ML20204G147

GA-C17044, Program Plan for Independent Review of Zimmer Project Mgt

ML20204G147
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	03/31/1983
From:	TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY
To:
Shared Package
ML20204G144	List: ML20204G137 ML20204G147
References
GA-C17044, NUDOCS 8305020368
Download: ML20204G147 (39)

Text

.

GA-C17044 Il 3

PROGRAM PLAN r-1-

I] INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF

, ZlMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT e -

PREPARED FOR CINCINNATI GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 1

1, i -

MARCH 1983

!?

i.

g  ?. I OLOGY Ii A o,,5>on o' G A Technologies Inc. -

8305020368 830421 PDR ADOCK 050003g e

e _ _ . _ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - -

i GA-C17044

.. PROGRAM PLAN 3

! INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT l

PREPARED FOR CINCINNATI GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY l

MARCH 1983

. nF 5 . . -. > ,s. 2 22

.,._y.-,

.w. . .5., ..

,_7,,,,., i g y i  !

A o.rs.ee o' G A Technologies Inc. - l I

1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

I

SUMMARY

................................................... 1 II TASK DESCRIPTIONS ......................................... 4

!" Task A TFT Program Management and Integration .......... 5 Task B Evaluation of Existing CG&E Project Management Organization ......................... 8 Task C Evaluation of CG&E Management Policies Toward Quality Assurance .............................. 11 Task D Evaluation of CG&E's Quality Assurance Program . 14 Task E Evaluation of CG&E Quality Confirmation Program ........................................ 18 Task F Evaluation of CG&E Project Management Interfaces with Major Subcontrac tors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Task G Evaluation of Planned Transition from Plant Construction to Operations Phase ............... 25

. Task H Evaluation"of Alternate Project Management Organiza tions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Task I Reports and Recommendations .................... 32

- i i-f' ~ , -- -nmr,-------n- ,m- ---sw- ,

, p----- n y yn,~ ,p,,_,w, ,---- - -

y

I.

SUMMARY

t.

This Program Plan has been developed for the independent review of Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company's (CG&E) management of the W. H. Zinner, F

Unit 1, Nuclear Power Station (NPS) Project in the areas of organization, management, quality assurance, quality confirmation, and interface control, p-. This program will be performed Ly Torrey Pines Technology (TFT), a division

{. of GA Technologies, Inc. (GA), for Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company.

r--

The program is divided Jnto nine tasks as follows:

Task A TPT Program Management and Integration Task B Evaluation of Existing CG&E Project Management Organization Task C Evaluation of CG&E Management Policies Toward Quality Assurance Task D Evaluation of CG&E Quality Assurance Program Task E Evaluation of CG&E Quality Confirmation Program Task F Evaluation of CG&E Project Management Interfaces with Major Subcontractors Task G Evaluation of Planned T"ransition from Plant Construction to Operations Phase

Task H Evaluation of Alternate Project Management Organizations Task I Reports and Recommendations The program is structured to determine what organizational changes must be effected to ensure that construction of the Zimmer 1 NPS can be completed in conformance with NRC. regulations and the construction permit.

, Individuals assigned to this program will file statements of independence, under oath or affirmation, attesting to their freedom from conflict of interest with CG&E, Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Company, I

1 l  !

W 7

Dayton Power & Light, Sargent & Lundy, Kaiser Engineers, General Electric

{ Company and Bechtel on the Zimmer Project. ,

This program will be performed under a documented QA program prepared specifically for this project utilizing the NRC-approved GA Quality Assurance Program.

g. All communications with CG&E will conform to the " Protocol Governing

,: Communications Between CG&E and Independent Organizations Conducting Reviews or Audits under the Commission's Order," as transmitted by letter dated 3/2/83 from NRC to CG&E.

This independent review is scheduled to be completed in June,1983 The overall schedule is shown in Figure 1.

S 9

k' 2

a -

--...,n . _

TORREY PINES D TECHNOL GY eAuE _ ut A OlvtSPON Of GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANT ,'

^

(FIGURE ONE)

PHOJECT ilit.E INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT PHUJLCT MANAGLH A. J. NEYI_AN MAR l APR l HAY l JUN l'JUL WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 i l'7 24 I 8 PROJECT INITIATION 3/7 V YF )RMAL Alfrif0 RIZA'l ION PUBLIC MEETINGS y 7 TASK A - TPT PROJECT MANAGEMEN' & It TECRATIO,N_

Al PROGRAM PLAN y V REaSSESt A2 PREPARE & ISSUE QAPD -

A3 INTRODUCTORY MEETINGS W/CG&l: Y A4 RECEIVE PROJECT MGT. DOCS A ^ Y AS SURVEY TEAM MEETINGS W/CC&E A6 FOLLOW-UP INTERVIEWS INIT) AL

l ;l a

" j

' f 7 f f 3 3 } 3 y

3

~

7 7 f Y

1 3 3 I

A A N N G 1 1 N F F I

O C -

N E O C N

A I

U S

S A

Y T

I N L O M I l T Q A

Z D Y I R f t A A

G W I O

R T T O

T_

N S

E I

W D

" E C

• M

I.

