ML20205B981
| ML20205B981 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1986 |
| From: | Robert Williams PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO |
| To: | Berkow H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| P-86504, NUDOCS 8608120222 | |
| Download: ML20205B981 (23) | |
Text
.
O Public Service-Company of Colorado P.O. Box 840 Denver, CO 80201 - 0840 (303) 571 - 7511 2420 W.
26th Avenue, Suite 100D, Denver, Colorado 80211 July 31, 1986 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P-86504 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Attention:
Mr. H. N.
Berkow, Director Standardization and Special Projects Directorate Docket No. 50-267
SUBJECT:
Status Report for Performance Enhancement Program
Dear Mr. Berkow:
Attached is the fifth Status Report for the Performance Enhancement Program.
It covers the three-month time period from April 1,
1986 through June 30, 1986.
This letter, with its attachments, documents the report scheduled to be given on August 5, 1986 at the FSV Visitor Center.
This letter is consistent with our commitment made in the May 29, 1985 SALP meeting and PSC will continue to provide progress reports on a quarterly basis if desired.
k p
R
/jod(Ili
P-86504 Page 2 July 31, 1986 If you have any questions, please contact Mr. W. D.
Rodgers at (303) 480-6904.
Very'truly yours, m
R. O. Williams Vice President, Nuclear Operations smc Attachment cc:
R.
F. Walker l
B
MPS-86025 Public Service Company of Colorado Performance Enhancement Program Quarterly Status Report - As of June 30, 1986 f
This report documents the status of Public Service Company of Colorado's Performance Enhancement Program (PEP) and covers the three-month time period from April 1, 1986 through June 30, 1986.
This report has been compiled from status reports submitted monthly from each project manager.
This is our fifth status report to the NRC regarding the PEP.
Summarv With the addition of Project VII there are currently 46 projects.
Twenty-two of these projects have been completed.
Also, forty-six of the total 84 project parts have been completed.
It has been determined that Project Achievement Criteria (PAC) will be established for each one of the 46 projects including those already shown as complete.
The purpose of developing this criteria is to give assurance that the actions taken have been effective in achieving the design intent of each project.
PAC has already been included in all Project VII action items.
All of the six original PEP projects have shown significant progress during the quarter.
Project VII, Total Responsibility Management has required a
great deal of effort to move it from the start-up phase into being an active project.
The following summarizes the status of the seven overall projects:
Project I - Organizational Concerns Hiring of new personnel has shown some progress compared to last quarter.
The remaining five positions require experienced nuclear personnel and candidates are aggressively being sought by our Employment Department.
Six of eight projects are complete.
Project II - Master Planning and Scheduling The EQ outage is being scheduled by the newly developed departments within Nuclear Production and Nuclear Engineering.
These scheduling techniques are proving to be quite valuable in providing management with information as to outage status and potential problem areas.
At the conclusion of the EQ outage, a review of the scheduling functions from all divisions will be conducted to determine where we can improve each division's system and its integration into the Master Planning and Scheduling function.
One of three projects is complete.
' Project III Eatablich 'Pravantiva Maintensnca Plenning and Schuduling With the Maintenance Planning Group in place and their initial training complete, progress on developing preventive maintenance procedures has been very good.
The project is on schedule for completion by the end of the year.
Implementation of Maintenance Planning and Scheduling has progressed smoothly throughout the
- quarter, however, completion is being slightly delayed for decision on a
planning and scheduling computer system (i.e.
Premis, Project 2).
One of four projects is complete.
Project IV - Upgrade Nuclear Policies and Procedures Progress on procedure updates has been satisfactory.
Revision i
and issuance of procedures is progressing, however, the training on these projects has not been fully implemented in all areas.
Three of ten projects in Project IV have been completed.
j Improve Management and Nuclear Division Personnel Project V
Training i
The development of training within each division is progressing quite well.
Each group has dedicated staff to the training function and is showing a strong commitment to completing this project.
Training for Electrical Maintenance Personnel is now making good progress since a qualified training instructor has been secured.
We have not yet received INPO accreditation for the operator positions,
- however, INPO concerns have been i
addressed and we anticipate accreditation in the near future.
Three of ten projects in Project V have been completed.
Project VI - Plant Conduct of Operations A
contractor is now assisting us with implementation of Project VI.4, Implement Plant Signage Program and their progress has been good.
