ML20204G008

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of to B Richardson Re Millstone Nuclear Power Station.Correspondence Forwarded to NRC Staff for Appropriate Action
ML20204G008
Person / Time
Site: Millstone  
Issue date: 03/22/1999
From: Julian E
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Solow R
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
NUDOCS 9903260064
Download: ML20204G008 (2)


Text

._.

.~

e 410 n

8 9'o UNITED STATES p

8" NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n

j WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 e

  1. 4, g

March 22,1999 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Rita Solow Box 996 Sag Harbor, NY 11963

REFERENCE:

Millstone Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 50-245/336/423

Dear Ms. Solow:

We received your March 9,1999, letter addressed to Bill Richardson, Secretary of Energy regarding the Millstone Nuclear Power Station. The Department of Energy determined that the subject of your letter does not fall within its purview. Therefore, they referred your letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). We have forwarded your letter to the NRC staff for appropriate consideration. A copy of your letter and this reply are also being placed in Agency records on the Millstone Nuclear Power Station.

Sincerely, I

Emile L. Julian Assistant for Rulemakings and Adjudications i

\\

l

\\

9903260064 990322 PDR ADOCK 05000245 H

Pm i

l 3S09-

,o, i-March 9, 1999 Bill Richardson Secretary of Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave, SW Washington, D.C. 20585

Dear Mr. Richardson,

I write in strong opposition to any attempts to restart reactor #2 at Millstone Nuclear facility in Waterford, Conn.

Various accidents and safety violations have shutdown the Millstone plant frequently since its reopening last summer.

Our waterways are being pollutaci--although. you say in your letter to Representative Michael Forbes of February 9, 1999

{

that the amounts of radioactive tritium released by Millstone into the water are acceptable, I strongly disagree.

I understand from the NRC hearing held in Riverhead, NY, March 1, 1999, that the reactor #3 is now operating under probationary restrictions imposed by your commission. With this in mind, any attempts to restart reactor #2 seem irresponsible at best, criminal at worst.

Please don't allow Millstone to increase its operations in anyway,=*i1 there ie an adequate evacuctiva plan for

%g Eurarn T.cng 161end.

Prccisivnius vu ev iuai ma lod 14e

.should be i ncluded in th-i-5 ik ynia b1 net er chania he stored ir eveiy doctm 'sevemtion plan; thir affe-ti vfike, g avary erknni nurce'c office, cycui hecpital and pheiwrcy-4.n 4y rare c. =c ger.cy, jg We'in Eastern Long Island live in a densely populated area only 12 milds away from Millstone.

We are trapped; there is NO evacuation plan for us in case of a.ccident.

(After much study, Suffolk County government concluded years ago that an evacuation plan for Eastern Long Island was not feasible.)

It is irresponsible to allow our communities to be at such high risk for the sake of the profits of the pri.vate corporation, Northeast Utilities.

Please Close Down The Millstone Nuclear Power Plant.

The threat to our health and safety is too great!

+

S i n c a ra l_y, Pm,4h W6 w h$