G O A P N

A t

T F 4 E

T M C E E G J

t 4

f R M A P S E t t .

) S N T T ' T I E EN O S E P N

& S I O RI Y T & S E O E

& G T CI OT S R G T D T M E C S N IT FI L O C S , ES L 1 1 I O LA N TO P I A S S VE U F L I OR SI GR E F' L Q S WN LI D K O K T PE EF MT R O K E EO OT E S C A D RE N C F C I I VI 1

1 A N E Z TI UD TO Y N E O C VT NV C T O H I CS D CC R O l l

A RC II G S ( I C N EN EY E A I C S EE T

/ T A JO CT JE M T U T- TL TC U T T A & G OC OI OC M A & T N NL NA R S R U R R RL RA U . U A E IO E i O O L S O PR PI PF S L S T MT C MT T C P A E E E B R A E S TN P TC E V R ER EP EI EE L V R RE UT RE B R R E U TU TO TS TT A E U & AM N AJ O D AT AR AN AN N D PE WE PO S T L - E UC UP UO UI R - E L EG OM ER K I A C LU L LP L E C E DA LU DP S N N B O AR AR AS AR T C O V N LC A O I H VT VO VE VO N R E AA OO AN T H F K P ES EF ER EF I K P L QM FD QI S S 1 8 9 A 1 2 3 4 S 6 A l 2 3 4 5 A A A T B B B B B B T C C C C C

-,l

. v Y v 7

v 3 Y p V y I' '

^ ^

M A -

R f

f  :

A O R R G P O 1 R

O -

P -

I E T C A N M L

g A

R I _

U F S N S O 1 A C _

Y Y _

• T T

- I.

l M I.

A A I

_ U T U W

- D Q Y Y A S Q E N R C T T E I I A E A I N C E V E

W T & S U L E A T & S T O R C T Q A M F R C T R: NO N T O C S E U E R O C S E P I D Q L E P I N I M E E F L A P T E F L O T E D R O K F M N R O K I A F V , UE C M O I I C T T O

. L TC Y N E A Y N E A N S O I N R O H R N M M R O H M E N T V TA A I C G O A A A I C R M O L NS TR M T O I R R M T I E I U M A & R T G G M A & F L TN S IE AU U N P AO E I S U U P A O O U R TT TS S L S U R R S L S O M UI NI NA A E A L P P A E C I LT EV E L V R Q AS L V R AA E MI MY A E U VM A A A E U Y M VM T ET ET N D S EE Q Q N D T AW ER A GC GI R - E L R - E I RE I U E 'E EB E E E C L GI EF L

- AA AL C &N A N NA T D O & &O & & T . E O A OV AA AU N R C CR G C N R U RE GO V MQ MQ I K P C CP C C I K P Q PR CC E

_ S S 5

_ 5 7 '8 A 1 2 D 4 E 1 bl3 -

lI[lI$l' 4

(* E3' INTERNAL

SUMMARY

REP 0kT~

~ ~ ' ~~

v ' '

,r *

( ,

TASK F - EVALUATIdN 0F CC&E PRO IECT ltANACIMENT INTER FACES WITil MAJOl SUB( ONTRAl' TORS <

F1 PROCEDURES & CHECKLISTS A FI NAI, Y

?

F2 ORCANIZATION & INTERFACES Y F3 PROJECT PROCEDURES Y d F4 IMPLEMENTATION OF PROCEDURES V F5 EFFECTIVENESS -

Y F6 INTERNAL

SUMMARY

REPORT Y TASK C - EVALUATION OF PLANNED TRANS' TION FROM "LANT CONSTI:UCT I ON TL O P El<ATIONS Pila 1E ril PROCEDURES & CHECKLISTS DRA 7 1f FI 4AL V I:2 ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES &

PROCEDURE REVIEW I:3 INTERNAL

SUMMARY

REPORT -

CASK H - EVALUATION OF ALTERNAT -: PROGRAM PANAGE iENT 1RGANIZATit 'NS Ill PROCEDURES & CIIECKLISTS Y ' ^~Y 112 TASKS A THRU G REVIEW Y 113 CC&E & CONTRACTOR INTERVIEWS Y 114 ALTERNATE ORGANIZATIONAL Y DEVELOPMENT

. 7 1

e.

.. 7 I *

$ I I 8 I

I I

I I

I I

1 S

N . .

O - .

I T

A D

N S E T M R T M O e R O P O C E P E R T .

E R R R S O .

D 5 P "Y N E E M A R R

'A G M S O L M T R A U R P N

• S O I P N F )

L E I

. O A R K H B.