Bids for Project VI.7, Component Shelf-Life Program, have been received and a contractor should be selected in the next quarter.
Project VI.7 is significantly behind schedule.
Five of seven projects in Project VI have been completed.
Project VII - Total Responsibility Management Further development and implementation of this project has been a major effort during this quarter.
In Project VII.2, Action Plan Development, final action plans were completed, and under Project VII.3, Prioritize Action Plans, all action plans were given
'A',
'B',
or
'C' priorities
('A' is the highest priority).
Another part - VII.4, Resolve
'A' Priority Action Items, was added and is just beginning.
A project schedule for
'A' priority Action Items is being developed.
Three of four projects in Project VII have been completed.
Exhibit I is the summary schedule Bar Chart.
This schedule is Part B of the Nuclear Master Schedule.
It shows the original schedule and progress to date in summary form for each project.
Exhibit II is a more detailed schedule of Project V.7, Develop Nuclear Production - -
Divicien Training for INPO Accr;ditaticn.
Exhibit III will b2 a mora d3toilcd cch dulo for Projcct VII.4 - ROColva Acticn It020.
The remaining sections of this report describe progress of each project, work completed, and problems encountered.
Project Completions During the
- quarter, the following projects or project parts were completed:
VI.6, Improve Nuclear Licensing and Fuels Training - B.
Husted VI.7, Part 1 - Complete Aging Study - M.
Niehoff VII.1, Part 2 - Action Planning - D. Rodgers/Willey VII.2, Action Plan Development - D.
Rodgers/T. Willey VII.3, Prioritize Action Plans - Primary Task Group (PTG)
Project Changes and Additions The following changes and/or additions to the PEP have been made:
VII.4, Resolve
'A' Priority Action Items - added
~3-
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLOIIADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCHEDULE l
SUMMARY
SCHEDULE BAR CHART I
l EXHIBIT I l
PART B Performance Enhancement Program AS OF: June 30, 1986 PROJECT TIMETABLE SCHEDULED 1986 1987 PRO-NUS l
JECT REF.
DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J
F M
A M
J J
A S
Q4 Q1 Q2 03 y
I.
ORGANIZATIONAL CONCERNS 189end i
l I.1 E.2 Formalize Action Plan, Reor-D. Picard Complete ganization and Performance XXX
= NW h Enhancement Program I
XXX0
= Sche &aled Timetable l
I.2 A.1 Document Charters, Missions with urdefined otme-and Function Statements pletion date Part 1, Develop Charters D. Picard Complete Part 2, Update Procedures D.
Picard Complete N
= Finishend M within this schmaile I.3 A.9 Document Policy on Communi-M. Eachary Complete XXEE = Dctan&d s@mait, cation and Staff Meetings table I.4 E.1 Evaluate Staffing Levels L.
Brey Part 1, Evaluate and Approve Complete XX--
= Schman's has flost time
[
Part Hire New Personnel May 1 Jul 31(R)
FFFFFFFFFFFFEEEEEEEEEEEE I.5 E.6 Complete Nuclear Production J. Gahm Complete later or earlM then l
P anned.
Organizational Changes I.6 E.3 Evaluate Engineering and Warembourg Complete E.4 Licensing and Fuels at Fort St. Vrain I.7 Complete Organization D. Rodgers Decision Grids Part 1 - Implement Corporate Complete Grid Part 2 - Develop and Implement Hold FFFFFFFFEEEE Nuclear Decision Grids I.8 Evaluate Staff Retention D. Rodgers Complete II.
MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING II.1 A.2 Establish Nuclear Master D. Picard Complete g
Planning and Scheduling Function I
l l
_.-._....._.___.m.-_
j PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF Carneann NUCLEAR MASTER SCEEDULE s
SENSIARY. SCEEDULE BAR CEART EERISIT I PART 3: Performance Enhancement Program AS OF: June 38, 1994 PROJECT TISETABLE t
SCHEDULED 1986 1987 PRO-NUS JBCT REF.,DESCRIPTIOst RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J
F M
A N
J J
A 8
04 01 02 03 i
TV II.2 A.4 Develop Annual and Long-C. Fuller 3
Range Schedules Part 1, Initial Schedule Complete Part 2, Complete Schedule Jun 15 To be Est.
