ML20205C296
| ML20205C296 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1986 |
| From: | Williams J TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| To: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 1294, NUDOCS 8608120301 | |
| Download: ML20205C296 (1) | |
Text
TOLEDO Docket No. 50-346 EDISON License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1294 Jul7 30* 1986 JOE WILUAMS. JR sn veansw.o run
[419)249 2300 (419}249 5223 Director of Reactor Regulation Attn:
Mr. John F. Stolz PWR Project Directorate #6 Division of PWR Licensing-B United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555
Dear Mr. Stolz:
Toledo Edison has reviewed your draft Safety Evaluation Report (Log No. 1998, dated May 9, 1986) of the Davis-Besse Procedures Generation Package (Serial No. 1030) submitted March 1, 1984. We acknowledge the issues raised with respect to the package and will address each identified item.
As indicated in the Procedures Generation Package, however, Toledo' Edison completed the development and implementation of the Upgraded Emergency Operating Procedure (EOP) during the 1984 refueling outage. Control room operator training, requalification testing, and emergency response have been based on the procedure since that time. The Upgraded Emergency Operating Procedure was in place and used during the June 9, 1985 event.
A review of the event identified some concerns with the E0P and prompted further evaluations of the procedure. The Davis-Besse Course of Action document, Appendices C.4.1 and C.4.2, describe the findings of this evaluation. In general, the evaluation found the procedure to be technically correct and complete, requiring only minor modifications.
Based on the results of this evaluation and the extent of our past experience with this procedure, we believe the Emergency Operating Procedure, as developed in accordance with the Procedures Generation Package, supports safe plant operation.
Although we plan to address each concern identified in the draft SER, we wish to request an extension for completion of our response until three months following restart of Davis-Besse. This extension is necessary because our operationally experienced personnel, who will be required to address these issues, are heavily involved in restart activities.
Very truly yours, CH?_ N b, @
JW:JRL:plf i
i cc: DB-1 NRC Resident Inspector l' I
[]
THE TOLEDO FDISON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MADISON AVENUE TOLEDO. OHIO 43652 8608120301 860730 PDR ADOCK 05000346 P
ppy
_