N E S u M - E I ,

t i I W- L B te N it I U I K B P 1 5

S 7 0

1 A

F l

I 2

1 1

A G

i

, II. TASK DESCRIPTION The purpose of this program is to conduct an independent review of Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company's management of the W. H. Zinsner Unit 1 Nuclear Power Station (NPS) project including its quality assurance program and its quality confirmation program to determine organizational changes needed to ensure that construction of the Zimmer 1 plant can be completed in conformance with NRC regulations and the construction permit.

The program will review the organizational structure, policies and procedures and QA activities of CG&E, including its interfaces with Sargent

& Lundy, H. J. Kaiser Engineers and General Electric Company as they existegi at the date of NRC's stopwork order (CLI-82-33). Alternative organizational structures including procedural and organizational changes that have been implemented and/or proposed by CG&E since the stop work order will be evaluated and appropriate ways of strengthening the Zimmer project management will be recommended.

Tecnnical review, construction inspection and evaluation are not included in the program.

Detailed descriptions of the tasks included in this program are pro-vided in the following subsections.

4

i

, TASK A - TPT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION Objective

. To annage and direct all activities related to TPT's independent review of the W. H. Zimmer, Unit No.1, NPS Project Management.

Subtasks A1. Prepare a program plan identifying the planned work and schedule. The plan and appropriateness of approach will be reassessed following the review by the survey team ( A5 below) and a final program plan prepared.

A2. Prepare a Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD) specifically for this TPT project, utilizing the NRC-approved GA Quality Assurance Program. This document will define internal audits to assess com-pliance with the independent verification of project requirements.

A3 Hold introductory meetings with CG&E management. Set up programmatic interfaces and communication / correspondence procedures.

A4. Obtain information and documentation related to W. H. Zimmer Unit No. 1 project management and related major subcontractor interfaces (e.g. , organization charts, policies, procedures and practices, QA manuals, status reports, histories and related documents).

I l

l A5. Assemble survey team comprising key TPT personnel for meetings with CG&E and Zimmer 1 project management staff. Interview key CG&E, subcontractor and other personnel as required to obtain additional information and/or explanation of the documentation received in A4.

A6. Arrange follow-up detailed meetings and interviews, and obtain additional cross-check documents /information as appropriate based on the assessment of the initial survey team. Include interviews with

(

l representatives of related organizations, such as NRC, Advisory 5

, Groups, Interview Groups, Insurance Companies, State Inspectors, etc.

to obtain a comprehensive assessment and information data base on the existing Zimmer project management organization. The interviews will

~

include past and pecsent management and other individuals having

- information pertinent to this review.

A7 Initiate the following Tasks B through G, and any additional tasks deemed necessary to meet the independent review objective.

AB. Monitor costs and schedule.

A9 Final Evaluation and Report (See Tasks H and I).

Milestones (Assume project initiation 3/7/83)

A1 Program Plan (Initial Issue / Reassessment) 3/23-5/13 A2 QAPD 3/23 A3 Introductory meetings with CG&E 4/27 A4 Project management documents 3/30 & 4/29 l

i AS Survey team meetings with CG&E 5/2 - 5/6 A6 Follow-up meetings 5/16 - 5/27 A7 Tasks B through G 3/21 - 6/10 A8 Monitor costs / schedules On-going A9 Final Evaluation and Report 7/1 l

l

-r-. ----s - ,- _ , . . ~ ,- _ - - . 4 ,---_. - - ---- , p--.r -- - ------ -y

1 TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCllEDULE PAGE OF A DIVtslON OF GENERAL ATOtteC COtsPANY TASK A - TPT PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION DATE

^ ^*

• PROJECT TITt.E PROJECT M AN AGER MAR APR MAY JUN WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY l l l lJUL W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 PROJECT INITIATION _ 3/7 V V FURMAL AlmK RIZATION PUBLIC HEETINGS T y Al PROGRAM PLAN T y REASSESS A2 PREPARE & ISSUE QAPD A3 INTRODUCTORY MEETINGS W/CC&l. Y y A4 RECEIVE PROJECT MCT. DOCS. Y V AS SURVEY TEAM MEETINGS W/CC&E Y A6 FOLLOW-UP INTERVIEWS INIT IAL A7 TASKS B TilRU C Y ,

A8 MONITOR COST /SCllEDULE ON COING I A9 FINAL REPORT (TASK H & I) II GA I/57 (Hew 8/80)

_ TASK B - EVALUATION OF EXISTING CG&E PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION Objective

- To evaluate the CG&E Project Management Organization which was in effect at the date of NRC's stopwork order (CLI-82-33) on the Zimmer 1 NPS, to determine whether deficiencies exist in its structure, policies, organi-zation and/or procedures that have kept implementation of the project from meeting the high standards required for nuclear power plant design, procurement and construction. Evaluation of CG&E's interfaces with major subcontractors will be evaluated under Task F.

Subtasks B1. Prepare a procedure and checklists to accomplish the evaluation described below.

B2. Evaluate the CG&E project organization structure, based on the information and interviews described in Task A. The evaluation will assess project management visibility, adequacy in staffing, clarity in definition, interorganizational relationships, scope, communication, document control, and reporting systems. The possibility for and existence of an informal organizational structure will be investigated also.