Eruwwwwwwwwwwwwa II.3 A.2 Implement Planning and Sche-duling Methods & Procedures Part 1, Initial Definition D. Picard Complete Part 2, NED Implementation R. Craun Complete Part 3, NLF Implementation R. Nested Complete Part 4, QA Implementation M. Ferris Complete i
j Part 5, NPD Implementation D. Miller Aug 5 May 31(R) rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrEE TII. ESTABLISN PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE l
PLANNING AND k.ar.uGLING 1
4 j
III.1 B.2 Establish Maintenance D. Miller Complete FFFFFFFF Planning Group 1,
III.2 B.3 Define Maintenance Planning D. Miller and Scheduling Function 6
i Part 1, Initial Definition Complete t
Part 2, Implementation Jul 15 Jun 20(R)
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFBEE l
1 i
)
III.3 B.4 Develop Preventive Mainte-F. Novechek
{
l nance Engineering Program j
Part 1, Initial Definition Complete i
Part 2, PM Development, Complete Existing Critical Signifi-i cant components Part 3, PM Development, Jan 2 Dec 31 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFyruwwwwwwuryvwwwww j
Remainder of Critical Significant Components Part 4, Post Maintenance Complete i
]
Testing Procedure i
i 4
i l
1
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COIDRADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCHEDULE
SUMMARY
SCHEDULE BAR CHART 4
EXXIBIT I PART St Performance Enhancement Program AS OF: June 30, 1986 PROJECT TIMETABLE SCHEDULED 1986 1987 PRO-NUS JECT REF.
DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J
F M
A M
J J
A S
Q4 Q1 Q2 03 1 F III.4 Evaluate Davis-Besse Event D. Rodgers Part 1 - Initial Review Complete Part 2 - Detail Evaluation Jan 05 Jun 87(R2) FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF7XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IV.
UPGRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES IV.1 B.1 Review and Revise Design J. Reesy Apr 1 Jul 31(R)
FFFFFFFFFFFFEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE A.5 Change Modification Process IV.2 Col Implement NRC Commitment D. Goss Complete Control Program IV.3 C.2 Document Procedures for D. Goss Complete Regulatory Correspondence Review IV.4 c.3 Review Essential Regulatory J. Williams Documents Part 1, Review Essential Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF Regulatory Documents Part 2, Review Past Active Feb 1 Jul 10 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF7 XX Commitments for Passive Copenitments Part 3, Review 10CFR Jun 1 Dec 01 FFF7XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX for Passive Conunitments Part 4, Review FSAR Nov 15 Dec 15 '90 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX0 for Passive Commitments IV.5
'A. 6 Review and Revise Nuclear Production Procedures Part I, Initial Definition C. Fuller Complete Part 2, Nuclear Production C. Fuller Jul 1 Jul 30(R2) FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE EEEE Procedures Development Part 3, Review and Revise C. Fuller Aug 2 Feb 01 88 (R) FFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX0 Emergency Procedures IV.6 Review and Revise Exclusion T. Prenger Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF List and Related Procedures Mk
j PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COIDRADO NUCLEAR MASTED SCHEDULE
SUMMARY
SCHEDULE BAR CHART EXXIBIT I PART B: Performance Enhancement Program AS OF: June 30, 1986 PROJECT TIMETABLE SCHEDULED 1986 1987 PRO-NUS JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J
F M
A M
J J
A S
Q4 Q1 02 Q3
' P IV.7 Revise Technical Specifi-cations Part 1, Develop and Submit J. Gramling Apr 1 Oct Ol(R)
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXX)XXXXXXXXXXXX for NRC Approval Part 2, Implement and C. Fuller Oct 01 (R) Next X(EST)XXX0 Train at Plant Refueling IV.8 Review and Revise Nuclear M. Daum Engineering Division Procedures Part 1, Revise Procedures May 1 Jul 31(R)
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEEEEEE IV.9 Review and Revise Level I Plant Procedures (P & G)
Part 1, Revise
'P' Procedure C. Fuller Sep 3 Nov 15 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF7XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 2, Revise
'G' Procedure F. Novachek Sep 3 Jul 31 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXX IV.10 Review and Revise Level I M. Ferris Sep 3 Oct 28(R)
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXEEEEEEEE QA Procedures (Q)
V.
IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NUCLEAR DIVISION PERSONNEL TRAINING V.1 A.3 Conduct Management Skills M. McNulty Complete Upgrade Part 1 Initial Definition Part 2, Implementation of Core Courses V.2 A.10 Review Memoership in L. Brey Complete Industry Organizations V.3 B.7 Enhance 10CFR50.59 Training Part 1, Conduct Training J. Johns Complete Part 2, Update Text Data D. Goss Apr 1 Dec 29 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFIXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Base Part 3, Train NED Personnel J. Johns Complete F
V.4 D.1 Improve Quality Assurance M. Ferris D.2 Division Training D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete Part 2, Implement Primary Jun 3 Dec 86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Courses Part 3. Implement Secondary Jan 87 Dec $7 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX0 Courses Part 4, Implement Remaining To be Established JL Courses
m___
_m PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COTna m NUCLEAR MASTER SCREDULE SUfetARY SCNEDULE RAR CNART EXMIBIT I PART 8: Performance Enhancement Program AS OF June 30, 1986 PROJECT TIMETABLE SCHEDULED 1986 1997 PRO-NUS
' JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J
F M
A M
J J
A S
04 Q1 02 03 1 F V.5 D.1 Improve Nuclear Engineering M. Daum D.2 Division Training D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete Part 2, Complete Procedure Oct 14 Jun 30 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXE Lesson Plans Part 3, Job and Task Analysis Nov 4 Sep 30 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXX3XXXXXXXXXXXX Part 4, Implementation Oct 1 Oct 1998(Est)
XYYYYX(EST)XXXXXX0 i
V.6 D.1 Improve Licensing and Fuels R. Musted D.2 Division Training i
I D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete l
Part 2, Implement Initial Sep 2 Sep 30 FFFFFFFFFa'FFFFFFFFFFFFFFKXXXXXXXXXX l
Four Courses Part 3, Implement Remain-May 1 Dec 31(R)
FFFFFFX3KXXXXXXXNYXXXXXXX ing Courses Part 4, Develop NLF Mar 3 Jul IS FFFFPFFFFFFFFFX3KX Training Procedures V.7 D.1 Develop Nuclear Production T. Borst D.2 Division Training for INPO D.3 Accreditation D.4 Part 1, Operator Accredita-Complete FFFF tion Training Part 2, Non-Operator Accre-Jul 1 Feb 5 87 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXYYYYYKX
's ditation Training 3
N V.8 D.5 Consolidate Site Training T. Borst Complete
\\
V.9 D.6 Detrain Licensed Personnel T. Borst Part 1, Training Frogram Complete Development Part 2, Conduct Training Oct 1(R) Sep 30 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXNXX i
- \\
l s
V.10 Design and Implement S. Willford Jun 1 To be Fst.
FFX3KXXXXXXXXXXXx0 Training Simulator
~
VI.
PLANT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS A\\
VI.1 A.S Formalize Plant Tour Proce-C. Fuller Complete dures and Reporting
'S VI.2 Revise Conduct of Operations C. Fuller Complete VI.3 Document Supervisor C. Fuller Complete s s Desponsibilities w'
~.
l
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NUCLEAR MASTED SCHEDULE I
SUMMARY
SCHEDULE BAR CHART EINIBIT I PART B: Performance Enhancement Program AS OF June 30, 1986 PROJECT TIMETABLE SCHEDULED 1986 1987 PRO-NUS JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J
F M
A M
J J
A S
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 9F VI.4 Implement Plant Signage C. Fuller Feb 3 Jul 31 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFX3XXXX Program VI.5 Complete Facilities F. Novachek Complete Planning Study VI.6 Improve Parts Management J. Reesy Complete System VI.7 Establish Component Shelf-Life Program Part 1, Complete Aging M. Niehoff Complete FFFF Study Part 2, Install Component J. Reesy Feb 3(R) Sep 15(R)
FFFFFFFFEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Shelf-Life Program VII.
TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY MANAGEMENT VII.1 Problem Identification, T. Willey Complete Ownership and Action Planning Part 1, Identification of Problems Part 2, Define Action Items VII.2 Develop Action Plans T. Willey Complete FFFFFF VII.3,
Prioritize Action Items PTG Complete F
VII.4 Resolve Action Items D. Rodgers Part 1, Resolve
'A' Jun 10 Dec31 '87 XXKXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Priority Items Part 2, Resolve
'B' To be determined.
