Officer, Region I at (610) 337-5042.
Sincerely, f
OriginalSi0ned ') (
9904060010 990327 PAUL H.LOHA 3 PDR E TRO ESO Paul H. Lohaus, Director Office of State Programs
Enclosure:
E5 3M
^**"
Distribution WHBIEECMTS C6PV DIR RF (9-8) % . DCD (SPOS)"? !
SDroggitis ~ PDR;(YES)
@OO ' l 1
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ FLETCHER \DW *See Previous n trence.
- Ta receive e cop r of thee document. Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure 'i!" Copy with attachme t/ )- u,e "N* = No copy OFFICE RI 6M -l OSP5Q5l OGC l- OMMl l 1 NAME DWhite:nb 4W SSalomon STreby PHLohau s~ j DATE. , 03/ ///99 03/ h /99 03/25/99
I f
~ e l
l Mr. Roland Fletcher, Manager Radiological Health Program Maryland Dopartment of the Environment 2500 Broenir.g Highway
. Baltimore, MD 21224
Dear Mr. Fletcher:
As requested, we have reviewed the proposed transportation and record keeping requirements
- for termination or transfer of licensed activities amendmerits to the Maryland State Regulations for the Control of ionizing Radiation Part T and Sections C.32, C.38, D.1109, and D.1301 dated February 22,1999. The regulations were reviewed by comparison to the equivalent NRC regulations in 10 CFR Parts 30 and 71. We have also discussed our review of the regulations with Ray Manley on March 10,1999.
As a result of our review, we have two comments that have been identified in the enclosure.
- Please note that we lusve limited our review to regulations required for compatibility and/or health and safety. Under our current procedure, a finding that a State regulation meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the equivalent NRC regulation may only be made based on a review of the final State regulatior[. However, we have determined that if your proposed regulations were adopted incorporating the comments and without other significant change, they would meet the compatibility and health and safety categories established in OSP Procedure SA-200 (formerly, B.7).
We request that when the proposed regulations are adopted and published as final regulations, a copy of the "as published" regulations be provided for our review. As requested in OSP Procedure SA-201, Bgview of State Reaulations'(November 10,1998), please highlight the final changes and send one copy in a computer readable format, if possible.
if you have any questions regarding ents, the comm/ and health and safety the compatibility categories, or any of the NRC regulations use'd in this review, please contact me or Duncan
' White, Regional State Agreements Officer, ' gion I at (610) 337-5042.
Sincerely, Paul H. Lohaus, Director Office of State Programs
Enclosure:
As stated Distribution DIR RF (9-8) DCD (SPOS)
SDroggitis PDR (YES)
BUsilton ,
Maryland File DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ FLETCHER \DW (kgIg Tm receive a cop r of this document, Indicate in the hor: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure = with a t/ c sura *N' = No copy OFFICE - RI 6 b S l OSP9t$1 OGCqq L_ OSP; PHI NAME DWhite:nb @ SSalomon FGemerem PHLohau s" DATE 03/ ll/99 03/li /99 03//Lf/99 03/'2/99 I OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-14
,/
. e a ver p k UNITED STATES g
e j
f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. enana -t l
I March 27, 1999
%****+! -
4 Mr. Roland Fletcher, Manager Radiological Health Program Maryland Department of the Environment 2500 Broening Highway Baltimore, MD. 21224
Dear Mr. Fletcher:
As requested, we have reviewed the proposed transportation and record keeping requirements
~ for termination or transfer of licensed activities amendments to the Maryland State Regulations for the Control of lonizing Radiation Part T and Sections C.32, C.38, D.1109, and D.1301 dated
- February 22,1999. The regulations were reviewed by comparison to the equivalent NRC regulations in 10 CFR Parts 30 and 71. We have also discussed our review of the regulations' with Ray Manley on March 10,1999.
As a result of our review, we have two comments that have been identified in the enclosure.
Please note that we have limited our review to regulations required for compatibility and/or health and safety. Under our current procedure, a finding that a State regulation meets the i compatibility and health and safety categories of the equivalent NRC regulation may only be made based on a review of the final State regulation. However, we have determined that if your proposed regulations were adopted incorporating the comments and without other significant change, they would meet the compatibility and health and safety categories established in OSP ,
Procedure SA-200 (formerly, B.7). J We request that when the proposed regulations are adopted and published as final regulations, a copy of the "as published" regulations be provided for our review. As requested in OSP Precedure SA-201, Review of State Reaulations (November 10,1998), please highlight the final changes and send one copy in a computer readable format, if possible.
If you have any questions regarding the comments, the compatibility and health and safety cater
- or any of the NRC regulations used in this review, please contact me or Duncan V Onal State Agreements Officer, Region I at (610) 337-5042.
' cerely, d/ % l Paul H. Lohaus, Director !
Office of State Programs 4
Enclosure:
As stated i
- a. a COMMENTS ON PROPOSED MARYLAND REGULATIONS AGAINST COMPATIBILITY AND HEALTH AND SAFETY CATEGORIES State NRC Category Reaulation Reaulation Subject and Comments NRC T.13 (c)(d) 71.13 (c)(d) Transportation Package Approvals Paragraphs (c) and (d) address ;
transportation package approval areas reserved to the NRC. Unless these paragraphs are deleted, the regulation would not meet the compatibility category.
NRC T.83 -71.83 Assumptions as to Unknown Properties This section is reserved to the NRC.
Unless this section is deleted, the regulation would not meet the compatibility category.
t I