B3 Evaluate CG&E project policies to determine if project management responsibilities and authority are clearly defined for all project activities.

B4. Evaluate CG&E project management system and procedures to determine if procedures are available which clearly define how policies and responsibilities are intended to be implemented. Selected documen-tation will be examined and interviews held to determine if the procedures have been effectively implemented in practice.

8

B5. Evaluate CG&E project management systems to determine if they adequately and effectively control all interfaces between internal organizations. Interfaces between the CG&E project organization and

- major subcontractors will be evaluated under Task F. Selected documentation will be examined and interviews will be held to determine if the management systems have been implemented in practice.

B6. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task B.

Milestones B1 Procedures and checklists (Draf t/ Final) 4/6-5/13 B2 Evaluate organization structure 5/13 B3 Evaluate project policies 5/13 B4 Evaluate project procedures 6/3 B5 Evaluate project management systems for interface control 6/3 B6 Internal summary report 6/10 9

RNES PROJECT SCliEDULE TECHNOLOGY p,gg g, 4 DIVIS80N OF OENEftAL ATottlC COe0PANY ,

TASK B - EVALUATION OF CG&E PROJECT HANAGEMENT REVISIO.N LTR ORCANIZATION DATE PROJECT TITLE NDEPENDENT REVIW OF ZIHMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT M ANAGER A. J. NEYLAN HAR l APR l HAY l JUN lJUL WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 DRUT FINAL 21 PROCEDURES & CHECKLISTS V Y 22 EVALUATE ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE V

23 EVALUATE PROJECT POLICIES Y FOR PROPER CONSIDERATION 84 EVALUATE PROCEDURES FOR RESPONSIBILITY DEFIMITIONS 25 EVALUATE PROJECT HGT SYST FOR INTERFACE CONTROL B6 INTERNAL SUHHARY REPORT

.A 1751 (Hew 8/HO)

4 TASK C - EVALUATION OF CG&E MANAGEMENT POLICIES TOWARD QUALITY ASSURANCE In the context used herein, the term " quality assurance" includes control i meas'ures implemented by all persons performing quality-related activities and.is not limited to activities of the QA Department.

Objective To review CG&E'S project management policies which affect quality assurance, and to assess the degree to which those policies help to assure an effective QA program.

Subtasks C1. Prepare a procedure and checklists to accomplish the evaluation described below.

C2. Evaluate the organization level and status of the CG&E QA Department to determine if the level and status are consistent with that required for an effective QA program.

C3 Evaluate the CG&E QA Department's access to upper management to determine if QA program status and problems can be, and have been, brought to the attention of upper management and acted upon, as appro-priate, in a timely manner.

Cll . Identify and interview appropriate personnel and obtain relevant supporting quality assurance related documents as a follow up to the initial survey in Task A to provide a basis for the following evaluations.

C5 Evaluate the CG&E QA Department's involvement in project activities to determine if the QA Department is sufficiently involved to help assure adequate control and cognizance over the project.

11

C6. Evaluate CG&E management's involvement in quality assurance activities

, to determine if management is sufficiently involved to provide an appropriate level of support and status to the QA program. Evaluation will include organizational level of QA with relation to line and site

- managers responsible for activities affecting quality, communication channels between QA and other senior management positions, distribu-tion of QA reports to management, QA and project meeting attendance and CG&E policy statements regarding QA.

C7 Evaluate the CG&E project management attitude and commitment toward quality assurance. Assess impact with respect to resulting effective-ness of the QA Department, quality program, quality-related imple-menting procedures, management's quality assurance responsibilities, and the role of quality assurance in achieving a facility of adequate quality.

C8. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task C.

Milestones C1 Procedure and checklista 4/6-5/13 C2 Level and status of QA Department 6/3 C3 QA Department access to management 6/3 C4 Follow-up interviews, document collection 5/27 C5 QA Department involvement in project activities 6/3 C6 Management involvement in QA activities 6/3 C7 Management attitude toward quality assurance 6/3 C8 Internal summary report 6/10 12

PINES gg PROJECT SCIIEDULE A oeveseoes or casernat Atossec coasPAny N TASK C - EVALUATION OF CC&E MANAGEMENT POLICIES REVISION LTR

, TOWARD QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE PROJECT TITLE D I OF MER MJM MNACME PROJECT M ANAGER A.J.N M MAa APa WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY I l MAT I aUN l aUt W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 Cl PROCEDURES & CHECKLISTS DI: AMf F y i

C2 LEVEL & STATUS OF QA DEPT.