Priority Items Part 3, Resolve
'C' To be determined.
Priority Items Mk
Public Servic3 Company of Calcrcd3
- EX"ICIT II Parfsrmanca Enhancement Progrca Project V.7 - Develop Nuclear Production Division Training for INPO Accreditation Percent Complete Schedule Project Timetable Anlys Desgn Devel Eval Start Submit Compl 1985 - 1986 Proj Description Sum Phase Phase Phase Phase SER SER(*)
(0)
M/J J/A S/O N/D J/F M/A M/J'J/A S/O N/D
,7 P'rt 1 Operator Accreditation 1.
Non Licensed Reactor Operator 100 100 100 100 80 100 complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 0
2 Licensed Reactor Operator 100 100 100 100 80 100 Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 0
3.
Senior Reactor Operator &
100 100 100 100 80 100 complete PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Shift Supervisor 8
P2rt 2 Non-operator Accreditation 4.
Chemistry Technician 50 100 50 35 80 70 1/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXX 0
5.
Electrical Maintenance Personnel 25 95 55 30 80 70 1/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXX 0
6.
Mechanical Maintenance Personnel 61 100 60 26 80 70 1/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF)XXXXXXXXXXXX 4
7.
Technical Advisors 25 50 15 30 80 70 12/84 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXX)XXXXXXXXXXXX 9
8.
Instrument Technician 70 96 57 39 80 70 3/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF7XXXXXXXXXXXX e
g 9.
Radiological Protection Tech.
62 100 95 60 80 70 6/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFXXXXXXXXXX 8
- 10. Technical Staff & Managers 42 67 7
25 80 70 6/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXX)XXXXXXXXXXXX f
db (1) Note: Schedule is for submitting the Self Evaluation Report (SER) to INPO and implementing the training programs at PSC
- not for achieving INPO Board Accreditation.
o O
e
PROJECT I - ORGANIZATIONAL CONCERNS PROJECT I.1
- FORMALIZE ACTION PLAN, REORGANIZATION AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM - Doug Picard - Complete PROJECT I.2 DOCUMENT CHARTERS, MISSION AND FUNCTION STATEMENTS -
Doug Picard - Complete PROJECT I.3 - DOCUMENT POLICY ON COMMUNICATIONS AND STAFF MEETINGS -
Mike Zachary - Complete PROJECT I.4 - EVALUATE STAFFING LEVELS - Larry Brey Part 1 - Evaluate and Approve Staffing - Complete Part 2 - Hire New Personnel
- 1. The status of the new positions is as follows:
a.
5 of 5 filled in QA.
b.
45 of 46 filled in NPD.
c.
6 of 9 filled in NLF.
d.
16 of 17 filled in NED, 18th requisition was cancelled.
e.
1 of 1 filled in Administration.
f.
73 of 77 filled in total or 90 percent (One PEP position was converted to a Security Engineer).
- 2. Overall, there are 19 positions open.
Five of these are from the original seventy-eight approved in this project.
PROJECT I.5 COMPLETE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES -
Jack Gahm - Complete PROJECT I.6 EVALUATE ENGINEERING AND LICENSING AND FUELS AT FORT ST. VRAIN - Don Warembourg - Complete PROJECT I.7 - COMPLETE ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION GRIDS - Duane Rodgers Part 1 - Implement Corporate Grid - Complete i
Part 2 - Develop and Implement Nuclear Decision Grids - Hold l
1.
Project has been placed on hold until after EQ.
PROJECT I.8 - EVALUATE STAFF RETENTION - Duane Rodgers - Complete t
1 l
~
PROJECT II - MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING PROJECT II.1 ESTABLISH NUCLEAR MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING -
Doug Picard - Complete PROJECT II.2 - DEVELOP ANNUAL AND LONG-RANGE SCHEDULES - Chuck Fuller Part 1 - Initial Schedule - Complete Part 2 - Complete Schedule
- 1. Level 1
and 2
schedules have been developed and circulated throughout the nuclear organization for review and comment.
These schedules will be regularly updated so that all divisions can use this information as a
common basis for their own scheduling efforts.
This information will also be used by the corporate Production Services organization to schedule Fort St. Vrain outages into their Major Unit Outage Forecast.