V 03 QA DEPARTMElff ACCESS TO MANAGEMENT C4 FOLLOW UP IlfrERVIEWS, Y

. DOCUMENT COLLECTION os C5 QA DEPAR'INENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROJECT ACTIVITIES C6 MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN Y QA ACTIVITIES C7 MANAGEMENT ATTITUDE TOWARD Y QUALITY ASSURANCE C8 INTERNAL

SUMMARY

REPORT Y GA 1751 (flev 8/80)

TASK D - EVALUATION OF CG&E QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Objective:

To review CG&E's QA Program to determine its adequacy, implementation and

, effectiveness, and to recommend measures needed to assure that construction .

can be completed in compliance with NRC Regulations.

Subtasks D1. Prepare a procedure and checklist to accomplish the evaluation described below.

D2. Measure the adequacy of CG&E's QA Program by determining whether the documented QA system meets the requirements of the PSAR, Chapter 17, 10CFR50, Appendix 1, and ANSI Std. N45.2.

D3 Review the results of the evaluations performed by CG&E to investigate major quality-related problems experienced at Zimmer. Assess the thoroughness and accuracy of these evaluations and of the measures which they implemented to correct the problems.

D4. Review the implementation of the QA program by CG&E in the following areas:

a. Work Instructions - developing, maintaining and implementing sub-tier procedures and instructions for work and inspections that affect quality. .

b. Training and Indoctrination - establishing and implementing appropriate quality-related training programs and employee indoctrination.

14

- - _ - - _ _ = _ - - -_ . _ _ . . - . - .

t .

c. Qualification, Certification - assuring that personnel performing quality-related activities are certified as being properly trained and qualified.

. d. Procurement Controls - effectively connunicating quality require-ments in procurement documents, assessing the capability of suppliers, and surveillance of supplier activities.

e. Design Controls - effectively reviewing design control processes and practices of major contractors.

f.

PSAR/ Code Controls - establishing and implementing a system to assure that PSAR and Code commitments are met, design changes are .

compatible with PSAR/ Code, PSAR changes are carried out in the design.

g.

CG&E overview - establishing and implementing effective programs in the area of audite, surveillance, inspection and inde;e.; dent assessments of contractor activities.

h. Records - establishing and implementing a quality records control system which meets the requirements for assuring validity, accu-racy, completeness and traceability of records in a retrievable manner.

i. Control of Nonconformances - establiehing and implementing an effective system for documenting and reporting deficiencies, including reports to the NRC and the policy / procedures for implementing "stop work."

j.

l Corrective Action /Cause Analysis - establishing and implenenting the system to assure that significant deficiencies are investigated and corrected promptly by an effective priority action system including a means for assessing a cause of problems and analysis of deficiency trends.

15

( _ _

4

k. Tracking Systems - establishing and implementing the effective means for tracking activitias, action items, open items and the follow up of probl (

D5. Evaluate CG&E's QA prograo interface relationships with Sargent &

Lundy, Kaiser Engineers, and General Geetric Company. Measure conformance to requirements for assuring transmission of information and records relating to quality. The evaluation will also examine quality-related interfaces between CG&E's QA, Project, and Construc-tion and Operations organizations, to assure that the QA program structure and supporting procedures necessary to effective implementa-tion are in place.

D6. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task D.

Milestones D1 Procedures and Checklists (Draft / Final) 4/6-5/13 D2 CG&E's QA Program Adequacy 5/18 D3 CG&E Evaluation of Quality Problems 5/27 D4 CG&E QA Program Implementation 5/27

a. Work Instructions

b. Training and Indoctrination

c. Qualification, Certification

d. Procurement Controls

e. Design Controls

f. FSAR/ Code Controls

g. CG&E Overview

h. Records

i. Control of Nonconformances J. Corrective Action

k. Tracking Systems D5 CG&EhAProgramInterfaces 6/3 D6 Internal Summary Report 6/10 16

TORREY '

PINES TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCllEDULE PAGE OF A OtVISION OF GaletRAL ATOtetC COtePANY TASK D - EVAI.UATION OF CG&E QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DATE

>ROJECT TITL E INDEPENDEE REVIW OF ZIMR PROJECT MANAGEEE PROJECT MAN AGER A. J. NEYLAY HAR l APR l HAY l JUN lJUL WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 DIAFT F :NAL 11 PROCEDURES & CHECKLISTS I AI

)2 CG&E'S QA PROGRAM' ADEQUACY Y 13 CG&E EVALUATION OF QUALITY V PROBLEMS

)4 CG&E QA PROGRAM IMPLEMENTAT1 0N Y 15 CG&E QA PROGRAM INTERFACES V 16 INTERNAL SIMIARY REPORT V A 1751(Heo 8/803

TASK E - EVALUATION OF CG&E'S QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM Objective Review CG&E's Quality Confirmation Program to determine its adequacy and effectiveness in achieving the objectives and meeting the commitments of the program.

Subtasks E1. Prepare procedure and checklists to accomplish the evaluation described below.

E2. Review CG&E's Zimmer 1 Quality Confirmation Program Plan concerning corrective measures for identified nonconformances. Evaluate the objectives, criteria for sampling, and procedures for documenting, tracking and reporting.