PROJECT II.3 IMPLEMENT PLANNING AND SCHEDULING METHODS AND PROCEDURES - Doug Picard Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - NED Implementation - R.
Craun - Complete
- 1. The manhour tracking system is now operational and this project is complete.
- 2. A new nuclear policy to prioritize Action Requests and Change Notices has been developed, approved, and issued.
The purpose of this policy is to supply the entire organization with a prioritized list of Change Notices and Action Requests.
This new system will not be fully implemented until after the EQ outage.
This item is also complete.
Part 3 - NLF Implementation - R.
Husted - Complete Part 4 - QA Implementation - M.
Ferris - Complete Part 5 - NPD Implementation - D. Miller 1.
Significant progress was made on Part 5 during the quarter.
Long-range scheduling techniques are being used in this project.
- 2. Overall, this project is 95%
complete and should be fully completed in July. _..
PROJECT III - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING PROJECT III.1 - ESTABLISH MAINTENANCE PLANNING GROUP - Dave Miller -
Complete PROJECT III.2 - DEFINE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING FUNCTION -
Dave Miller Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implementation
- 1. Significant progress was made during the quarter and this project part is nearing completion.
- 2. Overall, this project is 95% complete and is primarily waiting for a planning and scheduling computer system to be selected.
PROJECT III.3 - DEVELOP PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING PROGRAM -
Frank Novachek Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - PM Development, Existing Critical Significant Components -
Complete
- 1. This part was complete with the issuance of 185 procedures.
PM Development, Remainder of Critical Significant Part 3
Components
- 1. Significant progress was made on this project during the quarter even though EQ demands have been heavy.
Overall, this project is 38% complete.
Target completion is still scheduled for December 31, 1986.
Part 4 - Post Maintenance Testing Procedure - Complete Project III.4 - Evaluate Davis-Besse Event - D.
Rodgers Part 1 - Initial Review - Complete Part 2 - Detail Evaluation
- 1. EQ continues to slow progress, however, Nuclear Licensing has done an extensive review of the Davis-Besse Event and is developing several options for further investigation.
PROJECT IV - UPGRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PROJECT IV.1 - REVIEW AND REVISE DESIGN CHANGE MODIFICATION PROCESS -
Jack Reesy
- 1. We are awaiting Nuclear Licensing action to advise the NRC of the proposed PSC change allowing a Design Change Notice to change safety related design documents.
PROJECT IV.2 IMPLEMENT COMMITMENT CONTROL PROGRAM - Dave Goss -
Complete PROJECT IV.3 DOCUMENT PROCEDURES FOR REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE REVIEW - Dave Goss - Complete PROJECT IV.4 - REVIEW ESSENTIAL REGULATORY DOCUMENTS - Jack Williams Part 1 - Review Essential Regulatory Documents - Complete Part 2 - Review Past Active Commitments for Passive Commitments
- 1. There has been good progress in review of past commitments for the Passive Commitment Log.
The essential regulatory document tracking system now includes entries for 276 Generic Letters, 83 I&E Bulletins, 254 I&E Notices, and 104 Regulatory Guides.
Part 3 - Review 10CFR for Passive Commitments
- 1. This item was split to separate 10CFR from FSAR commitments.
FSAR items were put into Part 4.
- 2. An initial review has been completed,
- however, numerous comments and suggestions regarding the passive commitments catalog have indicated that a complete review of commitments is required.
This review is currently underway, and will add to the scope of the project.
Part 4 - Review FSAR for Passive Commitments 1.
See Part 3 - Review 10CFR for Passive Commitments.
PROJECT IV.5 REVIEW AND REVISE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION PROCEDURES -
Chuck Fuller Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Nuclear Production Procedures Development 1.
54 of 58 System Operating Procedures (SOP) have been reviewed by Operations.
The remaining four SOP's are still being rewritten.
The heavy EQ workload is slowing progress on verification walkdowns.,
- 2. All R3sults Procsdures have bacn rewritten.
Approximately 94%
have been completed.
- 3. Revision and verification of SOP's and Results procedures is progressing on schedule.
The training for these new procedures has not yet started.
Part 3 - Review and Revise Emergency Procedures
- 1. Revisions of the Emergency Procedures should be issued by October, 1986.
A deferral on this project has been requested from the NRC but no concurrence has been received.