E3 Review a sampling of CG&E's implementation of its confirmation pro-gram. The following criteria will be used to evaluate the areas designated in CG&E's Quality Confirmation Program.

(a) Was the procedure adequate to locate and identify all defi-ciencies?

(b) Are the records adequate to identify each item inspected and the resulta?

(c) Are the records adequate to account for all items in each category?

(d) Are personnel assigned to reinspection under the Quality Con-firmation Program appropriately trained and qualified in the areas assigned?

(e) How many nonconformances were found, properly dispositioned, and rectified. What is the backlog?

18

(

(f) How much effort (man-hours) was assigned to the task? Was the estimate realistic?

E4. Review the results of CG&E's own management evaluations of the effectiveness of the Quality Confirmation Program including evalua-tions of major problems experienced in its implementation. Assess adequacy and accuracy of the CG&E evaluations.

E5. Evaluate the results of Subtasks E3 and E4. Identify any weaknesses and recommend corrective actions.

E6. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task E.

Milestones El Procedures and checklists (Draft / Final) 4/6-5/13 E2 Quality confirmation review 5/6 E3 Program implementation review 5/27 E4 CG&E evaluation of confirmation 5/27 E5 Evaluate results 6/7 E6 Internal summary report 6/10 O

19

~

E 8 J

F O 1 4

2 E R E G T T A L A P N D " 7 1

f O

I S T I

N V

E R

A L

0 1 Y Y

E N

. 3 J I I

. I I A

7 2

N O 0 I 2 T R 7 A E M G 3 R A 3 L I N 1 A F A N N

O C

M T

F Y C 6 Y E J

T O I

L R 9 E A P 2 L U U Q D M E

1 E A 2 1 & R 2 C C G S C O  !

R f T f F P f C O E 5 E M 1 J N E O O G R I A P T N A A 4

8 U 1 L

A T V C E E 1 J A

- O R

E P 5 2

K R _

S E I

A P T M 8 I 1 Z

F O

1 W

E 1

I Y

0 V

E E

/

W E

0 A

P R W I V

A G T S E T N T R N R YC O E S O O GC D N

Y I N I T

P E

OG L O I

A E T LO I

K I A F R P V C T T O Y OTA E D

I T E A N S Y R

E S NL A C H M E N T N C R M O L A R EHf t E

I A I E I TN U t R

OI NCt EE e /

M

& F N

L P AO S

E M I

T PTG E S O M UI R S F E T E C I LT .,,

_ O L I R AA E L .,.

0 0

T K U Y M VM T A ,,

0 I

T 1 D T AW ER A N 4

S F

E I RE I U R .

T O C L GI EF L E IV t C W O A OV &N A T ..

O E R U RE CO V N .

A J P Q PR CC E I ,s O ,

R l 2 3 4 S 6 P E E E E E E m j

t l

TASK F - EVALUATION OF CG&E'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT INTERFACES WITH MAJOR SUBCONTRACTORS

~

Objective To evaluate the adequacy of CG&E's project management's methods for (a) administration and control of major subcontractors and suppliers, and (b) for managing changes to their contracts to ensure effective control of performance. The evaluation will be made by determining if CG&E's project procedures on Zimmer 1 NPS were defined and implemented in a manner to assure that major subcontractors were made aware of and fulfilled their responsibilities. The evaluation within this task will include CG&E interfaces with Sargent & Lundy, H. J. Kaiser Engineers, and General Electric Company.

Subtasks F1. Prepare procedures and checklists to accomplish the evaluation described below.

F2. Evaluate the Zimmer 1 project management staff and structure, based on the information and interviews described in Tasks A & B, for ability to control subcontractor interfaces and monitor subcontractor performance. This will be accomplished, in conjunction with Tasks [.&

B, by reviewing the education, skills, and experience of the project staff and their access to upper management.

F3 Evaluate Zizaner 1 project management procedures for controlling inter-faces with major subcontractors by examining procedural requirements for the following items: .

o definition of responsibilities o established lines of communication o review of subcontractor activities o verification of subcontractor performance 21 ' _

o identification of problem areas o methods of problem resolution F4. Evaluate whether project procedures have been implemented by examining a representative sample of project work statements, meeting notes, reports, memoranda, and correspondence for compliance with the re-quirements. The sample will include design and construction inter-faces between CG&E and Sargent and Lundy, H. J. Kaiser, and General Electric as appropriate.

FS. Review the contents of selected sets of documents for the following items:

o Project requirements transmitted to major subcontractors were technically adequate and completely defined o Subcontractor reports demonstrated awareness of and compliance with project directives o Performance of subcontractor activities was verified o Appropriate corrective actions and open items were assigned and monitored for completion, if appropriate.

A minimum of two representative sets of project directives and follow-up documents will be selected from the documents reviewed under Sub-task F5. One set will encompass a design related requirement, and one set will encompass a construction related requirement. This subtask will be used to evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the system used by CG&E to control interfaces with major subcontractors.

i F6. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task F.