REVIEW AND REVISE EXCLUSION LIST AND RELATED PROJECT IV.6 PROCEDURES - Tim Prenger - Complete PROJECT IV.7 - REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIPICATIONS - Jim Gramling Part 1 - Develop and Submit for NRC Approval
- 1. NRC comments have been received and reviewed.
PSC views many of these comments as representing significant expansion of the program scope.
A meeting has been held and further PSC/NRC interaction is anticipated in order to resolve this issue.
PROJECT IV.8 - REVIEW AND REVISE ENGINEERING PROCEDURES - Mike Daum Part 1 - Revise Procedures
- 1. SEMAP 11 and 12 were completed and approved.
- 2. G-9 has been approved by Nuclear Engineering and Nuclear Licensing and is currently being reviewed by Quality Assurance.
- 3. The project is 99% complete.
PROJECT IV.9
- REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I PLANT PROCEDURES (P & G)
Jack Gahm Part 1 - Revise
'P' Procedures - Chuck Fuller
- 1. The rewrite of P-7, P-10, and P-12 are complete.
2.
P-3 revision is 95% complete.
Part 2 - Revise
'G' Procedures - Frank Novachek
- 1. Three of fourteen G procedures are complete.
The project is progressing on schedule and is now approximately 80% complete.
REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT IV.10 PROCEDURES - Mike Ferris
- 1. Twelve of nineteen procedures have been completed and issued.. -..
'2. Ths project ic progressing eatiefactorily and in approximstoly 70% comploto.
1 j
PROJECT V - IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NUCLEAR DIVISION TRAINING PROJECT V.1 CONDUCT MANAGEMENT SKILLS UPGRADE - Martin McNulty -
Complete PROJECT V.2 REVIEW MEMBERSHIP IN INDUSTRY ORGANIZATIONS - Larry Brey - Complete PROJECT V.3 - ENHANCE 10CFR50.59 TRAINING - Mike Holmes Part 1 - Conduct Training - Jeff Johns - Complete Part 2 - Update Text Data Base - Dave Goss
- 1. Update of the Text Data Base is progressing satisfactorily utilizing temporary personnel.
Target dates for the overall project should be met.
- 2. This project part is 65% complete.
Part 3 - Train NED Personnel - Jeff Johns - Complete IMPROVE QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION TRAINING - Mike PROJECT V.4 Ferris Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implementation
- 1. A number of training classes and meetings have been held during the quarter including:
FSV Operating Licenses EQ Auditor Training Organization Policies and Procedures
- 2. The QA division is investigating use of a computer-based training system to more rapidly meet the QA training requirements.
- 3. Additional personnel resources have been committed to the training effort so that training can proceed in parallel with other commitments.
PROJECT V.5 IMPROVE NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAINING - Mike Daum Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete - -
Phrt'2 - Complete Procedura Training Lesson Plans
- l. This part is 924 complete and progressing smoothly.
Part 3 - Job and Task Analysis l
- 1. Progress has.been. slowed due to heavy work requirements.
Additional temporary personnel are being assigned to this project as of the end of the quarter.
- 2. Overall project completion should remain on target.
PROJECT V.6 - IMPROVE LICENSING AND FUELS TRAINING - Bob Husted Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implement Initial Four Courses
- 1. A pilot presentation of NLF-001 (FSV Operating License Course) was given.
- 2. Enabling objectives for NLF-012 (Nuclear Reactor Physics Course) were written and approved.
- 3. This project part is 95% complete.
Part 3 - Implement Primary Courses
- 1. A pilot presentation of NLF-003 (Reference Material Course) organization policies and procedures was completed.
t Part 4 - Develop NLF Training Procedures
- 1. Work on this project part is progressing smoothly, however, a i
detailed action plan will be required for further project tracking.
1 PROJECT V.7
- DEVELOP NUCLEAR PRODUCTION DIVISION TRAINING FOR INPO ACCREDITATION - Ted Borst i
Part 1 - Operator Accreditation Training - Complete Part 2 - Non Operator Accreditation
- 1. A significant effort was expended toward answering INPO concerns from their accreditation report.
4
- 2. Good progress has been made toward accreditation of Chemistry i
Technician, Electrical Maintenance Technician, Instrument Technician, and Radiological Protection Technician.