22

Milestones F1 Procedures and checklists (Draft / Final) 4/6-5/13 F2 Organization and interfaces 5/6 F3 Project procedures 6/3 F4 Implementation of procedures 6/3 F5 Effectiveness 6/3 F6 Internal summary report 6/10 O

i l

t l

l 23

. ....w p . ,,, .m e s.+% c.y , t.-M e N

PINES -

TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCIIEDULE A OfWISION OF OENEllA4' ATORIIC COe8PANY TASK F - EVALUATION OF CC&E PROJECT MANAGEMENT IlffERFACES REVISION LTR WITH MAJOR SUBCONTRACTORS DATE PROJECT TITLE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIN{ER PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MANAGER _ A. 3. NRYTJLN MAR WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY l APR l MAY l JUN ' lJUL W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 DRAF' PINAL F1 PROCEDURES & CHECKLISTS Y jf F2 ORGANIZATION & INTERFACES AI F3 PROJECT PROCEDURES F4 IMPLEMENTATION OF PRDCEDURE Y F5 EFFECTIVENESS V

F6 INTERNAL

SUMMARY

REPORT V

l l

i l

l GA 1157 (flev 8/80) l

TASK G - EVALUATION OF PLANNED TRANSITION FROM PLANT CONSTRUCTION TO OPERATIONS PHASE Objective To review existing procedures and the methods by which these proce-dures are to be implemented in the transition of the plant from the con-struction phase to the operations phase. The review will cover organizs-tion and procedures. Follow-through to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the planM d transition is not included within the scope of this task.

Subtasks G1. Prepare a procedura and checklist, to accomplish the evaluation described below.

G2. The scope of this subtask is to review those policies and procedures which establish the responsibility and jurisdiction of organizations which are involved in any phase of the transition from construction to operations. Procedures will be reviewed for:

(a) Definition of when a particular plant system is ready for final construction checkout, preoperational testing, startup testing, l or for ratesting.

(b) Specification of the jurisdiction and responsibility of each organization involved in or responsible for receiving plant systems at completion of construction and for conducting required tests, interpretation / acceptance of the results, and turnover to succeeding test programs, or in determination that rete' sting is required.

25

(c) Specification of the plant condition and documentation required at turnover from construction to operations, and from one test phase to the next, and identification of deficiencies and/or exceptions which exist at the time of turnover.

(d) Definition of the trackirg systems used to monitor items that are incomplete at the time of conditional turnover and items that are identified during testing as requiring resolution.

(e) Specification of the methods by which the functions of the various organizations are to be coordinated to complete the transition as expeditiously as feasible.

G3 Prepare Summary Report for the Results of Task G.

Milestones G1 Procedure and checklist (Draft / Final) 4/6-5/13 G2 Organizational policies and procedure review 5/27 G3 Internal summary report 6/10 e

26

. L 8 U

J l

F O 1 4

2 E R E G T T N 7 A L A U 1 P N D J O

I S

I Y

V 0 E

R W 1 R

N

. l 3 J.

A Y 7

2 T

N A 0 L R 2 P E M G Y O A A 3 R N H 1 F A N E M O S T I A C 6 T H E l J

I P O S

N S R 9 E A N P 2 L R O U T I D T E D A 2 H E R 2 C N E S N P A O T L T C P O N R 5 E T E P 1 J F M A O O N E R O G P N I A O T N 8 I C A i

T U l A R l U T T L S C 1 A N E V O J E C O R 5

- P 2 C R E

K M R S M A 8 A I H 1 T Z F

O 1 1

W E

V I E V /

M A

P E

R W &

s t S S T T T E R YCO N S I O GCs e E

D Y I L

C P E

Ot LO N T

I K

I L R E V C O Y OTA P I T E PW Y R

E S NL A E D C H C LI E

A R EHRN N A AV t e

R OINCE EE I /

M

& NE OR t

U TPTO F E E

T S

E I

TE S

_ O L I R AR L A

0 T K U ZU .

0 0

I T R D ID N 8

E NE R .

S I T O C AC E na V

f C W O GO T O E R RR N A J P OP I u O r.

R 1 2 3 a P c G G p

TASK H - EVALUATION OF ALTERNATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS Objective To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of various alternate organizational structures for the management of the Zimmer 1 Nuclear Project and to provide a basis for recommending the one most likely to assure that the high standards required of nuclear power plant design, procurement and construction are met.

Subtasks H1. Prepare a procedure and checklist to accomplish the evaluation described below. .

H2. Review the results of tasks A through G to determine what problems occurred in the management and quality assurance programs of the Zimmer 1 Project. Emphasis will be placed on identification of organizational structure or elements which could (a) negatively affect such things as consnunication between the various groups and top management, (b) result in any missing, diffused or unclear lines of responsibility and authority, and (c) limit the proper implementation of procedures to control the work.

H3 Interview cognizant personnel, in conjunction with Task A, to obtain and assess ideas and evidence concerning potential management and organization changes which would improve project performance.

H4. Evaluate at least four alternatives for the management of the Zimmer 1 project as called out in the NRC order suspending construction (CLI-82-33). Include evaluation of procedural and organizational changes that have been implemented and/or proposed by CG&E since the stop work order. Review the alternatives to see what advantages and disadvantages would exist if applied to the Zimmer project including consideration of the following.

28

. l (a) Comparison with approaches to the management of other nuclear projects in evaluating the alternatives for the Zimmer 1 plant.

(b) The NRC requirement in Appendix B of 10CFR50 that requires CG&E as the owner of the plant to be ultimately responsible for all activities associated with its design, construction and operation.

(c) The implications of major organizational change on project continuity.

H5. Prepare a sumey report on the work in Task H.

Milestones H1 Procedures and checklists (Draft / Final) 4/6-5/13 H2 Task A through G review 6/3 H3 CG&E and contractor interviews 5/27 H4 Alternate organizational development 6/10 H5 Internal summary report 6/17 29

iII

. L U 8 J

l F 1 O

4 2

E R E G T T N 7 A L A U 1 P N D J O

I S

I V

V 0 E 1 R

W Y U l N 3 J

Y r . 7 N' A 2 E

M E

G 0 A 2 N R I A E M G Y A A 3 M N H 1 A A R M G T O

R C 6 P E l E S J L E N O U T O R 9 D A I P 2 E N T H R A C E Z S T I 2 L N 2 T A A .

C G E F R T J O O N O E R 5 R N M P 1 P O E A I G T A A N U A 8 L M A

V T l E C E 1

- J O

H R P 5 K 2 S R A E T M M R I A 8 Z P 1 F

O 1 W 1 E

I L Y V E

W E

N E A R / I P

e t T W S V

R L

A T O N T E N R YC E S W T O O GC D Y I L

E N I T

P E

Oe LO s

t N

E T

K V I I A R P VI C E R Z Y OTA E TI E R O T

I N

Y R

E NLA D C H C G C A A RE S HR E N

I A

& U A

R G

R M

M R

O NCe Er e /

M R T OT U TRTc r E E

T S

E R

H T

N O

C EE TM N S L

o L I AP u T K U A A o 1 R D & NO N s

s 1 E S RL R .

T O C K E EE E m C W O S & 'T V T ,,

o E R A C LE N ,

A J P T C AD I s O .

H l

{

2(

3

{ M 51 p

TASK I - REPORTS Objectives Prepare bi-weekly reports on the evaluation and progress. Prepare, review and issue a final evaluation report.

Subtasks II. Prepare and submit biweekly progress reports to CG&E for information.

All communications will be simultaneously transmitted to the NRC.

I2. Prepare a final report compiling all results of the review. The report will include a description of the work performed under Tasks A through H, an identification of documents used in or generated by this project, the results of the review, and the conclusions drawn from each task, and final recommendations.

The final report will be in two volumes: an Executive Summary Volume, and a Discussion Volume. The report will be submitted simultaneously to CG&E and the NRC.

Milestones II Bi-weekly progress reports 4/22, 5/6, 5/20, 6/3, 6/17 I2 Publish Final Report 7/1 o

31

i L

U 8 F

l J

V O 1 4

2 E R E G T. T N 7 A t A U 1 P N D J O

I S

I V N 0 E A 1 R L Y

E ,

N l 3 J

A 7 2

0 V

2 R

E S G Y N A A 3 O N H 1 I A T

A D

M T

V N C 6 E E l M J E M O L O R 9 U C P 2 D E E

H C

R D

Y S N 2 A 2 T

C S T E T N J R E R 5

. O O M P 1 R P E A P E G R A N

- A 8 M

I T l K C S E 1 A J T O R

P 5 2

R E

t 9

} R I A 8 Z M 1 F

O 1

W E

1 I

V Y

N E E S A R / T P

0 T

W R O

0 N P YC0 E E GC D N

Y T

R T R

OeN E I S O L O P V S P OAT E D

I T E R

E R

S NL A N C G E HR I A O L NCE I

EE s

e /

M R

P A

N PTO F E E

T Y I

F y

. O L I L M t

. t s T K K H 8

/

. I E S

. Os T R E I v O e 5B T C

W- L B

l f(

VI D E W I U 1 A J B P 5 O 7 1

R 1 2 A

P 1 1 G

G

J i

Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director April 22, 1983 Page Two A check in the amount of $4,000 was submitted with my April 18, 1983 letter in accordance with 10 CFR 50, 5170.22 to cover the associated-licensing fees.

This letter.is a supplement to that letter, and therefore, no additional fees are enclosed.

Very truly yours,

% v.

Hal'B. Tucker PFG:scs i -Attachment cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 i Atlanta, Georgia 30303 4

Mr. J. C. Bryant NRC Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station Mr. E. L. Conner, Jr.

, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 i

I i

I f,

i f

l

-.. ... .. . - - - . . . . . - - .-.. . . - . . . - --