- 3. The project is 65%
complete and should be completed on schedule.
i l
PROJECT V.8 - CONSOLIDATE SITE TRAINING - Ted Borst - Complete
{
PROJECT V.9 - RETRAIN LICENSED PERSONNEL - Ted Borst l 4
.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _, _ _ _ _ _.. _,_.,__ ___,_.~ -.
Part 1 - Training Program Davalopment - Completa Part 2 - Conduct Training
- 1. The seventh rotation has been completed.
- 2. As of May 29, 1986, three Reactor Operator licensees failed the NRC exam.
One Senior Reactor Operator failed the written exam and one Senior Reactor Operator failed the oral exam.
- 3. An accelerated requalification class was given for licensed personnel.
PROJECT V.10 - INVESTIGATE TRAINING SIMULATOR - S. Willford
- 1. An overview committee was formed to investigate the need and requirements for a Fort St. Vrain Operator Training Simulator.
This committee has met twice and will be presenting recommendations to management for inclusion in the 1987 Operating Plan. - _ _
~
PROJECT VI - PLANT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS PROJECT VI.1 - FORMALIZE PLANT TOUR PROCEDURES AND REPORTING - Chuck Fuller - Complete REVISE CONDUCT OF PLANT OPERATIONS - Chuck Fuller -
PROJECT VI.2 Complete PROJECT VI.3 - DOCUMENT SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES - Chuck Fuller -
Complete PROJECT VI.4 - IMPLEMENT PLANT SIGNAGE PROGRAM - Chuck Fuller
- 1. A contractor was selected to handle this project.
The have used both Results and Operations personnel as " plant" experts and are showing good progress in completing this project.
- 2. This project is currently 30% complete and is slightly behind schedule.
PROJECT VI.5 - COMPLETE FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY - Frank Novachek -
Complete Jack Reesy -
PROJECT VI.6 IMPROVE PARTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Complete
- 1. All procedures were issued and the project is now complete.
2.
Project Achievement criteria will be developed for this project to assure that the parts management system is working properly and has achieved the design intent of the project.
Jack PROJECT VI.7 ESTABLISH COMPONENT SHELF-LIFE PROGRAM Reesy/ Mike Niehoff Part 1 - Complete Aging Study - Mike Niehoff - Complete Part 2 - Install Component Shelf-Life Program - Jack Reesy
- 1. Since Sargent and Lundy packages have not all been approved, they cannot yet be utilized as an official basis for shelf-life determination.
- 2. Bids on the shelf-life determination project have been received from several contractors.
These bids have been reviewed and a contract for the work should be issued in July or August. __-
PROJECT VII - TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY MANAGEMENT PROJECT VII.1 - PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION, OWNERSHIP AND ACTION PLANNING
- Complete Part 1 - Problem Identification - Complete Part 2 - Action Planning - Complete
- 1. Prior to June 9,
all action items were defined and each action / recommendation had Project Achievement Criteria
~
resources and project duration developed.
- 2. On June 9, 1986 the Primary Task Group met to assign
'A,'
'B,'
or
'C' priorities to each of the 70 action items
('A' priority is the highest priority).
Thirty-three
'A' priority items were defined.
VII.2 - ACTION PLAN DEVELOPMENT - Rodgers/Willey - Complete 1.
Final action plans were drafted.
Each plan contains estimates of manpower and other resources.
Project Achievement Criteria has also been included in each item.
VII.3 - PRIORITIZE ACTION PLANS - Primary Task Group - Complete
- 1. The Primary Task Group met on June 9, 1986.
At this meeting, all Action / Recommendations were prioritized with an
'A',
'B',
or
'C' priority with
'A' as the highest priority assigned.
VII.4 - RESOLVE ACTION ITEMS Part 1 - Resolve
'A' Priority Action Items - D. Rodgers
- 1. Preliminary schedules are being developed for all
'A' priority action items.
- 2. Action / Recommendations 36 and 60 are
- complete, and the following are in progress:
Action / Recommendation 01 Action / Recommendation 05/63 Action / Recommendation 06
{
Action / Recommendation 10 Action / Recommendation 15 Action / Recommendation 23 Action / Recommendation 39 l
Part 2 - Resolve
'B' Priority Action Items - D.
Rodgers
- 1. Work on this project has not begun yet.
Part 3 - Resolve
'C' Priority Action Items - D.
Rodgers
- 1. Work on this project has not begun yet. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _